‘A relativist approach to the issues raised by abortion leads to wrong moral choices.’ Discuss. One could indeed present the argument that a relativist approach to abortion could lead to the wrong moral choices. For example, in subjective ethical relativism, although one may be able to make a moral choice completely by themselves, there are no clear guidelines in which they have to adhere to. This may lead to corruptible behaviour, as people might delude themselves into thinking certain things
Words: 330 - Pages: 2
Did we read or see the news today? Take a bit of time to reflect on how reliable the information you received is. Were you at the given events? Did it actually occur? Is it the whole truth or a twisted version of the story? Are their sources reliable? We tend to believe what the authority tells us even though we do not actually have any prove. Obviously I am not saying we should disregard everything the media tells or shows us; however we much consider that there are people with hidden agenda out
Words: 283 - Pages: 2
Law and moral standards are intimately related as both regulate the conduct of the individual in a society. The laws that are generated are usually based on moral principles of the society which may be derived from their cultural beliefs, their religions and customs. Moral standards are the code of conduct of individual on what they considered of ethical things to do and whatnot, usually it is influence by their religions and their own customs belief. Phil Harris defined moral standards as a set
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
An Ethical Dilemma Every person has unique moral imperatives that force him or her to act in particular ways. A dilemma emerges when there is a conflict between individual opinions where one has to make choices. It may either be within a person or between two or more individuals. Ethical dilemmas are common in daily life experiences and workplaces, and they are accompanied by challenges of analyzing the problem critically and making effective decisions that do not harm others. At one point
Words: 1962 - Pages: 8
accepted morals that our environment and society has determined to be moral. (DeGeorge, Pg 22) I know what is considered to be right or wrong and I do not have a problem in determining what is right and wrong according to the values and morals that my parents have instilled in me since I was a young child. As I transitioned into an adult, I realize that morality is a sense of judgment. I usually follow my instincts and the feeling that I get deep down inside to guide my ethical and moral decisions
Words: 334 - Pages: 2
Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the definition of right or wrong depends on the prevailing view of a particular individual, culture, or historical period. Different cultures have different ethical and moral standards that might seem odd or wrong but if they are justifiable and or not completely forced upon a group then there should be nothing wrong with said act. I agree with ethical relativism, to a certain extent, the fact that people in our modern
Words: 1259 - Pages: 6
not follow ethics of that society, society may cast those people down consequently. Having grown up in a Christian family with great devotion and being instilled with Christian morals, there are times that my morals conflict with the ethics set by society and other times when ethics and morals agree with each other. Morals, in my opinion, are the principles that have been instilled in me by my parents and by my teachers and friends. One of those principles is “thou shall not kill.” Morally, I believe
Words: 322 - Pages: 2
(i.e. moral facts). Moral realism is the theory that moral statements have a truth value and there are moral facts to determine said truth values. Moral realists believe moral facts can exist independent of our knowledge of them, therefore moral facts need no proof to exist and we do not necessarily know any moral facts to determine a statements truth value. This theory belongs to cognitivism which is a collection of theories that claim that moral statements have a truth value; however moral realism
Words: 1224 - Pages: 5
ethical standard to identify what is right or wrong; instead, it is up to each society to develop a moral standard that is most compatible with their distinctive culture. Ethical Relativism argues that people should act within the moral standards set forth by their specific culture. It is also important to note that a society can evolve (as well as regress) over time, making way for a revised set of moral standards that are more compatible with sociological views at that time. I found it hard to identify
Words: 1585 - Pages: 7
relation between narrative style and moral judg ement in literature is an issue in aesthetic philosophy that stretches back to Plato. ‘Narrative style’, I define as those formal literary aspects employed by the writer, in order to construct a narrative that is unique. By ‘moral judgement’, I refer to the messag e conveyed by a given text when referring to objects beyond itself. The above quest ion presupposes a relation between narrative style and moral judgement, and as such, part of
Words: 1472 - Pages: 6
