...contribution of Social Action Theories to our understanding of society today? There are some many structural theories put across in today’s society which can be interpreted in many different levels. Structural theories such as Functionalism and Marxism have more of a positivist approach to how they see societies values as they are macro level which means they view society as a real physical thing out there which initially shapes our ideas and behaviour, and they also put the meaning across how to understand people’s behaviour we must first properly understand the social structure that shapes it to what it is today. Moreover, unlike structural theories which are put across, action theories also bring to the understanding as they are micro level which can be seen as a voluntaristic approach which focuses on the actions and sometimes interactions of individuals as having free will and personal choice. Weber also argues the point how our actions are not determined by society as structural theories specify how we possess agency and so therefore we can shape society through our choices, meanings and actions put forward. Overall the main critical four actions theories which evaluate our understanding in terms of society today, is Weber’s social action, ethnomethodology, phenomenology and symbolic interactionism. However all these actions specifically differ in how far they see structural explanations of behavior in the everyday surroundings. Firstly, the main famous action put across...
Words: 964 - Pages: 4
...Social action theories are known as micro theories which take a bottom-up approach to studying society; they look at how individuals within society interact with each other. There are many forms of social action theories, the main ones being symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and ethnomethodology. They are all based on the work of Max Weber, a sociologist, who acknowledged that structural factors can shape our behaviour but individuals do have reasons for their actions. He used this to explain why people behave in the way in which they do within society. Weber saw four types of actions which are commonly committed within society; rational, this includes logical plans which are used to achieve goals, traditional-customary behaviour, this is behaviour which is traditional and has always been done; he also saw affectual actions, this includes an emotion associated with an action and value-rational actions, this is behaviour which is seen as logical by an individual. Weber’s discovery of these actions can therefore be seen as useful in the study of society. Weber discovered these actions by using his concept of verstehan, a deeper understanding. However, some sociologists have criticised him as they argue that verstehan cannot be accomplished as it is not possible to see thing in the way that others see them, leaving sociologists to question whether Weber’s social action theory is useful in the study of society. Social action theories have also been referred to as interactionism...
Words: 759 - Pages: 4
...Action Theories - Theory and methods This is not a structural theory. Action theories focus on individual behaviour in everyday social situations. This is a bottom up approach – looking at meanings and interpretations of actions. There are many branches of action theories; Symbolic interactionism, Labelling theory, Dramturgical model, Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology, Structuration theory and Webe’rs integrated approaches Key features: 1. Society and social structures/ institutions are socially constructed (family does not exist externally to our daily lives) 2. People have free will to do things and form their own identities 3. Prefer to research on small groups of individuals (micro) 4. People’s behaviour is driven by their beliefs, meaning and emotions gives to a situation. e.g how mother interprets crying of baby, meaning of the cry will affect her actions and the babies behaviour will affect the mother Symbolic interactionism This focuses on how we create the world through our interactions. Our interactions are based on the meaning we give to situations and we can convey this through symbols like language. G. H. Mead – The Role of Others – Symbols vs Instincts Symbols versus instincts: * Animals are guided through instinct whereas we are guided by our responses to the world in the form of meanings we attach to significant things. * We create the world by attaching symbols to meanings we have attached. The symbol of putting a finger to your...
Words: 2330 - Pages: 10
...focuses on the actions and interactions of individuals and is a bottom-up approach. Such micro approaches, see society as shaped by its members, who possess agency, in other words, the ability to act as free agents. Micro approaches, also known as action theories, include social action theory, symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and ethnomethodoly. However, macro sociologists take a deterministic approach, as they believe that our actions are determined by society. Macro theories include Functionalism and Marxism, who see individuals as puppets, under the control of social structures. One micro approach to sociology is Weber’s social action theory. According to Weber, in order to understand human behaviour, we must take into account both the level of structural cause, and the level of subjective meaning that individuals attach to their actions. Weber argues that there are an infinite number of subjective meanings that actors give to their actions; however he attempts to classify actions into four types. Instrumentally rational action refers to action that is driven by a given goal, in order to achieve through the most efficient means. Value rational action involves action towards a goal that the actor regards as desirable, for example worshipping god in order to get to heaven. Unlike instrumentally rational action, there is no way of calculating whether the means of achieving the goal are effective. Traditional action involves habitual or routine actions. Weber argues that...
Words: 1093 - Pages: 5
...based on the concept of social structure or social system, and ones based on the concept of social action”. Assess the value of social action approaches to an understanding of society Social action theories could be considered to be far more useful for explaining contemporary society as they offer an alternative to the out-dated structuralist ideas which dominated sociology since the 1800s. Social action theories help us to understand social interaction which obviously plays a vital part in contemporary society as every member does this on a daily basis. They see people as individuals who have the capacity to think and make rational choices, a concept ignored by structuralists. Structuralists seem to believe we are puppets that are predictable and can be studied and measured in the same way as the natural sciences. But how is a human being like a single atom that can be studied in a laboratory? However, the notion of free will could be the social action theories downfall, as its over reliance is an easy target by many critics as they point out we are clearly influenced by factors such as gender and class. Social Action Theory is the first of the micro theories and is therefore useful as Weber was the first to acknowledge the existence of individuals and rational choice. He does however, understand that structures exist and do have some impact on our lives. This therefore makes him incredibly useful as he addresses both ideas in the structure/action debate. Weber also not...
Words: 765 - Pages: 4
...SOC 370 December 4th, 2014 Sociology of Race Relations With Police Officers The United States prides itself on life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. As a country, all men are created equal and have the same opportunities. However, to this day, that is not the case. For decades and arguably centuries, African Americans and other minorities have continued to fight this ongoing battle against racism and prejudice. This struggle is also very prevalent in police and judicial affairs. With the recent racial tension going on in the United States, it is important to understand why African Americans are still feeling this way in order to find ways in which to eliminate police brutality. Using Weber’s theory of authority, one can apply his ideology to the recent events in race relations and police officers in order to understand the ongoing tension and divulging into the reasoning behind people’s reactions to these events, emphasizing the issue is centralized around power and authority. There are everyday events that occur that highlight the ongoing racial tension between African Americans and police officers, showing that discrimination and racism is not dead here in the United States. For example, take the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri. There is major controversy in the telling of the Michael Brown shooting. Michael Brown was shot and killed on August 9th by Officer Darren Wilson (Clarke). Brown was unarmed when the incident happened and the witnesses’...
Words: 2745 - Pages: 11
...Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy Written by Dr. Wasim Al-Habil College of Commerce The Islamic University of Gaza Beginning with Max Weber, bureaucracies have been regarded as mechanisms that rationalize authority and decision-making in society. Yet subsequent theorists have questioned the rationality of bureaucracies. Which features of modern-day public bureaucracies are rational? Which are not? Buttress your argument with citations from organization and/or public administration theories. Introduction: Max Weber’s work about bureaucracy, translated into English in 1946, was one of the major contributions that has influenced the literature of public administration. However, Van Riper (1997) argues that the work of Weber on bureaucracy has no influence on American PA until the 1950’s. The word bureaucracy is derived from two words; “bureau” and “Kratos.” While the word “bureau” refers to the office the Greek suffix “kratia or kratos” means power or rule. Thus we use the word “bureaucracy” to refer to the power of the office (Hummel, 1998, 307). “Bureaucracy” is rule conducted from a desk or office, i.e. by the preparation and dispatch of written documents and electronic ones. Bureaucracy is borrowed by the field of public administration (PA) from the field of sociology. It was borrowed by PA in much a similar way that practices of business were borrowed from the field of business administration and economics. Weber (1946) presents bureaucracy...
Words: 4935 - Pages: 20
...Quiz 1 1. Max Weber's term verstehen suggests that D) sociologists must put themselves in the shoes of others to know how those others think and feel. 2. When testing hypotheses, D) scientists try to determine the connection that exists between dependent and independent variables. 3. Herbert Spencer viewed society as a system, having important similarities with B) a biological organism 4. Max Weber's term verstehen describes an approach for understanding E) subjective meanings people attach to their actions. 5. A predictive statement or question regarding a possible relationship between variables is called a(n) C) hypothesis 6. Which theoretical perspective of sociology views society as a system? D) functionalism 7. The concept that represents the main features of a phenomenon such as bureaucracy is called B) an ideal type. 8. Science A) is a process, itself a form of social behavior. B) All of the responses are correct. C) assumes that under identical conditions, the same cause will always produce the same effect. D) makes the assumption that every event is caused by other events. Points Earned: | 1.0/1.0 | | Correct Answer(s): | B | 9. When sociologists discover a correlation between variables, they have B) not established causation. 10. Studies of people's values, beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions most frequently use C) the survey method. 11. The “sociological imagination” allows us to explore the relationship...
Words: 1106 - Pages: 5
...KKKKKK Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy Written by Dr. Wasim Al-Habil College of Commerce The Islamic University of Gaza Beginning with Max Weber, bureaucracies have been regarded as mechanisms that rationalize authority and decision-making in society. Yet subsequent theorists have questioned the rationality of bureaucracies. Which features of modern-day public bureaucracies are rational? Which are not? Buttress your argument with citations from organization and/or public administration theories. Introduction: Max Weber’s work about bureaucracy, translated into English in 1946, was one of the major contributions that has influenced the literature of public administration. However, Van Riper (1997) argues that the work of Weber on bureaucracy has no influence on American PA until the 1950’s. The word bureaucracy is derived from two words; “bureau” and “Kratos.” While the word “bureau” refers to the office the Greek suffix “kratia or kratos” means power or rule. Thus we use the word “bureaucracy” to refer to the power of the office (Hummel, 1998, 307). “Bureaucracy” is rule conducted from a desk or office, i.e. by the preparation and dispatch of written documents and electronic ones. Bureaucracy is borrowed by the field of public administration (PA) from the field of sociology. It was borrowed by PA in much a similar way that practices of business were borrowed from the field of business administration and economics. Weber (1946) presents...
Words: 4936 - Pages: 20
...| Organization Theory Assignment | BUSM 3194-Organizational Theory | | Linda (S3417437) | Class group: L04Lecturer: Mr Foo Hee Luan BOB | What are the advantages and disadvantages of a multi-perspective approach to understanding organization? | TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 1. Multiple Perspective; Modern, Symbolic-Interpretive and Postmodern 3-4 Perspective on Organization Structure and Cultural 2. Modern Perspective 4-5 3. Symbolic-Interpretive Perspective 5-6 4. Postmodern Perspective 6 5. Multi-perspective Advantage & Disadvantage 6-7 6. Conclusion 8 Reference list 9-10 Word count: 1963 words Introduction Nowadays, organizations are becoming more and more complex. This may due to the globalization, advancement in technology and derelegulation of the market. From the past till now, we can learn about an organisation through theories and different perspectives that developed by different theorists. We need to understand the organisation in different ways and different perspective in order to face any problems that deal with different organization phenomena. Here comes in the Multiple Perspectives, where includes the – modern, symbolic-interpretive and postmodern perspectives, where...
Words: 2709 - Pages: 11
...Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 2. BUREAUCRACY AND RATIONAL-LEGAL AUTHORITY......................... 2 3. CORNERSTONES OF BUREAUCRACY ......................................................... 4 4. DYSFUNCTIONS OF BUREAUCRACY ........................................................... 5 5. RELEVANCE FOR COTEMPORARY ORGANISATIONS .......................... 6 6. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 7 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary The label “Bureaucracy” today is not quite what any organization wants to have written on their flags. Everyone has their own experiences and feelings associated with this term and in most cases it has a negative connotation. A quick view through current media will confirm this. However bureaucracy, as conceived by Max Weber originally, was regarded as progress and something that can improve efficiency and stability within an organization. Organizations can draw upon the pioneering work of Max Weber even today. While displaying certain dysfunctions that are directly linked to strict bureaucracies...
Words: 2002 - Pages: 9
...Organizations as Rational Systems Prepared by Anna Lin, 9041816 This paper introduces Rational System Perspectives in relations to four promin ent schools of organization theory; which are Taylor’s scientific management, Fayol’s general principles of management, Weber’s theory of bureaucracy and Simon’s discussion on administrative behavior. Rational System Perspectives There are two key elements characterizing rational systems: 1) Goal Specificity Specific goals support rational behavior in organizations by providing guideli nes on structural design, which leads to specify what tasks are to be performe d and how resources are to be allocated. 2) Formalization Formalization is an attempt to make behavior more predictable by standardizing and regulating. Formalization provides stable expectation, which is a precond ition to rationality. Selected schools The author related rational system perspectives to four schools of organizatio nal theories. Taylor’s Scientific Management (1911) Taylor Scientifically analyzed tasks performed by individual workers and disco vered the best procedure that would produce the maximum output with the minimu m input of resources. His attempts (to rationalize labor at level of the indiv idual worker )led to changes in the entire structure of work arrangement. Ther efore, efficiency improved. His four principles includes: 1) Develop a science for each element of an individual’s work. 2) Scientifically select and train...
Words: 1244 - Pages: 5
...His analytical focus differed from those of Herbert Spencer, whose center was on the evolution of the body social as analogous to an organism, and Emile Durkheim, whose concern was with institutional arrangements that maintain the cohesion of social structures, as well as that of Karl Marx, who envisioned a society based on the conflicts between social classes in the changing social structure and productive relations. On the other hand, Weber’s focus was on the subjective meanings that human actors attach to their actions in their mutual orientations within specific social-historical contexts. Max Weber classified four types of social action namely: Zweckrational or Purposeful rationality is a goal-oriented rational action; Affective action is an emotion-based where the actor acts without rationally weighing the means and ends; Traditional action is guided by customary habits of thought; lastly, Wertrational or Value-oriented rational action is an action striving for a substantive or practical...
Words: 1023 - Pages: 5
...MARX and WEBER on SOCIAL CLASS: an OVERVIEW. INTRODUCTION These notes, based on previous lectures, attempt to set in context the views of two scholars who wrote on social class at an interval of almost fifty years but whose insights have remained highly influential. These two men are: Karl Marx (1818-1883) German, but worked in London from 1849 onwards wrote on class in the 1840s and through to the 1860s and 1870s. statements on class appear in The Communist Manifesto, (published in 1848; jointly written with Friedrich Engels) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon, (published in 1869, but written earlier) Das Kapital Volume I, (published in 1867) Das Kapital Volumes II and III, (published posthumously and edited by Engels) and Max Weber (1864-1920) German, wrote on class 1910-1920 statements on class appear in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, (first published as a two-part essay in 1904 and 1905; revised by Weber before his death and published as a book, 1920; English translation by Talcott Parsons, 1930) Economy and Society, (published posthumously in 1922) Neither man made a complete statement of his views. In both cases the manuscript is breaks off before the discussion of social class is finished. MARX AND SOCIAL CLASS Marx made more than one statement of his views. The best-known...
Words: 1847 - Pages: 8
...Joseph Alois Schumpeter (Triesch, Moravia, February 8, 1883 - Salisbury, Connecticut, January 8, 1950 (age 66)) is an Austrian economist mid twentieth century, known for his theories of economic fluctuations, creative destruction and innovation . He is the author of a History of Economic Analysis, published in 1954 and still refers. Neither Keynesian nor neoclassical, is often close to the Austrian School of Economics. It is considered economist excitement and it is called heterodox economist for his theories on the evolution of capitalism in democracy, he believes doomed to disappear for social and political reasons. Schumpeter leaves hardly classify an economic school. Whether it was Austrian , he has never been part of the Austrian School with which he was familiar with the teachings of Eugen von Böhm- Bawerk at the University of Vienna. The economist he admired most was undoubtedly Leon Walras , but his analysis goes beyond the neoclassical framework . He was also heavily influenced by the writings of the German sociologist Max Weber. And if he shared some conclusions with Karl Marx, his analysis was very far from Marxist economic designs. Is actually the founder of general economic evolutionism . It is therefore listed in the circle called "heterodox" economists. He believes that the foundation and spring dynamics of the economy are innovation and technical progress. The history of capitalism is a permanent moult. Technology evolves, turns pushing swathes of...
Words: 1911 - Pages: 8