one of them will have a gun. In a study done by Harvard University in 2004, thirty-eight percent of American households reported owning at least one gun. For generations, it has been a proudly proclaimed by Americans that they have the right to bear arms. This right, however, is under attack from the forty-six percent of Americans who now believe that the United States needs to pass stricter gun laws or change the second amendment. This number is decreased three points from just four months ago (Diamond)
Words: 714 - Pages: 3
protect the nation, protect their families, and to hunt for food. In the United States, gun control is an issue that has both sides firmly imbedded in their beliefs. The parties in favor of gun ownership and the right to keep and bear arms rely on the fact that provisions for such rights are protected by the Constitution. No legitimate study in the US has ever shown that gun control has any positive impact on crime. Society benefits from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. In this time
Words: 2321 - Pages: 10
Gun Control For as long as I can remember, “The Right to Bear Arms” has always been one of the key essential rights to all American citizens. It went hand in hand with “Freedom of Speech”. Ask just about any high school freshman to name three specific rights provided to us by our United States forefathers in our U.S. Constitution and “The Right to bear Arms” will surely reach most lists. It was just one of those things that stood out as a young student of U.S. government. As I’ve
Words: 1799 - Pages: 8
the second amendment to the constitution and its importance. The Second Amendment states that, “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The interpretation of the “right of the people” shows that it protects the individual rights of the citizens to own guns. The second amendment is widely considered to be the most important amendment in the constitution for several reasons. It bestows the citizens with
Words: 999 - Pages: 4
statement alone should end any controversy on the issue of gun control. Regulating individual’s right to bear arms certainly would bring a since of safety to our society. In order for that to happen, government will have to do more than just prohibited sales of guns. In everyone’s community someone knows an individual who owns gun e.g., for protection or hunting. To regulate the rights to bear arms authorities would have to confiscate everyone’s guns to make America safer. I personally would like
Words: 1640 - Pages: 7
concealed carry guns and if people should have them. Concealed carry guns are a very dangerous and useful tool. Some people say concealed carry guns should be banned, Some people think it’s a great tool and responsible citizens should have the right to bear arms, and other people just don’t really care. I am one of those people who believes concealed carry guns are a great tool. So I will be writing to support my claim that concealed carry guns should not be are a good tool. Concealed carry guns are
Words: 447 - Pages: 2
signed the Constitution in this document there are many Articles and the First ten are known as the bill rights and the first one is the right to free speech, most everyone is in agreement that is one of the most important rights as citizens. Now the Second Amendment which states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. In this paper it is the authors’ intension to show why this Amendment is important
Words: 2105 - Pages: 9
constitution should be challenged on this controversial topic. Discussions about citizens’ rights to bear arms extend back to ancient times. Supporters of gun control would like even tighter restrictions on the sale and circulation of firearms. According to Samuel Adams he argued that the Constitution should never be interpreted “to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” Several stated premises in the article were that “Opponents of gun
Words: 912 - Pages: 4
one hundred thousand times a year. A gun ban would be violating rights making it unconstitutional. It would also make it much harder for one to defend himself while being ineffective in stopping people who get illegally owned guns. Even though people say that firearms are dangerous, there should not be a ban placed on them. A nationwide firearm ban would be a violation of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment guarantees the rights to, “A well regulated Militia,
Words: 669 - Pages: 3
Company point is not similar to Sweden. The United States Constitution guarantees all citizens the right to bear arms. Gun control legislation infringes on the right of citizens to bear arms. Therefore, gun control legislation is contrary to the Constitution. – Causal Reasoning – false cause - the Gun Control Legislation has no relationship to the United States Constitution’s right to bear arms. Almost every industrialized nation in the world except for the United States has a national curriculum
Words: 301 - Pages: 2
