Free Essay

Trial Analysis

In:

Submitted By cdalli29
Words 706
Pages 3
The procedures that are followed in the criminal trials today have been carefully fine tuned throughout history. The consistent set of procedures is followed by both the federal and state governments and is designed to provide a fair trial for the defendant. Procedure begins with the opening statements and ends with a verdict. In this paper, those procedures and all the ones that fall in between will be discussed.
Opening statements begins a trial and are given to the jury and judge by attorneys for both sides of the case. Starting with the prosecuting attorney, an explanation of the case as well as a summary of what the attorney is asking for the jury to decide is given. Once the prosecution has made their statement, the defense attorney is permitted to give their opening statement, however the defense attorney may request to hold their opening statement until the beginning of the defense case.
Once the opening statement has been made, the prosecution begins to present their case. This is where the prosecution calls forth any witnesses they may have to provide testimony for the case. Anyone involved in the arrest, interrogation, or investigation of the crime as well as any witnesses to the crime, may be called to testify. Throughout the testimonies evidence is permitted to be admitted to the court to further help the case. The defense is the allowed to cross examine each witness so that they may try to discredit any statements given that may help to prove the prosecution’s case.
After the prosecution has presented its case, the defense attorney may now begin to present their case to the judge and jury. Just like the prosecution, the defense brings in any witnesses or experts to provide testimony along with evidence that will help to prove their case. Once the defense has

presented their case the prosecution is given the chance to cross examine the witnesses to try and discredit testimony.
Both cases have now been presented to the judge and jury and if the judge sees it fit a redirection and recall is issued. This allows for either counsel to recall a witness after cross examination for further questioning. This can be used to verify previous testimony that had been given or to persist for more information that could be critical to either case that had not yet been divulged.
When there are no more questions and no further evidence to be submitted by either counsel, closing arguments are given. Again, the prosecution goes first summarizing their case and reminding the judge and jury of all the important facts and evidence that have been brought to their attention during the trial. This is the last chance the counsel is given to persuade the jury to agree with their case. After the prosecution gives their closing statements the defense follows with the same procedure.
The next step in the trial is when the judge gives detailed instructions to the jury in regards to the case and what they should be deciding. This is called the charge to the jury. The jury is then dismissed from the court room and escorted to a private area where they review and discuss the case and eventually come to a conclusion. When deliberation is complete the court reconvenes and the jury presents the judge and counsel with their verdict. Judgment is then made by the court. The court can agree with the verdict, dismiss the case, or permit a new trial. If the court concurs with the jury then sentencing is given and the defendant escorted out of the court or the judge will set another date for sentencing and the court is dismissed. If the defense counsel so chooses they may file for an appeal.

Criminal trials are very complex and it is important that no steps are missed and that every attention to detail is made. Counsel should be sure that they are clear and concise in explaining the trial and the procedures it will follow to their client so that everyone involved is aware of what is going on in each step. Pretrial and post trials are also very important in the outcome of a criminal trial and should not be taken lightly.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

My Jouror's Trial Analysis

...The voir dire process is important within our judicial system as it promotes an ideology that both the American people and government hope to sustain—that being the concept of a fair, unbiased system in which all citizens are treated according to precedent and laws as opposed to biases, whether illicit or not. As noticed within the simulation, many jurors had biases that would have significantly impacted the trial. My own assigned juror had known the defendant and had previous tensions with them. While this bias may not always appear in court, my juror had a predetermined idea to use this time on the jury to “get back” at the defendant rather than viewing the case with an unbiased eye. Of course, this would have ended badly for the defendant,...

Words: 768 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Selection, Trials and Constitutional Rights The jury selection process is a significant portion of the trial process. Jury selection ensures that courts maintain proper Due Process and comply with constitutional guidelines. Furthermore, it gives lawyers the ability to evaluate the people in the jury and determine how they would feel about the case. The trial process branches out into six steps: jury selection, opening statements, presentation of evidence, closing arguments, charging of the jury and deliberation of jury. Throughout the process of jury selection, potential jury is based on a process names an voir dire; otherwise known as committing to telling the truth. During voir dire, potential jurors are included in the case or eliminated from the jury. Potential jurors are required to answer a series of questions concerning their personal bias regarding the case. The series of questions help determine if any of the potential jurors have had previous exposure to the context of the case, or a personal connection to the actual trial. If a lawyer can conclude based on the questioning, that the juror may be biased, they have the ability to challenge their position on the jury. Voir dire will be further examined in order to discuss how an unbiased jury is prepared for a trial. The following step once the jury is selected is the opening statements. The prosecution and the defense each have an opportunity to present their case to the jury. Although, no...

Words: 930 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Scopes Trial Analysis

...nation’s first law that made it punishable by law to teach evolution. The ACLU, which only formed five years prior was determined to defend any teacher willing to challenge this law; Such a teacher, was a young Biologist at Dayton High School, John T. Scopes who agreed to be tried for violating the Butler Act and was charged. The ACLU, for all its efforts, at the time had little success, took the case and hired Clarence Darrow, a famous trial lawyer of the era, to defend Scopes in, The State of Tennessee v John Thomas Scopes, commonly referred to, as The Scopes Trial. The prosecution countered with, Christian fundamentalist, William Jennings Bryan, who proposed that only creationism should be taught in school....

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Salem Witch Trial Analysis

...In the case of Thomas Brown and the Salem Witch Trial is viewed legally because of the of the laws that were required of the process. The whole outcome of the trial is politically legal due to the adultery, lying, heresy and going against the government. In The General Law and Liberties Concerning the Inhabitants of the Massachusetts section of Adultery, it says, “If any person commit ADULTERY with a married or espoused wife”. This connects to John Proctor who was not religious as the community after Mr. Hale question him. Mr. Proctor repeat “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image” and forgetting adultery. This is suspicious since the fundamental principle of the Massachusetts was based on the word of God. This is also ironic since Mr.Proctor had an affair with Abigail Williams; “you loved me then and you do now”(15). This proves that many don’t confess to their wrong doing just to avoid to punishment....

Words: 558 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Character Analysis: The Salem Witch Trials

...The forces at work in the Salem Witch Trials are the forces of greed, vengeance, fear and lies. The reason that these things are at work in Salem is because every person in the play that is not accused is after something. Mr. Putnam and Mr. Parris are filled with greed. Abigail is filled with vengeance. The whole town is filled with fear. Abigail and the girls are filled with lies. First, Mr. Putnam is one of the people who accuses others most because he wants more land and if he accuses people and they confess then he can have their land. He accuses George Jacobs because he is his neighbor and he wishes to have Jacobs’ land. Mr. Parris desires to have power over the town and to be rich. Signs of this are that he replaced the candlesticks...

Words: 762 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Analysis Of The Trial Of God By Elie Wiesel

...In the book The Trial of God written by Elie Wiesel, an Innkeeper by the name of Berish and his daughter Hanna are the last 2 surviving Jewish people in Shamgorod Ukraine after a pogrom occurred. Three Jewish minstrels unintentionally end up in Shamgorod during Purim, offending Berish greatly, but after coming to an agreement Berish allows the three minstrels to stay free of charge in an exchange for performances from the three men for himself and Maria, a Christian waitress at his inn. After much conversation while trying to find a topic for the minstrels to perform they decide to put God on trial. The three minstrels were to be judges, Berish requested to be the prosecutor, and Maria the audience or the people. The minstrels have asked Berish several times about what happened...

Words: 433 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Elizabeth Proctor Second Trial Analysis

...Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are gathered here to decide the fate of Elizabeth Proctor. I will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you must find her innocent of all charges of witchcraft. During this trial, the prosecution will present evidence which I hope you will find to be said with ulterior motives. There have been many people accused of the act of witchcraft in the past couple of days; however, there is no real evidence supporting this accusation. It has been stated that Reverend Parris was the one who caught multiple people dancing naked in the forest, the very virgin forest where Salem villagers believed was the Devil’s place and home. This is supposed to make us all believe that there were acts of witchery. Ever since several women were caught dallying in the forest, more than two...

Words: 1087 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Salem Witch Trials Dbq Analysis

...What Caused the Salem Witch Trial Hysteria of 1692? In the year of 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts, the devil took the souls of weak-willed people, which were wizards and witches. This event was called the Salem Witch Trials, which consisted of numerous people allegedly practicing witchcraft. To prevent the witchcraft they hunted and tried the accused. The punishment for practicing witchcraft was death. Every historian had a different thought on what caused the event. Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum suggested that the most reliable form of evidence was supernatural strengths, weaknesses or unusual physical characteristics. The Salem Witch Trial Hysteria of 1692 was caused by Puritans belief of the devil, Bridget Bishop spreading the practice of witchcraft to others, and Cotton Mather’s story of the sermon and manuscript. One cause of the witch trial...

Words: 522 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Trial Analysis CJA/364 October 13, 2013 This paper will be about Jury Trial Analysis. I will give a analysis in which the paper I will identify and discuss the steps in a jury trial. In the paper analysis it will be quite clear or the assess the constitutional trial rights that are enacted during a jury trial, as well as examine and discuss the selection of a fair and unbiased jury. In any criminal cases or a case that requires a jury; jurors are selected for a courtroom from the pool of available jurors. This is called Selection of jury, which is the first step in a jury trial. The judge and attorneys question the jurors in a process called voir dire, which means “to speak the truth”. This determines if any juror has a personal in the case, a prejudice or bias that wrongly influences the him or her as a juror. The attorneys may challenge some jurors and ask the court to excuse them from that particular trial. There are two types of challenges that attorneys uses during questions for a selection for a potential juror. The challenges are, challenge for cause and peremptory challenge. Peremptory challenges are limited in number and challenges for cause have an unlimited number. The second step is, the opening statements. This is when the attorney of plaintiff and the attorney for the defense outline the proof to be presented to the jury during the trial. Opening statement are not evidence, only expectations of what each attorney expects the evidence to prove. ...

Words: 773 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Trial Analysis Jaynice Harden March 16, 2015 CJA/364 Criminal Procedure Shane Krauser Jury Trial Analysis In today’s society, there are many people who know what a jury trial is and what is expected in the process of a jury trial. They may also know why the process is important and very necessary as it protects the citizens of the United States. The part that some people may not know about is the process that is taken during the pre-trial phase. Any and every individual that has been accused of wrong doing have the right to a fair trial. In addition, everyone has the right to an attorney to help then fight and understand the legal side of the defense. A jury trial can consists of 12 adjudicators which as selected at random that will take all information into consideration and decide upon the facts of the civil or criminal case. Criminal cases are more serious than civil cases. “In this case, serious offense refers to offense carrying a punishment of over six months (Gaines & Miller,2011). A jury trial consists of six steps that must be followed in order to ensure a fair trial. The prosecution as well as the defense is very needing of these steps in the criminal justice system. If it should happen to be a violent crime then a fair and impartial jury would have to be the ones to give the prosecution the verdict. However, if it turns out that the accused is not guilty then the accused have the right to due process and a fair trial. A jury trial is very important...

Words: 1560 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Trial Analysis The jury selection process is a significant portion of the trial process. Jury selection ensures that courts maintain proper Due Process and comply with constitutional guidelines. Furthermore, it gives lawyers the ability to evaluate the people in the jury and determine how they would feel about the case. The trial process branches out into six steps: jury selection, opening statements, presentation of evidence, closing arguments, charging of the jury and deliberation of jury. Throughout the process of jury selection, potential jury is based on a process names an voir dire; otherwise known as committing to telling the truth. During voir dire, potential jurors are included in the case or eliminated from the jury. Potential jurors are required to answer a series of questions concerning their personal bias regarding the case. The series of questions help determine if any of the potential jurors have had previous exposure to the context of the case, or a personal connection to the actual trial. If a lawyer can conclude based on the questioning, that the juror may be biased, they have the ability to challenge their position on the jury. Voir dire will be further examined in order to discuss how an unbiased jury is prepared for a trial. Normally twelve jurors are than selected with two being selected as alternates. Both sides of counsel (Defense and Prosecution) are given the chance to question or challenge each juror before their acceptance or rejection as potential...

Words: 900 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Trial Analysis CJA/364 Jury Trial Analysis In the United States citizens are given certain rights when they are accused of a crime and are facing a trial. They have the right to a speedy trial, this it to avoid a person being charged with a crime them spending a prolonged period incarcerated prior to conviction. They have the right to an impartial jury. Jurors are interviewed by both the prosecution and the defense to endure that the defendant is not known to them and that if the potential jurors do have any knowledge of the crime, gained via the media or sources other than personal knowledge. Defendants are also entitled to an impartial judge. Judges are held to a higher standard that than of people in other jobs. They are required to put aside personal opinions and make decisions based solely on the facts as they are presented in court. The Right to a Speedy Trial The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a person accused of a crime the right to a speedy trial. The Founding Father of the United States added this amendment to the Constitution for two reasons, ("The Free Dictionary", 2014). First they wanted to prevent those accused but not yet convicted of crimes from spending a long period of time incarcerated when they have not been found guilty of it yet. The second reason was the fear that if the trial was delayed the memories of witness could fade, witnesses themselves could disappear, and evidence could be lost. While both...

Words: 1282 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Trial Analysis Alex G Neville CJA/364 11/30/2014 Jonathan Sperling Jury Trial Analysis The process of the courtroom trial serves as the backbone of the criminal justice system. With its various processes and integral steps to ensure that justice is carried out and the truth is finally founded in an open courtroom. It is also pivotal to the maintenance of the order and structure of not only the criminal justice system, but society itself. Opening Statements Opening statements are an introductory statement made by attorneys for each side at the start of a trial. The statement while not mandatory is seldom waived, due to its invaluable opportunity to provide an overview of the case to the jury and to explain the anticipated proof that will be presented during the trial. It is also an excellent opportunity to also gain a foothold within the jury to either establish the defendant’s guilt or innocence, or to establish reasonable doubt within the minds of the jury. Presentation of the Case Witness Examination is the process the immediately follows the opening statement. The prosecutor begins examination of their witnesses. This is the prosecutor’s, initial step in attempting to prove its case. The amount of time during this process varies greatly. During this the prosecution can introduce evidence from the crime scene. Following the prosecutions examination of its witnesses, the defense has the opportunity to cross examine or question the same witness. The...

Words: 695 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Individual Jury Trial Analysis Brad Phillips October 16, 2013 In the United States criminal justice system, there is a process that must be followed in order to not only charge a person with an offense or crime but also in order to submit that person to a criminal court trial. When an individual is charged with a crime there are steps that a law enforcement officer must take in order to make a legal arrest but the process does not end at that point as there is also significant steps that must be taken before a jury trial begins. Each of these steps is significant and vital to the criminal justice system as they each protect against corruption, abuse and violation of individual rights. After examining each step on its own merit it is much easier to observe how each of these steps plays its role apart and in relation to the other steps in the process. The first step in the jury trial process is the act of initiating a trial. This is the step in the process wherein a hearing is held to determine the specifics of the trial. The judge will determine if the defendant is competent to stand trial and also rule on any pretrial motions that have been made. In addition, if the trial is taking place in a state that has Grand Jury requirements, it is during this phase that the Grand Jury meets to decide on evidence and if there is sufficient justification for the trial to continue. The second step in a jury trial is the selection of the jurors. This is not always the next...

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Nuremberg Trial Analysis

...investigated. No one, obviously, had been so luxurious as to anticipate that forceful war will be exorcized by a trial. The trust appeared to be that the judgment of animosity would chomp into the way of life, influence general conclusion, and oblige animosity by governments due to sympathy toward local and remote feedback or assents against a culpable country, and in addition person discipline. However, the essentialness of those contemplations for molding official choices about hostility particularly by totalitarian governments-was a long way from clear. In any occasion, after Nuremberg, there were forceful wars, for instance, in Korea, Afghanistan, and the Persian Bay wars for which no person discipline was even tried to be forced. Nuremberg may, obviously, have held the number down and was summoned to legitimize and arrange resistance to the Korean and Inlet hostilities. The frequency of hostility has been high enough to bring up issues about Nuremberg's hindrance impact addresses that are honed by the challenges of upholding its banishments. Moreover, it is doubtful that once a forceful war breaks out, an attacker's apprehension of discipline may urge...

Words: 2181 - Pages: 9