state) brought the suit and its sovereign interests are protected. The defendant is right that his HHL’s are nothing like the roastpiles, however, like the roastpiles they present a substantial imposition on the plaintiff’s profitability of their business just as Madison was hurt in Ducktown Sulphur. Though an injunction was not issued in Ducktown Sulphur, this was to protect the 12,000 employee’s jobs because there were no other options in the town. Johnson’s HHL’s only benefit his farm and there
Words: 598 - Pages: 3
In the case of Roberta Smith’s argument against Patrick Johnson’s use of “Hungry Hungry Ladybugs”, or HHLs, Mrs. Smith is likely to be granted both an injunction and damages by the Court. The evidence brought forth makes it a clear case of nuisance under the common law of New Columbia, which also disputes all of Mr. Johnson’s counter-arguments. Barring unforeseen developments due to new data, Mrs. Smith’s claim falls in line with similar cases that have been granted varying levels of damages and
Words: 630 - Pages: 3
for accepting the lift from a driver, knowing that he consumed sizeable quantity of alcohol, which would lead to the dangerous driving with a negative outcome. Thus, he cites section 466 from the American Law Institution Restatement of the Law of Torts, which says that the plaintiff’s contributorily negligent behavior involves unconstrained and irrational exposure to the risk caused by the defendant’s unreasonable
Words: 1381 - Pages: 6
NEGIGENCE In the 1928 edition of Bevan on Negligence stated that negligence is “it has to deal……with duties as they appear when the normal standard of performance is not attained…considering defaults in conduct, and only in the second place with the adequate discharge of obligations”. 1. DUTY OF CARE Gleeson CJ and Gummow J, the approach to determine a duty of care is to identify the “salient features” that combine to constitute a sufficiently close relationship to give rise to a duty
Words: 11108 - Pages: 45
operation of the particular business. The Act applies to employers that employ fifteen or more employees. (Fundamentals of Business Law, 2013, p. 431) Also, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of age against individuals forty years of age and older. For the Act to apply the employer must employ more than twenty individuals. (Fundamentals of Business Law, 2013, p. 429) In this case of CARDWARE Inc., the business does not have a qualifying
Words: 1307 - Pages: 6
reasonable people) to have a lower opinion of Bob, which can cause his business to suffer. The ethical aspect of this issue is the fact that Martha being a reasonable person should have known that it is ethically wrong to talk about somebody in a hurtful way especially among his peers. Martha will be liable for defamation. She slandered Bob’s reputation and as a result his clients will doubt his word and his reputation and business as a result will suffer. The statement “Bob just doesn’t keep promises”
Words: 508 - Pages: 3
A federal agency such as (SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is responsible for making sure they are enforcing the federal securities set forth. In order for this agency to be active in enforcing these laws Congress allows the agency to bring Civil enforcement actions against anyone whether a company or individual who has committed accounting fraud. By providing false information or any other violations of the securities law SEC makes it a requirement that people or companies submit quarterly
Words: 959 - Pages: 4
DISCHARGEMENT OF CONTRACT The law of contracts forms a substantial part of our various relationships that can have some sort of influence over us on an almost daily basis – even when there is no physical contract in front of us we may still be privy to some sort of contractual obligation. Alternatively, if you’re a fan of social theorists such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, you may argue that we’re also bound by ‘the social contract’, but we digress. Getting back to our original point
Words: 2112 - Pages: 9
Preemption Under the ACAA to Give Discrimination Victim Her Day in Court Kelsey M. Taylor I. Introduction In Gilstrap v. United Air Lines, Inc., the Ninth Circuit saved a discrimination victim’s suit from dismissal when it held that state-law tort claims against an air carrier were not preempted by federal law. The panel did agree with the lower court that an airline terminal is not a “place of public accommodation” governed by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Nevertheless, the court
Words: 2841 - Pages: 12
Understanding Work Related Injuries Workers compensation was developed in the early 1900’s to provide employees who have been injured on the job with compensation for their injuries, and it protects employers from liability for employee’s injuries. The benefit of workers compensation really goes both ways, it not only provides a protection for the employer from lawsuits, but also provides the employee a sort of financial safety net so if they are injured on the job and cannot work they
Words: 894 - Pages: 4
