“California recognizes imperfect self defence in homicide cases where the killing resulted from an “actual but unreasonable belief in the necessity to defend against imminent peril to life or great bodily injury” CALJIC No. 5.17 (1995) Menendez v. Terhune (2005). According to the Menendez v. Terhune Journal, “Under California law, a defendant is entitled to a jury under instruction only if substantial evidence, or “evidence sufficient to deserve consideration by the jury,” supports the giving of
Words: 1007 - Pages: 5
II. APPELLANT 'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL WAS PROTECTED WHEN APPELLANT 'S COUNSEL WAS PRESENT DURING THE LINE-UP PROCESS AND POLICE INTERVIEW IS NOT A CRITICAL STAGE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WITHIN THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL GUARANTEE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT BECAUSE THERE IS NO FACE TO FACE CONFRONTATION The Sixth Amendment states that the accused shall enjoy the right to the assistance of counsel for his defense in all criminal procedures. However, police interview is not a critical stage
Words: 1871 - Pages: 8
false confessions from people more often than I am sure many of them would care to admit. This outcome can often be attributed to the defendant’s incompetency about their rights upon arrest prior to interrogation. Following the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) at the time of arrest, law enforcement officials are required to inform the defendant of their Miranda rights before the officers can interrogate the defendants, these rights are as followed; You have the right to remain silent, if you give
Words: 1078 - Pages: 5
Shirene Tabarestani 1895-0581 The Central Park Five Documentary In one of the most well known cities of the United States, New York City was the central focus in the 1980’s. Five minority youths aged 14 to 16 were arrested and convicted of rape, sexual assault, and almost murdering 28-year old white female investment banker, Trisha Meili, as she was jogging through Central Park on the night of April 19th, 1989. These innocent Latino and African American five young men— Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson
Words: 1903 - Pages: 8
investigators form violating a suspect fifth-amendment rights. A series of unfortunate events led up to the Miranda Rights being implemented into the criminal justice system. On March 2nd, 1963 a young woman reported her tape to the Phoenix, Arizona police department. She told the police that she had been driven to the desert and raped by a male unfamiliar to her. Although her polygraph test was inconclusive they arrested Ernesto Miranda. Ernesto Miranda had a prior history as a peeping tom
Words: 1300 - Pages: 6
Terea Snider The Legal Process CJAD 310- FlWW – 13 March 16, 2013 The Legal Process Suspect to Defendant: Facing Charges The suspect is formally charged with a crime. The police officer then sends a report to the Prosecutor’s office, fully staffed with lawyers and their job is to initiate and to prosecute criminal cases. The Prosecutor must then decide to make an independent decision to determine what charges need to be filed and with the help of citizens who will then be known as the
Words: 1658 - Pages: 7
The Miranda Rights are the most common legal issues that must be observed when conducting an interview or an interrogation. Suspects are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and they have rights that must be respected. Arresting officers must always inform suspects of their alienable rights. Failure to inform the suspect of his or her rights can lead to legal technicalities that can render any information taken during the suspect’s interview or interrogation null and void. The Miranda Rights provides
Words: 377 - Pages: 2
DEVELOPMENT AND SCOPE OF THE MIRANDA WARNINGS Miranda v. Arizona - 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Ernesto Miranda, a 22 year old male, was accused of raping an 18 year old female in 1963. Upon his apprehension, Mr. Miranda was presented with a confession requiring his signature; Mr. Miranda underwent a police interrogation that was reported as spanning upwards of 2 hours – within his interrogation, he made a full confession, agreeing that he did so without duress, force, or threat. However, at no time
Words: 957 - Pages: 4
or her rights or the statement that was said will be disregarded in the court of law. (U.S. Gov Info/Miranda: Right of Silence) These rights are called Miranda rights which protect citizens of the U.S. from self incrimination. (See cases Miranda v Arizona, Dickerson v United States and Escobedo v Illinois) "If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. At that time, the individual must have an opportunity to confer with the
Words: 547 - Pages: 3
unlikely ever to be undone. The impact of segregation is greater when it has the sanction of law. Conclusion (Vote): 9 Votes for Brown, 0 Votes against, Legal provision; Equal Protection Impact: Schools can no longer be segregated. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Facts: Miranda was unaware of his rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and offered incriminating evidence during police interrogations. Issues: The question is whether or not the police is
Words: 385 - Pages: 2
