Jean-Bertrand LEFEBVRE Sophie HENNEKAM -TREGUIER Inju YANG-McCOURT FORMAT : 3 hours weekly: 1 ½ hr. of lecture, 1 ½ hr. tutorial 2 tutorial groups will follow a weekend seminar format CREDITS : 5 ECTS credits PRE-REQUISITE MODULES: None LEARNING OBJECTIVES : This module is designed to prepare students for their future role as business managers by giving them a conceptual
Words: 2975 - Pages: 12
B10048 Business Management (2010-12) XLRI School of Business and Human Resources Organizational Behavior Grouping 1. Introduction A group can be broadly defined as a collection of two or more individuals, who have come together for a common purpose. Generally, the common purpose is apparent as is the case with trade unions- which are formed with the purpose of upholding the interests
Words: 2765 - Pages: 12
Effective leaders develop effective groups. It is paramount for leaders to establish democracy and open communication within a group. I will be explaining what tactics are useful for leaders to develop effective group participation. I will further explain how negotiation and persuasion can help ease conflict and controversy. Groups can be effective or non effective, they can operate as a democracy or a hierarchy. Depending on the type of group and activities performed there are different levels
Words: 671 - Pages: 3
Trust and support 3. Power equalization 4. Confrontation 5. Participation History of OD Relatively new field of study – 50’s & 60’s No unifying theory – just models of practice Emerged from study of group dynamics & planned change. Late 40’s T-groups – training groups, behavioral skills and individual insight into problem solving Kurt Lewin at MIT – RCGD, Teachers College/Columbia Four Trunk Stems of OD Laboratory Training Survey research and Feedback Action Research
Words: 745 - Pages: 3
Groups and Teams Paper Anita Fields Management 307 Paul Mahajan April 27, 2011 Groups and Teams A team is internally
Words: 698 - Pages: 3
does the leader emerge in this group? The appointed leader of the group is the jury foreman, but he ends up really acting as a facilitator in that he tells everyone where to sit, and when there is a call to vote, he tallies the votes. At one point, he even tries to relinquish the role as foreman. It is the architect that emerges as the real leader of the group by encouraging discussion of the facts laid out before them. 2. What bias do you observe in this group and from where does it originate
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
.................................................................................................3 Evolution of the Group.................................................................................................................4 Group Structure/Dynamics..........................................................................................................5 Intra-Group Conflict.............................................................................................................
Words: 2765 - Pages: 12
Strayer University PSY 110 Group Dynamics Assignment 4 Lauren Vinson Strayer University PSY 110 Group Dynamics Assignment 4 Lauren Vinson Introduction; At my previous college in Richmond, Virginia I was involved in a work-study job. In the work-study job, the job involved Audio Visual Services. The description of the job was to provide media equipment for certain events on campus. In the work-study job, I worked in a group but, also by myself at times. When I applied to the job
Words: 1033 - Pages: 5
Psychology Program………………………………………. Individual Case Summary Format…………………………………………………………………. Family Case Summary Format…………………………………………………………………….. Group Case Summary Format………………………………………………….………………….. Group Case Summary (Process)………………….………………………………………... Group Case Summary (Psycho-educational)……………………….………………............ Group Case Summary (Support/Self-Help Group)………………………………………… Couples Case Summary Format……………………………………………………........................ 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 8 9 12 13 13 14 15 16 Guidelines
Words: 4473 - Pages: 18
Ford Fairlane Dr. Professor Teacher MBA555 29 November 2014 Social Loafing: Laziness or Something Else? A frequent observation whenever groups of people gather together in team settings is that certain team members underperform relative to the performance of their teammates. The first reported observation of this was by Ringelmann in 1913 who demonstrated that men collectively pulling on a rope do not pull as hard as when pulling alone (Ringelmann). This phenomenon, termed Social Loafing (Latané
Words: 2696 - Pages: 11
