Free Essay

The Hell Debate

In:

Submitted By moorer28
Words 2658
Pages 11
Liberty University

The Hell Debate

A RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO

Dr. Marshall Wicks

IN COMPLETION OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR

Fundamental Theological Issues

BY

Ritchie Moore

SCHOOL’S LOCATION: Lynchburg, Virginia

August 9, 2011

This paper definitely has an interesting topic, the nature of Hell. In the next couple of pages I’m hoping to explain why I believe there is a hell and what that entails, with a little help from some other documentation and beliefs.
Growing up I think everyone has their own perspective of that place. Christians unquestionably think about hell a lot differently than unbelievers. One of the biggest point is that there are some people that use hell as a swear word. I imagine Christians would consider hell to be something more than just a bad word, it could be the worst place that a person could ever go after they die. As everyone knows our beliefs are part of the good news of God. God wants us to love him freely, He loves us and wants to be loved in return. Love cannot be forced, it has to be given freely and hell represents the possibility of saying no to God finally. Hell is not God’s choice as much as it is ours. Hell is more about refusing life than suffering punishment, because God loves us even in his judging of us.[1] It has been said that hell is a spiritual and material furnace of fire where its victims are delicately tortured in their minds and in their bodies, by God, the devils, and damned humans including themselves. Harsh as it may seem, traditionalists see any challenge to this position as diminishing the glory of the divine judgment, taking away from the dignity of our immortality, and making hell less of a punishment than it actually is.
Several critics to the traditional views to hell have come up with questions about the beliefs and were trying to abolish that belief. However, they did not have answers to the rebuttal from the traditionalist when they asked how can you explain what Matthew 25:46 is talking about. Matthew 25:46 says: And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.[2] The conditionalist respond by saying the text does not define eternal, and it could be rendered qualitatively rather than quantitatively. I believe there will always be debates on hell and the word eternal. Some traditionalists say that Luke 16:19-31, which says, “There was a certain rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen and fared sumptuously every day. But there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, full of sores, who was laid at his gate, desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table. Moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham’s bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off and Lazarus in his bosom. “Then he cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.’ But Abraham said, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented. And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.’ “Then he said, ‘I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.’ Abraham said to him, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’”[3] teaches that the lost will endure eternal torment. However, condition lists point out that Jesus’ parable pertains to the intermediate rather than the final state.
I think there are five important phrases when talking about the hell debate. The first would be the eternal conscious physical and spiritual torment. Meaning, the damned in hell will suffer in body and soul forever.[4] Second would be eternal conscious spiritual torment. Meaning, the unsaved will suffer spiritual or psychological torment rather than physical torment.[5] Third is eternal separation from God. Meaning, this loss specific way of talking about hell is relational, stressing the terrible fate of never-ending loss of communion with God.[6] Fourth is the conditional immortality. Meaning, souls are not inherently immortal, but persons are granted immortality by God when they are justified. In contrast, the unsaved do not receive the gift of immortality and ultimately will cease to exist.[7] The final phrase is Annihilationism. Meaning, Evangelicals who propound annihilationism usually do so from a conditionalist foundation. Consequently, the nature of hell uses the term conditionalism to denote belief in both conditional immortality and the ultimate annihilation of the lost.
There is another debate brewing when it comes to hell. It is the, is hell never, forever or just for a while? That question brings up a few questions that need to be answers or pondered prior to this discussion. First are unbelievers destined for an eternity of mindful torment in a real place that the Bible refers to as the lake of fire or Gehenna (commonly called Hell)? Or, are unbelievers put out of both material and spiritual existence, or, do all humans eventually receive the grace of God's salvation, although for many after a time of purgatorial purification?[8] Most theologians believe that unsaved people will be judged by God and be committed to eternal punishment in hell.
The nature of hell is like every other biblical truth, it rest wholly on the authority of God revealing it. God told them most graphically about Hell and repeated His assertion three times. It was a place of punishment; of fire; everlasting. The same truth He strikingly brought out in the parable of Dives and Lazarus.[9] There should be no debate in this subject but it is unfortunately human nature to question things. However, when it comes to things that God has told us and explained several times we should not question. I read in an article somewhere that they made a good point, it said, If hell is not a reality how are we to understand the sentence of those at His left on judgment day? They will be separated from Him and will be cursed of God. We can defend, we can explain and we can point out in the Bible where it speaks about hell at least fifteen times what hell is and how it can be. However, unless others have some sort of belief they will never believe and always question its existence.
There are a couple views on how long a person will be condemned to hell. The traditional view believes that the person who winds up in hell is doomed to a never-ending existence of excruciating pain and suffering. It is a place of no escape and no hope. Many traditionalists believe that hell must be eternal because of the nature of sin itself. All sin is an offense against God, goes this argument, and since God is infinite, all sin is infinitely horrible. Several people have difficulties with this view. The concept of eternal torment seems to convert the true God of justice into a cosmic sadist. Another example is God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah with fire, suddenly and quickly. He destroyed Noah’s evil world with water, suddenly and quickly. In the Law of Moses there was no provision for incarceration or torture. Even sacrificial animals were spared suffering through precise prescriptions for their killing that guaranteed a death that would be as quick and painless as possible. Another reason some have a problem with traditional views is that it seems to ignore an important Biblical teaching about hell, that it is a place of destruction. The traditionalist view of irreparable loss seems to be a stretch, when it is said as destroy or destruction. Many traditionalist believe that the soul is immortal. However, the Bible denies the immortality of the soul completely. As 1 Timothy 6:15-16 says God is the only one that has immortality. Also talking about immortality 1 Corinthians 15:53 says that mortal will not become immortal until the time of their resurrection. Basically I’m saying immortality is a gift from God and He gives it to the redeemed at the time of their resurrection, and with that said there would be no reason to believe in an eternal hell if the soul is not essentially immortal. There are a couple more issues that some people have with the traditional view, it basically just doesn’t follow the Bible when it comes to understanding the nature of hell.
Another point of view, called the conditionalist, says that immortality is conditional, depending upon one’s acceptance of Christ.[10] I believe the Bible teaches the unrighteous will be resurrected, judged, punished in hell for a period of time proportional to their sins and then suffer destruction, which is basically the death of body and soul. The conditionalist viewpoint can be traced back to Bible times. For example, it can be found in the writings of Justin Martyr. In his Dialogue with Trypho the Jew, Martyr states that the soul is mortal, that the souls of the unrighteous will suffer only as long as God wills, and that finally their souls will pass out of existence.[11] No matter how much people want to ignore this, hell is a reality and it is a dreadful destiny. Hell exists because God cannot be mocked, for as Galatians 6:7 says, Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.[12] Also as John 3:36 says, He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.[13] Some argue that everyone will be saved. Most take the position that the unrighteous are annihilated at physical death.
For another perspective on the nature of hell, the Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that since there is no afterlife immediately following death, it is impossible for one to experience either blessing or torment in Hades. Eternal nonexistence is the eventuality of those who are cast into Gehenna, or the lake of fire.[14] Of course I do not believe this point of view, however, I thought to have most if not all views of this subject represented I needed to add this in. There are several viewpoints about hell and all might have their good points as to why their beliefs are correct or should be listened to. However, my belief is that hell is a place that needs to be avoided at all costs and that hell is an unimaginably terrifying place. You should do all you can to make sure hell is not your final home.
Ultimately your eternal destiny is in your hands. You can choose eternal life by receiving Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Or, you can choose eternal destruction by refusing to accept God’s gift of love and grace. A good way to put this is from Deuteronomy 30:15-19, which says, “See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil, in that I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments, His statutes, and His judgments, that you may live and multiply; and the Lord your God will bless you in the land which you go to possess. But if your heart turns away so that you do not hear, and are drawn away, and worship other gods and serve them, I announce to you today that you shall surely perish; you shall not prolong your days in the land which you cross over the Jordan to go in and possess. I call heaven and earth as witnesses today against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live.[15]
Talking about the nature of hell, I know that a lot of people complain about what is going on in the world right now with everything. You could honestly take the thought about hell and what it represents and apply that to today’s world. There are a lot of places where it is impossible to believe that God would let this happen. There are wars happening overseas, there is fighting amongst governments and drug cartels, there are things such as families that are homeless and have no food and there are other unspeakable things that happen in this world. I know that not all of us live in a horrible world. A lot of us can live in our little bubble and think that nothing is going on. Honestly, I don’t even watch the news anymore because all you hear about is the negative things that are happening. You never hear about the positive or uplifting things that people are doing to make this world a better place. I would assume that the people that live in the situations that I mentioned earlier would probably agree that they are living in hell a on earth. We have an all powerful loving God, unfortunately we have some really horrific people out there and I know that they will be judged accordingly. It’s just very sad that there are innocent people that are suffering in this world because of them. I realize the best thing we can do for the people in those positions is to pray for them.
If you either didn’t believe in hell or were kind of on the fence a little, I’m hoping that I might have shed some light on the why you should believe that there is a hell. I have faith that as long as we live a life as put forth for us by God that we will not be going to hell. I believe that it is our job to make sure that our friends and family believe in this also and do not end up having hell as their final destination.

Bibliography

Blanchard, John, and Donald Carson. "The Nature of Hell." Christianity Today, 2000.
Brow, Robert, and Earle Ellis. "The Nature of Hell." Christianity Today, 2000.
Harmon, Kendall, Peter Head, and Alec Motyer. "The Nature of Hell." Christianity Today, 2000.
Harris, Murray, and Anthony Hoekema. "The Nature of Hell." Christianity Today, 2000.
Lonergan, William I. "Hell -- Fact or Fiction." America, 1996: 36-37.
Lucado, Max. The Inspirational Study Bible. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Word Publishing, 1995.
Mayhue, R.L. "Hell: Never, Forever, or Just for Awhile." Master's Seminary Journal, 1998: 129-145.
Pinnock, Clark H. "The Nature of Hell." Ex auditu, 2004: 47-59.
Quick, Kevin. Reasoning with Jehovah's Witness. www.kevinquick.com/kkministries/books/reasoing/hell.html.
Reagan, David. "The Nature of Hell: An eternal punishment or eternal torment?" Lamb and Lion, 1996.

-----------------------
[1] (Pinnock 2004)
[2] (Lucado 1995)
[3] (Lucado 1995)
[4] (Blanchard and Carson 2000)
[5] (Harris and Hoekema 2000)
[6] (Harmon, Head and Motyer 2000)
[7] (Brow and Ellis 2000)
[8] (Mayhue 1998)
[9] (Lonergan 1996)
[10] (Reagan 1996)
[11] (Reagan 1996)
[12] (Lucado 1995)
[13] (Lucado 1995)
[14] (Quick n.d.)
[15] (Lucado 1995)

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Hell Debate

...THE HELL DEBATE A Paper Presented to Professor Beauchamp of Liberty University Lynchburg, VA BIBL 350 By Gordon C. Wilson December 13, 2012 INTRODUCTION In this paper, I will give a brief overview of the nature of hell, the classical view and the annihilationist view. For the last decade, there has been a significant debate surrounding this very topic within evangelical circle. It is hard to understand how God can let his children be punished in hell, being he is an all-loving God and creator. However, John 3:36 makes it clear for all of us. (He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him)(Dake, Finis).” The Bible teaches that God loves you so much that the Creator of this universe (Jesus Christ) came to "taste death" for every man. Jesus wasn't just some baby for a manger scene. He is God come in the flesh to destroy the power of death and hell--He holds the keys, people! If you say yes to Jesus, hell won't be your final destination. If you say no to Jesus, the lake of fire will be your eternal home. There is no getting out and no comfort--it's everlasting. Regardless of whether you believe it or not, hell exists and the Bible says that it is never full. I've heard folks say that hell is not mentioned in the Bible or that hell is just the grave. Well, let's take a look at what the Authorized King James Bible says. Here are a few scriptures that deal with hell...

Words: 1997 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Hell Debate

...Liberty University Hell Debate: The Classical view and The Annihilationist view of Hell RLGN 335 B08 Professor: Wesley Handy By Tami L Moore October 16, 2015 Jesus, suggest that hell is “outer darkness “beyond heaven because heaven is light “where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” He teaches that many will seek to enter heaven but be shut out (Luke 13:22-30), suggesting that there is no way to escape from hell once there. Throughout life, we have heard plenty of talk about Heaven and Hell. Heaven was for the people that believe in doing well unto God as Christian and lived their lives accordingly to God's Commandments. . And Hell was always known as the place where the devil reside and the place that sinners and evil people that resisted God and refuse to accept God into their hearts and lived in sin, and last judgement is served. Heaven and Hell was spoken of in church, but most Pastor spoke on hell lesser than they did heaven. Sinclair Ferguson expresses how the doctrine of hell should influence one’s preaching. “He says preachers should stress God’s righteousness, the sinfulness of sin, and God’s justice in condemning sin. He adds that expositors should affirm that hell is real, that hell is vividly described in the New Testament, and that hell, though prepared for the devil and his angels, is shared by human beings” (Morgan and Peterson). Many Pastors thought it was easier to reach the people if they talk more on Heaven and...

Words: 2153 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Hell Debate

...Angelology and Satanology Ethical Dualism means that there are two mutual hostile forces of beings in the world, one being the source of all that is good, the other the source of all evil. There were two challenges of Satan that is recorded in Genesis 3 and Matthew 4. There was the temptation of Adam and Eve and also Jesus the son of God. Out of these two challenges the rewards of success would be great for Satan. The results of Eve’s sin were great and gave a big victory for Satan. Satan approached Jesus through the same three avenues of temptation as he approached Eve. (Matt. 4: 3; 5, 6; 8, 9). Satan was unsuccessful this time. God is the only eternal self-existent being that we read about which is represented in the Bible. Satan is not self-existent so he had to have a point of origin. God created Satan as a leading Angel who later wanted to become more powerful than God himself. Satan wanted to be worshipped. When reading the Chapter Ezekiel from the Bible it reveals more about a "king" who is obviously Lucifer. God did not create evil however he does reward and punishes according to our obedience. God created his angels and appointed arch angels who were highest of all angels. Since the arch angel had such high power they believed they could overpower God and went against God. The high power angel thought he could persuade Gods people into his world. Punishment came upon the angel and he was considered a fallen angel (Satan). God is the Father of all spirits including...

Words: 673 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Late Adulthood

...Hell Debate __________________ A Paper Presented to Liberty University __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Theology 350 __________________ by Tirsa Woodson July 3, 2015 The Hell Debate The debate over the nature of hell is one that can bring out the best and the worst in biblical exegesis. Everyone nowadays is concerned about the enemy (Satan) and delete hell existence. The beginning signs that Jesus is coming soon, frightens the human race. We were taught when God returns, it will be judgment day. John reveals this judgement will take pace during the last days, when God will conquer all who have and would defy him and to rescue the righteous. Judgment meant the outcome of an individual, will they go to heaven with God or to hell with the devil. There are many misconceptions about Hell, rather the lost will burn forever or annihilated. Hell is real. Universalism believes everyone will eventually be saved, while Christian believe we all will be judged for the deeds we have done. First, the Annihilationist believe  that the unrighteous will not suffer eternal torment, but that they will, after being justly punished according to their deeds, be annihilated and cease to exist. Also they believe that hell is eternal in consequence, not duration the wicked shall be no more (Boyd & Eddy). Secondly the classical view states that the wicked will be cast into hell that supports the traditional...

Words: 1329 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Theo

...text and interact with theological and exegetical arguments used to support all sides of the issue, but nevertheless come to conclusions based upon the strength of the arguments being studied. In doing research of this kind, you are encouraged to use primary sources written by proponents of the positions being espoused. Do not exclusively use secondary sources that summarize the content of a position. Instead, be sure to use sources that argue in support of a position. The first Theological Research Paper is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 5. The second one is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8. Theological Research Paper 1 Choose one of the following topics: 1. The Charismatic Gifts Debate: Are sign gifts for today or have they ceased? What is the purpose of the sign gifts, and if they are being practiced today, are they being practiced in a biblical manner? 2. The Baptism...

Words: 660 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Theo 350

...text and interact with theological and exegetical arguments used to support all sides of the issue, but nevertheless come to conclusions based upon the strength of the arguments being studied. In doing research of this kind, you are encouraged to use primary sources written by proponents of the positions being espoused. Do not exclusively use secondary sources that summarize the content of a position. Instead, be sure to use sources that argue in support of a position. The first Theological Research Paper is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 5. The second one is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8. Theological Research Paper 1 Choose one of the following topics: 1. The Charismatic Gifts Debate: Are sign gifts for today or have they ceased? What is the purpose of the sign gifts, and if they are being practiced today, are they being practiced in a biblical manner? 2. The Baptism...

Words: 660 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

On the Matter of Hell

...November 2015 The Collective Inferno: A Look into Dante and Others’ Views on Hell Though for some a subject far too heavy to be spoken of but in hushed tones, Hell has been the topic of much debate and speculation by theologians and philosophers, both Christian and otherwise. They have pondered such questions as whether or not hell is a real place, and if so whether it is divided into different sections or if it is one homogenous lake of fire. Even for those who may not believe in Hell, the idea of a place of eternal torment as punishment for ones’ sins is a fascinating one. It causes one to contemplate the nature of sin and humanity, whether some sins are worse than others, and if so, does God punish some more than others. It may be natural for one to feel that some sins are more wicked than others. Thus, it follows reason that some sins require greater punishment. A child who impulsively shoves his sibling may need a quick spanking or time out, while the First Son was condemned to wander the earth in exile. If man was indeed made in God’s image then man must still have some semblance of God’s morality. Turner and Ressler comment on scriptural mentions of Hell and sin: Biblically, there seems to be definite teaching that there are different levels of Hell--at least in the sense that there are various degrees of punishment. The Bible does not specifically mention higher or lower levels of Hell in the location sense, but it does allude to degrees of punishment and sins. ...

Words: 944 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Theological Critique: Four Views on Hell

...UNIVERSITY THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE: FOUR VIEWS ON HELL A THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE SUBMITTED TO DR. ROBERT WETMORE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COURSE THEO 530 LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BY PETER J. FILIPIAK SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................1 CRITICAL INTERACTION...................................................................................2 The Literal View...........................................................................................2 The Metaphorical View................................................................................4 The Purgatorial View....................................................................................5 The Conditional View..................................................................................6 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................7 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................................................................9 Introduction Four Views on Hell is a book edited by William Crockett in which four contributing...

Words: 2461 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Epic of Gilgamesh

...The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Book of Job can be thoroughly analyzed containing many similarities and differences. These two works of literature were written in different time periods. Fiero states that The Epic of Gilgamesh is an epic poem that precedes the Hebrew bible (19), while The Book of Job is religious text that is an actual excerpt from the Hebrew bible. Both originated from the region, Mesopotamia where it was common for people to have negative views on everything and believe that the evil in the world outweighs the good. Utnapishtim in the Epic of Gilgamesh and Job in The Book of Job shows these views in both works. Utnapishtim says to Gilgamesh, “There is no permanence” (Fiero 37). This shows how Utnapishtim believes that good things won’t last forever. God blesses the main characters in both works. Gilgamesh is blessed with a perfect body, beauty, and courage. “Two thirds they made him God and one third man” (Fiero 19). Job was blessed with flocks of animals, a large family, and protected land. Job is said to be “blameless and upright” (Fiero 34). Although blessed both men were pushed to their mental and physical limits to see what they were made of. “Job and Gilgamesh are tested by superhuman forces, and both come to realize that misfortune and suffering are typical of the human condition” (Fiero 37). Gilgamesh is tested when Ishtar, the Goddess of love, takes the life of his companion Enkidu for rejecting her affections for him. “Because I am afraid of death...

Words: 1717 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

None

...Why The Hell Is Spanking Teens Still Allowed In Texas High Schools? * 2 years ago by Lindsay Cross There’s a debate going on at Springtown High School near Fort Worth, Texas. It’s about whether corporal punishment should be conducted by someone the same gender as the offending student. One mother says yes. One school superintendent says no. And I say, “Why the hell are high school students in Texas still being paddled?” Taylor Santos is a respected student and athlete at Springtown High. She let another student copy off of her work, which is obviously a violation of the honor code in every school known to man. As a punishment, Taylor could take two days of in-school suspension, or she could choose to accept a paddling. That’s right, Texas still allows and apparently uses corporal punishment. You know, the practice that you assumed ended a couple decades ago? The form of discipline that’s been denounced over and over again by child psychologists? Yea, that kind of corporal punishment. Santos didn’t want to miss any class serving out her punishment, she so decided to accept the paddling. However, when she talked to her mother about this decision, they both assumed that the spanking would be carried out by a female, as was school district policy. Instead, a male vice principal administered the paddling and Taylor’s behind looked “burned and blistered” according to her mother. That’s when this mom decided to take her issue to the school board, hoping to make sure that males...

Words: 543 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Milton in Paradise Lost

...Milton in Paradise Lost Immediately after the prologue, Milton raises the question of how Adam and Eve’s disobedience occurred and explains that their actions were partly due to a serpent’s deception. This serpent is Satan, and the poem joins him and his followers in Hell, where they have just been cast after being defeated by God in Heaven. Satan lies stunned beside his second-in-command, Beelzebub, in a lake of fire that gives off darkness instead of light. Breaking the awful silence, Satan bemoans their terrible position, but does not repent of his rebellion against God, suggesting that they might gather their forces for another attack. Beelzebub is doubtful; he now believes that God cannot be overpowered. Satan does not fully contradict this assessment, but suggests that they could at least pervert God’s good works to evil purposes. The two devils then rise up and, spreading their wings, fly over to the dry land next to the flaming lake. But they can undertake this action only because God has allowed them to loose their chains. All of the devils were formerly angels who chose to follow Satan in his rebellion, and God still intends to turn their evil deeds toward the good. Once out of the lake, Satan becomes more optimistic about their situation. He calls the rest of the fallen angels, his legions, to join him on land. They immediately obey and, despite their wounds and suffering, fly up to gather on the plain. Milton lists some of the more notable of the angels whose names...

Words: 636 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Obligatory Duty

...righteousness,— be they male or female — and have faith, they will enter Heaven, and not the least injustice will be done to them}* (An-Nisaa' 4:124) To put my answer in a framework, I find it necessary to make the following distinctions, especially in the area of women in Islam. There is a difference between:    1. A ‘popular’ narration and an ‘authentic’ narration.    2. ‘Islam’ and ‘Muslims.’    3. Islamic ‘Shari’ah’ and Islamic ‘madhahib.’    4. The ‘Scriptures’ and the ‘interpretation of the Scriptures.’ First, there are popular narrations that say that ‘most occupiers of hell are women,’ ‘women are deficient in mind and faith,’ ‘women are crooked,’ ‘your bad omen is in your woman,’ and so on. I can tell you with confidence that all these narration are un-authentic (or ‘weak’), whoever the narrator is and wherever they are narrated and written. Without getting ourselves in much debate and discussing who ‘out-narrates’ who, the reason behind the rejection of such narrations is that they are at odds with the Quran.  Let me take one of these narrations and assess its authenticity, as an example. According to Bukhari, Abu Hurairah, narrated: ‘Your bad omen is in your woman, your animal, and your house.’ However, Bukhari also, in the same chapter, narrated that Aisha, the Prophet’s wife, refused Abu Hurairah’s narration and said that the Prophet (peace be upon him) had said, instead: ‘People during the Days of Ignorance (jahiliyya) used to say that bad omens are in women...

Words: 1495 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Democratic Debate Analysis

...All in all the democratic debate was a welcome change of pace from the republican debate. Unlike the republicans, the democrats were reasonable and most could be considered middle ground politics. Also none of the democratic candidates are widely considered to be insane with their politics (i.e Trump and Ted Cruz). Another nice change is how few democrats compared to republicans (5-21) because only one person is going to win the nomination. The real winner of the debate was Hillary Clinton. For months, she’s been flip flopping on a lot of tough (and often pointless) questions (emails, Benghazi, campaign donors) and she didn’t respond in the right way to stop the fire in time. Now at the debate, she proved why she was and probably will be the...

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Destiny of the Unevangelized

...THE DESTINY OF THE UNEVANGELIZED DEBATE PRESENTED TO PROFESSOR OGEDI OMENYINMA FOR THEO 350 – DO4 BY REV. JOSEPH T. WHITAKER, III LU23755920 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY LYNCHBURG VIRGINIA JULY 31, 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 NO OTHER NAME (THE RESTRICTIVE VIEW)---------------------------------------------------- GOD DOES ALL HE CAN DO (THE UNIVERSAL OPPORTUNITY VIEW)------------------- HOPE BEYOND THE GRAVE (THE POSTMORTEM EVANGELISM VIEW)---------------- HE HAS NOT LEFT HIMSELF WITHOUT A WITNESS (THE INCLUSIVE VIEW)--------- CONCLUSION--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BIBLIOGRAPHY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 Introduction The terrible reality of hell and the possibility that human beings can find themselves in that horrific location is a very serious and sobering consideration. An examination of some of the opinions/views will be made in this paper, with special attention given to the authoritative Word of God, as Scripture...

Words: 2936 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

The Vinter Case

...capital punishment debate, the death penalty is predominantly a moral issue. Opponents believe it is inhumane to permanently prevent a murderer from committing the same crime again. But, had Douglas Vinter been sentenced to death, he would not have been released in 2005, and he would not have been able to murder his wife years later. Pro-death penalty supporters believe the painful emotional tolls on the victims’ families are just as evil as allowing the felon to commit another crime. The loss of a loved one leaves permanent scars on the families – many whom live with haunting memories of what could have been. The people who support the death penalty claim that sacrifices must be made in order to protect the greater public from the dangers of convicted criminals, but especially from the heartache they...

Words: 888 - Pages: 4