Case 2.2 (The Ford Pinto) 2.) Suppose Ford officials were asked to justify their decision. What moral principles do you think they would invoke? Assess Ford’s handling of the Pinto from the perspective of each of the moral theories discussed in the chapter. 3.) Utilitarian’s would say that jeopardizing motorist does not by itself make Ford’s action morally objectionable. The only morally relevant matter is whether Ford gave equal consideration to the interests of each affected
Words: 294 - Pages: 2
The In Dr. Michael Sandel’s video, “The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number”, the issue of utilitarianism in regards to policy making is discussed. In particular, the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are called into question and applied to modern day scenarios that illustrate how difficult it can be to create a policy based on utilitarianism alone. Several issues arise throughout the course of the discussion that create doubt as to its effectiveness as well as convincing evidence
Words: 1173 - Pages: 5
1. What moral issues does the Pinto case raise? I think Pinto case raised some serious issue of abusing human rights and not behaving ethically in the world of business. Any business/service should never ever put a value on human life and not take consideration of a known deadly danger. Ford had an option as well as the solution to design the car in a way that prevented cars from exploding; however they refused to implement it. They thought that it was cost effective not to fix dangerous condition
Words: 846 - Pages: 4
Pinto Case Bottom Line vs. Customer Needs and Safety The Facts In early 1968, a decision was made at Ford Motor Company to enter the small car market to compete against foreign competitors. Lee Iacocca, a future company President, wanted the new vehicle, called a Pinto, to be in showrooms by the 1971 model introductions. This would mean that it would be the shortest production planning period in automotive history at that time. Due to the extremely tight timeline, many processes for building the
Words: 721 - Pages: 3
The Ford Pinto Case Back in the 1970s the Ford Pinto was debuted without regard to proper safety features and concern for proper ethics while producing this automobile. Buyers wanted lower pricing and bigger trunk space more than the consideration for safety. Lee Iacocca, president of Ford, ran the business striving for higher profits and cutting costs. His lack of interest for human life initiated many lawsuits against Ford and, in the end, was a far bigger cost than installing safety features
Words: 975 - Pages: 4
que realizó Ford en aquel entonces mostró un defecto claro con el tanque de gasolina del Ford Pinto, y el tanque de gas tenía una propensión a la ruptura de impacto trasero a baja velocidad. La falta de responsabilidad social escalando a nuevas niveles en este caso en el que Ford fue la primera empresa que presento cargos penales por homicidio, debido a su comportamiento despreciable e inhumano. El Pinto fue trasladado de urgencia en un tiempo récord desde la planificación hasta la producción con
Words: 370 - Pages: 2
Kiyon Gaines PHIL 391-01 January 22, 2012 Ford’s Fault How can you place a value on a person’s life? This is exactly what the Ford Motor Company did when assessing the cost vs. the benefits concerning their faulty production of the Ford Pinto. It had been found that the fuel bladder was not installed in the correct place so that when this vehicle was struck from behind it caused leakage. This leakage could then result in the car combusting and causing harm and in worse case scenarios death
Words: 392 - Pages: 2
THE PINTO CASE A SHORT SUMMARY In the early 1960s Ford’s market position was being heavily eroded by competition from domestic and foreign manufactures of subcompacts. Lee Iacocca, then President of Ford, was determined to regain Ford’s share of the market by having a new subcompact, the Pinto, in production by 1970. Then Ford engineers crash tested an early model of the Pinto. They found that when the automobile was struck from the rear at 20 miles per hour, the gas tank regularly ruptured
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
1. What moral issues does the Pinto case raise? I think Pinto case raised some serious issue of abusing human rights and not behaving ethically in the world of business. Any business/service should never ever put a value on human life and not take consideration of a known deadly danger. Ford had an option as well as the solution to design the car in a way that prevented cars from exploding; however they refused to implement it. They thought that it was cost effective not to fix dangerous condition
Words: 695 - Pages: 3
As Pinto’s management had the opportunity to create a new design which would decrease the possibility of the Ford Pinto from exploding, the company’s decision not to move forward with its implementation could be considered appropriate. Ford justified this avoidance based on the accepted risk/benefit analysis to determine if the costs of making the change accommodated the social benefit. This risk/benefit analysis was created measuring the development of product liability, adopted by Judge Learned
Words: 421 - Pages: 2
