1. Please explain the Frye Standard. The Frye Standard is a standard used to determine the admissibility of an expert’s scientific testimony. A court in which applies the Frye Standard must determine whether or not the method which the evidence was obtained was generally accepted by experts in the field in which it belongs. 2. When did this standard come into effect and why? He Frye Standard came out of a 1923 legal decision (Frye V United States). It was a case discussing the admissibility of
Words: 386 - Pages: 2
Criminalistics Unit 2 IP Alisha Podolski Joe had a relationship with women named Michelle their relationship ended. Michelle started a relationship with a man named Sam. Joe completed his working day and stopped in for a beer. There was a nice crowd in the bar of 20 people. Joe and Sam began to a verbal conflict; this grew to be a physical fight, and then Sam pulled his knife on Joe stabbing his chest and slit his aorta. When a fight breaks out the natural reaction to the public to gather around
Words: 1566 - Pages: 7
for officer’s safety. Officers need to address medical care issue to the people that need it. They must control, identify, and secure initial interviews. They must establish crime scene boundaries. Officers must identify and preserve crime scene evidence like the groceries, handwritten note, phone, bloody shoe print, shoe print in the dirt, fingerprints on the woman, gun bullet, and fingerprints on the purse like in the sample crime scene. Officers would most likely be doing different things at different
Words: 1895 - Pages: 8
ACCT 574 Week 4 Midterm Exam Answers https://homeworklance.com/downloads/acct-574-week-4-midterm-exam-answers/ ACCT 574 Week 4 Midterm Exam Answers ACCT 574 Week 4 Midterm 1. (TCO A) Which statement is false? 2. (TCO A) What would be a task of a litigation services practitioner? 3. (TCO A) Which is not a forensic¬type certificate? 4. (TCO A) Under the “KPMG” categories of fraud, what would probably not be an external fraud? 5. (TCO A) Which statement is false? 6. (TCO A) What is an
Words: 441 - Pages: 2
COURSE CODE – OSC532(V1.0) UNIT 5 – EVIDENCE HANDLING zoe wRIGHT UNIT 5 – EVIDENCE HANDLING zoe wRIGHT 2015 2015 Introduction This unit will be discussing the various packaging techniques in handling evidence taken away from crime scenes with the most appropriate ones being considered for each type of evidence found. It will be discussed having the implications of poor packaging and the results which lead to contamination of all evidence if not packaged properly and the outcome
Words: 2900 - Pages: 12
of a subpoena ad testificandum or duces tecum if your intended witness, who is neither the witness of the adverse party nor a hostile witness, unjustifiably declines to execute a judicial affidavit or provide the relevant documentary and/or object evidence [Section 22.2(d)]. 8. If the court issues a subpoena as requested, personally serve the subpoena upon the intended witness and bear the cost of the expenses of the witness in appearing before the lawyer who will prepare or supervise the
Words: 6158 - Pages: 25
When investigating an explosion, many agencies and their specialized personnel may unite to locate valuable evidence. A criminalist is responsible for detecting and identifying chemicals that were used to ignite the explosion, as well as the detonating mechanisms. For this reason, a criminalist primary concern should be locating the crater and examining the hole to remove soil and debris before a possible contamination occur from heavy foot traffic. Once the important soil and debris has been collected
Words: 284 - Pages: 2
accurate scenes as well. The first one is (Swabbing protocols for DNA. n.d. para. How to swab) when Sara and Nike went back to the car and searching for more evidence, we can see Sara is swabbing the dry blood on the car. The process Sara took is the same as what the real-life CSIs would do (15:05). According to the Investigator Guide to the evidence, using an eyedropper to apply clean distilled water on the qtip, and swab the area where the dry blood is. Which is what exactly Sara did. Another one accurate
Words: 1182 - Pages: 5
Mr. Lackhart, the first thing we should do it to stipulate in writing an agreement with the defendants about what evidence is admissible under the provisions of the California Evidence Code § 451-452. In this case the evidence we want admitted are five substantial material things: 1. Defendants’ insurance policy; 2. Photograph of Sarah Jane Robertson’s face following dog-bite – Chin & Lip. [Figure 4.1] 3. Photograph of Sarah’s face – front view. [Figure 4.2] 4. Photograph of Sarah’s face – lower
Words: 415 - Pages: 2
Adnan is innocent because there is no hard evidence that says he actually killed Hae Min Lee. First, Jay Wilds stated that Adnan Syed showed him Hae's body in the trunk of her car and that he helped Adnan bury her body in Leakin Park on the date of January 13, 1999. But the autopsy report says Hae was killed she was laying on a flat surface for at least 10 to 12 hours which makes the scenery of Jay and Adan very impossible.Jay testifies that after he and Adnan buried Hae, Adnan drove Hae's car from
Words: 660 - Pages: 3
