Case Study 1: Management of Corporations Legal Issues According to (Harvey v.Facey, 1983), there was no intention disclosed in the offer, therefor, Greg’s acceptance was not legally binding. Upon a sample contract with Innovative Designs, it states numerous times throughout the contract that a person shall not work in similar services as he works in the organization to earn profit for his own (Sec.gov, n.d.). Furthermore, one shall not do similar work for up to three months after termination of
Words: 554 - Pages: 3
A. Give 2 specific examples/ scenarios of each of the following intentional torts: 1. Invasion of Privacy a. Most retail places, they ask their customers at the checkout station for their phone number, email address, or home address. It said to be that there are third party organization who willing to pay for these information and start sending to these customers their product advertisements, or unnecessary information loads that the customers do not have control over. b. Every tax season
Words: 746 - Pages: 3
Chelsea MIchael CLN 4U1 McCabe 09/30/2016 Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy Essay Canada’s laws are a combination of many different philosophies about how to achieve justice. One of the most impactful philosophists are Plato because he believed that humans by nature are good which is a belief that Canada has adopted. Aristotle also believed in natural law and that everyone should have access to the same resources despite financial advantages or disadvantages similarly to Canada's beliefs. Lastly
Words: 919 - Pages: 4
I would like to propose for the P plate laws to be re- enacted, the new P Plate laws are creating more accidents and more unsafe driving on the South Australian roads as all P platers (who have to have their plates showing) are only allowed to carry one passenger at a time and have a curfew. With the new curfew being 12am- 5am, anyone who has their P-plates is unable to drive places in case of an emergency. What would happen if the P-plater was to get a call in the middle of the night by a family
Words: 458 - Pages: 2
Plaintiff: Kadlec Medical Center, its insurer Western Professional Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellees Defendant: Lakeview Anesthesia Associates, A Professional Medical Association; Lakeview Medical Center LLC, doing business as Lakeview Regional Medical Center; Dr. Mark Dennis; Dr. William J. Preau, III, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Dr. David Baldone; Dr. Allan Parr, Defendants-Cross-Appelees Facts: Dr. Robert Berry, licensed worked at Lakeview Anesthesia Associates
Words: 518 - Pages: 3
1. What was the legal issue in this case? Pregnancy Discrimination - Laxton was the target of discrimination because of her pregnancy and targeted with false causes which lead to her termination from the company. 2. What did the court decide? “The jury returned a verdict in favor of Laxton, awarding $127,000 in back pay, $57,000 in front pay, $100,000 in mental anguish, and $200,000 in punitive damages.” 3. What reason does the employer provide for Laxton’s termination? Gap claimed that Laxton
Words: 368 - Pages: 2
Zaroff was roaming the streets of Bath after his successful hunting trip looking for a place to stay. The hotel he was previously staying in would not allow him to take in any game, be it dead or alive, no matter how many times he insisted that they would regret not housing the incredible General Zaroff. Then when the hotel threatened to call the police, the General decided to leave. Besides, who would want to stay at a place that holds no value to the hunt, Zaroff thought to himself. Exasperated
Words: 1024 - Pages: 5
Martti Koskenniemi maked two arguments against the idea of jus cogens. First, Koskenniemi argues that peremptory norms are a form of “kitsch”, a false universalism, based in a particular European tradition (international law), which provides the international lawyer with a series of ideas that allows him or her to achieve a “nostalgic feel for an abstract mankind” and to ignore the very real problems and divisions that exist in the world. For Koskenniemi, peremptory norms refer to nothing factual
Words: 289 - Pages: 2
CC Cough. S The patient is a 43-year-old female with a history of asthma for which she takes Singulair as well as albuterol on a p.r.n. basis. Generally, she does not need her albuterol on a regular basis. Three weeks ago however, both of her daughters, as well as herself had a typical cold. She states that all of the symptoms of the cold got better except she is left with a cough, which is productive of yellow to greenish sputum. She does state the cough is fairly consistent throughout the
Words: 358 - Pages: 2
The Cooper v. Oklahoma case shaped the first phrase because “Oklahoma’s practice of requiring the defendant to prove incompetence by clear and convincing evidence imposes a significant risk of an erroneous determination that the defendant is competent. Oklahoma’s clear and convincing evidence standard affects a class of cases in which the defendant has already demonstrated that he is more likely than not incompetent.” From this case, the Court concluded that preponderance of evidence is sufficient
Words: 1775 - Pages: 8
