the facts and assess what the likely decision would be on this issue. Exam: identify the legal issue, apply the law to the facts, and choose the correct answer, ethics or discussion. September 25th, 2015 - Business Torts – Lecture 3 *1 Deceit (Fraud): A false, intentional, representation that was relied upon by the plaintiff and which caused the plaintiff to suffer a loss. [Representation: description or portrayal in a particular way (e.g. through a statement)] Elements of Deceit: *
Words: 947 - Pages: 4
in more than just a criminal way. The residents of the nursing home had family members in and they themselves where members of the community. 2.What intentional torts do you think the nursing aides committed? Please give a definition for each intentional tort that you choose with an explination of why you chose that tort. The intentional tort Assault and Battery is the only one that seems to apply. As defined Assault is the threaten of harm, while battery is the actual harm to a person. The girls
Words: 629 - Pages: 3
The tort of trespass against the person is the relevant issue here which consists of assault, battery ,false imprisonment and emotional suffering which can be identified in the first problem question. RULES: The Non-Fatal Offences against the Persons Act 1997 is the act which protects a person against the tort of trespass against a person. Battery is the direct application of physical contact upon the person of another without his or her consent, express or implied. It is contact which is outside
Words: 1238 - Pages: 5
on the grounds that he did not have the intent to hit Talmage and was therefore not liable for battery. Issue: If an actor intends to inflict an intentional tort upon one party and accidentally harms a second party, can the actor be held liable to the second party for battery? Holding and Rule: Yes. If an actor intends to inflict an intentional tort upon one party and accidentally harms a second party, the actor can be held liable to the second party for battery under the doctrine of transferred
Words: 329 - Pages: 2
duty, Cause in fact, proximate (legal) cause, and Actual damages. An intentional tort is one where the tortfeasor was willful in bringing about a particular event that caused harm to another party. Negligence is an accidental (without willful intent) event that caused harm to another party. The difference between the two is the mind-set and intent of the tortfeasor. I will describe an example of negligence and an intentional tort. I was at the swimming pool with some of my friends and one of them
Words: 445 - Pages: 2
HSA515 February/1/2011 Healthcare Policy Law and ethics Abstract The Snow Storm Lawsuit is a case of Negligence, Duty to act, and wrongful death. This paper will explain the legal, ethical and professional considerations. The Chief Executive Officer of a small non-profit community hospital were on vacation in the Bahamas, the are was hit by a large snow storm, in this case, many of the hospitals health care providers were unable to make it to work, as a result. This paper
Words: 1140 - Pages: 5
Torts Outline- Brill Fall 2001 Overview: *What is a tort? A civil wrong other than a breach of contract for which the law provides a remedy. *Purposes of Tort law: Deter wrongful Encourage socially responsible behavior Restore injured parties to their original condition Peaceful means Intentional Torts I. Intent a. Definition—(1) voluntary acts for the purpose of causing [the essential element of the tort] OR (2) voluntary acts with knowledge to a substantial certainty that
Words: 12012 - Pages: 49
EDA 555 Preempting Liability Preempting Liability Different liability issues are addressed in the campus of Del Castillo Elementary. The following would be some of the issues that will be covered in this paper: safety in school, intentional and unintentional torts, liability and negligence, supervisor duties, FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), and student record confidentiality. School safety is and should always be a key component of their campus. As mentioned by Gay (2014)
Words: 857 - Pages: 4
is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal and/or civil liability False imprisonment False imprisonment is a restraint of a person in a bounded area without justification or consent. False imprisonment is a common-law felony and a tort. It applies to private as well as governmental detention. When it comes to public police, the proving of false imprisonment is sufficient
Words: 626 - Pages: 3
mentally incompetent person, who was a charge of the state while standing in Walmart. The intentional tort of battery consists of intent to contact, not intent to harm. This contact must be deliberate and it must also be harmful. However, the actor does not need to know that his action is harmful in order for the tort of battery to apply. Along with this, the state is not liable for the intentional tort of battery due to legislatively granted immunity. The Wagners brought suit against the state
Words: 394 - Pages: 2
