The Daily Stormer's Argument Against The Bill Of Rights
Submitted By Words 269 Pages 2
Recently, a group called The Daily Stormer made a very disrespectful article about a young women who had recently died, named Heather Heyer. It was then that their host, GoDaddy, kicked them out and since then they have not been able to find another host. People are disagreeing on weather this is OK or weather this is breaking the bill of rights, freedom of press, and freedom of speech. Many people are saying this is bad and it was recently found out that, just like the editor of The Daily Stormer, the man who hit Heather was a Trump supporter and a Neo-Nazi. A Neo-Nazi is someone who wishes to revive the old ways of Hitler and the Nazis. They have been moved to the dark web, which is not normally accessible by means of normal browsers. The man who hit Heather was charged with murder and so far has not been found guilty or innocent.…show more content… They didn't need to go as far as they did and it was just plain uncalled for in the beginning. They said things like ‘She was a waste of Godly effort’ and ‘She needed to be killed’ ‘I congratulate the man who actually rid the world of her’. So while I do believe that taking their website down was actually against the Bill of Rights and just Unconstitutional, I do think that Andrew Anglin ( the author of The Daily Stormer) got what he