...1 On Being Sane in Insane Places Rosenhan’s study, “On Being Sane in Insane Places” caused a lot of controversy in the field of psychiatry. Rosenhan and eight other participants agreed to attempt to have themselves admitted into a psychiatric hospital on the assumption that they were hearing a voice. As Rosenham stated, the voice they were hearing would say something along the lines of, “I am hearing a voice. It is saying thud (page 65).” Rosenhan wanted to see if people claiming to hear voices would be admitted into a psychiatric hospital and labeled with some kind of mental illness or if maybe they would be prescribed medication that would alter their state of mind. Rosenhan was, without a second guess, admitted. Once he was inside, he went back to being normal. At one point he even stated to the doctor, “You know, the voice isn’t bothering me anymore (page 67).” Rosenhan once claimed, “that diagnosis is not carried within the person, but within the context, and that any diagnostic process that lends itself so readily to massive errors of this sort cannot be a very reliable one.” Being admitted and put on medication due to hearing voices or being released on the diagnosis of being in remission is quite ridiculous. Rosenhan had validity to his claims. They were all admitted without a second thought. All were given medications, even after going back to being normal. They were all kept in the psychiatric hospitals for...
Words: 714 - Pages: 3
...“On being sane in insane places” In discussions of Rosenhan, one controversial issue has been his take on psychiatrists and psychiatric diagnoses. On the one hand Rosenhan argues that psychiatry is not scientific. On the other hand, Spitzer contends Rosenhan is wrong. My own view is that there seems to be some truth to both sides. Sending “sane” people into facilities to see if with just one simple symptom they can be committed, it seems to be insane and yet according to his study it worked. These eight individuals gave the same symptom, hearing a voice that said “thud”, all diagnosed as schizophrenics except one. Strange isn’t it? It’s stated in the chapter that Rosenhan was approached by one of the other patients while in the treatment facility who knew he wasn’t a legitimate psychiatric patient. He noted the inhumane treatment some of the patients received and the medications that were handed out like candy. He also stated there was a lack of seeing a patient as an individual. I begin to wonder and contemplate....
Words: 1031 - Pages: 5
...Page4/5 Question 2) What do We mean when we say nobody understands Insanity?.......................................................................Page6 Conclusion/References……………………………………………..Page7 Introduction In this assignment I will answer the Two questions given in class by the lecturer which are: • What is Sociological Imagination? and • What do we mean, when we say no one understands insanity? I will use help from online sources and material given in class (slide about D.L. Rosenhan, 1973, on being sane in insane places.) given by the lecturer to help me develop ideas and reach a good conclusion and understanding of the questions above. I will also analyse Sociological Imagination based on C. Wright Mills ideas, I will develop my own ideas on sociological imagination and also have a critical analysis on insanity and sanity, explaining why is difficult or almost impossible to differentiate the sane from the insane. I will also relate inanity to Sociological imagination. This assignment contains references and aconclusion. Question 1) What is Sociological Imagination? Sociological imagination, is a neologism of sociology, analysed by the American social scientist C. Wright Mills in 1959, that seeks to describe the connection process between the person's individual experience with social institutions under which they live, and their own place in the history of mankind. It is the ability to develop sociologists to analyze the connection...
Words: 1202 - Pages: 5
...Imagine you were an old and you had this stranger watching you would you run or let him keep watching you? The narrator of “The Tale Tell Heart” watched the old man sleep for 7 nights on a row. In the beginning of the the book he talked about an illness. and he killed the old man over his eye. also after he killed him he smiled at the corpse then he chopped him into pieces. The reason that i think that the narrator is insane is because. in the beginning of the story he talked about an illness and back in the 1800’s there was not a lot of advanced medicine. and he could of had any disease. And he is arguing with himself that he is not insane. and that is normally a sign that you are insane. I think he is insane because. near the end he...
Words: 359 - Pages: 2
...Turner against Chris Smith. We know that Logan Turner did murder Chris, but we are on our way to figure out if he is sane or insane. My job for the day is to prove that Logan is insane and does know what he did. I hope that you will support me on my opinion, and continue listening to this case. Logan is legally insane because he has a disease that makes him act crazy. This man knew exactly what he was doing, but he was too insane to stop and be a good person. For the first piece of evidence it says, “The disease had sharpened my senses—not destroyed—not dulled them.” (page 1). Right from the beginning of the claim,...
Words: 677 - Pages: 3
...hanged.” By Aldous Huxley A best friend of a man goes into the man’s room and kills him during the night. Well, that’s insane you would already think, really who would kill their best friend? This man was creeped out by a feature of a friendly old man so much that he decided to kill a man over an eye. You may think that because he killed an old man that he is insane but, he was very well sane at the moment of the crime and these three reasons will support my case. One of my reasons that proves that the man in the story is that he knows he is planning to kill a man. One way this is proven is at the beginning of the story when he admits that he is aware of himself during the crime because he can tell the story perfectly without flaw. The killer also knew he was doing this and tries to tell you the story “calmly” as if he did nothing. According to the model penal code test if the criminal is not aware of if the crime is right or wrong then he is insane ,but this man said he pondered on it for a few days and then made up his mind.This one of many reasons proves that he was not insane at the time of the murder....
Words: 604 - Pages: 3
...Many questions have been asked if Hamlet, McMurphy and Chief Bromden are crazy or sane. Hamlet is the main character from a play by William Shakespeare called Hamlet. McMurphy and Chief are characters from a novel by Ken Kesey called One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. There have been many scenes in the play where Hamlet might seams crazy but without a doubt he is sane. Even though McMurphy do some crazy things he is definitely not crazy because he is aware of his actions and he does all these insane things just to make the Nurse Ratched mad. Chief Bromden’s character can easily be identified as sane because he knows how to stay out of trouble and from getting electric shock treatments. Hamlet says to Horatio “How strange or odd soe'er I bear myself, As I perchance hereafter shall think meet to put an antic disposition on,” (I. v. 172-174). This quote is said right after when the Ghost tells Hamlet that his uncle Claudius has murdered his father. Hamlet plans on pretending to be a crazy so he can get revenge on Claudius. He also mentions to Horatio that to keep this to himself as a secret. This is perfect quote to proof Hamlet is not crazy and puts on an act as a madman. When Hamlet talks to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, he tells them in a way that he would be portray as a madman that he has been acting insane. “I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.” (II. ii. 132-133). He also let them know that their true reason for visiting...
Words: 766 - Pages: 4
...The story of tell-tale-heart is written by Edgar Allen Poe it tells the story of a man who kills an old man. This story is a great story it creates tension and suspense. In the story I believe the man didn’t have a mental state of mind. This narrator grabs your attention wanting you to read more about the story. You should read the book it is a great book. The man committed murder, he killed the man because of the old man’s evil eye and the way his heart thumped, louder and louder he was afraid the neighbors could hear the old man’s heart. He was sane, but he wanted revenge because of the way the evil man’s eye mocked and looked at him. The man was sane throughout the story, but when he heard the old man’s heart thumping louder, and louder,...
Words: 332 - Pages: 2
...“The Yellow Wallpaper” vs “The Lottery” The brain has so many secrets that still have not yet been found. There are doctors that specialize in the study of brain, but with it only being a study they do not know what the brain can do. When not knowing what, the brain can do there could be different types of insane people that could be sane, and sane people that could be insane. Determining the sane from the insane people is what doctors need to figure out. Based on the differences between the characters of Jane in “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Mrs. Hutchinson in “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson one can conclude that Mrs.Hutchinson is saner then Jane. Science is always figuring out new things about the brain, but it...
Words: 656 - Pages: 3
...The Tell-Tale Heart Case Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Today we will discuss the murder of an old man known as The Tell-Tale Heart Trial. The main question we are trying to answer is: Is the murderer sane or insane? This man is insane due to evidence of his actions and how they fit the legal description of insanity. To begin, one of the most significant pieces of evidence that shows his insanity is the fact that he explains the murder so calmly, with no hesitation whatsoever. Nobody that is sane should be anywhere near comfortable describing a murder. The way he proudly defined this murderous act, he indeed seemed to have had no problem with killing the man. The legal definition of insanity states that an insane...
Words: 498 - Pages: 2
...The statement “a society defines ‘conformity’ as ‘that which is sane’” from Literature: The Human Experience can be analyzed through Henrick Ibsen’s drama A Doll’s House. This play allows the audience to examine the life of a woman under pressure to conform to a society’s standards, of whose manipulation she is unaware. As her eyes are opened to the dehumanization and self-serving nature of her friends and family, Nora finds that what she thought to be “sane” all along, really is quite the opposite. Webster’s Dictionary defines “conformity” as “action in accordance with some specified standard or authority.” This definition validates that those around Nora dictated her way of living. Torvald Helmer, Nora’s husband, views her as a child, or incapable of independent or intelligent thought which causes Nora to not delve into deeper issues and to “grow” into an adult. Toward the end of the play, Nora says to Torvald, “I was your little skylark, your doll, which you would in future, treat with doubly care, because it was so brittle and fragile.” Torvald never saw her as anything more than a play-thing, a doll, or someone that lacked knowledge or depth. It is as if society has ingrained in Torvald that women are to be treated as children and as though they cannot think for themselves. The term sane, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary, means “mentally sound, able to anticipate and appraise the effect of one’s actions.” In Nora, Ibsen creates a woman who is mentally sound and...
Words: 652 - Pages: 3
...In “The Black Cat” by Edgar Allen Poe, a man hangs a cat and murders his wife. Some believe that the man who does this was sane and therefore guilty and others believe that he was not guilty because he was insane and mentally unstable. He does these hurtful things under the influence of alcohol. After the alcohol wears off, he recognizes the harm he has done and feels remorse. Although, the man was a depressed alcoholic with a bad temper, he was sane and therefore guilty of his crime. The man’s sanity is proven through many remarks throughout the story. For example, after the man killed the cat, he states, “I experienced a sentiment half of horror, half of remorse, for the crime which I had been guilty.” This quote demonstrates that he was...
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
...adversity and is destined to murder the individual who killed his father. Hamlet is a character who although his actions and emotions may be one of an insane person, in the beginning of the book it is clear that Hamlet decides to fake madness in order for his plan to succeed in killing Claudius. Hamlet is sane because throughout the play he only acts crazy in front of certain people, to others he acts properly and displays proper prince like behavior who is able to cope with them without sounding crazy, and even after everything that has been going on in his life he is able to take revenge by killing his father's murderer. In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare Hamlet is sane but acts insane to fulfill his destiny of getting vengeance on his father's murderer. Hamlet throughout the play seems insane but in reality it is only an act to achieve his goal of killing his father's murderer. Hamlet chooses to go mad so he has an advantage over his opponent and since he is the Prince of Denmark cert... ... middle of paper ... ...al individual's, if an individual was crazy they would not be thinking everything through and if someone were crazy they would definitely not have the capabilities of outsmarting someone, like how Hamlet outsmarted Claudius. All these reasons and much more are why Hamlet is not insane, he is as sane of an individual as any other, but unlike others he had to go through a lot of emotional pain and a sense of abandonment to reach a successful point...
Words: 280 - Pages: 2
...Summary on "On Being Sane in Insane Places" by D. L. Rosenhan D.L. Rosenhan was an American psuchologist, he was best known for the rosenhan experiment and study of challenging the validity of psychology diagnosis. He was a leading expert on psychology and law. In 1973 he published "On being sane in insane places," one of the most vividly read articles in the field of psychology. The article details the Rosenhan experiment. "On being Sane in insane places" was an experiment done to test the validity of psychiatric diagnosis. It tested a variety of people. It used (3 women, and 5 males a psychology graduate student in his 20s, three psychologists, a paediatrician, a psychiatrist, a painterm and a housewife) "pseudopatients" who faked hallusinations to attempt to get into 12 different psyc hospital in 5 different states across the U.S. They scheduled appointment and showed up complaining of hearing voices. They stated they didn't know the voice but it was the same sex as them. They also said that the voice was saying "empty", "hollow", and "thud". The pseudo patients gave fake names and job information to protect their true identites, but all other information was true. Such as life expirences, relationships, and so forth. They were all admitted and diagnosed with schizaphrenia except for one. After admission they told staff they were fine and were still forced to take antipsychotic drugs. They discharged from each hospital after 7-52 days,but only after accepting their diagnosis...
Words: 635 - Pages: 3
...confession of sorts by Montresor. The most prominent question of all, is Montresor insane? Could it be possible to murder someone over a verbal insult and still be in one’s right mind? One could conclude after multiple reads and after gaining a better understanding of the irony in the story that a person in their right mind(sane), but with ill intentions, as in the case of Montresor, would be able to plan such a brutal crime. One must take into consideration, what is sanity? As defined by Merriam-Webster “sanity is the quality or state of being sane; especially: soundness or health of mind,” (“sanity”). With that definition in mind, it is important to consider what determines the soundness or health of mind? In today’s society those determinations are made through the use of ethics and morals. In general, a person’s sanity is questioned when others believe someone has done something ridiculous/extreme and out of the ordinary, or during trials for crimes. During trials for crimes, it would be efficient to say that a person has done something extremely ridiculous and out of the ordinary for most people, like robbing or murdering someone. For all intents and purposes, it could be argued that Montresor could be insane. To hold onto a grudge for such a long time over an insult, then to plan, what, in the end, is the perfect murder, could also be deemed as sane. However, would a person who is deemed sane, be able to put that much thought into a step by step murder, and feel no guilt...
Words: 1420 - Pages: 6