Assess Utilitarianism

Page 9 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Premium Essay

    Kantianism And Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism and Kantianism Utilitarianism is where an action is only morally right if it benefits most of the beings in a community. Kantianism, however, is more about whether it is right or wrong instead of focusing on the consequences that follow. An example of utilitarianism would be a person who recently got a raise at their job. They want to spend the money on things they want, like new clothes, furniture, and the like. They later decide that it would be a better idea to buy presents

    Words: 2352 - Pages: 10

  • Premium Essay

    Double Effect Research Paper

    Applying The Principle Of Double Effect. “But what about cases where an action aims at a good end that is achieved only through what is, according to natural law, evil? For example, in order to preserve my life (a basic good according to natural law), I must kill my attacker. Since killing violates the basic good of life, I seemingly violated the natural law at the same time I was obeying it. The “principle of double effect” has been developed by natural law theorists to resolve such dilemmas. In

    Words: 470 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    CRISPR-Cas9 Case Study

    on a patient. A rule utilitarian would evaluate using CRISPR-Cas9 in accordance to rules surrounding the particular action. A rule utilitarian would only act if the law permitted all of the actions. According to John Stuart Mill in his book Utilitarianism, "to have a right, then, is, I conceive, to have something which society ought to defend me in the

    Words: 458 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Consequentialism And Obese Children

    Consequentialism According to consequentialism theory, the morally right action one should take is the one that will result in the best overall consequences (Leroch 2014). In this case, helping Puerto Rican children be healthier and live longer is the stated moral good, therefore, to Consequentialists, any actions that promote such a consequence are considered morally or ethically correct. Critics consider it unfair to fine poor parents who do not or are not able to help their obese children eat

    Words: 807 - Pages: 4

  • Premium Essay

    Utilitarianism

    The principle of utilitarianism the moral test for the rightness or wrongness of an action. It is based on the principle of utility, aiming to maximise pleasure and minimize pain. The word utility comes from the Greek “utilis” meaning beneficial/useful theory. It is a teleological consequential argument, as everything is focused on the end result and whether or not it generates happiness. It is relative to the situation as can bend the rules, allowing hedonistic acts to occur, hedonistic acts are

    Words: 1587 - Pages: 7

  • Free Essay

    Equal Consideration

    of sentience. So in the case that animals do feel emotions like pleasure and plain, we must give them equal consideration of our interest. To help understand Peter Singer one must be familiar with the ideas of utilitarianism. There are two moral principles when talking about utilitarianism; the first principle is equality, in which everyone is treated with the same rights, and the second principle is the best balance of satisfaction over frustration. As discussed in class, human beings have the tendency

    Words: 290 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Describe the Distinctive Features of a Utilitarian Ethical System

    features of a Utilitarian ethical system The principle of utility states that actions are acceptable as long as they have an outcome of either happiness or pleasure. There are two main types of utilitarianism; Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism. The two main figureheads of modern utilitarianism were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Jeremy Bentham came up with the idea of the hedonic calculus. This was his system of measuring how good or bad a consequence is. It was also known as the

    Words: 846 - Pages: 4

  • Free Essay

    How Fair Is the Judgment That Bentham’s Utilitarianism Is a ‘Pig Philosophy’ or ‘Swine Ethic.’ (10 Marks)

    How fair is the judgment that Bentham’s Utilitarianism is a ‘pig philosophy’ or ‘swine ethic.’ (10 marks) Thomas Carlyle was a critic of Bentham’s approach of Utilitarianism. He reflects on Bentham’s approach as a ‘pig philosophy’. This is because he saw it more as a morality based on the ‘swinish pleasure of the masses.’ Bentham’s philosophy was referred as a swinish or the pig’s philosophy as it endorsed on the greatest amount of pleasure for the greatest number of people. This is degrading

    Words: 590 - Pages: 3

  • Free Essay

    Utilitarianism

    they are any longer capable of enjoying.” This quote is especially important for understanding Mill’s defense of utilitarianism in front of critiques that suggest this doctrine to be one of immediate pleasure; a doctrine that will stop people from accelerating their development and enriching their character through knowledge. The critique addresses the focus of utilitarianism as a doctrine that emphasizes immediate and animalistic pleasures and turns them into the main reason for being.

    Words: 506 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism is a moral theory generally considered to have been founded by Jeremy Bentham, a 19th century English philosopher and social reformer. It is centered on the concept of happiness, and those who seek it. The idea is that all people seek happiness, and that it is the ultimate goal of all human beings to be happy. Therefore, according to classical utilitarianism, when a person wishes to act in an ethically sound manner he or she should strive to bring about the greatest possible amount

    Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Page   1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 50