...questioning and thought than bloody action. The central tension in the play arises from Hamlets inability to find any definite moral truths, or certainties, as he works his way towards revenge. A theme ascends, known as The Impossibility of Certainty, the overall reading and vision for my film. Our lives, as well as the lives of our contemporary audience, are continually built upon uncertainties, as we try to distinguish what we think we know, and what we actually know. By successfully articulating this theme, The Impossibility of Certainty, I feel that it will be able captivate and concern contemporary audience’s to a point where they are immersed in the film, comparing it to their own lives. We know there is a constant search for truth and stability in peoples’ lives. Whether it is in relationships, about life or even death, they forever long to have a sense of certainty. This film will show that true certainty, like that Hamlet is searching for regarding the death of his father, is impossible to find, and that constantly searching for it will only bring you internal conflict and unhappiness, and in Hamlet’s extreme case, death. Therefore the message that we are trying to convey to the contemporary audience is that a quest to attain a sense of certainty is futile and impossible, whereas a shift of focus onto happiness and the joyful side of life is a healthier approach. Hamlet, and his internal conflicts, will undoubtedly be key to this film. Like most modern adaptations of Hamlet...
Words: 892 - Pages: 4
...Da-sein and Being-Toward-Death Note: Da-sein = existence of a thing—of man as a being; Simply, it is being, particularly of man in the world 1. The seeming impossibility of ontologically grasping and determining Da-sein as a whole a. Care * Forms the totality of the structural whole of Da-sein * “Being ahead of itself” * Da-sein is always after its “potentiality-of-being”; it is influenced by being ahead of itself even when there is nothing further ahead of it. * Hopelessness does not tear away da-sein from its possibilities/potentiality of its being; it is simply another way towards them. * Da-sein always lives for the sake of itself * There is always something “outstanding” in Da-sein that has not yet become real (it is merely a potentiality for its being) thus exists a feeling of incompleteness and the presence of a “nothing” * Eliminating what is outstanding (i.e. attaining “wholeness”) annihilates Da-sein’s being. Should this occur, it will never again be experienced as a being-in-the-world * ------------ b. The impossibility of grasping Da-sein as a whole 2. The Possibility of Experiencing the Death of Others and the Possibility of Grasping Da-sein as a Whole c. Death brings Da-sein to wholeness. Death is the transition from “being there” to no-longer-being-there. d. Death takes away the possibility for da-sein to experience it (death) as something “experienced” ...
Words: 5003 - Pages: 21
...or entity buying the insurance policy. The amount of money to be charged for a certain amount of insurance coverage is called the premium. Categories of risk include:- 1. Financial risks which means that the risk must have financial measurement. 2. Pure risks which means that the risk must be real and not related to gambling 3. Particular risks which means that these risks are not widespread in their effect, for example such as earthquake risk for the region prone to it. 1.1 Basic Characteristics of insurance. The insurance has the following characteristics which are, generally, observed in case of life, marine, fire and general insurances. 1.Sharing of Risk:- Insurance is a device to share the financial losses which might befall on an individual or his family on the happening of a specified event. The event may be death of a bread-winner to the family in the case of life insurance, marine-perils in marine insurance, fire in fire insurance and other certain events in general insurance, e.g., theft in burglary insurance, accident in motor insurance, etc. The loss arising nom these events if insured are shared by all the insured in the form of premium. 2.Co-operative Device:-The most important feature of every insurance plan is the co-operation of large number of persons who, in effect, agree to share the financial loss arising due to a particular risk which is insured. Such a group of persons may be brought together voluntarily or through publicity or through solicitation...
Words: 1778 - Pages: 8
...Explain how Yeats portrays feelings towards death in ‘Sailing to Byzantium’. ! ! ‘Sailing to Byzantium’ shows Yeats in the latter years of his life as he is quickly approaching the certainty of death; Yeats is aware that he is ‘fastened to a dying animal’, and accepts the concept. Yeats writes the poem with four separate stanzas to portray the numerous thought patterns and ambiguity occurring in his mind towards death; these thought patterns occupy stages on his journey to the ‘holy city of Byzantium’. This contrasts with the airman in ‘An Irish Airman’, where Yeats’ singular stanza reflects the airman’s certainty and single arc of thought.! ! Yeats’ opening is blunt and directly to the point, showing an apparent lack of enthusiasm for his old age; Yeats appears worn down with age. The rhythm of the opening stanza is slow and steady, which portrays the Yeats, the ‘paltry thing’, has also slowed down due to his age. Yeats opens the poem with ‘that’, which shows a sense of disconnection from the scene he is describing, as he is no longer part of the world as previously known. The slow, trudging tone of the poem reflects Yeats’ largely negative feelings towards old age and the realisation of death. The tone is almost tedious, the very antithesis of ‘In Memory Of’, in which Yeats speaks of the beauty of youth with bright imagery, ‘light of evening, and glamorous clothing, ‘silk kimonos’. Both ‘In Memory Of’ and ‘Sailing to Byzantium’ include the mention of summer...
Words: 1121 - Pages: 5
...main evil is pain. He therefore proposed that all humans pursue the maximisation of pleasure and minimisation of pain. Bentham believed in the greatest good for the greatest number, and believed that quantity (rather than Mills belief in quality) played the main role in deciding whether an act was good or not, as the one providing most pleasure for most people, whilst providing least or no pain, is seen as the best choice by Bentham. To decide the value of happiness created with such act, Bentham would apply the Hedonic calculus, with 7 criteria which help to calculate pain and pleasure generated by the act. Intensity would be applied to see how intense the pleasure or pain is, duration to see how long will the pleasure or pain last, certainty to see what is the probability that the pleasure or pain will occur, propinquity to see of how far off in the future is the pleasure or pain, fecundity to see what is the probability that the pleasure will lead to another pleasure, purity to see what is the probability that the pain will lead to other pain in the future and extent to see...
Words: 987 - Pages: 4
...The ways of life of Gilgamesh and Abraham pose to the question many people constantly ask. What is the best way of life? Between the two, Abraham’s way of life is far less fulfilling than Gilgamesh’s lifestyle as there is little to no certainty in the pleasure that people of Abraham’s way of life are working towards. Gilgamesh’s “go home” lifestyle, as stated in David Noble’s article, Gilgamesh’s wisdom, is far superior to the lifestyle of Abraham in the way that the people of Uruk are able to better enjoy themselves in their current life. The people of Uruk are able to live the life they desire while Abraham and his people must live their lives in accordance to God. In Uruk, people are told to eat, drink and be merry, while the people of...
Words: 632 - Pages: 3
...SION Thrown into a positive form, the doctrine contended for in the foregoing chapters is this: 1. The whole management and direction of human life depends upon the question whether or not there is a God and a future state of human existence. If there is a God, but no future state, God is nothing to us. If there is a future state, but no God, we can form no rational guess about the future state. 2. If there is no God and no future state, reasonable men will regulate their conduct either by inclination or by common utilitarianism (p. 167) . 3. If there is a God and a future state, reasonable men will regulate their conduct by a wider kind of utilitarianism (pp. 182–83) . 4. By whatever rule they regulate their conduct, no room is left for any rational enthusiasm for the order of ideas hinted at by the phrase ‘Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity’; for, whichever rule is applied, there are a vast number of matters in respect of which men ought not to be free; they are fundamentally unequal, and they are not brothers at all, or only under qualifications which make the assertion of their fraternity unimportant. It is impossible to carry on speculations which lead to such results without being led to ask oneself the question whether they are or can be of any sort of importance? The questions which I have been discussing have been debated in various forms for thousands of years. Is this consistent with the possibility that they can ever be solved, and, if not, why should...
Words: 4140 - Pages: 17
...God maintains access to the created order and involves Himself with it as he chooses. God designed the universe in such a way that nature follows a recognizable patter. Because God acts with purpose, reality is inherently meaningful. What is a human being? Human nature is both biological and spiritual. Humans are the unique creation of a personal God, and shares His likeness as personal being. Therefore, they have intrinsic worth as human beings. They were created to enjoy and external relationship with our Maker. Our lives have objective meaning and purpose. Because human nature is a composite of external spirit and mortal flesh, the death of the body is not the end of personal existence. They live externally, either in conscious communion with God or under His righteous judgment. What happens to a person at death? Death is either the gate to life with God or to external separation from Him. The destination is dependent upon the response they give to God’s provision for our sinfulness. How can they know anything at all? Reason and experience can be...
Words: 2375 - Pages: 10
...Throughout time, theologians and philosophers, as well as common citizens, have created and developed many areas of thought. From religion to politics, there are many subjects that lend themselves to discussion and offer people the opportunity to place their trust in them. While some believe in things with complete certainty, others doubt even the hardest of facts. The best balance between certainty and doubt is to reserve a small amount of doubt for every aspect, which allows for constructive arguments and the betterment of society, as too much certainty in a belief can lead to horrible consequences. When individuals develop absolute certainty in a certain belief, the outcome can be catastrophic. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, the residents of Salem are very pious members of the Puritan religion. They are so engrossed by their beliefs that...
Words: 523 - Pages: 3
...non-combatants as a means to achieve an end. Nagel refers to the victims of terrorism as “collateral damage”, an unintended harm that come to non-combatants. He makes the point that unlike terrorism, minimizing the “collateral damage’ is different because of the difference in attitude towards the value human life. When attacking enemies in war it is justified to put innocent peoples’ life’s at risk but one must do their best to minimize the collateral damage as much as possible, even if not completely avoidable. Terrorist have no regard for human life, they see humans as expendable and as a means to an end in order to get what they want. Terrorism is considered immoral because it inflicts harm on innocent people as a means to an end. It is wrong to aim at intentionally killing non-combatants because they have done no harm, however it is morally...
Words: 926 - Pages: 4
...Opposing Thoughts in a Coexisting World The foundation of life of this world, is coexisting with one another at the same time or in the same place in peace. In the story “Twelve Angry Men” written by Reginald Rose, he creates a theoretical question, if opposing ideas can coexist as well. Justice verses mercy and certainty versus doubt is the underlying conflict throughout the story displayed by each juror with their personal backgrounds either leading to condemning or saving a teen’s life. After act one, we see the struggle between each juror going from certainty and pushing for justice only to be later filled with doubt and demanding mercy. These opposing ideas disrupt the vary balance of peace leading for any coexisting out the door. The Idea of justice versus mercy is constantly questioned and played out by juror number eight and juror number three. The struggle for justice by juror number three using laws to fairly judge and punish the teen for his father’s murder is contradicted by juror number eight as he seeks for merciful truth. In act one, juror number three says, “I never saw a guiltier man in my life. You sat right in court and heard the same thing I did. The man’s a dangerous killer…”(Rose 3) followed by juror number eight explaining his not guilty vote saying, “… this boy’s been kicked around all his life. You know, living in a slum, his mother dead since he was nine … I think maybe we owe him a few words, that’s all” (3). Juror number three is an extremely opinionated...
Words: 622 - Pages: 3
...Comp 1 Mr. Croomer Argumentative Essay April 26, 2013 Death Penalty Should the death penalty be used to punish violent criminals? No one should ever take another humans life no matter what. Killing people who kill just makes us the killers. Some people have been proven innocent after they have been executed. Criminals should expect to be killed if they killed someone else. The death penalty helps prevent future murders. It also gives closer to the victims family. It cost less money to kill someone than to keep them alive in jail. Tax payers should not have to pay for a criminal to live. Every year a prisoner gets older so their health care goes up. If you are proven guilty in a court of law of a crime that is so horrible, like murder with no reason, then you should be put to death. Killers should expect to be killed. With the death penalty in place less people die. If we go ahead and kill them now after they have killed some one then it prevents them from killing again. They cant kill the wittiness. They wont have the chance to plot any other killings. It gives closer to the victims family. The family gets to watch him die like he watched their family member die. Either way it cost a lot of money for someone to live in prison or be put to death. It cost more money to keep someone alive instead of killing them. Tax payers should not have to pay for a criminals life in jail. They have to pay for everything their clothes, shelter, and food. They also pay for their chance...
Words: 1378 - Pages: 6
...Descartes talk of his desire for certainty and truth and the method he uses to determine truth and falsity. The text shows Descartes method of making certain the knowledge he obtains and he does not limit this to philosophical knowledge he uses his method in seeking all forms of truth be it the sciences, theology or philosophy. Throughout the text Descartes talks of the importance of certainty and truth and begins by stating that the ability to distinguish what is true and false, or “good sense” as Descartes called it, is not a talent inherent to a few chosen intellectuals who received education but as something that everyone possesses and can develop. He backs this up by making an account of his years studying in both the literature of the ancients and the sciences and despite all his studying ended up realizing that he was still had doubts about what he had learned. He realized that knowledge and certainty could not be gained from books alone because some wrote not to find truth but to make ideas plausible and to Descartes anything that was tantamount to plausible was the same as false. (Descartes 2006, 10) What was important to Descartes for discerning true from false was not book smarts but more on life experience and exposure to different opinions. The method he uses to find certainty is something that uses discernment from one’s own reason to make it certain for the thinker. The very basis of the method is the fact that one must find certainty using his own reasoning, it...
Words: 1501 - Pages: 7
...consideration of possible reforms. Homicide, in English criminal law is a generic term covering offences such as murder, manslaughter and death by dangerous driving. What they all have in common is the unlawful killing of a human being, and what distinguishes them is the state of mind of the defendant who has caused the death or the defences available to them. According to Coke's classic definition, Murder is when a man of sound memory and of an age of discretion unlawfully killed within the any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura (the person) under the King's peace with malice afore thought either expressed by the party or implied by law. [So as the party wounded etc die of the wound or hurt, etc within a year and a day of the same]. Coke's definition should not be read literally and it is neither accurate or helpful. For instance, any person can be found guilty of murder and the year and a day rule was abolished by S1 law Reform Act 1996. The reference to 'malice afore thought' this suggests some element of planning and ill will on the part of the murder when in truth it can be spontaneous and the law requires no evidence of ill will. From the outset it should be started that a few centuries of Jurisprudence and the odd statutory intervention such fundamental terms as causation & intention let alone when does life begin and end should have been well matured by now. In actual fact case law is inconsistent judicial opinion appears to be in a state of...
Words: 3343 - Pages: 14
...sublime but also inhumane. Miss Emily as a monument - this description is repeated several times, her rare sightings adding to the mystery: "Now and then we would see her at the window for a moment” (Faulkner 221). And even towards the end of the story - she no longer leaves the house at all - she is now and then seen in her window: "like the carven torso of an idol in a niche, looking or not looking at us, we could never tell which" (Faulkner 222).The monument Faulkner made his character in to and the tone of the story gives way to associations with grace, respect and timelessness, but also acts as being inhumane, artificial - ultimately: dead (which is Emily’s outcome). Emily also moves between the border of life and death. It cannot be said, fully identified with certainty whether she is watching her neighborhood or not (during all those years of seclusion). The comparison with one of the angels in colorful church windows - provided with the features of tragic serenity - conveys this...
Words: 1847 - Pages: 8