Which system is more effective, the adversarial system as employed by the United States, or the civil law method used by many Continental European systems? I think each system has its strengths and weaknesses. The adversarial system promotes a sense of competition, which is motivating for many Americans in our individualistic society. The civil system presents an air of teamwork, which may also work for some Americans. I believe that for the purposes of being motivated to work the case, the adversarial
Words: 831 - Pages: 4
October 12, 2015 Miranda V. Arizona (1966) No. 759 In 1963 Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the kidnapping and rape of a 18 year old female although he confessed under police interrogation, he was never informed of his right to remain silent. Miranda was eventually convicted but appealed to the Supreme Court in 1966 claiming his confession was unconstitutional. In the case the Supreme
Words: 498 - Pages: 2
U.S. v. King Case Study Elise Flanagan BCC 402 Bobby Kemp 14 March 2016 Introduction The purpose of this work is to discuss the relevancy of the court case the United States of America v. Richard D. King, Jr. and the influence it had on future cybercrime cases. A description will be given as to how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments are applied to cybercrimes, as well as an explanation how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments were addressed in this case. Further explanation on how the King ruling may apply
Words: 973 - Pages: 4
That’s right! It’s as simple as that. Don’t open your mouth. If you want to feel sophisticated, you can assert your 5th Amendment right or say, “I want a lawyer.” Bottom line, the police aren’t speaking with you because they want to hang out with you later this week, they are speaking to you because they think you will give them the information they need to put the cuffs on you. Right now, you’re thinking one of two things. A) I can talk my way out of anything, I’m good with people, or B) I didn’t
Words: 311 - Pages: 2
What are the Miranda Rights? In 1966 The Miranda rights earned their name for the Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona, during which the court imposed these preventative safeguards meant to ensure one's 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and the 6th Amendment right to counsel, and provide future law enforcement officers and citizens with guidelines from which the Miranda Rights we know today are based. However, despite what many people believe they do not have their origin in that case
Words: 322 - Pages: 2
We realize that a cop must give the Miranda cautioning before questioning somebody who is in guardianship. In the event that the officer doesn't, the presume's announcements—and confirmation coming about because of it for the most part can't be utilized against the suspect at trial. In any case, imagine a scenario where the officer knows the speculate simply left a stacked weapon at a bustling play area. On the off chance that the officer asks, "Where did you put the firearm?" before perusing the
Words: 882 - Pages: 4
He stated that on the date of the incident, he and his partner responded and finalized a 311 noise complaint at 727 DeKalb Avenue. Later on within his tour they walked in the Precinct thru the rear door and he recognized some of the guys that were present at 727 DeKalb Avenue were in the front lobby waiting around. PO Ortega stated that he walked towards the people that were at 727 DeKalb Avenue, assuming that his partner, PO Hale was right behind him. I presented PO Ortega with a picture of the
Words: 591 - Pages: 3
Ernesto Miranda was arrested by Phoenix Police Officer Carroll Cooley and Detective Wilfred Young on March 13, 1963, for the kidnapping and rape of 18 year old Lois Ann Jameson. Jameson was abducted on her way home from work. She was forced into a car, driven to a secluded area where she was sexually assaulted and robbed. Her attacker then dropped her off near her home. Miranda fit the description given to police as well as owning a vehicle similar to the one described by the victim. Miranda was interrogated
Words: 502 - Pages: 3
Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1963 after a rape and kidnapping victim identified him, but police officers questioning him did not advise him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, or of his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of an attorney. While he pled guilty to the crime, his attorney later claimed that his confession should have been excluded from trial. The Supreme Court agreed, deciding that the police had not taken proper steps to inform Miranda of his rights. Lower
Words: 623 - Pages: 3
Case Name: County of Los Angeles v. Mendez 581U.S.___ (2017) Operational Fact: In October 2010, deputies from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department were searching for a potentially armed and dangerous “parolee-at-large” that was seen at a certain residence. While other officers searched, without a warrant in the main house Deputies Conley and Pederson searched the back of the property where unknowingly, Mendez and Garcia were sleeping in a shack on the property. Deputies Conley and Pederson
Words: 1462 - Pages: 6
