The Right To Bear Arms

Page 10 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Premium Essay

    Gun Control

    control takes on a proportion of extreme magnitude. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing

    Words: 559 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    The Great Debate

    control throw around the Second Amendment a whole lot. What many have failed to realize is that the Second Amendment protects the right of militias to own guns, not the individual. Let's take a look at what the Second Amendment states. The Second Amendment to the Constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep

    Words: 1584 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    Gun Control

    citizens the rights to bear arms, and approximately fifty percent of Americans owning some form of a firearm, issues involving the ownership and possession of guns have led to heated debates in American society. Most notably is the issue of gun control. Many feel that the some form of gun regulation is necessary in order to lower the level of gun related violence in the country. On the other hand, the opponents of gun control feel that it would be an infringement on their second amendment rights. The outcome

    Words: 1092 - Pages: 5

  • Premium Essay

    Gun Control Rhetorical Analysis

    common reasoning. People believe that gun control goes against the second amendment of the constitution of the United States. The second amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. While the people against gun control use phrases like “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”. The article “Connecticut shootings: guns don’t kill people, lack of gun control kills

    Words: 1813 - Pages: 8

  • Premium Essay

    Arguments For The Seconded Amendment

    media today is the issue of the Seconded Amendment in the United States Constitution. As most know, the Seconded Amendment in the United States Constitution “preserves the right of the people to” ‘keep and bear arms’ (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 22). Despite the fact that, this is well documented in the Bill of Rights, some government officials, throughout history, have wanted to revise this amendment in the name of national security (Library of Congress, 2015). How are these officials

    Words: 370 - Pages: 2

  • Free Essay

    Why Gun Control Is a Bad Idea

    the United States Constitution that protects the right to keep and bear arms by its citizens. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The right to bear arms predates the Bill of Rights; the Second Amendment was based partially on the right to bear arms in English common-law, and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. This right was described as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense, resistance to oppression, and the

    Words: 1681 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    Individual Rights Principles

    Constitution rough draft #1 Individual Rights are very important to both our government and people because it is what gives us the freedom to do what we want and to say what we want. This principle of the constitution affects us in many different ways by giving us the freedom that we luxuriate in. There are still many ways and possibilities that if we never had this principle in our government, negative impacts and more problems would come up. Individual Rights we have are very valuable to us because

    Words: 564 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    Gun Control Research Paper

    they’ve changed in the 227 years the United States has had a Bill of Rights. The second amendment in its entirety is as follows “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The wording used is very broad, not listing any specifics other than that of a Militia, a free state, and “Arms”. Arms can also be seen as an even broader term. “Arms” in the year 1791 referred to muskets and

    Words: 442 - Pages: 2

  • Premium Essay

    Gun Control

    dangerous to be kept in homes, and that guns should not be owned by anyone, only used by the National Guard and law enforcement. These people think their opinions are correct according to the second amendment, the amendment that deals with the bearing of arms by citizens of America, but there have been different interpretations of it. The reason that people feel gun ownership is such a problem is that so many people lose their lives by them each year. Personally, I feel that guns lead to increases in crime

    Words: 1303 - Pages: 6

  • Premium Essay

    The Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

    regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended meaning. For example, some people believe that the Amendment's phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" creates an individual constitutional right for citizens of the United States. Under this "individual right theory," the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies

    Words: 1465 - Pages: 6

Page   1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 50