events going on around the world and also in the state that they based in. When the media decides to expose a particular issue they should do so in an objective, fair and accurate way, but that is not always the case in most circumstances. Utilitarianism suggests that there is an obvious solution that is fair, and it may be one that appeals to common sense as well. If you look at the responsibilities of the media from a utilitarian point of view the media should inform people about issues that
Words: 875 - Pages: 4
A potential response is that one may proceed in Trolley but not in Transplant. The key difference can be explained by the Kantian idea of using people as an end in itself, rather than a means. In essence, for an agent to proceed in Transplant, he physically needs the body of a healthy man in order to save the five; whereas in Trolley the bystander does not use his victim in any sense (Thompson, Reading B). While this idea explains Trolley and Transplant in its vanilla form, it fails to explain the
Words: 456 - Pages: 2
quality of software, Software is expensive, the risk of being caught is minimal and etc(Siponen, Mikko T., and Tero Vartiainen. "Unauthorized Copying of Software."). According to Act Utilitarianism all these reasons can be considered as actions to increase happiness so they could be ethical while if you use Rule Utilitarianism none of these reasons are ethical, these reasons are not compelling and we all must obey the rules that do not deceive and do not cheat. From what I’ve learnt in class I think it’s
Words: 1111 - Pages: 5
Responsibility to Animals Animals only exist through the eyes of the beholder. They are cute kitties, sweet puppies, and then we have animals like rats, chickens, cows, and pigs. Some animals we have emotional commitment with and those we do not. We are arguing for animals to have the rights as humans do. There are animals being used in labs, in poor conditions on farms for mast productions, and animals being mistreated. Should any animal have the right to life? Should they have the right to be
Words: 1510 - Pages: 7
achieve some larger end” (Tremblay et al 2008, 9). In other words, the consequence of the action will provide the information if the action was right or wrong. The consequentialist justification brings a social and political benefit. Third, the utilitarianism theory
Words: 415 - Pages: 2
Explain both the general principles of utilitarianism and the distinctive features of Mill's utilitarianism Utilitarianism says that the result or the consequence of an act is the real measure of whether it is good or bad. This theory emphasizes ends over means. It is therefore, a teleological or deontological ethics theory. Teleological ethics determines whether an action is right or wrong depending on the consequence or end result. Deontological, on the other hand, is when the actions are intrinsically
Words: 852 - Pages: 4
"Prepaid Plastic Is Creeping Into Credit" 1. The textbook authors explain that "Managers operate in two organizational environments--internal and external--both made up of stakeholders...". Which organizational environment and which two groups or forces in the organizational environment are best illustrated in the article? Explain why. You must be specific. Ans: External stakeholders are best illustrated in the article and it is people or groups in the organization external environment that
Words: 353 - Pages: 2
Morality (from the Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behavior") is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper.[1] Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from acode of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion, or culture, or it can derive from a standard that a person believes should be universal.[2] Morality may also be specifically synonymous with "goodness" or "rightness."
Words: 1480 - Pages: 6
Egoism: This theory looks at an action in light of these consequences for only one entity, the person deciding whether an action is ethical. In other words, if an action is good for me, then it is ethical. The plus of that theory is that it is easy to apply--you need only look at a proposed action, figure out the consequences for you and if they are good then the action is ethical. The minus of the theory is that it obviously leads to many conclusions that most would agree are not ethical. Suppose
Words: 1418 - Pages: 6
Consequentialism and Utilitarianism The struggle between intrinsic and instrumental value seems to be eonian, and even though they do have very different meanings, people sometimes find it very difficult to distinguish between them. If something is said to encompass intrinsic value, it means that it is good or bad in itself, without having any reference to who it is good/bad for, or what it is good/bad at – most references define it as “just being good in itself”; a very popular example of this
Words: 589 - Pages: 3
