...SOC 205 Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial https://homeworklance.com/downloads/soc-205-case-study-1-understanding-the-court-system/ For More Information Visit Our Website ( https://homeworklance.com/ ) Email us At: Support@homeworklance.com or lancehomework@gmail.com Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System Due Week 3 and worth 200 points The U.S. Court System is a complex system that includes both federal and state-level courts. The federal system includes the judicial branch of the government. This system is designed to help society interpret the U.S. Constitution and provide guidelines for society. Court cases may concern many different topics and have an unlimited number of outcomes. Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research a civil or criminal court case in which you are interested. Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you: 1. Summarize the seminal facts of the case that you chose. 2. Explain the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose. 3. Describe the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described. 4. Explain whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and include any related jurisdictional requirements. Explain the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system. 5. Summarize the outcome of the case, and indicate whether the judge or...
Words: 486 - Pages: 2
...SOC 205 Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial https://homeworklance.com/downloads/soc-205-case-study-1-understanding-the-court-system/ For More Information Visit Our Website ( https://homeworklance.com/ ) Email us At: Support@homeworklance.com or lancehomework@gmail.com Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System Due Week 3 and worth 200 points The U.S. Court System is a complex system that includes both federal and state-level courts. The federal system includes the judicial branch of the government. This system is designed to help society interpret the U.S. Constitution and provide guidelines for society. Court cases may concern many different topics and have an unlimited number of outcomes. Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research a civil or criminal court case in which you are interested. Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you: 1. Summarize the seminal facts of the case that you chose. 2. Explain the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose. 3. Describe the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described. 4. Explain whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and include any related jurisdictional requirements. Explain the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system. 5. Summarize the outcome of the case, and indicate whether the judge or jury...
Words: 486 - Pages: 2
...SOC 205 Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial https://homeworklance.com/downloads/soc-205-case-study-1-understanding-the-court-system/ For More Information Visit Our Website ( https://homeworklance.com/ ) Email us At: Support@homeworklance.com or lancehomework@gmail.com Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System Due Week 3 and worth 200 points The U.S. Court System is a complex system that includes both federal and state-level courts. The federal system includes the judicial branch of the government. This system is designed to help society interpret the U.S. Constitution and provide guidelines for society. Court cases may concern many different topics and have an unlimited number of outcomes. Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research a civil or criminal court case in which you are interested. Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you: 1. Summarize the seminal facts of the case that you chose. 2. Explain the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose. 3. Describe the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described. 4. Explain whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and include any related jurisdictional requirements. Explain the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system. 5. Summarize the outcome of the case, and indicate whether the judge or jury...
Words: 486 - Pages: 2
...Learning about the major sub-systems within the criminal justice system has taught me a lot about how it relates to the Biblical principles that we utilized every week in our lessons. Fisher tells us that the “importance of the covenant is the sharing of the power” (2016). The sharing of the power is how law enforcement agencies enforce the law. Everyone has the shared power to make sure citizens are being protected. The law enforcement sub-system consists of the county law enforcement, state law enforcement, municipal law enforcement, and the federal law enforcement. “Altogether, tens of thousands of law enforcement officers at the federal, state, county, and municipal levels protect life and property and serve their respective publics”...
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
...MGT 434 Week One The Legal environment of employment Introduction This week you will begin the exploration of the legal environment in which the employment relationship functions. This exploration will include a look at how our federal system of government works relative to the passage of statutes, and how federal and state jurisdictions relate to one another, thereby determining which statutory system applies to which circumstances. Additionally, the relationship of statutes, regulations, and court case law will be analyzed to understand the manner in which they work together to define our laws. There will also be a review of the regulatory and civil litigation processes to ascertain how an employment grievance, such as discrimination, is handled within our legal system. Week in Relation to the Course Employment laws are promulgated by legislative and regulatory action and court rulings with the intent to provide equitable workplace opportunities for employees, as well as a productive, safe and healthy work environment. This course covers the laws that are in place in our society that attempt to accomplish this purpose, and the implications of these laws for both employers and employees. Obviously, for laws or regulations to accomplish this objective, they must be enforceable. While this is elementary, and generally understood by members of our society, the manner of enforcement is not as readily understood. And, the manner in which the laws and regulations are created,...
Words: 2059 - Pages: 9
...Specialized Courts, also known as problem solving courts, are a useful part of the criminal justice system. These types of courts originated when the increasing progression from a rehabilitative system to the “tough on crime” perspective. Specialized courts are used to focus on a specific group of offenders instead of the entire group of offenders for a more individualized approach to each case. This is important to ensure that offenders receive the proper penalties and are able to access the tools necessary for reintegration into society. Specialized courts are specific courts which include offenses such as domestic violence, driving while intoxicated, mental health, and juvenile courts. The creation of problem solving courts help to improve the processing of the court systems by having alternative methods for each type of offense. Doing so, there is a better understanding of the rule of law, penalties, and other factors associated with types of offenders. This understanding is necessary to assist first time offenders, and help to rehabilitate repeat offenders. Without these courts, offenders would be faced with an impersonal court system creating multiple frustrations between the offender and the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is often faced with a large number of cases and issues...
Words: 404 - Pages: 2
...Introduction Many people have argued that crimes committed by juveniles should not be tried in adult court. Such arguments have been made on the perception that during the time of the crime, the juvenile was not in a position to clearly understand what the crime entailed. Nonetheless, while this might be true according to those that argue in favor of juveniles being tried in juvenile courts, a hidden reality exists that the social issue behind certain crimes are much more complicated than the allegations made pertaining to juvenile courts and certain crimes. When allegations such as “the juvenile was raised knowing that his behavior was acceptable” are being employed to reason for the juvenile being tried in a juvenile court (even when crimes of homicide are committed) then those who commit capital crimes ought to be penalized by the law as written by the law. Under this presumption alone, anyone who commits capital crime is subject to the penalties of the law. This creates the reasons as to why juveniles should be treated as adults in homicide cases. Research findings by Fox, J....
Words: 1638 - Pages: 7
...It is the same type of system with federal and state laws and rules. This paper will compare and contrast those types of laws. According to Halbert & Halbert (2012) we can identify its (laws) purposes: law both sets behavioral standards and sets up a system for compliance with them. By following this theory business, state, and federal laws monitor all behavior set within an organization. There has to be an understanding of law by learning it, common knowledge, upbringing, and from society as a whole understanding the consequences of its actions. State and Federal courts have very different structures. According to "United States Courts" (2014), " The state court system use the Constitution and laws of each state to establish the state court with the Supreme Court being the highest court, state courts have courts that handle specific matters, if a decision is made and the parties are dissatisfied they may take their case to the Court of Appeals, parties have the option to ask the highest state court to hear the case, only certain cases are eligible for review by U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Court System invest the judicial power of the United States in the federal court meaning it specifically creates the U.S. Supreme Court and gives Congress the authority to create the lower federal courts. Congress has used this power to establish the 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals, the 94 U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and the U.S. Court of International Trade...
Words: 758 - Pages: 4
...Constitution. In fact, the Constitution, can and will, take precedent over any state law. The State of New Jersey has one of the simplest court systems in the nation, with only a few basic types of courts. The court systems are the municipal courts, tax court, state superior court, an Appellate Division, and the New Jersey Supreme Court. Most citizens will come in contact with only the municipal courts, which deal with motor vehicle violations, minor criminal-type offenses, municipal ordinance offenses, and other minor offenses. The tax courts deal with exactly that, appeals of tax decisions made by County Boards of Taxation. The superior courts work with cases that involve criminal, civil, and family law cases. Typically, the superior court is called trial court, because it is the court system where trials are conducted. The appellate division is the court system that hear appeals from the tax courts and trial courts. Lastly, the New Jersey Supreme Court is the highest appellate court,, and reviews cases from all of the lower courts (New Jersey Judiciary, 2015). The court system in the State of New Jersey is vastly different when compared to the Federal court system. While the state court system works with most criminal cases, contract cases, and family cases, the federal court system works in a different way. The federal court system...
Words: 950 - Pages: 4
...is that there may not be a thorough understanding of expectations that both parties have of the other. International law is very broad and must also take into consideration any religious and diplomatic factors. Resolving legal disputes in international transactions can be challenging because even though international courts have been established, the jurisdiction of these courts can be difficult to define. Each country has their own legal systems in place, and this will also be considered in resolving disputes. Some of the practical considerations that need to be thought through when taking legal action against a foreign business partner based in another country include understanding any treaties that are in place, as well as the international organizations that could apply, such as the World Trade Organization, The International Monetary Fund, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. An understanding of local laws and customs is necessary. It is important to consider putting arbitration agreements in place beforehand. Factors that could work against CadMex and their decision to grant sublicensing agreements would include the possibility that if a dispute arises, the country of Candore is not currently a signatory to any of the “major international trade conventions,” (Contemporary Business Law I , 2014). The Candorean government cannot be subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. courts, and the Candorean courts are quite inexperienced in handling...
Words: 484 - Pages: 2
...Through Zehr’s definition we can see the main pillars of Restorative Justice. Shannon looks at both the retributive criminal justice system and the restorative justice approach to her situation. In her book Shannon states that Zehr looks at the criminal justice system through these main questions, what law was broken, who did it, what punishment does he or she deserve. Restorative justice changes the perspective and asks these questions, who was hurt, what are their needs and who obligation is it to address those needs. Essentially, we see here how Shannon’s situation, and those involved, focused more on the retributive approach compared to the restorative approach. Shannon received no help from the criminal justice system, they did not view her as a victim, and instead she was stigmatized and forced into difficult situations. Restorative justice recognizes that crime is a violation and these violations create obligations. In Shannon’s situation, the system failed to recognize the violation and obligations that occurred to...
Words: 1453 - Pages: 6
...the U.S Court Systems CJA/490 University of Phoenix When the English were colonizing North America, they brought with them their laws. Being from the British Common Law system, the settlers understood how that system worked, so they modeled their own government using Common Law. In the 18th century, when the Union was formed and the colonies became states, they kept their Common Law governments. However, the Articles of Confederation set forth to establish one supreme court, being the federal court. Article III of the U.S. Constitution states: 'The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.' As a result of the Constitution and the forming of the Federal Court, the powers were divided between the state and central government. There are fifty-one separate systems of courts, one for each state and another for the federal government. Hence the term “dual court system”. The federal court system includes: the U.S. Supreme Court; the U.S. courts of appeal; the U.S. district court; and courts of special jurisdiction. The U.S. Supreme Court, established in 1789, is the highest judicial body and final court of appeal in the United States. Its nine members include one chief justice and eight associate justices who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court is responsible...
Words: 1286 - Pages: 6
...2012 Assessment Report 2012 Legal Studies GA 3: Written examination GENERAL COMMENTS The 2012 Legal Studies examination was challenging for many students. Many common misunderstandings about various aspects of the legal system were evident in responses to the examination. Few students were able to demonstrate knowledge of a directions hearing. Incorrect cases were used as examples of the High Court protecting rights. In Question 3a. few students correctly identified that the Court of Appeal was higher than the Supreme Court (Trial Division) in the court hierarchy. Many students had a limited understanding of the operation of section 109 of the Constitution and struggled to provide a thorough response to Question 3b. Students should become familiar with the study design throughout the year. Students are expected to demonstrate the ability to discuss, explain and evaluate. Students’ ability to evaluate requires more attention. Students should not rely on rote-learned or pre-prepared answers as they will rarely address the question. Time management was an issue in this examination, with many students writing lengthy responses to questions that only required a shorter response, therefore not allowing enough time for longer questions. A shorter question that asks for an outline (for example, Question 1a.) requires no more than one or two sentences in response. Good examination technique is essential and students should practise their technique throughout the year. If students continue...
Words: 9474 - Pages: 38
...What is the dual court system? What is the reasoning behind having a dual court system in the United States? What would happen if there was not a dual court system in the United States? A dual court system is separate from the state court system and federal court system, the state deals with criminal and civil cases. Whereas the federal court may hear criminal and civil cases that are associated to the federal constitution. The reason is because years earlier the central government was very weak and states government was powerful. America has 50, court state systems due to the need for each state to retain significant authority and judicial it’s separate from the federal court system. Whereas state court evolved from early colonial arrangements, federal courts where created by the United States constitutions (Schmalleger F, 2009). There is a need for greater legitimacy a national policy mediates identities in ways that enrich and provide a understandings of constitutional. Dual court system is impacted by history due to the concept of two court systems still in force. Changes have been made to the each individual court record to ensue the record runs smooth, just like models adopted by state court systems. It may help if United State adopted a new court system that could handle all criminal court cases, or a new system that could handle certain court cases. The federal court judges could also hear traffic court cases. The state and federal court systems work side by side, it...
Words: 281 - Pages: 2
...The Warren Court left an unprecedented legacy of judicial activism in the area of civil rights law as well as in the area of civil liberties—specifically, the rights of the accused as addressed in Amendments 4 through 8. In the period from 1961 to 1969, the Warren Court examined almost every aspect of the criminal justice system in the United States, using the 14th Amendment to extend constitutional protections to all courts in every State. This process became known as the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights. During those years, cases concerning the right to legal counsel, confessions, searches, and the treatment of juvenile criminals all appeared on the Court's docket. The Warren Court's began with the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which was the first of several significant cases that re-evaluated the role of the 14th Amendment as it applied to state judicial systems. In a 6-3 decision, the Court overturne the conviction, and five justices found that the States were bound to exclude evidence seized in violation of the 4th Amendment. The 4th Amendment sets the standards for searches and seizures by law enforcement officials in the United States, the Court noted, and the 14th Amendment requires judges to uphold those standards in every State. Evidence gained by an illegal search became inadmissible in State courts as a result of the decision. The “Mapp Rule” has since been modified, so the exclusionary rule is no longer as absolute as when first handed down in Mapp. Critics of...
Words: 2336 - Pages: 10
