2AC domestic surveillance
The plan limits the surveillance of domestic communication which the NSA has been collecting “incidentally” via Section 702.
Tushnet, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, 15, (Mark, "The Presidential Empire," Dissent Magazine, Spring 2015, http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/the-presidential-empire, accessed September 11, 2015) JCP-BL

Edward Snowden’s revelations brought home the fact that one of the main tasks of the National Surveillance State is indeed surveillance. Much of what Snowden brought to public attention were modernized versions of classical espionage conducted by U.S. spies outside the United States. That sort of espionage was completely consistent with U.S. law. Technology meant, though, that surveillance outside the United States inevitably included information about activities by U.S. citizens both outside the nation’s borders and within them. The statutes creating the framework for this surveillance have provisions aimed at limiting its domestic use to cases with a substantial connection to international terrorism. But, Snowden showed us, those provisions were not fully effective, and the scale of modern surveillance meant that even reasonably effective protections against domestic surveillance still left large numbers of innocent people subject to it.
Counter-Interpretation – Domestic surveillance deals with information transmitted within a country
HRC 14
(Human Rights Council 2014 IMUNC2014 https://imunc.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/hrc-study-guide.pdf, accessed September 11, 2015) JCP-BL
Domestic surveillance: Involves the monitoring, interception, collection, analysis, use, preservation, retention of, interference with, or access to information that includes, reflects, or arises from or a person’s communications in the past, present or future with or without their consent or choice,