Free Essay

The Fountainhead

In:

Submitted By vnala123
Words 808
Pages 4
The Fountainhead Essay Contest
Howard Roark, the main protagonist of The Fountainhead, embodies Ayn Rand’s depiction of individualism and originality, trying to fulfill his potential in a manipulative world. He never regrets any of his actions or decisions despite rejection from the rest of society. Even from the beginning of the novel, he was clearly aware of the obstacles ahead of him and was confident in his abilities to succeed in a selfish environment. “He knew that the days would be difficult… he knew also that he would not think, because everything was clear to him already” (pg. 15). As an independent man, his interactions with the other characters of the novel clearly represent the author’s notion that being self-sufficient in a collectivist society is a virtue. Rand’s main point throughout the book is that Roark dismisses conventions and is driven by passion, not like the others around him that only lust for power.
Ayn Rand’s characteristically dry writing style accentuates the relationships between the characters of The Fountainhead, especially the ones between Howard Roark and his “rivals” like Peter Keating and Ellsworth Toohey. Roark is unique in his willingness to embrace his individualistic mind, act on his own decisions, and be generally indifferent towards the opinion of others. This is a stark contrast to a head figure of architecture like Toohey who is blinded by his own hubris, taking advantage of the work of others in order to achieve his own standing and hide his own lack of talent. Toohey has a superficial view on the world: “There's nothing as significant as a human face. Nor as eloquent. We can never really know another person, except by our first glance at him. Because, in that glance, we know everything.” (pg.193). Operating in a style that completely diverges from Toohey, Roark finds it unnecessary to preach his values to the world or pay mind to the views of others. His talents are the only thing he focuses on, therefore when Toohey asks what he thinks of him, Roark replies without hesitation that he does not think of him. Yet Toohey is not the first of the authoritarian figures that tried to control him. He faces these issues at the very beginning of the book in his conversations with the Dean and alludes to previous situations as well. “[Roark] had met many men such as the Dean; he had never understood them. He knew there was some important difference between his actions and theirs . . .” (pg. 27). It only emphasizes his consistency and his determination to advance himself and his original work. Had he relented to authority and compromised, success would not have come to him as it did. However, Roark is able to hold on to his ideals, and his determination allows him to maintain the ultimately successful way of thinking and living.
Throughout The Fountainhead, Rand has her story reflect on the idea that individualism is suppressed in groups and society, a somewhat anti-socialistic view on the world. Socialism represents the common ownership controlled by the government, a concept of which Rand is clearly against in her works. Through a socio-political perspective, it’s clear to see that she took inspiration for this work through the influences of the life around her. Communistic ideals were rampant in Russia during her lifetime and Rand must have been a victim of the iron-fisted social structure. “Communism is, above all, a spiritual theory that denies the individual, not merely as an economic power, but in all and every respect” (pg. 700). Ellsworth Toohey’s ideals and tactics to control those around him have a resemblance to Joseph Stalin, Russia’s former dictator. “Men have a very powerful weapon against you. Reason. So you must be very careful to take it away from them . . . can you rule a thinking man?” (pg. 637).
Roark is strikingly similar in thinking to Ayn Rand who, as a philosopher, supported rationalistic views and ethical egoism as opposed to oppression and egocentrism. Objectivism is precisely the body of philosophical principles set forth in her works, advocating individual rights and self-responsibility. Roark is practical and blunt, as Ayn Rand is, and isn’t uncomfortable in speaking his mind with others. “Every piece of it is there because the house needs it.” (pg. 136). Even when he is desperately in need of a commission he refuses to mold his ideas in order to satisfy the public, waiting for clients that will let him design in his own way and critique him objectively. Though the novel at times shows the uncertainty of Roark’s egotism surviving in a society so opposed to independent-mindedness, the conclusion of this novel reveals that he ultimately achieves real success through the Cortlandt Homes trial. He sways the preconceptions of society with his integrity and mindset, the true fountainhead of man’s advancement.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Fountainhead Review Questions

...Janea Herbert AP Language and Comp. The Fountainhead Review Questions: The Keating Section Ch. 1-6 1. The “preface” is metaphorically significant because it is a foreshadowing of the issues that Roark will have to deal with. Just as he is standing on a cliff, about to dive into the lake, he is preparing to dive into a new part of his life which he knows will be difficult. Roark is also going to shape out things which in the metaphor, granite rocks are waiting to be cut. 2. What the meeting with the Dean of Stanton reveals about Roark is that he is an independent thinker who follows his own convictions despite other acceptable standards existing which he does not to follow. Roark does not care what other people think of his vision, nor does he care about the consequences he faces when he refuses to conform. What Roark’s rules tell me about him is that he doesn’t like to copy other people’s styles in any way and believes that everything should be original because no two things serve the same purpose. What the Dean means when he says this statement is, that architects are not really individuals, because they belong to a larger social unit comprised of many people, and is less important than the group as a whole. An objectivist would reject the Dean’s proclamation because he/she believes that the most important goal in peoples’ lives is to please themselves. In light of the novels’ philosophical...

Words: 1218 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Howard Rand's The Fountainhead

...In The Fountainhead, Rand characterizes her thoughts of the ideal human being throughout the embodiment of the novel’s hero who lives by his own achievement, does not give or receive the unworthy, and values accomplishment and dismisses resentment and jealousy. The novel’s central character, Howard Roark is a brilliant architect who struggles against a traditionalist society that rejects his revolutionary designs, therefore giving voice to Rand’s own Objectivist philosophy. The Objectivist philosophy states that the ethical purpose of human life is the quest for one’s personal happiness and rational self-interest. Therefore, Roark is innately selfish, entirely unaware of others, and dearly committed to his own success and prosperity. Throughout...

Words: 1586 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Comparing Roark And Toohey's The Fountainhead

...Howard Roark and Ellsworth Toohey are declared in The Fountainhead where they both exclaim prime illustrations of a realistic perspective. Specifically, Roark is the hidden side of society that is obsolete, and hard to understand that is actually among realization. Evidently, Roark is an exemplar of the "individual" that is truly successful for his talents, reason, drive, and inner beliefs: " they were sketches of buildings such as had never stood on the face of the earth."-(7). Roark absorbs his art impression into buildings and architecture. His artistic view is quite unorthodox that is questioned. Society's view on abstract structure is irrelevant to Roark's behavior. He avoids any temptation of conformity to commit to his personal...

Words: 1374 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Individuality In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead

...The idea of not giving into anyone, of not letting anyone affect one’s own decisions and beliefs, builds a strong personality. In The Fountainhead, Howard Roark has the same, uncompromising personality. No matter what others think of him or do to him, he does what he thinks is right. Similarly, when Ellsworth Toohey asks Roark what Roark thinks of Toohey after everything Toohey does to him, Roark merely says “But I don’t think of you,” (Rand 401) in order to show that nothing bothers Roark, a trait of his personality. The brief exchange between Toohey and Roark clearly depicts the theme of individuality as Roark’s line expresses the true meaning of the theme. The theme of the novel has a deeper, underlying meaning to it. Rand tries to promote...

Words: 815 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Howard Roark In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead

...Howard Roark is the embodiment of the perfect human being, as envisioned by Ayn Rand. Although utterly selfish, he is the only one in The Fountainhead to live his own life. From a young age one is taught that ‘it is better to give than receive’ and that to live a life of altruism is much more ethical than to live a life of selfishness. However, Roark does not follow these teachings. He denounces altruism - he lives a life of independent thinking which is not tainted by the world. Although his ways of living are questioned and thought to be ridiculous by some, Roark lives the way men should live their lives and this ultimately leads to his great architectural success. However, Roark’s way of life did not bring immediate success. Staying true...

Words: 1288 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Does Toohey Use Collectivism In The Fountainhead

...At the end of Part II, Ellsworth Toohey confronts Howard Roark and says, “Mr. Roark, we’re alone here. Why don’t you tell me what you think of me?” To which Roark replies, “But I don’t think of you.” The theme of The Fountainhead is: individualism vs. collectivism in men’s soul; which could be compared to Ellsworth Toohey vs. Howard Roark. The hero, Howard Roark, is a unique architect. He struggles to succeed in life with the constant negativity from the public. Ellsworth Toohey is the villain in the novel and purpose in society is to make second-handers the forefront of society. Ellsworth Toohey represents collectivism. The book is reflects the conflict of those who has a mind of their own and those who allows others to dominate their lives....

Words: 1374 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Buildings (Architecture [Modernism]) and Songs (Music [Jazz])

...composition, of parts, the make up of materials that are joined together to make a building. The Fountainhead, with Howard Roark as the protagonist, is an individual that truly sets him part from collaborations and compromise. His independent, rebellious attitude towards compromise strikes him as an individual that has roots of foundation, but prospers in his own wants. His vision, with the combination of music gives him a sense feeling and imagining the abstract structures he has in his mind. Although Roark does not compromise, he’s composed of the roots like a tree, the foundation of the structure that never change, along with the branches and leaves that fall like a deciduous tree, but grow to wave to the winds. Modernism is a style that Roark prefers and only designs. Modernism is the rejection of classical and traditional forms, to modify and break the point of design and new abstract forms in an architectural perspective. The Fountainhead is basically Howard Roark verses the world. The word tries to balance him out. This reflects me with the scene beginning with setting: “ The leaves streamed down, trembling the sun. They were not green; only a few scattered through the torrent, stood out in single drops of a green so bright and pure that it hurt the yes; the rest were not a color, but a light, the substance of fire on metal, living sparks without edges” (Rand, The Fountainhead 503). The leaves resemble the people in the community, which make up the world, as the world is...

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Altruism In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...Religion promises eventual, superior happiness – Nirvana, Heaven, Paradise – through obedience. This eventual, superior happiness is achieved through the service of the equal children of one divine being or another. This eventual, superior happiness is reached by the abandonment of the great evil of selfishness. This eventual, superior happiness is derived from one’s metaphorical self-slaughter on behalf of their brethren. “Look at any great system of ethics, from the Orient up,” Ellsworth M. Toohey, the villain of Rand’s bestselling novel The Fountainhead, says. “Didn’t they all preach the sacrifice of personal joy?... Just prove that a thing makes men happy – and you’ve damned it.” This condemnation of all manners of selfishness is also visible in the Marxist-Leninist political structure of the modern nations of Laos, China, Cuba, Vietnam, and North Korea, and the devastating political, economic, and social collapses that have followed the implementation of this socialist...

Words: 816 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Individuality In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...from his home in the domain of the Unmentionable Times, Equality discovers the truth. The Unspeakable Word, the secret, the key to his true freedom, is the word “I” (94). As his ultimate act to declare his independence and identity, Equality gives himself a name. This declaration of independence completely liberates him from the collectivist dictatorship and his brothers, who are identified as nothing more than a collection of generic collectivist values and numbers. Through his transgressions, Equality was able to escape from the dungeons of the second handlers and stand victorious on the grounds of the creators. Works Cited Rand, A. (1961). Anthem. New York, NY: New American Library. (A) The Soul of an Individualist excerpts from The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand. Word Count: 918 ...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Fountain Head

...The Fountainhead 1 The metaphorical significance of the preface that I noticed was the fact that Ayn rand talked about the success of the book and tries to clear some misconceptions of her writing. I think it was supposed to ready the reader for that kind of dedication to work. Ayn rand took it upon her to make sure her on to got across which demonstrated how serious she was about her work. This also comes to play with the paradox she uses to also characterize Roark. A paradox is something that does not goes and is even considered illogical or unacceptable. This is the exact definition of Roark in general. Because he is so unique with his views in architecture he is ostracized by his career field which makes his independent demesne even more noticeable. 2.. The meeting with the dean reveals that Roark has a mind which is hard to understand at times but ultimately he has a very valid point with his philosophy. He takes pride in his work and won’t put up anything that lacks originality. The rules tell us that Roark despises when people don take the time to make their work express a part of themselves. When the dean says that “an architect is not in end to himself” he meant to say an individual person is not meant to make history or change anything. The story does not end or start with you. An architect’s job is to simply add to the past of our ancestors in attempt to reach there greatness. An objectivist would defiantly reject the idea because the belief system is all about...

Words: 718 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Summary: The Funtainhead By Ayn Rand

...THE FOUNTAINHEAD by Ayn Rand, set in the mid 1920's in the city of high rises, New York, portrays the exceptional building style of the modeler, Howard Roark which parallels his uncompromising and individualistic identity. Roark is compelled to overcome cooperation in a general public where Dominique Francon, a wonderful and rich lady, is the main individual who comprehends his expectations and cravings, while Dwindle Keating, a third-rate planner whose profession is effective because of his adjustment to society, longs to get dignity, and Ellsworth Toohey, a Philanthropic, pursuits to annihilate men's souls in his mission for control over humanity. In this phenomenal book, Rand joins both her enchanting thoughtful perspectives with a touch of sentiment to recount the narrative of the...

Words: 1916 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Ayn Rand Anthem Analysis

...“The words of the evil ones, the words of the unmentionable times. What are the words which we have lost?¨ Equality 7-2521 states of Ayn Rand Anthem. This classic novella is about one man facing the laws of the society. Were everyone thinks he’s a sinner. He fights for equality. Along his trials he finds out what the passion to love to be elated, to feel free. Equality 7-2521 was in a dark world to begin with. He wanted to escape the society, he finally is facing the fact and letting go of all the pain,fear,doubt. The fearful dark and quiet city, no one talks everyone listens everyone is equal. He is breaking a law because he’s alone. “The laws say that none among men may be along at anytime. For this is the great transgression and the root of all evil.¨ (Rand 17) Equality 7-2521 believes he is a evildoer or brainwashed.” We are nothing. Mankind is all. By the grace of our brothers we allowed our lives. We exist through,by and for our brothers who are the state amen.” (Rand 21) He is accepting that he is a sinner and he treasures it he doesn't care what the council thinks or says. “We are defying the will of our councils we alone. Of the thousands who walk this earth we alone in this hour are doing a work which has no purpose save that we wish to do it.” (Rand 36) This is a world he could not live in anymore. He is feeling things fondness to content to feel love to feel free. He is starting to change, to find himself. “We don't know why when we think of them we feel...

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Central Theme Of Individuality In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...In the novel, Anthem, the author Ayn Rand expresses many different thoughts relating to the central theme of individuality, the idea of how one can be independent and different from others. She allows the reader to view this idea by describing the character Equality 7-2521 as someone who believes that there is more out there for himself and reaching for the highest standards in the context of the novel. The author uses the characterization of Equality 7-2521 to support the theme of individuality. This theme affects the route of the novel by showing that the main character wants to become his own individual and will do whatever it takes to break away from the conformity, including working in tunnels from the forbidden times to sharing his personal...

Words: 325 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Comparing The Rules Of The City In Anthem, By Ayn Rand

...Imagine sharing a room with a hundred people, none of which question the set of rules before them. Do not say the sacred word, do not be individual, you must love all men equally. The object of choice is invalid. This is from the book Anthem, written by Ayn Rand, who escaped communism in Russia and set herself a new belief; objectivism. Like Ayn Rand, the main character, Equality 7-2521, perceives these rules as unjust, therefore rebels against them. Equality later then escapes the City and discovers himself, creating a new set of rules which will compare to one’s of the city. Although that is what he tried to detain from. There is no “we,” but there is an “I.” The rules of the City are there to set a norm throughout the people, and to demolish...

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Equality 7-2521's Names In Anthem, By Ayn Rand

... In today’s society, a great deal of consideration goes into choosing a child’s name. We want it to be meaningful and so we take into consideration heritage, trends, and personal characteristics, as if it will influence who they will become. This is not the case in Anthem, by Ayn Rand, where names are assigned to people randomly at birth; one word, five numbers. In Anthem, the main characters Equality 7-2521 and Liberty 5-3000’s names are an ironic contrast to their personalities. Equality 7-2521’s name is ironic in that by definition, equality means everyone is the same and there is no place for individuality. His strong belief was that all people should be recognized as individuals, and we watched him struggle with this belief throughout the novel. Equality 7-2521 demonstrated this when he was working in the tunnel under the subway. He was illegally working on a project that had the potential to significantly improve the lives of everyone in their society. His inventing made him realize “how great is the unexplored,” and he felt that “many lifetimes will not bring [them] to the end of [their] quest,” (36) which was to improve their society. Equality 7-2521 was also aware that no amount of time could ever be enough and the possibilities are endless. These independent attainments are what set him apart in his society. The need to be recognized for his independent thoughts and actions are what fueled Equality 7-2521’s passion for life and were also the source of his greatest...

Words: 608 - Pages: 3