... Book I: Establishment of Epicureanism through Torquatus Epicureanism appeals to the masses for its notion that happiness and pleasure consists of performing right and moral actions for one’s own sake. Pleasure is the highest good, without need for justification because we perceive them as true through our senses, and pain is the highest evil. Epicurean Pleasure: Greatest pleasure is freedom from pain, Cicero says not true. * “The pleasure we deem greatest is that which is felt when all pain is removed. For when freed from pain, we take delight in that very liberation and release from all that is distressing.” (1.37) * “Every animal as soon as it is born seeks pleasure and rejoices in it, while shunning pain as the highest evil and avoiding it as much as possible. This is behavior that has not yet been corrupted, when nature’s judgment is pure and whole.” (1.30) * Kinetic pleasure: “the sort of pleasure which stirs our nature with its sweetness and produces agreeable sensations in us.” (1.37) * No one desires pain because it is pain, but there are times where “effort and pain are the means to some great pleasure,” (1.32) such as hard bodily exercise leading to an agreeable state thereafter. * Conversely, those who are blinded and corrupted by immediate pleasure and fail to see the pain to come or those who abandon their duties by avoiding effort and pain are to be criticized. (1.33) Physics: Physics explains nature, and by understanding it, we free ourselves...
Words: 958 - Pages: 4
...right or wrong, therefore no action can be wrong in itself as teleological ethics is entirely consequentialist and relativist. This differentiates from a deontological perspective which interprets actions as either intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of the consequences it could potentially bring. In this essay I will address Bentham’s Act Utilitarianism, as well as Joseph Fletchers situation ethics. Bentham’s teleological ethics is a democratic theory as pleasure is considered for the majority and not just the individual. Bentham's act utilitarianism suggests that all humans are motivated by ‘two sovereign masters’ pleasure and pain, therefore in this view we can all be considered hedonists who are motivated by pleasure but seek to avoid pain. Bentham also suggests the principle of utility, which considered an action or moral decision right by its usefulness. If an action is useful, and can bring about pleasure it is then right. Moreover Bentham only considered an action to be right if it took into account the greatest happiness principle, ‘the greatest good for the greatest number.’ This means that the action that produces the greatest amount of pleasure for the majority can be considered right, in addition to this he maintained the view that actions that are not considered to be ‘useful’, should be considered wrong if they are selfish and do not consider the majority....
Words: 582 - Pages: 3
...Yellen Mr. Rowe Psychological Egoism In this paper I will argue against psychological egoism. More specifically, I will argue against hedonistic psychological egoism, a popular form of psychological egoism. Hedonistic psychological egoism is the view that the ultimate motive for human action is the desire to experience pleasure or avoid pain. I will begin by contrasting psychological egoism with ethical egoism. I will then discuss arguments that support psychological egoism, and refute those arguments using Rachels’ and Feinberg’s view’s against the theory. I will conclude by arguing that psychological egoism is implausible as it is incapable of being falsified, and fails to distinguish critical terms proposed in the theory. I will begin by defining psychological egoism. Psychological egoism is the view that people always act according to their self-interest. According to this view, our only intrinsic desires are desires for the advancement of our own self-interest. But we can still have instrumental desires for other things. Instrumental desires are desires that you have only because you believe that satisfying that desire will help you satisfy some other desire. For example, I may desire to write this paper only because I believe that by writing this paper I will get a good grade, and I desire to get a good grade; I don’t intrinsically desire to write this paper. Now that I have defined psychological egoism, I will contrast the theory with ethical egoism. Psychological...
Words: 1910 - Pages: 8
...Three theories of ethics From early childhood on, we live in a world of choices, actions and consequences. Some acts make us happy, others sad, some guilty, others proud, and many actions just get us through the day. We observe other people and experience feelings of empathy, sympathy, envy, embarrassment, censure. We judge (or “think about”) the actions of ourselves and others according to criteria gathered over time from family, friends, mentors and society at large. Philosophers stand outside this “circle of living,” to observe the hows and whys of what we do and become who we are, and try to interpret that. So do artists, poets and novelists. But philosophers choose to situate individual beings and their actions within larger theoretical settings, called principles. They search for the defining principles that guide our actions, and for general descriptions that will explain the way things are and what they mean. This effort is to help us both understand ourselves better and act better. As philosophers have considered human experience, three fundamental areas have been elicited: How and what we know, think or understand ------> theory What we create, produce or make -------> arts How we act, what we do or should do -------> practice The third strand will be the focus of our exploration in this seminar: How should we act? What should we be, or become? This debate is known as “moral theory”...
Words: 4753 - Pages: 20
...makes us see if we are good or bad. He argues that for you to become good you have to do goodness and act good. If you act good the habit of being good will make your character that of a good person. He uses the example of a builder. A builder becomes a builder by building; a good person becomes good by doing good and making it a habit to do good. In order to be good you have to do good. Aristotle then discusses how one does good. He says that in order for you to do good you must avoid excess and deficiency. Being good is requires balance, a mean. Anything in excess is harmful. This mean is relative. Goodness is not universal and it is relative to each person. We must each find this average of good that applies to your own case. As humans we grow up and naturally we want to avoid displeasure and go after pleasure. Aristotle believes that often this isn’t the right thing; sometimes the good thing is having pain and displeasure if it means doing what is good. We must condition ourselves to choose what is good not what gives us pleasure. He then questions weather it is possible to do good with out trying to be good. Meaning that good happened on accident. Aristotle doesn’t think this is good enough. He says that you have to do the good action and still have to be good when you’re doing it in order for it to really be good. He believes that by being good it becomes easier to do goodness. Goodness is something that builds on its self. I agree with this, however I disagree with his...
Words: 568 - Pages: 3
...Instructor: Course: Date: Does God exist? If so, why is there evil? Like St. Augustine, I do acknowledge that ``God exists”. In order to explain his ideology, Augustine refers to the life of a tree, rock, dog and human beings. He argues that among the things aforementioned, only human being posses the ability to think and act thus meaning that among the creations on earth, the human being is the intelligent creature. Further, he expounds his argument by stating that if another being is intelligently superior to human beings, then it has to be God. However, St. Augustine acknowledges the presence of evil. St. Augustine’s opinion of sin is linked to the freedom to exercise ``freewill” by individuals an aspect that results to ``moral evil”. Free will forms the basis by Augustine that God should not be blamed for ``the existence” of sin. To expound on his argument, Augustine informs his readers that he like many other people has been subject to sin due to his desire to realize what sin entails and urges the people not to dwell so much on sin rather than the existence of God(pg,164). In conclusion, I support Augustine’s argument that no one can understand the thinking of God thus we should focus on his goodness rather than sin existence. Are Human Beings Selfish? I believe that every ``human being” is selfish. The selfish nature of human beings is evident from the daily activities that we engage in during our lifetime and routines. In the current society, it is common for politicians...
Words: 901 - Pages: 4
...The relationship between the id, ego and superego....let's start with id, it is born with us, it is the unconscious pleasure seeking component of the structural model. It's seeks pleasure and avoids pain. Simple basic instinct that we are born with. Next we have the ego, The ego is based on the reality principle and is in our preconscious. The ego understands that other people have needs and desires and that sometimes being impulsive or selfish can hurt us in the long run. Its the ego's job to meet the needs of the id, while taking into consideration the reality of the situation. Then we have the superego, The superego is divided into two parts; ego ideal and conscience. The ego-ideal is what we aspire to, a standard of good behavior. The conscience is our inner voice, it tells us when we have done something wrong. The superego is either a source of rewards, that is feelings of satisfaction and pride, or of punishment, feelings of shame or guilt. The demands of the "id" (I want it and I want it now) and the demands of the superego, (no it's wrong) are often in conflict with each other. According to Freud, the ego is the strongest so that it can satisfy the needs of the id, not upset the superego, and still take into consideration the reality of every situation. If the id gets too strong, impulses and self gratification take over the person's life. If the superego becomes to strong, the person would be driven by rigid morals, would be judgmental and unbending in his or her...
Words: 275 - Pages: 2
...you humble. Success keeps you glowing, but God keeps you going. I love walking in the rain because then no-one knows I'm crying. Trust the one who could see three things in you, sorrow behind your smile, and love behind your anger and meaning behind your silence. The worst sorrows in life are fears. Fear of tomorrow, fear of what happened yesterday and its possible advent in future, fear of pain, of hunger, of illness, of finances and finally of Death! At birth you are crying the world around you is happy and smiling, live a life that when you die the world is crying wanting more of you. Never do anything that the world gives a sigh of relief that you have indeed died at last. Every man has his secret sorrows. A man...
Words: 1059 - Pages: 5
...LIBERTY UNIVERSITY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY Pain and Suffering in the Christian Experience Submitted to Dr. Andrea H. Adams in partial fulfillment of the requirement for completion of SEMI 500-B27 LUO Introduction to Seminary Studies by Tami Carroll February 22, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction 2 What Causes Humans to Suffer? 2 Pain is Inevitable 2 Humans Seek Personal Pleasure 3 Why Does God Allow Bad Things to Happen? 4 Free Will 4 God’s Authentic Love 5 The Purpose for Suffering 6 Draws Man to God 6 Repentance 7 Conclusion 9 Bibliography 10 Pain and Suffering in the Christian Experience There are numerous schools of thought in regards to why humans suffer. Christians question why a loving God allows bad things happen to His people. They wonder how sufferings in the life of a Christian can possibly build faith. These ideas will be explored through the life and works of theologian and scholar, C. S. Lewis. Answers will be sought through the examination of Lewis’s personal experiences, his theological studies and his fictional writings. This paper will prove that human pain and suffering is essential in the Christian experience by examining the reasons human suffer, why God does not intervene to prevent suffering, and how pain and suffering might build faith and draw people...
Words: 2955 - Pages: 12
...ethical theory composed by Joh Stuart Mill. Utilitarianism focuses on ideas of there being a hierarchy of pleasures in the world, that actions are justifiable so long as the outcomes benefit the wellbeing of the whole, and that in order of one to perform these actions they must become impartial spectators to the entire situation in order to make the best decision. With these concepts combined one can then see the anatomy of utilitarianism being that the happiness of the whole is considered greater than the happiness of the community so long as the happiness attained is above in the hierarchy of pleasures. Mill begins the discussion of his theory with his definition of happiness through the ‘Greatest Happiness Principle’....
Words: 1698 - Pages: 7
...Principle holds that action that appears right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce unhappiness. But he instead states that “Pleasure and freedom from pain (or unhappiness) are the only desirable ends.” (Alex, “Ethics and the Goodlife summaries”). From Cassandra point of view of the greatest happiness principle, it helped her make a decision by her knowing she had freedom and maybe having a desirable ending. She basically pointed out the big question of what we ought to do and what shall we do. On the other hand “some unjust actions are permissible” according to Mill (“Study Guide: John Stuart Mill’s Ethics”). She cannot always predict what the consequences of her actions would be. She would just have to take a chance in order to help herself or just don’t do anything at all. Also the greatest happiness principle is the act to produce the greatest happiness meaning “higher pleasure” for the greatest numbers. That means that utility has to be increasing and pain has to decrease. Mill provides a system which is preferred by a majority and is considered the action with a higher quality result and thus would be more moral to perform than the action with a lower quality result. When looking back at the case you can see that Cassandra was trying to avoid or decrease the pain that she would face with getting the chemotherapy because it is tough and hard to go through and she didn’t wasn’t to feel that, so she focused on the utility part more...
Words: 2028 - Pages: 9
...belongs to Hedonism. If one experience more happiness during life, his life will be better. The more happiness you experience, the better your life is. There are actually two schools of thought here, Narrow Hedonism and Preference Hedonism, each with its own definition of happiness. Narrow Hedonism deems happiness a homogeneous state of pleasure, while Preference Hedonism expands the definition to include any state of mind favored by the individual, including pain (yes, pain is happiness, for some). However, the two schools are united in their focus on mental states, which as you will see is a silly idea. Hedonism is a way of life, characterised by openness to pleasurable experience. There are many qualms about hedonism. It is rejected on moral grounds and said to be detrimental to long-term happiness. Several mechanisms for this 'paradox of hedonism' have been suggested and telling examples of pleasure seekers ending up in despair have been given. The relation between hedonism and happiness has been studied at two levels: that of the nation and the individual. At the national level average happiness is correlated with moral acceptance of pleasure and with active leisure. At the individual level it is similarly linked with hedonistic attitudes and also correlated with hedonistic behaviours such as frequent sex and use of stimulants. In this essay, it will firstly discuss what is hedonism, including the two catories Narrow hedonism and Preference hedonism. Following this, it will...
Words: 2995 - Pages: 12
...seems to go into the extremes to preach his view on libertinism. It’s almost disgusting in how Dolmance and Madame De Saint-Ange educate Eugenie in their views, yet Eugenie takes their teachings as enlightenment. Why? As much as I hate to admit it, it is refreshing to see the other side of things. Coming from the extreme opposite of this ideal, Sade’s characters speak an almost ugly truth. Sade often shuns from religion and authority in favor of a more rational way of thinking. In many instances he replaces God with Nature as a form of measuring ideals. In many ways he focuses a person on self rather than society. I think trying to understand his repressed view can draw us closer to an even richer median of self. One of the first teaches that Dolmance preaches to Eugenie in her education is the existence of God. He opens by stating that man owes his existence only to Nature’s schemes. He states that we are bound only to reproduce, since reproduction is necessitated by the globe’s existence. Sade criticizes God as a phantom. He even questions then necessity of God. If Nature can create, produce, preserve, maintain, and hold equilibrium, what is the need to seek out a foreign agent? To Sade, God is an illusion and piety to this illusion is foolish. I find that Sade proposing that God is an illusion is a bold step, yet offers a viable alternative in the purpose of man. Many people today are influenced by their belief in God. They credit their existence and live their lives in the...
Words: 2474 - Pages: 10
...that goes back the human history. Ever since childhood we have been told stories through story books, picture, books, music, even the bible. Most of the time the characters, in story books, take the form of animals or inanimate objects. These stories are meant to entertain, influence, teach or even scare us. As children, these stories used to fascinate us and adults used it as a way to discourage us from deviant behaviors. When I was younger one of the folklore that used to be popular in my home country (Ghana) was “Anansesem” it simply means “spider tales”. It was a set of stories or fables about a trickster spider called Kwaku Ananse. Even though he is a spider, he appears like a man. In most of the stories, he tries to trick people for his own gain but his plans always backfires, mainly due to his own conceit, and when they do, he turns back into a spider and scurries up into the corner of a wall in shame. The adults usually told us these ananse stories to discourage us from doing stealing or lying etc. The stories were also a good way for us to socialize. All the kids in the area would come and sit around the adult telling the story; food will be made and passed around. After the stories, we will just be quiet in amazement or in fear, and then we will all run home because we don’t want Kwaku Anase to catch us and try to trick us. (Sometimes I blame this for my fear of spiders) As we grow older the fictional stories we hear or read become less “storybook like” and more...
Words: 678 - Pages: 3
...the beholder. They are cute kitties, sweet puppies, and then we have animals like rats, chickens, cows, and pigs. Some animals we have emotional commitment with and those we do not. We are arguing for animals to have the rights as humans do. There are animals being used in labs, in poor conditions on farms for mast productions, and animals being mistreated. Should any animal have the right to life? Should they have the right to be pain free? Have right to food? Animals cannot not speak for themselves, so people are having to speak up for them. Animals do have rights that are the same as humans. Whether or not proving if animals should have the right could change how they are treated and the usage of animals. "What we conclude about animal rights will have consequences for the food we eat and the clothes we wear, and it will have direct bearing on the kinds of science we think morally justifiable"(Cohen, 1986). The argument here other than animal rights is that humans think they are in control of their own rights or wrong ideas as long as society or culture goes along with them. When asking the question, “what are our moral obligations to animals,” the argument is that we do not have any obligations toward animals, due to them being species, not taking part of political contract or of determining what right or wrong is. Humans have laws in place that we have created, therefore, non-humans are expose to the rules we created. Being morally good, legal, fitting or proper is defined...
Words: 1510 - Pages: 7