Premium Essay

Violation Of Speech

Submitted By
Words 627
Pages 3
Dating all the way back too 399 BC when Socrates was executed for drawing people from religion, censorship has been a controversial topic. By definition of Ms. Collingwood, censorship is the suppression of speech or the destruction of communications that are deemed harmful or inappropriate. This suppression of speech and destruction of communications violates the first amendment right granted to American citizens by the Constitution because it restricts what we can read, write, hear, and say. For example, China has huge restrictions on every little thing they can do and they’re completely oblivious to the world outside of their country. Common people have no communication with anyone outside of China because of the restrictions on phones and internet usage, which makes citizens unexposed and vulnerable to be hurt. “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us.” (William O. Douglas, Supreme Court Justice). In this quote, Mr, Douglas is clearly on the side against censorship because it violates free speech. Without freedom of speech and press, in the sense that censorship is taking these rights away, people will be uneducated about what goes on in the world around them. Just because some people can not handle certain content, that does not mean …show more content…
It should be left in the hands of the parents or guardians of children and in the hands of adults for themselves. For example, say a book with a very powerful lesson in a sophomore class was challenged at a school for “inappropriate content”, such as violence, sexual acts, or use of foul language. When in reality, these kids hear and see worse things going on in their school or town every single day. Since the book was challenged, those kids could potentially never learn the lesson in that book that could have helped them in the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Speech: Human Rights Violations in India

...Speech: Human Rights Violations in India One third of the world’s child brides originate from India; whose journalists are continuously shut down for revealing their political opinions. India’s culture has been having arranged underage marriage for many centuries, “Child marriage, which has existed for centuries, is a complex issue, rooted deeply in gender inequality, tradition and poverty” according to an article published by UNICEF. In an article published by the Library of Congress Jeanine Cali writes, during the 19th century, Britain placed a sedition law in its colonies of India; today, that law is being used to deny Indian citizens their freedom of speech and opinion. In India, underage and forced marriage and the freedom of expression of opinion are ongoing human rights abuses; they violate articles 16 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, also known as UDHR. Currently, in India, children of young ages are being forced into illegal marriages which all violate Article 16 of the UDHR. “Because the wedding was illegal and a secret, except to the invited guests, and because marriage rites in Rajasthan are often conducted late at night, it was well into the afternoon before the three girl brides in this dry farm settlement in the north of India began to prepare themselves for their sacred vows” (Gorney). Gorney explains that the three weddings were to occur during the night as all of the marriages were illegal under Indian marriage laws. Although underage,...

Words: 768 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gender

...Intentional Violation of Cooperative Principle In Zhao Benshan’s Xiaopin Introduction Zhao Benshan is one of the most famous xiaopin performance artists in China. Some viewers titled him as “King of Xiaopin”. His performances are usually the most expected ones in Spring Festival Gala for the past 20 years. Hilarious lines from his shows seldom fail to catch on in China among both younger generation and senior citizens, both on the internet and in daily life. Some of Zhao’s expressions like 忽悠,得瑟 are even added into the sixth edition of Modern Chinese Dictionary. The popularity of Zhao Benshan and his xiaopin in China is a linguistic phenomenon worth noticing. This paper takes Zhao Benshan’s 2009 xiaopin Money Is Not A Problem (不差钱) as an example, which is regarded as one of his most successful work, and mainly explores the intentional violation of cooperative principle that contributes to the comic effect of Zhao’s xiaopin. It is analyzed from four respects, violation of quality maxim, violation of quantity maxim, violation of relation maxim and violation of manner maxim. Key Words Zhao Benshan, xiaopin, cooperative principle, conversational implicature According to Girce, all the speech acts have certain specific purposes. In order to achieve the purposes, both the speaker and the hearer are expected to obey some basic rules, which is called Cooperative Principle (CP). CP requires what participators of speech acts say contributes to the achievement...

Words: 1356 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

A Stand for Womens Rights

...Nicole Ferguson Professor Delli Santi English 112 22 February 2015 “A Stand for Women’s Rights Around the Globe” Women’s rights are no longer a major topic within the United States, but many countries still refuse to acknowledge the rights of women. On September 5, 1995, Hillary Clinton addressed the distinguished delegates and guests of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women with a heartfelt speech requesting the silence of women in many countries to be heard. The words and tone of Clinton’s speech reached out to the audience to take a stand against the violation of women’s rights. Hillary Clinton is known by many as a true women’s activist. The quest for women’s rights came long before Clinton’s political career. Clinton had dreamed of becoming an astronaut in her early years, but those dreams were crushed after gaining the knowledge that women were not accepted into the NASA program (Hillary). Clinton obtained her degree from Yale Law School in 1969, and immediately pursued a career in politics. Hillary assisted Bill Clinton in managing his campaign for a congressional seat in 1974, and they later married in 1975 (Hillary). Clinton was awarded numerous awards, including Young Mother of the Year and Woman of the Year, during her husband’s time as governor in Arkansas. These awards and the role she played in her husbands’ career had left Clinton with a high reputation in Arkansas. She was known as “one of the state’s most powerful political figures and a...

Words: 896 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Discuss Some of the Ways That Participants in a Conversation Are Sensitive to Others Needs

...that participants in a conversation are sensitive to others needs There are two theories in spoken language that explain how speech in conversations changes due different factors. Some of these factors include; professional status, regional background, and age. These theories are the accommodation theory and the co-operative principle. The accommodation theory was developed by Howard Giles in the 1970’s. He had the theory we change our speech depending on the conversational needs of the person we are talking to. This either leads to divergence, people’s speech moving apart, or convergence, moving our speech closer to the other person’s style. Furthermore, convergence has the effect of decreasing the social distance between speakers which includes downwards convergence which is moving away from Received Pronunciation. A situation where this would take place could be talking to a friend or relative with a strong regional accent. This contrasts with upwards convergence where a person moves closer to Received Pronunciation. A situation in which this could occur could be when talking to a boss or someone with higher status. Mutual convergence is when both the participants move towards each other’s speech styles which tends to happen when both the speakers like each other. Divergence has the effect of emphasising the differences between two people’s speech styles such as a teacher asserting their authority with a class of students. The co-operative principle was created by H.P Grice...

Words: 504 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Hillary Clinton Speech

...Hillary Clinton Speech - Women's Rights are Human Rights The Hillary Clinton Speech featured is in the form of a transcript, extract, passages or lines from the Hillary Clinton Speech . The Hillary Clinton Speech demonstrates good oratory skills, a great public speaker with the ability to use clear words and text. Speech Example Topic / Subject Type: Persuasive, Inspirational / Inspiring Speech. Hillary Clinton Speech Women's Rights are Human Rights Women's Rights Are Human Rights Famous Speech by Hillary Clinton Beijing, China: 5 September 1995 Mrs. Mongella, Under Secretary Kittani, distinguished delegates and guests:  I would like to thank the Secretary General of the United Nations for inviting me to be part of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. This is truly a celebration - a celebration of the contributions women make in every aspect of life: in the home, on the job, in their communities, as mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, learners, workers, citizens and leaders.  It is also a coming together, much the way women come together every day in every country.  We come together in fields and in factories. In village markets and supermarkets. In living rooms and board rooms.  Whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concerns. And time and again, our talk turns to our children and our families...

Words: 2660 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Freedom of Speech

...Freedom of Speech, Hate Speech, & Talk Radio Brice Hinchman Freedom of Speech, Hate Speech, & Talk Radio What is Freedom of speech? Well, the definition for freedom of speech is the ability to speak freely without being subject to censorship or without fear of retaliation from a governing body. There are at least two documents, the US Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that acknowledge that free speech is an unalienable right and protect it for all. There is another form of speech that may or may not be protected, depending on the circumstances, under the same documents and that is hate speech. Some of the limitations that are put in place by Government, employers, and educational facilities are a violation of what freedom of speech is really about, being able to freely speak your mind, but are necessary to protect the rights and liberties of other individuals. The freedom of speech is a very powerful right that is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Our Founding Fathers set the stage when they wrote the Declaration of Independence by stating that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” (Choices, 81). One of these liberties and unalienable rights was the Freedom of speech. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was ratified...

Words: 2457 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Charles Schenck's Violations Of Espionage And Sedition Acts

...Charles Schenck's arrest violated his unalienable rights given to him by the U.S. Constitution. The charges confronting Charles Schenck of his supposed violations of Espionage and Sedition Acts should not be validated. Charles Schenck was the General Secretary of the Socialists party of America who had distributed 15,000 leaflets opposing the United States mandatory drafting process, arguing that it was immoral. The government argued that it was a clear violation of the Espionage and Sedition Acts of June 15, 1917. However, the Espionage and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional and a violation of the First Amendment. The Espionage and Sedition Acts shouldn’t prohibit Schencks right to free speech. In the “Supreme Court Majority Opinion: Schenck...

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Acceptance Speech

...II PreAP/Block 7 14 May 2018 Rhetorical Analysis;“Elie Wiesel’s Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize” Author and human rights activist Elie Wiesel, in his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, discusses the nature of human injustice and its impact on his life and humanity as a whole. He adopts a forthright and heartfelt tone throughout his speech in order to gain support from his audience. Wiesel's purpose is to convince the audience to unite against injustice and human rights violations. In the beginning of the speech, Wiesel’s intention is to remind the audience of the scale and inhumanity of the Jewish genocide and to establish his own personal experiences with it. When presented with the Nobel Peace Prize, Wiesel asks a hypophora “do I have the right to accept this great honor on their behalf? I do not”. He includes this in order to establish a sense of humility with his audience so the case he presents is much more convincing to them. This...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Of Haley's Speech

...council, Ambassador Nikki Haley entices the audience in her speech outlining the US’ plans on handling foreign relations and human-rights violations. Through her paralleled structure and detailed imagery, Haley softens the hearts of her audience in order to inspire faith in her claims and trust in the policies that she and the council...

Words: 1082 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The United States Constitution vs the Patriot Act

...created in response, and passed with the aim of battling terrorism. However there are always two sides to any passing of a political law: those who support it and those who oppose it. Those who support the Patriot Act have consistently countered that the provisions of the Act are necessary to protect the people from future terrorist attacks, and that the law does an adequate job of protecting individual civil liberties; while those who oppose it argue that the Act is an egregious assault on individual liberties as it violates their constitutional rights. The hypothesis of this paper is to dissect and analyze Sections of the Patriot Act to see if they are in violation of the United States Constitution.  Specifically the paper will analyze Sections 505, 215 of the Patriot Act to see if they violate the Constitution. The first violation in question comes from Section 505 of the Patriot Act. Section 505 expands the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the FBI’s authority to issue National Security Letters or NSLs demanding customer records from various public establishments. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (2011), an organization dedicated to the protection of the constitutional rights of the people, “The National Security Letter provision of the...

Words: 1895 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Civil Liberties and the Book Matched

...agents from searching us or our property without "probable cause" to believe that we have committed a crime. Other amendments protect our freedom to make certain decisions about our bodies and our private lives without interference from the government - which includes the public schools.” These rights are very important to citizens in society. Without these rights, each citizen will be suppressed and violated. The rights of the individual should always be upheld. We obviously have far more rights to privacy than the citizens in the book "Matched" by Allie Condie. In the book Matched by Allie Condie, the citizens are forced to contend with a lack of privacy in their society. This lack of privacy is dangerous to society because of certain violations that this can bring; such as inference of the government in our daily lives and restriction of the fundamental rights that we are entitled to. In the book Matched, the government keeps an eye on every citizen. This constant surveillance is evidence of the lack of privacy going on in their society. The issue of lack of privacy is a major one in the story, and it was an issue that America has had to deal with. I cite the Patriot Act as an example. The purpose of this act was to “deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.” “The Patriot Act allowed federal agents to monitor electronic communications, which includes wireless phones, email...

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Essay

...is the state of being subject only to laws established for the good of the community, especially with regard to freedom of action and speech.” Hence in simple form we can say civil liberty is the freedom or rights we got since we are born. 1 Civil liberties may include freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly right to fair trial etc. To talk about civil rights, Oxford Dictionary defined,...

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gooding V Wilson Case Brief Summary

...Fulton County, Georgia on two counts of using “fighting” and abusive language in violation of a Georgia statute through the state court. The defendant appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Supreme Court of Georgia rejected Wilson’s appeal and retained the conviction. Defendant then took his case to the federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia were his conviction was appealed and the U.S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit confirmed his appeal. SUBSTANTIVE FACTS In Georgia, the defended picketed his way into a United States Army induction ceremony in efforts to protest his opposition of the Vietnam War. Once inductees started to come through, the defendant was involved in a small fight in which he committed assault and battery against police officers along with the use of abusive language towards them. The defendant was charged with two counts of using “fighting” and abusive language as it is in violation of a Georgia statute which makes it a misdemeanor to use “opprobrious words or abusive language, tending to cause a breach of peace” in the presence of someone else. The defendant sought to engage in an appeal as he felt this statute was in violation of his rights protected by the First and Fourteen Amendment of the United States. ISSUES...

Words: 633 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Burn

...Nneka Osuagwu American Government August 13, 2014 Burn, Baby, Burnnnn I don’t believe flag-burning is a violation of any law, and correlates with the first amendment. The first amendment states that congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of a religion, abridging the right to freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of people to assemble and petition against the government. The Flag Protection Act was created in opposition to the first amendment, and violated our rights. The destruction of the flag is not to soil the good name of our nation, but to protest certain government policies. Some Americans may feel that flag-burning is disrespectful not only towards our country, but directly to them. They may start to feel offended, but the government cannot prohibit the expression of ideas or freedom of speech just because the ideas are a bit offensive. The first amendment clearly states that congress shall make no law abridging the right to freedom of speech or press. The government cannot diminish our rights the moment we do something they do not like. The amendments were created in order to guarantee basic rights to all Americans, rights that the government cannot take from us. The Flag Protection Act was created in order to strip us from one of our rights, which is very unconstitutional. The destruction of the flag by citizens of America is not done to tarnish the name of our country or to offend other citizens, it’s done to protest certain government...

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Summary Of Benjamin Gitlow's Supreme Court Case

...It was passed on December 15, 1791. Initially, the first amendment only applied to laws promulgated by the National Assembly. Start Gitlow v. New York, the Supreme Court has used the First Amendment to the states and other Court. Benjamin Gitlow used his freedom of speech to publish a "Left Wing Manifesto" against the New York government. In the trial, Gitlow argued that the Manifesto was only historical analysis and he had no intention of opposing the Government. The court has to consider whether it is possible to consider a change to the state law on the grounds that it violates the federal constitution, especially violations of the law. Gitlow and New York have partially reversed and started a reversal trend almost completely. The Supreme Court now holds that most provisions should apply to both the federal and state governments to avoid unnecessary hassle. The court used the doctrine described for the first time in Gitlow in other cases and created a certain...

Words: 966 - Pages: 4