Discuss the United States v. Greber and United States v. McClatchey case questions 1. How, if at all, can you distinguish Greber from other instances of payment for professional services? Suppose the percentage Dr. Greber paid to the physicians had not exceeded Medicare’s guideline? Would that payment still amount to prohibited remuneration in this court’s eyes? Yes. I think Dr. Gerber is still responsible. Although the payments made had legitimate purposes, they could still be viewed as intent
Words: 647 - Pages: 3
It is good practice to include in a contract which state’s law will govern disputes that arise under the contract. A) True B) False 2. Stare decisis is typically of lesser importance to the Supreme Court in deciding constitutional issues than to trial courts in deciding specific controversies. A) True B) False 3. It is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine for State A to adopt a law identical to one adopted by State B. A) True B) False 4. Many areas of law important to
Words: 2742 - Pages: 11
conference. If the charges are serious they may not be discussed at the arraignment, and may be asked to appear in front of a grand jury. Your attorney may ask you if you want to speak on your own behalf (Cowling A.C.). If the case goes to the grand jury your lawyer has to prepare if you have any witnesses and to present you case in front of a jury
Words: 552 - Pages: 3
they think that they are worst of being left of the hook. I did hear something about domestic violence I just didn’t know who it was against. Alor of the people there seem to be involved with this case, or that they knew the defendant. This wasn’t a jury trial, the judge made the decision. The mother had stated that he had been left of the hook that she felt the court wasn’t taking this serious. The judge then told the mother that they are taking this serious that he is just making judgments according
Words: 361 - Pages: 2
commit even more violent crimes. If the criteria was more stringent we would have more innocent people found guilty and behind bars. The changes that I would recommend to the courtroom work group, is to allow the judge to have the jury present during the plea bargain. When the defendant enters a plea of guilty, the
Words: 334 - Pages: 2
A State of Confusion Wendy Haugen BUS 415 Douglas Edmunds Tanya Trucker’s lawsuit versus the State of Confusion conveys a paradigm concurrent with the course book regarding Interstate Commerce. Commercial traffic within the states, considered Interstate commerce, will affect commerce between states. The Commerce Clause allows the federal government to regulate the interstate commerce. The statute enacted by the state of Confusion requires all towing trailers and trucks that drive through
Words: 1013 - Pages: 5
the initial pass for a civil or criminal proceeding to have a voice in court. Appellate courts have authority to reassess findings decided on at trial court level. There are four essential parts amidst trial and appellate courts: purpose, evidence, juries, and judges (Ehow.com, 2012). Purpose Trial court focuses on finding the facts in determining the best decision for the case brought forth. The focus for appellate court is quite different since the facts in the proceeding came from trial
Words: 430 - Pages: 2
Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice Brent Weaver Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice, CJA/423 Torria Richardson 5-30-11 Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice Society has shown racial diversity among communities. Racial disparity can be found in the criminal justice system. A system designed to be fair and equal to individuals is not existent. Racial diversity can be found at the time of arrest to the time of sentencing. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the diversity
Words: 1983 - Pages: 8
searched and address of the residence. Also must be signed reviewed and signed by a judge. The prosecutions and defenses list is a list composed of witnesses that each side will call to help support each side of the case, and give testimony for the jury of what they believe took place. On the oral communications side will be the case summery in which both the prosecution and defense will put together a summary of the way they believe all event in the case took place. The judge will then give their
Words: 908 - Pages: 4
obviously clear as it seemed in court. The defence and the prosecution have rested and the jury is filling into the jury room to decide if a young sixteen year old boy of a minority race is guilty or innocent of murdering his father. It begins as an ‘open and shut’ case of murder, but soon becomes a mini drama of each of the jurors’ prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused, and each other, which every jury room tries to avoid. Prejudices’ and misconceptions are formed through personal experiences
Words: 328 - Pages: 2
