563
7/4/2016
Danielle Kelley

The analysis of national tactic
The United States following the 9/11 attacks notice that more required for the public safety and the guarding of the United States to prevent tragic situations as such from happening again. For that reason, new concepts created to help in the efforts. The national plan, for counterterrorism also the national security tactic, will help the government also; law enforcement agencies protect society also the well-being of the United States. To make sure that the enemies of the state will ever get away with conduct like that again. In this paper, it will be discussed the reviews of a national approach, for counterterrorism also the national security tactic like comparing the National Security approach and National tactic for Counterterrorism regarding scope and direction. Also, assess various strategies used to address terrorist threats. The Analyze the development and progression of homeland security from 9/11 until now, including the role of executive orders. By explaining the reviews, it will help show how much of an assist these two strategies are to the United States, in their mission to secure the nation and its people. Compare the National Security Strategy also Counterterrorism
When using these methods, many people can see that they have different tactics within their strategy. However, many people do not understand that there some similarities in them also like for instance the first thing that they can compare, with each other is they want the president and the government to protect the citizens within Americas Society also broad. Also, securing the people of America homeland all American interest dismantling, defeating Al-Qaida also their associates. “The individuals of the united states, also the interest will not be protected from terrorist attacks until them as a threat does not exist anymore” (national strategy counterterrorism,2011).The security world peace was also securing United States interest all over the world. What they have in comparison is that they want to stop the terrorist, from having any hiding areas that they can go. “Will not be able to obtain any weapons of mass destruction; also ruin any association by shaming them for having any connection with the terrorist groups also start to deprive terrorist groups enable means” (National security strategy, 2011). Various strategies
These comparisons show the likeness that both, these strategies have, however, these strategies have a great assess different tactic to address the threats of terrorist groups the homeland security as federal attempt to secure national critical infrastructure assets. Homeland security agency stated there are three main categories of critical infrastructure cyber, human, also physical. Support mean data networks used to transfer various amount d data also to direct companies, industry, banking also the vast sum of society lives. Also, keep information from people that want, to use it to do illegal activity. “Also human assets refer big amount of individuals who congregate for the reason of living circumstances, working situations or social events also who need to be guarded”(2006). The homeland security attempts focus on defending groups of people, to stop a large number of losses. Lastly is physical infrastructure pass on to transportation waterways, roadway, air, etc. also manufacturing facilities primarily petrochemical large employers, also nuclear amenities. By understanding of the site-specific scenarios, require identification of the threat point of origin can affect the location. Also, the vulnerability of the building employee’s procedures the effect of each risk as well depends on the vulnerability of the public facility also the system of the establishment. The mitigation is the decrease of the likely of the situation also the severity of an attack. It deals with delay an attack also lowers the impact of an attack that does happen. “Site selection the placement of the facilities makes sure their space between other buildings, roads, locations to parking. The high levels of security the facility l guards, surveillance, etc. also expert staff, physical blockades” (Kamien, D., 2012) by using these strategies, it will make sure that they can combat terrorist threats, from happening in society and can protect the facility that public purposes. Analyze the development and progression These methods have helped the U.S. prevent terrorist attacks and keep secure our community. However to use homeland security to do this they had to create and progress this following the tragic event of 9/11 until the present day. “Because following 9/11 attack Osama bin Laden call operatives to Afghanistan to talk about using commercials plans as a weapon” (DHS, 2016). DHS currently has come up with multiple-layered sharing information methods to help them obtain information on known and unknown terrorist or their associates to stop them from entering our country and others. Following 9/11, the hijackers obtain visa and passports to get entry into the U.S... Since then the DHS have come up with the visa security program to prevent any other attacks. They have special agents watch over the high-risk visa activity. This program is set up in 19 posts and 15 countries various departments helping with it. Leading up to 9/11, the terrorist prepared for it in the country Germany. Now, the DHS has a combating serious crime agreement to get information about any criminals also terrorism in 18 countries which one is the Germany. Following 9/11, the terrorist came to the U.S. on tourist visas traveler checks obtain in the Middle East. Now the DHS has associations with the national’s counterterrorism center also terrorist screening center to help them get knowledge on terrorist threats. Before 9’11 foreigners, wanting to get flying sessions could go all over the areas of the surveillance around the United and the plane that could do the most damage. Now the DHS has the transportation security administration be more accountable to make sure that foreigners wanting to fly an aircraft are not a threat to the United States society. They have national’s extensive suspicious activity reporting initiative also; they prescreen passage and have a watch list. “They have flight deck officer program created national emergency communications plan incident command. This system will help combat terrorist attacks as such.” The president of the U.S. has the authority to give out various executive orders"(Relyea, 2008). “Executive orders are known as instructions to the federal officials also federal departments also are created to govern the execution of public policy” (Relyea, 2008). Following the September 11 events, George Bush” he started giving out executive orders also new series of presidential directive known as homeland security presidential homeland security presidential directives. While Bush was in the term, he had issue 24 instructions, which a significant executive order” (Relyea, 2008). “This kind of rules enormous cost like for instance homeland security presidential directives that were done by former President Bush was development a highly multiple -layered terrorist ID also watching method”( Relyea,2008). In conclusion
These executive orders have given birth to the DHS also have helped them create useful and helpful ways to prevent and stop terrorist acts from happening in the United States but also around the globe. Like the highly layered terrorist identification system, this aids in view who is on the watch list for potential threats to the country. Also, assess the risk of each asset to help the DHS determine the level of risk target on the matter and point of origin. It aids the national strategy for counterterrorism also the national security strategy is helpful to them and become beneficial to the U.S and the globe to prevent terrorist attacks.

References
Kamien, D. (2012). Homeland Security Handbook: Strategic guidance for a coordinated approach to effective security and emergency management.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
National Infrastructure Protection Plan. (2006). Retrieved from http://Department of Homeland Security. (2006). National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Washington, D.C.: Author.
National Security Strategy. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf
National Strategy for Counterterrorism. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/counterterrorism_strategy.pdf
Relyea, H. C. (2008). CRS Report for Congress, Order. Retrieved from http://Relyea, H. C. (2008). Presidential Directives: Background and Overview, Updated November 26, 2008. CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 98-611 GOV. dhs. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/september-11-chronology#