can guide you in the right direction. I understand they did not read you your Miranda rights; however police required reading you your rights if you get arrested, if this does not happen it does not mean your case will automatically be thrown out. If the police have great deal of evidence that you did commit a crime, the officer did not need to rely on your answers to any question to convict you of your crime. ("Miranda Warning", 2007-2010) I understand that the police have not questioned you yet;
Words: 443 - Pages: 2
On March 13, 1963 a man named Ernesto Miranda was arrested by the Phoenix Police Department in his own home on circumstantial evidence that he kidnapped and raped a seventeen year old girl ten days earlier. The woman who reported the rape worked at a movie theater in downtown Phoenix and got off of work shortly after 11pm on March 2, 1963. The woman and one of her male coworkers took the bus home but before the woman reached her destination her coworker got off at one of the bus stops. Once she
Words: 1182 - Pages: 5
DUE PROCESS 2 Our founding fathers helped shape our country. The Constitution of the United States set down our rights as an individual of our country. Included in our Constitution is the right to a speedy trial and the right to due process. Everyone has a different opinion of what due process is. Our founding fathers gave us the right from the federal government to
Words: 1075 - Pages: 5
Due Process Paper Due Process Paper Due process A New York State Supreme Court Justice traces the constitutional concept of due process to the English concept of "the law of the land" (W. McKechnie, 1914). Due process, is a judicial requirement stating that enacted laws may not contain provisions that result in the unfair, arbitrary, or unreasonable treatment of an individual (Merriam-Webster). Due process of law is based on the idea that legal proceedings cannot interfere with life, liberty
Words: 1097 - Pages: 5
Birthday Headlines Pauline F. Bacay De La Salle – College of St. Benilde Introduction As final requirement for Technical Writing class, the students were to research on events that were headlines on the day they were born, 20 years, 50 years and 100 years ago. They were to present this in front of a panel in specific schedules their professor has given. This also served as their final exam for the second term of school year 2012 – 2011. They were to follow the APA style in doing the paper including
Words: 2918 - Pages: 12
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). (1) Facts: Miranda was unaware of his rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and offered incriminating evidence during police interrogations. (2) Issues: The question is whether or not the police is required to notify the arrested defendants of their Fifth Amendment constitutional rights against self-incrimination before they interrogate the defendants? (3) Rule: The U.S. Supreme Court established a “bright line” rule to
Words: 295 - Pages: 2
justice career, but also in our everyday personal lives. If a person caught in a situation where they are being interrogated by the police, it’s good to know what to expect and the full rights. One more key interest in the Fifth Amendment is the Miranda rights and the details surrounding when the rights are given, told, to the person. The objective is to show how cases are handled, and how Fifth Amendment plays one of major roles in the handling of criminal cases. The details of the case are important
Words: 1610 - Pages: 7
that it will be about is the Miranda V. Arizona case, which took place in February through March within 1966 the ruling, came out in June of 1966. In the ruling of the case of the case a five to four vote, which the decision went to Miranda v. Arizona in the case (Hendrie, Edward M, 1997). Q. the origins of where this case located Justice Tom C. Clark. The case of Miranda V. Arizona located, within the city and state of Phoenix Arizona the person name Ernesto A. Miranda. That came in this area as
Words: 1439 - Pages: 6
court system and other agencies the power to protect an individual’s rights and privacy. The Fifth Amendment is most known for giving the people the power to avoid self-incrimination and protecting ones right to remain silent in accordance to the Miranda rights. The Sixth Amendment gives the people the right to counsel during interrogation and at trial whether they can afford the attorney or not they are entitled to representation. With the Amendments in mind and the rights of individuals protected
Words: 897 - Pages: 4
Letter that same day, two police detectives visited Montejo back at the prison and requested the accompany them on an excursion to location to the murder weapon (which Montejo had earlier indicated he had thrown into a lake). He was again read his Miranda rights and agreed to go along. While in the police car, he wrote an inculpatory letter of apology to the victim's wife. Only upon their return did Montejo finally meet his court appointed attorney, who was quite upset that the detectives had interrogated
Words: 321 - Pages: 2
