Free Essay

Tlatelolco Massacre

In:

Submitted By raphiki
Words 2204
Pages 9
History 151
28 March 2013
HIST 151: Final Essay

Tlatelolco Massacre

The Tlatelolco massacre was one of Mexico’s worst bloody events. It took place in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas (“Scare of the Three Cultures”) during the afternoon and night of October 2, 1968. Ten days before the Olympic Games, a group of 10,000 students decided to protest against the government’s oppression. Unfortunately the government sent the army to control the event and opened fire on the group of students and killed hundreds of them. All those innocent lives killed ten days before the opening ceremony of the 1968 Summer Olympic Games made a lot of noise in Mexico but also in the whole world. At that time, the Mexican propaganda controlled the media and let the citizens know that the group of students was hostile to the army, which explained the actions of the president and therefor the soldiers. The official paperwork was only available to the public in 2000. These documents got Gustavo Diaz Ordaz and Luis Echeverria, the Mexican president and his interior minister at that time in a lot of trouble, not only after the massacre but also after the publication of the government’s documents.

The book I chose is Massacre in Mexico (“La Noche de Tlatelolco”) written by Elena Poniatowska. The book takes place in Mexico City during the year of 1968. During this period, Mexico has many political repressions. At this time it is also a year of searching and aspirations by students and the labor sector as well. This book is a collection of testimonies about the student massacre that occurred on October 2nd, 1968. It relates the thoughts and the feeling of the people in favor of the student movement but also the point of view of couple of people against the strikers. It also talks about the reasons of the rebellion, the life of citizens after the event, and gives us the antecedents and the consequences of the strike. All those comments were listed by chronological order from the day the massacre occurred and during the two following years. The president Luis Echeverria, Secretary of the Interior during the slaughter of 1968, literary prize awarded to Elena Poniatowska (Villaurrutia Xavier prize) in 1971 by “La noche de Tlatelolco.” But she refused, saying who would reward the dead. In 1979 she received the National Journalism Award. She was the first woman who was awarded this distinction, and the only writer who has won the award Mazatlan twice.

The Tlatelolco massacre took place in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas (“Scare of the Three Cultures”: it was called like that in order to recall the three periods during Mexican history – pre-Columbian, Spanish colonial and the independent “mestizo” nation) during the afternoon and night of October 2, 1968. A group of students took the an opportunity before the Olympic Games in Mexico City by going into the streets of down town Mexico and protesting unarmed and peacefully. Unfortunately the government sent the army to control the event. Sadly, under the Mexican president’s order, the soldiers opened fire on the group of students and killed hundreds of them. Not only students were the targets of the bullets but also civilians, protesters and Mexicans employees. All the innocent lives killed ten days before the opening ceremony of the 1968 Summer Olympic Games made a lot of noise in Mexico, but also world wide. At that time, the Mexican propaganda controlled the media and let the citizens know that the group of students was hostile to the army. That explained the actions of the president and therefor the soldiers. The official orders and paperwork was only available to the public in 2000. Those reports opened the country’s eyes on the real facts of the event. Snipers employed, military special surrounding techniques, eyewitnesses’ feedbacks, evidences of deaths, and 1,345 people were arrested. Gustavo Diaz Ordaz and Luis Echeverria the Mexican president and his interior minister at that time got in a lot of trouble not only after the massacre but also after the publication of the government’s documents.
The questions we can ask ourselves are: How did everything start? Was there any background? What really happened?
In 1968, the president Gustavo Diaz Ordaz and its government invested 150 million dollars (approximately $7.5 billion in today’s terms) in order to organize the Olympic Games in Mexico City. “On October 12, 1968, Mexico became the first country to broadcast the Olympic Games live and in color throughout the world. It was an opportunity for government officials and television executives to beam the country’s modern and economically successful face into the homes of viewers across the globe.” Students of 70 different institutions created the National Strike Council during the summer 1968. The CHN was a democratic delegation that promoted social, educational and political reforms. “1968 was, of course, the year of student discontent in Europe, in Paris, Prague, Berlin, London, and when there was student action in Mexico many thought it was part of the continuing theme.” In fact, in 1968, the world saw many student movements explode in France, Germany, Italy, Czechoslovakia, Argentina, Japan and United States. The assault on Vocational School#5 on July 23, 1968 made the students’ organizations mad. The police entered the school in order to arrest street gangs that had enrolled in the school. The granaderos (riot police controlled by the government) assaulted many students as well as teachers. The students created brigadas (brigades); this was the first form of resistance shown by the youth population. Also, couple of weeks before the sad event of Octubre 2, The Mexican police was present at a football game in high school. The game ended up with a massive fight. Sadly the police officers started beating the students up in order to stop the fight. They might have won a battle this day, but they did not know that they did not know that they did not win the war. Many other actions occurred after that to complain about the government violence and violation of the universities’ rights (National Autonomous University of Mexico and National Polytechnic Institut.)
The background of the situation helps us understand the reasons why this massacre occurred. The tensions between students and the Mexican police transformed the Tlatelolco strike into the Tlatelolco massacre. We are now asking ourselves what happened? What really happened?
On October 2nd, 1968 more than 10,000 students gathered in the Tlatelolco residential area in order to protest peacefully against the lack of freedom offered by their government. “By the time the first speaker began it was estimated that nearly 10,000 people were packed into that square, which gave the operation a huge lift. One of the speakers had just started delivering his message when a green Very light soared up behind the Foreign Office block; it caused immediate agitation in the square below and tension on my balcony. My interpreter went white and said, ‘we must leave, it’s the military’”. The army was sent by the government to control the group of protestors. “Gunfire erupted in the plaza around 6 p.m., and several hours later, hundreds of students and neighbors had been slain and thou- sands had been rounded up and detained at Military Camp Number One.” The president Gustavo Diaz Ordaz ordered his troops to open the fire on the young and unarmed citizens. The propaganda of the Mexican government controlled the media and announced that the group of students (infiltrate by communist forces) opened the fire first on the Mexican soldiers therefor they had to fire back to protect themselves. “The exact number of people killed in the massacre has not yet been determined, but forensic anthropologists who continue to attempt to identify the remains of victims found near the massacre site claim it is ‘highly probable’ that close to 500 people died in the conflict. Thousands were injured including Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci—and police detained another 2,000 in Military Camp Number One.”
President Gustavo Diaz Ordaz announced three days before the Olympic Games that “all the eyes of the world would be on Mexico in 1968 and that he hoped Mexicans would respond to their responsibilities in providing a warm and dignified reception for all visitors.” The whole world may have their eyes opened on the athletic event, but not eyes saw what happened during this day. This is why we are asking ourselves: What really happened?
It was only in 2000 that the government in the person of President Vicente Fox decided to make public the official documents. After all those years, view proofs have shown in the one they had, they accounted three to four civilians hurt, eyewitness saw hundreds of bodies being taken away by the military forces. Approximately 385 people died however they only found 40-documented deaths. Information was very hard to find because medias did not talk a lot about it, they did mention it in a couple of television broadcast but did not focus on in and go deeply into the subject. The story that has been told after the massacre is the following. Some special forces infiltrated the students’ group. They did set snipers on roofs and made the rest of the country believe that the students had snipers shooting on the police forces. Also in the middle of the crowd, some Mexican police officers wore one white glove so they would be able to recognize themselves. “On the third floor balcony, the student leaders take cover. ‘We went toward the elevators and there we ran into the men with white gloves.’ They encounter en wearing white gloves on their left hands. “They yelled: Get back! Get down! Get down motherf*****s’ we’re gonna kill you! Then they dragged us downstairs and handed us to the army. Hands against the wall, they made us pull down our pants.’” It was only on September 20th, 2005 that the successor of Gustavo Diaz Ordaz, Luis Echeverria (interior minister at the time) was charged in front of the Justice of genocide. The case lasted until 2006 when he got accused and was imprisoned. Finally on March 26th, 2009 Luis Echeverria got out of prison on the order of the Federal Court.

To sum up, the Tlatelolco massacre is a proof that back when it occurred, the Mexican government, by trying to be seen as a new and strong country, did appear as the opposite they were looking forward to. Such genocide should take place especially when the strikers are protesting peacefully and without any weapons. It also should take place before some athletic event against young students that yell in the street in order to make their future simply better via education. I also wanted to add that this event meant a lot to me as a student athlete. This is the reason why I decided to talk about this subject. However the fact that Justice has been made (even couple of years later) is the main idea we would like to remember about this butchery. We also want to remember all those souls and bodies that passed away for a good reason on this Plaza de las Tres Culturas.

Sources:

* Poniatowska, Elena. Massacre in Mexico / Elena Poniatowska ; translated from the Spanish by Helen R. Lane. New York: Viking Press, 1975

* Henry Giniger. "Hundreds Seized in Mexico Clashes." New York Times. September 23, 1968.

* Celeste González de Bustamante, “Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos: 1968 Olympic Dreams and Tlatelolco Nightmares: Imagining and Imaging Modernity on Television,” University of Arizona, (2010): 1-30.

* Werner, Michael S., ed. Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society & Culture. Vol. 2 Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1997.

* John Rodda, “‘Prensa, Prensa’: A Journalist’s Reflections on Mexico ’68,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, March 2010, 1.

* “Masacre en Tlatelolco, 2 De octubre 1968” Youtube, Published on May 26, 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw2KsKXrF5o

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Poniatowska, Elena. Massacre in Mexico / Elena Poniatowska ; translated from the Spanish by Helen R. Lane. New York: Viking Press, 1975
[ 2 ]. Henry Giniger. "Hundreds Seized in Mexico Clashes." New York Times. September 23, 1968.
[ 3 ]. Celeste González de Bustamante, “Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos: 1968 Olympic Dreams and Tlatelolco Nightmares: Imagining and Imaging Modernity on Television,” University of Arizona, (2010): 1-30.
[ 4 ]. Werner, Michael S., ed. Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society & Culture. Vol. 2 Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1997.
[ 5 ]. John Rodda, “‘Prensa, Prensa’: A Journalist’s Reflections on Mexico ’68,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, March 2010, 1.
[ 6 ]. John Rodda, “‘Prensa, Prensa’: A Journalist’s Reflections on Mexico ’68,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, March 2010, 1.
[ 7 ]. Celeste González de Bustamante, “Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos: 1968 Olympic Dreams and Tlatelolco Nightmares: Imagining and Imaging Modernity on Television,” University of Arizona, (2010): 1-30.
[ 8 ]. Celeste González de Bustamante, “Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos: 1968 Olympic Dreams and Tlatelolco Nightmares: Imagining and Imaging Modernity on Television,” University of Arizona, (2010): 1-30.
[ 9 ]. Celeste González de Bustamante, “Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos: 1968 Olympic Dreams and Tlatelolco Nightmares: Imagining and Imaging Modernity on Television,” University of Arizona, (2010): 1-30.
[ 10 ]. “Masacre en Tlatelolco, 2 De octubre 1968”, Youtube, Published on May 26, 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw2KsKXrF5o

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Massacre of Tlatelolco

...been suppressing the people far too much and it was a matter of time before these tensions blew. The events that took place as a result, in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas was to protest government actions and “It was in this vacuum, that the students injected their demands, aspirations, and desires that were not exclusively of their interest, but also of interest of the campesinos, workers, intellectuals and political parties” (Carey p.29). In order to better understand what happened that day in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas I will be providing background as to what led to the protest, the ideologies, the strategies and forms of organization in the movement as well as a summary of what happened that day known as the Tlatelolco Massacre. The Tlatelolco Massacre took place on October 2, 1968 in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas in Mexico City. A student movement arose here as a reaction to violent repression and dissatisfaction with the regime of the PRI. A peaceful demonstration organized by the Consejo Nacional de Huelga (CNH) was orchestrated in which over 10,000 university and high school students gathered together with support from independent labor unions, farmers and locals alike. The idea behind the movement was to promote social, educational, political reforms and justice. With the 1968 summer Olympics approaching the CNH saw this as an opportunity to harness the attention and make their demonstrations gain publicity of the injustice of the Mexican government. Among some...

Words: 1194 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Hotel Rwanda

...watching the movie; then, rewrite your notes into complete sentences that answer these questions: 1. What role did Tatiana Rusesabagina play in shaping Paul’s actions? 2. Who else influenced Paul’s decisions? 3. How did Paul’s definition of family expand to include the community later on in the film? 4. How and why does Paul’s attitude change over the course of the movie? 5. How would you characterize his level of personal responsibility and investment as events unfolded? 6. How would you describe Paul’s level of empowerment throughout the movie? Explain. Homework for next class: On a separate piece of paper write a paragraph where you explain how the colonization of Rwanda by the Belgians connects to the massacre and the conditions of the people today. You may use details from the movie, the timeline, and outside research to compose your answer. I expect that you use three examples to support your ideas. _____/15 NAME: ______________________________ Hotel Rwanda Movie Assignment Answer these questions on a separate piece of paper while watching the movie. First, take notes while watching the movie; then, rewrite your notes into complete sentences that answer these questions: 1. What role did Tatiana Rusesabagina play in shaping Paul’s actions? 2. Who else influenced Paul’s decisions? 3. How did Paul’s definition of family expand to include the community later on in the film? 4. How and why does Paul’s attitude...

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Modern Technology

...tasks faster and more convenient. For example, a student spend less time searching information and documents by clicking mouse on google rather than is stuck with many books in library. A business man can deal with his job by using laptop and internet whereas he can still enjoy holiday with his family. Nevertheless, for every solution technology provides twice as many problems are likely to cause. The modern technology is to some extent underlying causes of negative things in our society. It's Internet that provides an accessible medium for bad elements such as pornography, crimes and so on. the teenagers who are not conscious enough tend to imitate the sexual and violence clips and images on internet. A typical example of this is the massacre in an American school. A pupil killed his classmates by his father 's gun simply because he only acted as a clip he saw. Moreover, the average rate of girls who are pregnant is very soon because of sexual images 's influence. Modern technology is the key element for the change of lifestyle loosing...

Words: 398 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Alfonso García Robles 

...Alfonso García Robles  Fue un político y diplomático mexicano, premio Nobel de la Paz en 1982  Nació el 20 de marzo de 1911 en Zamora, Michoacán.  Licenciado en Derecho por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, con estudios de posgrado en el Instituto de Altos Estudios Internacionales de la Universidad de París (1936) y en la academia de Derecho Internacional de La Haya (Holanda).  Fue embajador desde 1957. Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores (1975-1976) y embajador ante las Naciones Unidas (ONU) desde 1970 hasta 1975, fue el artífice de la Comisión preparatoria para la desnuclearización de América Latina (1964) y del Tratado de Tlatelolco  (1967) que prohibió las armas nucleares en toda la región. Participante activo en el Comité de Desarme de Ginebra (1977-1981), presidió el Grupo de los 77 países en vías de desarrollo.  Por su destacada actividad en favor del pacifismo, el 13 de octubre de 1982 fue distinguido con el PremioNobel de la Paz, compartiendo galardón con la política y diplomática sueca Alva Myrdal.  Es autor de numerosas obras de política internacional, entre otras: El mundo de la posguerra (1946), La desnuclearización de América Latina (1965), México en las Naciones Unidas (1970), La asamblea general del desarme (1979) y El nuevo orden internacional y el desarme (1982).  En 1972 ingresó en El Colegio Nacional.  Alfonso García Robles falleció en Ciudad de México el 2 de septiembre de 1991.  Cargos Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores ...

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Boston Massacre

...The Boston Massacre happened in March 5, 1770 during the evening. In the Boston Massacre, British soldiers killed five inhabitants and wounded six inhabitants. Captain Thomas Preston was responsible for the British soldiers which killed five inhabitants. Whether Captain Thomas Preston gave the order “fire” or not is a controversial issue. Although there are lots of witnesses who argued they were sure that he gave the order, there were also lots of witnesses who argued they were sure that he was not gave the “fire” order. Although the evidences not give us a certain idea that Captain Thomas Preston was guilty or not, because the evidences are controversial, evidences strongly suggest that he was not guilty, he presumably did not give the order “fire”. During the 1760s and the first days of the 1770s the tension in the Boston was high because of the Stamp Act and the other new taxes which were going to be applied, known as “Townshend Duties”. “… men such as Samuel Adams were encouraging their fellow Bostonians to be even bolder in their remonstrance.”(Wheeler, Becker & Glover, 84). Because of the inhabitant’s uneasy, the British government ordered some regiments of soldiers in Boston. However, bringing soldiers in the Boston did not bring the peace in the Boston; instead it increased the tension which was already ready to increase. The disputes between the soldiers and inhabitants started slowly, but by bid. There was a reaction to the soldiers as well as to the British sympathizer...

Words: 1610 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Boston Massacre

...The Boston Massacre was an event, which led to the death of five colonists after British soldiers when ordered to fire upon them on March 5th, 1770. Much controversy surrounds the incident, as there seems to be a few different stories of what truly happened. Regardless, many people believe the Boston Massacre was the spark that ignited the Revolutionary War. My efforts will be focused on figuring our what really happened, and what events caused the British officers to shoot into the crowd of colonists. The incident took place on King Street (which is now called State Street today), on an early morning on the 5th of March in front of the British Sentry called Private Hugh White. Edward Gerrish, an apprentice of a wigmakers, began yelling at a British officer, lieutenant John Goldfinch for an unpaid bill. Gerrish left, but eventually came back hours later and began throwing rocks at the lieutenant. Soon, many colonists joined in and threw rocks themselves. At this point, Goldfinch had reached his boiling point, and challenged Gerrish before striking him with his musket. As the evening progressed, the crowd outside the sentry grew larger and larger and continued to harass the British officers. Meanwhile, Captain Thomas Preston overlooked the entire situation as it escalated. He immediately ordered 8 soldiers to help control the situation before it got out of hand. As the soldiers approached, with muskets loaded, the crowd of nearly 400 began to surround the outnumbered officers...

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Analysis Essay Unit 8

...The Attica Prison riot occurred on September 8, 1971 at the Attica Correctional Facility in Attica, New York. Prisoners started the riot due to demands for better living conditions as well as responding to the death of a black radical activist prisoner who had been shot to death by corrections officers in California's San Quentin Prison in August 1971. About 2,200 inmates rebelled and seized control of the prison, taking 33 staff hostage. Prison officials continued negotiations with the inmates for 4 days. The prisoners continued to unsuccessfully negotiate with Correctional Services Commissioner Russell G. Oswald and then later with a team of observers that included Tom Wicker, an editor of the New York Times, James Ingram of the Michigan Chronicle, state senator John Dunne, state representative Arthur Eve, civil rights lawyer William Kunstler, Minister Louis Farrakhan, National Representative of the Nation of Islam and others. (The Attica Uprising, 2013) Authorities finally agreed to 28 of the prisoners' demands, however they would not agree to complete amnesty from criminal prosecution for the prison takeover or for the removal of Attica's superintendent. Finally the Governor Nelson Rockefeller ordered state police to overtake the prison and take back control. As a result of this tactic at least 39 people were dead, including ten correctional officers and civilian employees. (The Attica Uprising, 2013) On September 5, 1972, eight members of the Palestinian terrorist...

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

My Dog

...The 1972 Summer Olympic were supposed to be a new beginning. Germany had a dream to show the world a new face of optimism at the XX Olympic Games in Munich. After the reign of Hitler, Germany wanted the world to know that the country turned a new leaf. The dream instead turned into a nightmare filled with tragedy and chaos. Eleven Israeli Olympic team members were killed by Arab terrorists. As the Summer Olympics were occurring, eight Palestinian terrorists passed security with ease. The group of terrorists went to an Olympic Village where the Israeli Olympiads were staying and took them hostage. Eleven Israelites were taken hostage by eight Arab terrorists. All of this was on live television and the world was in terror. The peaceful Olympics which put the nations at peace, turned into a negotiation between terrorists. “We have learned to be on guard for this kind of thing almost all the time, but not here-not with all the nations gathered in peace, with all the talk about sportsmanship and freedom.” Said Asher Mashia, an Israeli student. A series of bullets and gunfire quickly put an end to that sort of talk. This event created a new organized terror from their attack. After three hundred German policemen surrounded the building, the long wait began. Later, the leader of the group threw out a poster that listed their demands. The demand was the release of two hundred Palestinian guerrillas who were imprisoned in Israel and safe passage to the Arab world. If the demands were...

Words: 675 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Effects of Boston Masacre

...“What was the Cause and effect of the Boston Massacre?” History IB HL Year 1 Internal Assessment Word Count: 1625 Table of Contents Cover sheet……………………………………………………………………………………………...Pg1 Table of contents……………………………………………………………………………………..Pg2 Plan of investigation………………………………………………………………………………..Pg3 Summary of Evidence.……………………………………………………………………………..Pg3-5 Evaluation of Sources……………………………………………………………………………...Pg5-6 Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………..Pg6- 8 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………Pg8 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………………………….Pg9 A. Plan of Investigation The purpose of this paper is to answer the question, “what was the cause and effect of the Boston Massacre?” The body of the summary of evidence will investigate the people of the Boston Massacre. The summary of evidence will also investigate some of the lead up to the massacre. Documents will be analyzed to find causes and the build up to the Boston Massacre. The looking at a primary source and secondary sources will be heavily used. This paper will include the effects of the Boston Massacre such as the propaganda used to over exaggerate the Boston Massacre. In the documents being scoped at in this paper there will be the effects of the Boston Massacre such as The Committee of Correspondence and the 1773 Tea Act. While focusing on these aspects we analyze them into further investigation. B. Summary of Evidence The colonists were angering King George III, so...

Words: 1873 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Boston Mmassacre

...The Boston Massacre The Boston Massacre played a big role during the 1770’s by serving as an anti-British propaganda to enrage citizens and have the responsibility to eventually rise up and start the Revolutionary War. Citizens knew that they had the right to be free, but were growing angry because the British Parliament were raising taxes and placing taxes on them for more things. Without the Boston Massacre tensions leading up to war, and our freedom may not have happened at all. Since 1765, the people of Boston had been heading protests against British taxation: the Stamp Act then the Townshend Act. In 1767, The British Parliament passed the Townshend Act, enraging colonists. Citizens believed that the British didn’t have the right to tax them because they did not elect their representatives in Parliament. Only the Massachusetts Assembly, whose members were elected every year, had the right to levy taxes on its citizens. The Townshend Acts imposed duties on glass, lead, paints, paper and tea imported into the colonies. Townshend hoped the acts would defray imperial expenses in the colonies, but many Americans viewed the taxation as an abuse of power, resulting in the passage of agreements to limit imports from Britain. The East India Company was on the verge of collapse and Parliament hoped to boost the company's bottom line by allowing them to sell tea more cheaply to the colonists. Also, Boston was occupied by British soldiers in October, 1768 to help protect customs...

Words: 856 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Uxt Task 1

...I chose to study and analyze J.M.W. Turner’s Slave Ship for this project and found it to be very interesting. Immediately while looking at the piece you get a strong sense of emotion and drama that is being portrayed. There is a lot of depth and warmth in the colors that are used and wide swift brush strokes to create the images. The first image that caught my eye was of waves crashing on the left side of the painting. The white tips of the waves are very noticeable against the softer shades of the ocean. Behind the waves is a ship which is the next part of the painting that drew my attention. The ship seems to be caught in the rough waves of the sea and barely able to keep afloat. There is a glimmer of light from the sun peeking through and then what appears to be objects floating in the water. Without knowing the title of the painting I probably would not have known what these objects were but because the piece is title Slave Ship that leads me to believe that the images in the ocean are supposed to be humans, or slaves, that either fell out of the boat during the rough waves or tried to escape and swim away from the ship. The most interesting part of the painting is how the artist is able to seamlessly mold all of the images and emotions into one. It almost looks as though the piece was made in one continuous motion. The strokes and the colors used create a very powerful image and create a dramatic reaction for the viewer. This particular work of art by J.M.W. Turner was...

Words: 728 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Crispus Attucks Research Paper

...A young man, unafraid of consequences, will end up being the first civilian shot and killed during the Boston Massacre, as well as the first casualty of the American Revolution. After British control over the colonies tightened, tensions escalated and Crispus Attucks found himself to be one of the few to be directly affected by this worsening situation. Attucks was a rope maker and seaman along with many others and lived with the constant threat of being forced into the British navy. On March 2 in 1770 a fight erupted between three British soldiers and a group of rope makers, which set the stage for a future confrontation and sparked the result of the Boston Massacre. Three days later a fight broke out again when a British soldier entered a...

Words: 782 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Boston Massacre Essay

...The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. The event took place on King Street, Massachusetts. During this event, the British soldiers ruthlessly murdered five innocent civilians and injured six others. The growing tension between the colonists and the British soldiers was a direct result of the Townshend Acts of 1768. The continuous rivalry between the two progressed into a violent memory in American history. The British soldiers that participated in the Boston Massacre should have been sent to prison because they took it upon themselves to open fire against civilians rather than reason with the defenseless colonists. Therefore the soldiers’ barbaric actions cannot be justified. The British soldiers that took arms against the civilians...

Words: 1171 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Massacre: The Boston Massacre

...The Boston Massacre was the name given to the day when the British Army Soldiers killed five civilians and wounded six others. This event happened on March 5, 1770. The critical incident contributed to the downfall of the British regime. This all began after the death of an eleven-year-old boy, Christopher Snyder. Ebenezer Richardson fired at Snyder because the boy and a few others were harassing and tormenting him. The fact that the people believed Richardson would be brought to justice during the court session halted everyone’s plans for retaliation. The Bostonians anger was also fueled by the possible threat of cutting down the “liberty tree.” The British soldiers took position outside a building reassuring that no violence was to occur. Not long after, a mob of civilians stumbled upon them and began calling the soldiers harsh names, throwing snowballs and other objects at them, and treating them with great disrespect. A civilian then threw a club which hit a British soldier causing him to fall to the ground. As he was falling the soldiers gun discharged and moments later the other soldiers began firing their weapon as well. Once again, as the smoke cleared the soldiers could see five civilians dead and other fleeing that have been wounded. The soldiers that committed the crime were sure to be punished, but at the first court trails they were found not guilty. The case was then taken into the hands of the English; there the accused soldiers were found guilty and harshly punished...

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Rape Of Nanking Research Paper

...surrendered. 90,000 soldiers had surrendered, Japanese saw surrendering as a sign of cowardice and a violation of military honor. The Japanese then viewed the POWs as less than human and unworthy of life. (Source 1) Safety zone opened november 1937. December 1st the chinese government abandoned Nanking. International committee was left in charge. Western businessmen, missionaries and the international committee attempted to set up refugee camps for nanking cities. (Source ) The massacre extended into January 1938. Japanese soldiers continued the killing and harsh treatment of POWs and civilians of Nanking. The killing lasted over a period of 6 weeks. 20,000-80,000 women were raped. Imperial Japanese brutally murdered civilians and POWs. Killings lasted until the first week of February . (Source 5) Puppet government was installed which would rule nanking until of WWll. The genocidal rampage ended and was replaced by the “Nanking self-government committee”. The massacre had been disputed and exploited for propaganda. Purpose for propaganda was for historical revisionist, apologist, and Japanese nationalist. Some claim the number of deaths had been inflated. Others denied it happened. (Source 7) People returned to the city and the population grew. 700,000 ⅔ of the prewar population. In August 1945 Japan surrendered to the US and other allies. In 1945-1946 war crime trials were held in Nanjing. Tanio Haiso the commander was sentenced to death...

Words: 1008 - Pages: 5