Rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments vary. Their impact does take on a whole new light when you scope out the criminal proceeding type of jurisdictional stance if it’s looked at from a different scope and a different perspective when carrying on in the action of law. The Fourth Amendment for police officers has an impact on the everyday working person as they are commuting on highways and are subject to traffic stops for violation of codes. Police officers are given the legal authority
Words: 1491 - Pages: 6
This legal study will examine the meaning of voluntariness for the rule of confessions under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The premise of voluntariness for confessions defines the right of individuals to not be coerced into giving a statement that may incriminate them after being arrested and/or being interrogated by the police. In the framework of Canadian case law, it is important to understand the necessity of an “operating mind” as the foundation of a voluntary confession, which
Words: 1120 - Pages: 5
Patty Hearst had not been seen in months when, in February of 1974, surveillance videos of her and the group that kidnapped her surfaced showing them committing two armed robberies (FBI). A terrorist group kidnapped and ransomed her earlier that year; though, no one could find Hearst until months after the videos surfaced (FBI). After being found, Authorities put Hearst on trial for the crimes she had committed while kidnapped. Hearst’s case brought up many questions on how to proceed, to prosecute
Words: 2466 - Pages: 10
After an extensive twelve day of investigation, Miranda was eventually caught and was taken into custody for questioning. In the interrogation, he was told he had been identified in a lineup (which turned out to be false) and that he couldn’t leave until a confession was made. Miranda signed his confession with a statement that was already preprinted which indicated he knew his constitutional rights and was voluntarily confessing. Miranda was charged with rape and kidnapping in the first degree
Words: 875 - Pages: 4
Detective Hopewell begins warning Joseph of his Miranda Rights and further admissible interrogation by explicitly acknowledging that Joseph does not “really understand” what his Miranda Warnings or rights are. However, she states that is okay, because his mother (not his biological mother, but his step-mother, Krista) was present during the interrogation. Hopewell tells Joseph to let her know if he does not understand any part of what she is telling him so that she can further explain. He acknowledges
Words: 1856 - Pages: 8
The People of the State of New York v. Anthony Estavez (New York Supreme Court- Queens County, 2015) Facts: On December 27, 2013, uniformed police officer Arthur McCarthy observed Anthony Estevez attempting to sell tickets to a New York City Knicks basketball game to a couple at the entrance of Madison Square Garden in New York County. When Officer McCarthy attempted to place Mr. Estevez under arrest for his crimes, a struggle ensued causing physical injuries to both the Defendant and the officer
Words: 408 - Pages: 2
Jaime Ruiz 143 Evidence Crawford v. Washington 541 U.S. 36 (2004) Facts: On August 5, 1999, Kenneth Lee was stabbed at his apartment. Police later that day arrested the petitioner. After reading the petitioner and his wife their Miranda rights, detectives began to interrogated each one of them. Petitioner end up telling officers that Sylvia and him had gone on a search to find Lee because they were mad over an incident in which Lee had tried to rape Sylvia. The two eventually found Lee at his apartment
Words: 391 - Pages: 2
FACTS: Richard Barry Rocker and Joseph Cava [defendants-appellants], having waived a jury trial, were tried in the circuit court of the second circuit for creating a common nuisance at Puu Olai beach, County of Maui,contrary to Section 727-1 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. On February 26, 1969, officers of the Maui Police Department received a phone call from an anonymous person and, thereafter proceeded to the Puu Olai beach to look for nude sunbathers. The police surveyed the beach from a ridge
Words: 495 - Pages: 2
minor’s, who is in custody, Miranda Rights during his or her police interview. The issue came about when Michael Alvarado, seventeen year old from California, was interrogated by law enforcement officers about his involvement in a murder without his parents present. “During the interview, Alvarado confessed involvement. Based, in part, on these statements, Alvarado was convicted of second-degree murder and attempted robbery” (Oyez.org). Alvarado was never given his Miranda Rights, which created the
Words: 290 - Pages: 2
It is common knowledge that the Bill of Rights protects the right to not incriminate oneself. However, if one’s brain incriminates them, does that violate this principle? (Alan Alda, “Roundtable Discusses Sentence”). Is the ability to keep one’s thoughts private an unalienable right as well? No argument is as tremendous and concerning in the field of neurolaw as the question of “Do we have free will, and if we don’t do we have the right to hold people responsible?” With the rise of neuroscientific
Words: 1323 - Pages: 6
