Free Essay

What Makes Us so Different? Understanding Political Ideology Through Partisanship

In:

Submitted By mclarkrn
Words 2054
Pages 9
Govt-2301-WS3

What makes us so different? Understanding Political Ideology through Partisanship People today think that it doesn’t matter how you vote, the outcome will always be the same because the Democratic and GOP parties are run by corporations. Some think that in order to break away from the special interests and influences, there should be a strong third party and that party with a different platform is the Libertarian Party. Historically the main two parties were not much different. In the beginning both parties believed that “men (not big government) was to rule them” (The Fundamental Differences Between Republican and Democrats). There was a mutual desire for individual freedom. Currently it seems that their fundamental beliefs have changed. The Democratic Party wants to increase government involvement in the lives of the American public, whereas the Republicans would like to see decreased national government and have each state govern themselves (The Fundamental Differences Between Republican and Democrats). The Libertarians seem to want to get back to what the founding fathers envisioned. Each party has very strong convictions on the topics that confront America today. The hottest topic facing the nation is Same Sex Marriage. Since the beginning the Democrats have defended Civil Rights and supported the expansion of opportunities for all. They fight to end all forms of discrimination, but this is an uphill battle. “We support marriage equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under the law for same-sex couples” (Democratic Party on Civil Rights). On the other hand the Republicans strive to strengthen, protect and preserve “Traditional Marriage” by believing that “the union of one man and one woman must be upheld as the national standard…encouraged and promoted through laws governing marriage” by respecting all Americans, treating them with respect and dignity (Republican Platform). Then there are the Libertarians. One of their principals is “all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose” (Platform). When it comes to the tax issues facing our nation each of the “Big Three” have their own views on which way we should go. The Republicans envision tax cuts for everyone across the board. The Democrats support progressive taxes in order to increase funds to support public programs and to accomplish this; they would like to see the higher-income Americans pay their taxes at a higher rate than the average American (Democrat vs Republican). The Libertarians would like to see America with no taxes (Reed). National healthcare has been debated for nearly a century. Finally in 2010, President Obama, Democrat, signed into law The Affordable Care Act. With this, children with predisposed conditions will no longer be denied coverage, tax cuts are provided to small companies in order to offset the cost of employee coverage, and tax credits will be given to families to pay for insurance. It’s been said that with this act, the national deficit will be reduced by more than $1 trillion over the next 20 years. “The Affordable Care Act lays a new foundation for our country that will bring additional security and stability to the American people for generations to come” (Issues). The Republicans oppose the Affordable Care Act and support a more common-sense reform that would lower cost and ensure quality health care for Americans. They oppose any type of government-run health care because they feel that it does not “protect the physician-patient relationship, won’t promote competition and won’t promote health care quality and choice” (Our Party). The Libertarians have a vision to be able to restore the country to the principals of the Constitution. “Nowhere in the Constitution does it mention “healthcare” as a right of its citizens or that it be provided by the central government” (Ritchey II). If they were in power they would establish Medical Savings Accounts where Americans could deposit tax free monies and withdrawals form these accounts for medical needs would be tax deductible. They would like to see a deregulated healthcare industry, the removal of all barriers to access to safe, affordable medications, and the ability of interstate purchase of healthcare (Ritchey II). Every political party has their own ideas, values and beliefs. These are divided and categorized as “Left” or “Right” or “Middle of the road”. Then there are some smaller parties that take these basic beliefs and skew them even further to the left or the right, they are the extremists of the country. The “Left” is considered to be staunch supporters of social services, freedom of speech and the right to disagree. They would like to see the redistribution of wealth and to have everyone live as one; these are the Democrats. The Republicans are considered to be on the “Right”. They are seen as conservative, fiscally and socially responsible. They see big government as wasteful. They would like to see authority preserved, the continuance of the existing social order and they believe in private ownership. They are seen as Darwinian in that “the strong shall survive, cream rises to the top” (Democrat vs Republican). The far right is considered to be very religious, anti-bureaucracy and for the military. The far left is more liberal. They encourage a more involved government in all aspects of society (Democrat vs Republican). The Libertarians are not considered “Left” or “Right”. They like the “Middle of the road”. They think that everyone should be able to decide where they stand on their own as long as they respect the rights of others and it does not impede on anyone. I feel that the Libertarian party tends to be more on the “right” side of the fence because both the Republicans and Libertarians would like to the see decreased aid for the poor if it means increasing overall debt. Ultimately the” left” vs.” right” boils down to: what are their goals? Each of the political parties has a different platform from which they represent. The larger of the two, present their views as very broad and seem to lack details. I believe this is in order to be able to make their views fit what’s going on at the time. The Democrats are considered to be liberal and are in favor of large sweeping government healthcare programs and any other national governmental intervention that seems to be needed, but they want decreased military spending. They support same-sex marriage, the death penalty and they are pro-choice. The conservative Republicans are against increased taxes for anyone, and want to increase military spending. They denounce gay marriage, vote pro-life, but support the death penalty (Democrat vs Republican). The Libertarian has a traditional conservative political platform. They lay a plan for the country to, over time, become more self-sustaining. They call for the elimination of all kinds of taxes. They would like to see a minimalist government, giving additional responsibility to the people (Knox).
America is a two-party system. Ever since the Civil War the two prevailing parties have been the Democrats and Republicans. It’s a “winner takes all” system. Whoever gets the most votes wins. Every now and then a smaller third party throws their hat in the political ring, but without the political backing, funds and known representation, the current system will remain in place. In 1992 Ross Perot, paid for and ran on the Reform Party ticket. He was able to secure 19% of the presidential votes that year which is the highest third party totals in history. The following election he only garnered 8%. But each time he failed to receive any electoral votes even though he was able to defeat one major candidate at that time (Ragone). Personally I feel the same as most Americans, and choose not to align with either party. There are too many varied attitudes on the ideological scale, and you can’t please everyone. I wish there was another party to choose from, one that combined all the good and reasonable views from all three. It could be called “The Common Sense Party”. Have you ever wondered how the Democrats and Republicans came to be represented by the animal symbols that we’ve known to associate with them? First was the Democratic donkey. In 1828 when Andrew Jackson ran for office, his opponents labeled him a “jackass” for his views and campaign slogan “Let the people rule” (Donkey and Elephant). He turned this to his advantage and began using it on his campaign posters. It was widely used as the Democratic symbol after being used in a Harper’s Weekly cartoon in 1870 (Donkey and Elephant). The Republicans became associated with the elephant after a carton was printed in 1864 of Abraham Lincoln presidential campaign. It illustrated Father Abraham holding a banner celebrating the Union Victories. During the Civil War the saying “seeing the elephant” was said during combat. So it’s thought that it was logical to have the elephant represent successful battles (Donkey and Elephant). During America’s first 180 years a divided government was rare. That all changed in 1954 with the election of President Eisenhower to his second term. Eisenhower was a Republican and the Democrats won the House and Senate. Since that time we have had a divided government 38 out of 58 years. Some say that a divided government gives the president and the political parties’ carte blanche to avoid certain responsibilities and put the blame on the other guy (Cannon). As with anything, there are pros and cons to a unified and divided government. In 2003, three observations about a divided government were made by an economist and former advisor for President Regan, he is William Niskanen. He observed that America went to war more frequently during a unified government, even though the Afgan war has continued under both types. He also noted that government spending seemed to increase at a slower pace during a divided government, but this also seems to be changing course as the federal deficits under both G.W.Bush and Obama have risen. Each of these presidents presided over a unified and divided government. His final argument in behalf of a divided government, that I agree with, is that the probability of a major reform being able to last is higher with a divided government “because the necessity of bipartisan support is more likely to protect the law against subsequent change” (Cannon). For example the tax reform bill of 1986 that was initiated by President Regan was passed during a Democratic controlled house and a Republican Senate. Another example is the 1996 welfare bill it was signed into law by President Clinton and was passed by a Republican Congress, led by the Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (Cannon). I agree with Morris Fiorena, a political scientist from Stanford, who says this of a divided government “reasonable compromises happen when there are reasonable people on both sides” (Cannon). Mr. Fiorena also cautioned that a divided government can lead to gridlock (Cannon). This we have seen all too many times.

Works Cited
Cannon, Lou. "The Premature Burial of Divided Government." 5 October 2012. www.dyn.realclearpolitics.com. web. 14 April 2013.
"Democrat vs Republican." 2013. www.diffen.con. web. 5 April 2013.
"Democratic Party on Civil Rights." n.d. www.ontheissues.org. web. 26 March 2013.
"Donkey and Elephant." n.d. www.ourwhitehouse.org. web. 5 April 2013.
"Issues." 2013. www.democrats.org. web. 13 April 2013.
Knox, Clifton. "Repulican, Democrats And Libertarians: What's The Difference?" 20 September 2012. www.westernjournalism.com. web. 5 April 2013.
"Our Party." n.d. www.gop.com. web. 13 April 2013.
"Platform." May 2012. www.lp.org. web. 5 April 2013.
Ragone, Nick. "Why a Two-Party System?" n.d. www.netplaces.com. web. 14 April 2013.
Reed, Gary. "Libertarianism 101: What's the libertarian position on Taxes?" 27 August 2009. www.examiner.com. web. 5 April 2013.
"Republican Platform." 2012. www.gop.com. web. 1 April 2013.
Ritchey II, Barry. "Libertarian 101: What is the Libertarian position on healthcare reform?" 28 July 2009. www.examiner.com. web. 5 April 2013.
"The Fundamental Differences Between Republican and Democrats." n.d. www.tex.org. web. 13 April 2013.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Paul Robeson—Jackie Robinson Saga and a Political Collision.

...Ingrid B. US History 114-602 Fall 2012 Bergen Community College THE PAUL ROBESON—JACKIE ROBINSON SAGA AND A POLITICAL COLLISION. By Ronald A. Smith Journal of Sport History, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Summer, 1979) P 5-27 Dr. Ronald A. Smith, a historian and Professor Emeritus at Penn State University analyzes Jackie Robinson's appearance, and impact before the House UN-American Activities Committee in light of anti-American messages made by the entertainer and former Rutgers University All-American football superstar Paul Robeson. Smith argues that for symbolical grounds, the federal government reached out to Jackie Robinson so he can assist in getting rid of Paul Robeson from his function as a black leader. Using a relative analysis of both Robinson and Robeson early lives, Author Ronald Smith affirms that they spearheaded change from different paths. Smith illustrates how Jackie Robinson was willing to cooperate with white society for the purpose of positive racial goals and Paul Robeson wanted improvement own his own terms, not necessarily those suggested by white society. Nonetheless, Smith insists both Robinson and Robeson fought for equal rights in their respected ways. In this informative and well written essay, The Paul Robeson-Jackie Robinson Saga and Political Collision, Ronald A. Smith (following his Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin, he spent 28 years at Penn State teaching sport history and researching intercollegiate athletics) illustrates how a...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

American Politcs 010

...control the effects of factions--by setting them against one another, but dividing authority among institutions ● Problems with the Articles of confederation No ability to tax , No central currency, No way to negotiate treaties ,No executive capacity, difficult to maintain public order, nation security. ● 06.Deals addressed by the constitution Path dependency: reliance on experience, constrained by status quo; solutions based on familiar institutions. Some participants are content with current arrangements and not willing to change. ● 07.Federalist papers- A series of (85) published arguments that advocated the ratification of the Constitution. A sales pitch, these explicated the logic for the constitution and provide great insight for understanding why government was set up as it is. Specifically, laid out the problems with...

Words: 7682 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Political Marketing

...A TERM PAPER ON POLITICAL MARKETING INTRODUCTION Political marketing is a marketing designed to influence consumers about political issues, particular candidates for public office, or public issues. Although political marketing uses many of the same techniques that other forms of marketing do, it is actually used to promote a concept or an idea, rather than a specific product or service, and to motivate people to vote for that idea. The word “Political Marketing” emerge from the key words ‘politics’ and ‘marketing’. Politics simply means an activity which is concerned with governing a society or country. It has to do with the government or public affairs of a community or a state (that is a particular boundary). While, Marketing is a process of planning and executing the conceptions, pricing, promotion and distribution of ideas, goods and services, to create exchange that satisfy the individual and organizational objective. Marketing is often described as “selling of product”, but the fact is that marketing entails more than this. Kotler (2001) offers a definition that presents a comprehensive meaning of marketing as “a process by which individuals and groups, obtain what they need and want through creating, offering, and freely exchanging products and services of value with others”. The American Marketing Association (1995) also described Marketing as “the process of planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion, and distribution of ideas, goods, and services to...

Words: 4000 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Love

...Chapter 6  The media, government accountability, and citizen engagement  Katrin Voltmer  The past two decades or so have seen an unprecedented spread of democracy around the  globe.  With  the  fall  of  the  Berlin  wall  in  1989  and  the  end  of  the  Cold  War,  the  ‘third  wave’  of  democratization,  which  started  in  the  early  seventies,  now  encompasses  countries  in  Asia  and  Africa.1  And  even  in  states  whose  governments  continue  to  resist  a  more  open  and  participatory  form of governance, such as North Korea, Burma or Zimbabwe, the idea of democracy is a powerful  force that inspires people to take on a more active role in public life. However, many of the newly  emerging  democracies  seem  to  fall  short  of  some,  often  many,  of  the  basic  standards  that  define  democratic  rule,  with  irregular  voting  procedures,  corruption,  inefficiency  and  autocratic  styles  of  government  being  but  a  few  of  the  maladies.  In  addition,  as  many  of  the  newly  emerging  democracies belong to the developing world, inequality and poverty remain severe obstacles to full  self‐determination of the people.  The experiences of the past decades have shown that democracy is not a one‐way road and  that  a  viable  democracy  requires  more  than  the  implementation  of  the  key  institutions  of  government.  Rather,  an  accountable  and  efficient  government  is  embedded  in  a  complex  web  of  interdependent  conditions  that ...

Words: 10604 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay

Color of Water

...have regarding race. One of things that is a different about ‘The Color of Water” is that the character of Ruth espouses to her children the idea that we build a society that is color blind. Even the title of the work hints at this view since water has no color, thus the color of water is clear. Even though this idea of a colorless society sounds great it is utopian and just not possible. It is a much better idea that if we are going to tackle the issue of race in this country, that we do not pretend that we can’t see differences amongst various ethnicities. The real goal should be that we recognize these differences and celebrate them. To understand why Ruth would say to advocate something like a color blind society it is important to understand who Ruth is. The character of Ruth, even though she was a real person, could be looked upon as being a symbol for the American experience. The classic American dream is one in which hard working immigrants move to the US, the land of opportunity, and make it big through hard work and determination. The American experience is different from the American Dream in that it is the realistic events and experience that people have. The idea that the streets in the US are paved with gold and that all one has to do is make it here to succeed is a fairy tale, and you can tell this just by looking at some of the things that Ruth had to deal with. Ruth’s family made it to the US but did not have what anyone would really consider the American Dream...

Words: 2856 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Animals

...Երևանի Վ. Բրյուսովի անվան Պետաան Լեզվահասարակագիտական Համալսարան Political neologisms in the American Press (based on the articles on B. Obama's presidency) Danielyan Hovhannes CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………2 2. CHAPTER I General Notes on Political Neologisms……………………………………………..4 3. CHAPTER II Neologisms Connected with B. Obama's Presidency……………………………...9 4. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………….15 5. BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………..17 1 Introduction The current graduation paper is devoted to the detailed study of the neologisms in the American press. The latter is observed via examining the cases of neologisms brought forward by B. Obama. In this paper an attempt was made to throw light upon many words and phrases that are used in modern American political lexicon, as well as to examine some political neologisms that help to cover the 2008 Presidental Election Campaign. The graduation paper consists of an introduction, two chapters, conclusion...

Words: 5225 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Marketing Political

...The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School The Mary Jane and Frank P. Smeal College of Business ESSAYS IN POLITICAL MARKETING A Dissertation in Business Administration by David LeBaron  2008 David N. LeBaron Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2008 The thesis of David N. LeBaron was reviewed and approved* by the following: William T. Ross, Jr. Professor of Marketing Dissertation Co-Advisor Co-Chair of Committee John C. Liechty Associate Professor of Marketing Dissertation Co-Advisor Co-Chair of Committee Peter Ebbes Assistant Professor of Marketing David J. Huff Clinical Assistant Professor of Supply Chain and Information Systems Johannes Baumgartner Professor of Marketing Head of the Department of Marketing *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Political marketing sits at the nexus of two disciplines, political science and marketing, but is not entirely accepted by either. The present research looks at the origin, development, and evolution of political marketing and examines how the adoption of a political marketing orientation is impacting the practice of political campaigns. The role of political marketing in actually changing voters’ preferences is also examined, showing that grassroots marketing efforts seem to have the greatest effect, especially with undecided voters. Finally, voter segments are derived...

Words: 34057 - Pages: 137

Premium Essay

Theories of Journalism

...Theories of Communication – MCM 511 VU LESSON 01 COMMUNICATION Defining communication Communication is seen as central to our everyday ideas about what makes life worth living. It is not surprising that academicians have attempted to unravel the secrets of the communication process. In this section of the study we will examine the theorizing and theories of this discipline of communication. To understand communication theory we need to understand the nature of communication. Nature of communication People define terms in different ways, and those differences in definition can have a profound impact on the extent to which we understand each other and the way we move forward with both academic and everyday pursuits. Given the variety of ways in which words are used and understood, we are often ill-served to search for the single, so-called correct definition of a term. In other words, it is better to evaluate definition in terms of their utility rather than in terms of their correctness. So we should not assume that there is always a single right way to define a concept. There is a great deal of variation in the definitions. Some are very abstract and some are extremely specific. Few definitions are cited below. Communication is the process by which an individual (the communicator) transmits stimuli (usually verbal) to modify the behavior of other individuals (the audience). (Hovland Janis and Kelly in 1953) Communication is the process by which we understand others and in turn...

Words: 67078 - Pages: 269

Free Essay

Review of Law in Context

...text. You are only likely to get the maximum value out of this summary by reading it in conjunction with the text. The question of ‘the law in whose context’ may be worth keeping in mind as you read. This is an interpretation seen through my eyes, not yours. My comments are not unbiased, as it is as equally unlikely that yours may be. So my ‘advice’ is consider what is said here and in the book considering the need to understand the ‘mechanics’ that help make sense of the more involved themes that develop in the book as you progress through Law in Context. The observations, important in their own right, may be particularly useful for seeing how their often ubiquitous expression is taken as ‘normal’ in the areas of wider society, such as in discussions of economics and power. It is unlikely that you will find any ‘right answers’ from this summary, but I do hope it helps you in synthesising opinions. A bibliography of books I used is given at the end of this summary. If your head isn’t spinning too much, maybe it is worth getting together earlier in the semester with friends and talking about some of the issues that particularly interest you. Don’t be worried if ‘you don’t know anything’. It’s probable that you, as for most of us, are neither as enlightened nor as...

Words: 51747 - Pages: 207

Premium Essay

Media Research Methods

...Dave Madsen JGRD 915: Mass Communication Theory Dr. Linda Shipley Final Paper Dec. 14, 2009 Discovering Methods of Communication Use in Ord, Nebraska In a recent editorial opinion column in the Sioux City (Iowa) Journal, Editor Mitch Pugh wrote “We are becoming a nation that only wants to consume news that perpetuates or supports our own tightly held beliefs. I’m not sure I quite understand how that line of thinking contributes anything to a society that used to value open and fair-minded debate and learned from absorbing diverse viewpoints.” (Pugh) If you actually asked people about their news consumption practices, would they agree with that sentiment? Would the residents of a particular small town in Nebraska be able to determine if any commonly held beliefs might be determined by the selection of a specific type or style of media? These are just some of the questions that arise when evaluating the results of just such a research project. During the month of October, 2009, students of Dr. Linda Shipley’s Mass Communication Theory class at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, conducted interviews with 33 residents of the small town of Ord, Nebraska. The purposes of the survey were: 1) To measure the use of media by the people of Ord. Specifically, how do they gather information about Ord and how do they disseminate information about Ord? 2) To measure their opinions about living in Ord. The interviews were conducted by telephone, with each of the eleven...

Words: 3856 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Public Management

...multifarious in content. The common sense of public management is relatively straightforward. Good public managers, whatever their particular positions or responsibilities, are men and women with the temperament and skills to organize, motivate, and direct the actions of others in and out of government toward the creation and achievement of goals that warrant the use of public authority. Few public laws and policies are self-executing, and, in their formulation, all might benefit from managerial insight and experience. Under virtually any political philosophy or regime, then, the achievement of good government requires the responsible and competent use of public authority by a government’s managers. Common sense obscures issues that have been at the heart of public management from its inception as a field of study and practice, however. What if the goals to be achieved and their possible costs and consequences are unclear or in conflict? What if public managers are given insufficient authority, resources, and tools to organize, motivate, and monitor the efforts needed to...

Words: 7451 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Pols Final Exam Review

...Federal Government Exam 1 Review: The first exam will consist of questions generated from the following review sheet. Make sure you understand each of these topics before proceeding to the test. The exam will be timed so you will not have the ability to peruse your notes or retake the exam. The exam itself will consist of 30 multiple choice questions and you will have 35 minutes to complete the exam. Federalism: The Basic elements of a Federal system of government (i.e. how is it structured/how power is shared) • Layers of gov • Equal power • Distinct powers Powers of the federal government: delegated powers, implied powers (necessary and proper clause), and concurrent powers. • Delegated Powers: (expressed/enumerated powers) powers given to the federal government directly by the constitution. Some most important delegated powers are: the authority to tax, regulated interstate commerce, authority to declare war, and grants the president role of commander and chief of the military • Implied Powers: Powers not expressed in the constitution, but that can be inferred. “Necessary and proper clause” • Concurrent powers: powers shared by both levels of government. Ex: Taxes, roads, elections, commerce, establishing courts and a judicial system • Reserved powers: powers not assigned by the constitution to the national government but left to the states or the people. Guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Include “police power”-health and public...

Words: 37488 - Pages: 150

Free Essay

Iddir, Metaphor for Solidaity in Ethiopia

...paper is to gain insight into the relation between iddirs and sustainable development in Ethiopia. The material to achieve the aim is gathered through literature review and field work. The method of analysis is inspired by Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis (henceforth CDA). CDA focuses on the relation between language use and social reality. It combines three forms of analysis. The first is linguistic analysis of text. It deals with wording, grammar, syntax, cohesion, metaphor, transitivity, and so forth The second deals with discursive practice which is an analysis of the (processes of) production, distribution and consumption of texts. At this stage we look at inter-textuality and inter-discursivity. The third form studies the socio-cognitive effects of discursive practice, in particular, reproduction or transformation of status quo. Definitions of the key concepts are given in the introduction of this book. One of the issues to be dealt with is to what extent iddir can be considered indigenous. The paper is divided into four sections. The first section is a review of several publications on iddir. The second section is an overview of data gathered through field work. The third section contains a critical correlation of theoretical insights gathered through literature review (section one) and empirical insights gathered through fieldwork (section two). The final section contains some conclusions concerning indigenous knowledge and sustainable development. A Journey...

Words: 14413 - Pages: 58

Premium Essay

Bdhs

...specific terms such as "late capitalism" and "industrial society" even though these concepts figure prominently in many of the contributions to this volume. The conference strategy called for a general statement of a metaframework for the study of social change within which a variety of more specific theories could be identified. 2. Theories of Social Change Change is such an evident feature of social reality that any social-scientific theory, whatever its conceptual starting point, must sooner or later address it. At the same time it is essential to note that the ways social change has been identified have varied greatly in the history of thought. Furthermore, conceptions of change appear to have mirrored the historical ―2― realities of different epochs in large degree. In his essay...

Words: 171529 - Pages: 687

Premium Essay

Watchdogs

... the fall of authoritarian and socialist regimes, and the deregulation of the  media worldwide have fuelled a renewed interest in ––as well as a surge in efforts by various groups  to support–– “watchdogging” by the media.   Since the late 17th Century, classical liberal theorists had argued that publicity and openness  provide the best protection from the excesses of power. The idea of the press as Fourth Estate, as an  institution that exists primarily as a check on those in public office, was based on the premise that  powerful  states  had  to  be  prevented  from  overstepping  their  bounds.  The  press  working  independently of government, even as its freedoms were guaranteed by the state, was supposed to  help ensure that this was so.  The  1980s  and  1990s  saw  the  revival  of  this  centuries‐old  notion  and  its  application  especially  to  “transition  societies”  then  emerging  from  the  ruins  of  socialist  and  authoritarian  regimes.  It  had  resonance  among  citizens  facing  pervasive  corruption,  weak  rule  of  law,  and  predatory  or  incompetent  governments  unable  to  deliver  basic  services.  Today  even  in  countries  where democracy is a fairly  new experiment or  even  in those, like China, where  democracy  and  a  free press have yet to take root, the notion of the press as watchdogs of power is embedded in the  self‐definition of journalists1  and in varying degrees, also in public expectations of the media. It is,  moreover...

Words: 11805 - Pages: 48