Discuss the potential criminal liability of Jonty and Patrick for the non-fatal offences against the person, including any relevant defences (50 marks) Jonty is likely to liable for an s20 or s18 offence under the Offences against the Persons Act 1861. S20 is the malicious wounding or inflicting GBH with intention or subjective recklessness as to causing some harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years. This is the same maximum sentence as an s47 offence which can be seen as a problematic
Words: 613 - Pages: 3
early common law established a process called judicial law Judicial law is the power of a court to review legislative and executive actions, such as a law or an official act of a government employee or agent, to determine whether they are constitutional Established in 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison Also allows courts to review constitutionality of lower courts’ decisions Supremacy clause, located in Article VI of Constitution, provides that the Constitution, laws, and treaties
Words: 2852 - Pages: 12
Criminal Law in Action Final Project: Arson Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 Arson: Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 Michigan v. Tyler was decided in 1978. This was the first arson case to go to the Supreme Court. Only a few defense attorneys read the case briefs which made the fire investigator’s job easier. Before this decision search warrant at a fire was unheard of. Loren Tyler and Robert Tompkins leased a furniture store, Tyler’s Action, in Oakland County, Michigan. On January 21st
Words: 1895 - Pages: 8
Origins of American Criminal Law Angel Vance Scott Levasseur LEG 320 10/27/13 This weeks assignment is about the Origins of American Criminal Law. In my paper I am going to talk about the fourteenth amendment to the US Constitution. The Fourteenth amendment talks about the rights guaranteed privileges and immunities of citizenship, due process, and equal protection. In section one of this amendment it states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and
Words: 1809 - Pages: 8
Flagler College History and Evolution of the Death Penalty in the United States Ethics of Judiciary and Sociology of Criminal Law The history of the death penalty is tumultuous, from the punishment being initiated to abolished, and then reinstated. The death penalty, initiated in the United States in 1622, continues to be exploited by 32 states, regardless of its integrity and use to discourage people from committing serious crimes. It is now being eroded again and the abolition of the death
Words: 2123 - Pages: 9
to serve on the jury. The jury had been given the authority to judge the facts of the case, and them apply the law that was given by the judge to those facts, and render a verdict of guilty or not guilty. During the jury trial, the accused person will be represented either by a paid lawyer of his or her choice or by a court-appointed one. During the trial it is solely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused person, and it is up to the accused person and his representation to rebut
Words: 499 - Pages: 2
The topic of immigration here in the US is a very opinionated debate that is always being discussed, criticized, or viewed in some way. Whether we see it in the news, hear political representatives, or everyday citizens discussing their views on immigration, it seems everyone has something to say in regards to the topic. No matter where one gets their information on the subject matter, it is important to understand that immigration here in the US is a multicomplex issue that has various key
Words: 299 - Pages: 2
Resolution 827 (United Nations Security Council 25 de May de 1993) Azuero, J. C. (2008). DIFERENCIAS ENTRE EL DERECHO PENAL INTERNACIONAL Y EL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PENAL. Prolegómenos: Derechos y valores, dec, 181-211 Clariana, G. G. (1976). Sobre la Noción de Cooperación en el Derecho Internacional. Revista Española de Derecho Internacional N° 1 Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja - Genova. (s.f.). El régimen de consentimiento del Estado contra la jurisdicción universal. Recuperado el 1 de
Words: 320 - Pages: 2
Partene i denne saken er båteieren, Per Ås og Harald Holm. Rettsspørsmålet er om Per Ås og Harald Holm kan straffes for tyveri, (jf. straffeloven §257) Lovhjemmel I straffeloven §257 handler det om tyveri. ”For tyveri straffes den som borttar eller medvirker til å bortta en gjenstand som helt eller delvis tilhører en annen, i hensikt å skaffe seg eller andre en uberettiget vinning ved tilegnelsen av gjenstanden”. I dette tilfellet var båten i båteierens besittelse, selv om det var Ås og Holm
Words: 531 - Pages: 3
Criminal Liability of Corporation: An Indian Perspective Manjeet Kumar Sahu* Abstract Current Supreme Court’s decision have made the stand apparently clear in India that the Corporation can be prosecuted as a separate legal entity even in the offences where the punishment is imprisonment. This Paper explains the present status of India on Corporate Criminal Liability and how judicial decision is inconsistent with the legal provisions. It further provides the current situation about the corporate
Words: 7426 - Pages: 30
