...Company Analysis The Boston Beer Company- Britton McGlachlin As a relatively new entrant into the beer brewing industry, the United States has often been poked fun at and considered to be an inferior beer brewing country among global competitors. Up until 1984, most domestic beer options were pale lagers produced by the mass market brewers. If a person wanted to get a full and flavorful beer, it was considered that importing was the only option with beers such as Heineken and Beck’s establishing themselves as the premium beer leaders. American craft beers were virtually non-existent other than a few small basement and kitchen operations, and there were no widely distributed micro brewed, now known as craft, beers available. (History) In the early 1980s, Jim Koch, a would be sixth generation beer brewer, was convinced that he could find a niche in the competitive beer market for a high-quality American beer. In 1984, Koch used his great-great grandfather’s 150 year old recipe called “Louis Koch Lager” to brew his first batch of what eventually became Samuel Adams Boston Lager. (About) Jim began to take bottles of his beer bar-to-bar for tasting and received excellent feedback about the quality and flavor of his beer, which used all natural ingredients with no adjuncts. In 1985, Jim decided to debut in the Boston market with small batches focusing primarily on quality. Six weeks after its introduction, Samuel Adams was selected as “The Best Beer in America” in The...
Words: 3430 - Pages: 14
...Analysis of the Anheuser-Busch Company Report by Valanium Analysts: Chris Rigopulos, John Schneider, Jayne Tan Investment Recommendation: MARKET PERFORM December 5, 2001 BUD – NYSE (11/30/01) 52 week range Revenue (2001E) Market Capitalization Share Outstanding $43.10 $36.75 – $49.00 $14.9B $38.2 B 884.3M EPS Forecast (FYE 12/30) EPS Ratios Trailing P/E Forward P/E Leading PEG M/B Price/Sales 1999A 2000A 2001E 2002E $1.49 $1.71 $1.89 $2.09 Dividend Yield 1.67% Avg. Daily Trading Volume (3mo) 2.13M Book Value per Share (mrq) Return of Equity (ttm) Return on Assets (ttm) Est. 5 Years EPS Growth Rate Sector: Consumer/Non-Cyclical Industry: Beverages (Alcoholic) $4.83 40.39% 10.71% 11.0% BUD 23.2 20.6 1.87 8.93 3.11 Competitors Avg. 17.4 15.9 1.37 3.10 1.21 Valuation Predictions Actual Current Price Trailing P/E Valuation Leading P/E Valuation PEG Valuation M/B Valuation Price/Sales Valuation EBO (Abnormal Earnings) Valuation DCF Valuation Performance (Trailing, Annualized) Return on BUD Return on S&P 500 Return on Competitors $43.10 $32.38 $33.24 $31.48 $14.95 $16.73 $19.25 $46.87 6 mo -2.1% 18.3% - 2.9% 12 mo 24 mo -7.4% 9.9% -13.4% -10.3% 2.1% 8.9% Source: finance.yahoo.com, Valanium analysis • • Our valuations reflect a range of predictions, all falling below the current price point with the exception of the DCF estimate. However, we believe that A-B’s brand value and domestic presence are not captured within the accounting numbers...
Words: 8333 - Pages: 34
...MRKT 5000 Marketing September 04, 2011 Jim Koch And The Marketing of Samuel Adams Beer Executive Summary Currently, the United States beer market is segmented into many segments. The two largest domestic brewers, brewers located within the United States, are Anheuser-Busch and Miller. These two companies control 50 percent and 29 percent of domestic beer sales, respectively. With 80 percent of the beer market controlled by the two megabrewers the United States is a tough environment for a small craft brewer like Samuel Adams to survive. The U.S. population is over 311 million people, the world’s third largest population after China and India. American consumes nearly 200 million barrels of beer a year, or 20 gallons per person, second only to China which has four times the amount of people the United States. Samuel Adams Boston Lager is brewed by the Boston Beer Company and founded by 1984 by Jim Koch using his great–great–grandfather’s 1870 beer recipe. Due to the economic downturn and other environmental forces the general beer market has been flat in recent years, yet quality craft beers like Samuel Adams has seen double-digit growth. The craft brewing industry has had a strong growth curve over the past decade and Samuel Adams has been positioned perfectly to capture this momentum. Technological advances have been a positive development for the Samuel Adams brewing and packaging...
Words: 4464 - Pages: 18
...Suite 850, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. The Company's business goal is to become the leading brewer in the Better Beer category by creating and offering high quality full-flavored beers. With the support of a large, well-trained sales organization, the Company strives to achieve this goal by increasing brand availability and awareness through advertising, point-of-sale, promotional programs and drinker education. 3. Various beers, flavored malt beverages and hard cider styles and the rationalization of its product line, as a whole. 4. The Company sells its products to a network of approximately 400 wholesale distributors. These distributors, in turn, sell the products to retailers, such as pubs, restaurants, grocery chains, package stores, stadiums and other retail outlets, where the products are sold to drinkers. With few exceptions, the Company's products are not the primary brands in distributors' portfolios. Thus, the Company, in addition to competing with other malt beverages for a share of the drinker's business, competes with other brewers for a share of the distributor's attention, time and selling efforts. The Company sells its products predominantly in the United States, but also has markets in Canada, Europe, Israel, the Caribbean, the Pacific Rim and Mexico. 5. Yeast. Shipping cases, six-pack carriers and crowns. The two-row varieties of barley used in the Company's malt are mainly grown in the United States and Canada. The Company uses Noble...
Words: 1458 - Pages: 6
...discuss and identify the trends in global beer markets. It will discuss how Modelo’s International expansion was made possible by building strategic partnerships with experienced distributors in local markets. The paper will focus on how Modelo should enter in the foreign market and what is the best strategy. Modelo will face many challenges from his competitors and make the decision whether the company should diversify the business to promote growth. Identify and discuss the trends in the global beer markets. The global beer markets have four main trends and they are consolidation, international expansions, mergers and acquisitions. Consolidation with the beer industry broadens the area of sales and exposes brewers to more opportunities for growth of its company. Expansion of any company can be a positive attribute to overall success for the most obvious reason, revenue. The trend of breweries expansion might be credited to the very expensive initial startup cost of a brewery. In this area of the beer industry having more than one area of cash flow assists with the maintaining the fluctuating price of resources. (Thompson, Strickland III, & Gamble, 2009) International expansion can be a major attribute to a company’s success through seeking proficient production efficiencies. Some beer companies will produce their beer within its country than export versus having operational facilities in other countries where the beer is sold. International expansion unjustifiably...
Words: 1481 - Pages: 6
...lifestyle solution for busy families. In 1990, Peapod partnered with Jewel Food Stores to fulfill orders. In the beginning, Andrew, Thomas and their families did the shopping and packing and made deliveries with their own cars. (“Our company”) They joined the internet in 1996 when they created and launched their own website, www.peapod.com, they also made the Inc. 500 list of fastest growing privately held US companies. Peapod was associated with Jewel until 1999 when it opened a facility in Niles, Illinois, and started picking orders from there. Using their own picking center helped them control inventory and product quality. (“Our company”) In 2000, Peapod became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Ahold, the international food provider based in The Netherlands, and pursued exclusive relationships with Ahold USA grocers, Stop & Shop and Giant Foods. Peapod was grown slowly and wisely by leveraging partnerships with other established companies. In mid-2001, when competitors like Webvan were going out of business, Royal Ahold purchased the remaining outstanding shares of Peapod, making Peapod the leader in the online grocery space. Since Peapod joined forces with Ahold they now serve more than 355,000 customers each year. (“Our company”) Peapod operates under a centralized distribution model with two formats: warehouses and warerooms (room where goods are kept or displayed for sale). Both provide next-day delivery, but warerooms, which are dedicated areas attached...
Words: 812 - Pages: 4
...MillerCoors vs. Anheuser-Busch Salman Boer Carly Gorka Stephanie Kalin Kenny Koelling Felipe Naranjo Nizam Qutubuddin Executive Summary The beer industry in the United States is an extremely competitive one. For years, the industry has been solely dominated by one contender, Anheuser Busch. However, large brewers have always been looking for opportunities to extend their reach in the industry and gain more market share. Miller Brewing Company and Coors Brewing Company have been historical staples of the American beer industry since the nineteenth century. These companies merged with international giants South African Breweries and Molson, respectively, in efforts to better compete in the United States brewing industry. However, they still could not manage to take a share of the Anheuser Busch Empire. SABMiller and Molson Coors saw an opportunity in forming a joint venture that would be able to successfully compete with Anheuser Busch in the beer industry, and in 2008, created a third company called MillerCoors. The creation of MillerCoors was a success. Since the creation of the company, in June 2008, MillerCoors has been very profitable and has enjoyed steady growth in their market share. They have done this by integrating innovation as a major goal in their products, providing them with a certain level of differentiation, while reducing costs through the exploitation of synergies that exist in their different processes. MillerCoors was one of the very...
Words: 9229 - Pages: 37
...Boston Beer Equity Valuation Valuation Date: April 1, 2005 Jason Boney jboneyttu@yahoo.com Jordan Gristy jgristy@yahoo.com Preston Madden preston.e.madden@ttu.edu Heath Stanley charles.h.stanley@ttu.edu Boston Beer Co. Equity Valuation Table of Contents Executive Summary Business and Industry Analysis Competitive Advantages Five Forces Model Industry Competitive Analysis Accounting Analysis Key Accounting Policies Degree of Accounting Flexibility Evaluation of Accounting Strategy Accounting Quality of Disclosure Red Flags Quantitative Analysis Ratio Analysis Liquidity Profitability Capital Structure Forecasting Balance Sheet Income Statement Statement of Cash Flows Forecast Summary Valuation Analysis Method of Comparables Valuation Tools Discounted Free Cash Flow Residual Income Long Run Residual Abnormal Earnings Growth (AEG) Conclusion of Valuation Work Cited Appendix 4 7 8 9 15 17 17 20 22 23 23 25 29 29 31 34 37 37 38 39 40 41 41 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 52 3 Boston Beer Co. By Valuation Proclamation Heath Stanley, Jordan Gristy, Preston Madden, Jason Boney Investment Recommendation: Buy, Undervalued Stock Ticker and Exchange Current Price (4-1-05) 52 week price range Revenue (2004) Market Capitalization Shares Outstanding 3-month Avg. Daily Volume Percent Institutional Ownership Book Value Per Share ROE ROA Est. 5yr EPS Growth Rate Cost of Capital Est. Beta Estimated 5-year -0.201 3-year 0.098 2-year 0.434 Published Beta 0.35 Kd WACC SAM-NYSE $22.14...
Words: 17862 - Pages: 72
...Harvard Business School 9-291-025 January 15, 1991 The Redhook Ale Brewery Paul Shipman, president and co-founder of the Redhook Ale Brewery, raised his beer mug in a toast with Redhook's treasurer and financial officer, David Mickelson. Sales at the Seattle-based microbrewer had increased at an average rate of 53% per year since 1984, and September 1990 had been another record month. After eight years of operations, Redhook's ales and porters had captured 50% of the increasingly competitive microbrewery market in the Pacific Northwest. Demand was projected to exceed, in two years, the 40,000-barrel annual production capacity of the company's single brewery. As a result, current plans called for the construction of a similar-sized brewery in the Bay Area of northern California. There were also plans to introduce a lager brand which would require the construction of a third, larger brewery in the Puget Sound region of western Washington. Expansion on this scale would require significant outside financing. Shipman and Mickelson were seeking a $5 million equity infusion from a well- established European brewery with an interest in entering the North American market. In addition to the new equity, $6.5 million of new bank financing would be required for the planned expansion. Mickelson's next challenge would be to negotiate an acceptable credit arrangement with Redhook's bank to provide the required debt financing. The Re-emergence of Microbreweries Though...
Words: 4211 - Pages: 17
... | |The Beer Industry | |Spring 2010 | [pic] Beer Industry The term beer means “…any beverage brewed from a starch (or farinaceous) grain. Because the grain is made into a malt, another term for beer is malt liquor”. (The Beer Industry) According to the North American Industry Classification System, the beer industry is found in section 312: Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing. NAICS states that “Industries in the Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing subsector manufacture beverages and tobacco products. The industry group, Beverage Manufacturing, includes three types of establishments: (1) those that manufacture nonalcoholic beverages; (2) those that manufacture alcoholic beverages through the fermentation process; and (3) those that produce distilled alcoholic beverages…” Although beer is within the same section as wine and distilled spirits, they do not consider them the same. Within section 312 they have five separate sections: Beer can be found under section 312120 Breweries. Within this section the term Breweries is comprised of “establishments primarily engaged in brewing beer, ale, malt liquors, and non-alcoholic beers”. However, Standard & Poor’s would say that distilled spirits, wine, beer and tobacco are all a...
Words: 5136 - Pages: 21
...2011 Annual Report at every occasion chaiRman’S letteR In an era of constant, rapid and unpredictable change, the concept of staying the course, especially in business, can seem like an impossible mission. It takes strong and confident leadership, a clear and focused strategy and a team of talented people who are willing to go the distance in order to achieve the goal. Since fiscal 2010, the goal at Constellation Brands has been a singular one: profitable organic growth. During this period, we have embarked on an evolutionary journey that has taken us from a collection of stellar brands and acquired businesses to a highly disciplined and tightly aligned company that is, at every occasion, capitalizing on company-wide efficiencies and best practices to strengthen our operations, our people and our brands. Our fiscal 2011 results serve as a shining indicator that our collective efforts are paying off. More importantly, they validate the importance of staying true to one’s commitments. At Constellation Brands, our commitments are unwavering…to continue to grow our business and our premium brands, to enrich the communities where we live and work and to elevate life with every glass raised. These commitments are being realized every day because of our people, who are among the best and brightest in the industry. Dedicated, innovative and determined, our employees have stayed the course through unexpected challenges and increasingly higher expectations placed on them. We are...
Words: 59029 - Pages: 237
... copyright holder’s express permission. For permission to reproduce or cite this case, contact Jeffrey S. Harrison (RCNcases@richmond.edu). In your message, state your name, affiliation and the intended use of the case. Permission for classroom use will be granted free of charge. Other cases are available at: http://robins.richmond.edu/centers/center-‐for-‐active-‐business-‐education/research/case-‐network.html Larry Young, President and CEO of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (DPS) seemed to be on a roll. Named 2010 Beverage Executive of the Year by Beverage Industry Magazine, he led the company through three very difficult economic years since it separated from the London-based food and beverage giant Cadbury Schweppes. Reflecting on that time, he chuckled, “There couldn’t have been a worse year to go public.”1 Triggered by the collapse of mortgage-backed securities, the recession froze the credit markets and led to unprecedented commodities prices. In spite of adverse economic conditions and fierce...
Words: 8571 - Pages: 35
...Hudepohl Brewing Company Bob Pohl, age 32, was appointed general manager of the Hudepohl Brewing Company following the unexpected death of the company’s president in March 1980. Since 1975, Pohl had managed Hudepohl’s marketing response to rapidly changing conditions in the brewing industry. The death of the president, a relative, left Pohl as the only member of the founder’s family active in the day-to-day activities of the business. Pohl was optimistic about the company’s future despite Hudepohl’s recent disappointing performance. Since 1978 the brewery had been operating at less than 40% of its one-million-barrel1 capacity, and in 1978 the company had experienced the largest operating loss in its history—$538,000. After adjusting for gains on Hudepohl’s securities portfolio and a tax loss carryback, net income for that fiscal year was $95,161, down from $268,611 in 1977. After only three months as general manager, however, Pohl was predicting improved earnings in the near future. A 7% gain in sales during the first four months of 1980 seemed to confirm his expectations. Pohl felt that by 1983 Hudepohl would achieve a 10% growth in sales. Background on the Company Based in Cincinnati, Ohio, Hudepohl was the twentieth largest brewery in the United States. (Financial information is presented in Exhibits 1, 2, and 3.) Ownership and Organization Hudepohl’s board of directors consisted of seven members, all descendants of founder Louis Hudepohl. Chairman John Hesselbrock...
Words: 9359 - Pages: 38
...Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8 ( 1991 ) 67-83 Elsevier Towards a new theory of innovation management: A case study comparing Canon, Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc. Ikujiro Nonaka Institute of Business Research, Hitotsuhashi University, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan Martin Kenney Department of Applied Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Abstract This paper argues that innovation can be best understood as an information process which is then concretized as a product that meets demand. Two very different firms, Canon Inc. and Apple Computer Inc., are used as case study illustrations. Innovation does not proceed through logical deduction, but rather is furthered by the use of metaphors and analogies. The bureaucratic and staid structures of the firm can be challenged and broken up to provide the space for innovations to emerge. The leader’s role in the innovating firm is as a catalyst and facilitator, not as an allknowing despot. The importance of innovations is not merely in the new product, but also the “ripple” effects of innovations which can propel the firm into a self-renewal process. Keywords: Innovation management, High-technology, Case study. 1. Introduction Increasingly, corporate competitive success is hinging upon the effective management of innovation. Innovation has been the object of considerable academic study from a variety of perspectives. However, innovations are usually considered as objects. We...
Words: 7671 - Pages: 31
...Radical Transformation A series of fatal accidents, coupled with operational inefficiencies snowballed Korean Air into troubled times. Then, at the beginning of the 21st century, its CEO/ Chairman, Yang-Ho Cho undertook various transformation initiatives - for instance, improving service quality and safety standards, technology integration, upgrading pilot training, better business focus; putting in place a professional management team, improving corporate image through sponsorship marketing, etc. He gave a new corporate direction in the form of '10,10,10' goal. However, Korean Air is held up by a slew of challenges. Among which are inefficiencies of - Chaebol system of management, possible clash of its cargo business with its own shipping company, limited focus on the domestic market and growing competition from LCCs. How would Korean Air manage growth as a family-owned conglomerate? The case offers enriching scope for analysing a family business’s turnaround strategies, with all the legacy costs involved. Pedagogical Objectives • To discuss the (operational) dynamics of Korean Chaebols - their influence/ effects on the country’s industrial sector and the economy as a whole • To analyse how family-owned businesses manage the transition phase - from a supplier-driven economy to a demanddriven economy • To identify all the possible reasons for Korean Air ’s turbulent times and assessing whether they are controllable or not • To critically evaluate Korean Air ’s transformation efforts...
Words: 71150 - Pages: 285
