...Need of ADR for a learning team ADR can be a less adversarial and hostile way to resolve a dispute among the members of a learning team. This can be an important advantage where the members have a relationship to preserve. ADR can help them find win-win solutions and achieve their real goals. This, along with all of ADR’s other potential advantages, may increase everyone’s individual overall satisfaction with both the dispute resolution process and the outcome. Disagreements within the team that are subject to the ADR clause are: • Non-participation or absenteeism of a team member. • Not respecting team members to include diversity of the team. • Unethical behavior such as plagiarism. ADR Process All disputes that arise within the learning team that cannot be resolved 24 hours after the dispute will enable the ADR to occur. The dispute must be in reference to members’ disregard for the rules and regulations documented in the learning team charter. Personal conflicts that arise between team members will not initially be subjected to be resolved through ADR. However, in case when members’ personal conflicts within the learning team impacts and disables productivity and efficiency will facilitate the ADR process. There will be two ways of facilitating an ADR in the event of a dispute • Mediation - The have to participate in a mediated negotiation with the... Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause for Learning Team...
Words: 2213 - Pages: 9
...Running head: ADR CLAUSE ADR Clause for Learning Team Charter University of Phoenix Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a way of solving disagreements between two parties without using the court system. There are two major disadvantages of solving problems through litigation, one is it's very expensive and second it can take years before a decision is reached. The most popular ADR method is arbitration, other methods include mediation, mediation arbitration, mini trial, rent-a-judge, summary jury trials, early neutral evaluation, and peer review (Jennings, 2008). Arbitration is the most popular ADR, however, it can take as much effort and money as litigation. Asurvey of lawyers revealed 88 percent favorite ADR mediation (Jennings, 2008). Mediation is the best ADR method to use in a learning team setting. It solves conflicts between people and allows them interact. Under mediation, when people can't resolve their differences, a neutral mediator listens to both sides and tries to get the parties to agree on a solution. ADR Clause for Learning Team Charter will provide conflicts that can't be resolved within a 24 hour time period will cause the ADR to resolve the conflict. The conflict must be regarding a member not following the rules and regulations written in the learning team charter. When there is a problem or disagreement within the team, members agree to solve the problem through mediation. The mediator will be a neutral person selected by the remaining...
Words: 488 - Pages: 2
...Alternative Dispute ResolutionAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an increasingly popular option that allows people to resolve disputes outside of court in a cooperative manner. ADR can be faster, cheaper and less stressful than going to court. Most important, the use of ADR can provide greater satisfaction with the way disputes are resolved. The writer will discuss how ADR clause can be use in the learning team. The learning team is an effective tool used at the University of Phoenix to help students achieve academic success. The writer is an alumni student and has had much experience with working with students in the learning team environment. Some experiences have been quite satisfying and a few have been horrifying. The main dilemma in many of the learning teams was how to manage conflict resolution effectually amongst the members when problems could not be agreed upon. Such potential conflicts that might arise among or between team members were disagreements over the appropriate steps acquired to complete the assignment or lack of contribution and participation from individual team members. One type of alternative dispute resolution that was used in my prior learning teams was mediation which was very useful and another method is medarb which will be later discussed by the writer. The writer designed an ADR clause that can be used in any course. The clause states: Each student is to abide by the student code of conduct implemented by the University of Phoenix. Each...
Words: 755 - Pages: 4
...ADR Clause for Learning Team Charter All disputes that arise within the learning team that cannot be resolved 24 hours after the dispute began will enable ADR to occur. The dispute must be in reference to members’ disregard for the rules and regulations documented in the learning team charter. Personal conflicts that arise between team members will not initially be subjected to be resolved through ADR. Members’ personal conflicts which cause dispute within the learning team disabling productivity and efficiency will facilitate the ADR process. In the event a dispute shall arise between members of a learning team, the members agree to participate in a mediated negotiation with the assistance of a neutral person who will be appointed by the remaining members of the learning team. The mediation will involve each side of dispute communicating with an impartial person, to attempt to reach a voluntary agreement. Mediation involves no formal procedures and the mediator does not have the power to render a binding decision or force parties to agree. The team members which are involve in the dispute will not be forced to participate in the mediation process. In the event that the dispute is not settled during mediation, an arbitration clause will follow. If the dispute cannot be settled within 48 hours after the mediator has been appointed, the dispute will be referred and resolved through arbitration. This clause will be enforced for members who denied mediation and members who were...
Words: 286 - Pages: 2
...Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause Cynthia Yvette Bevel LAW/531 August 9, 2010 Michael Carrozzo Abstract A Lawsuit through the court system to resolve disputes can result in a significant amount of time lost in addition to extensive litigation cost. Some businesses avoid costly litigation by opting to resolving disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and other aids. When teams have disputes among members, an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause would be an effective tool in resolving conflict with minimal impact or disruption. The most common form of ADR is arbitration. However, other forms are negotiation and mediation. Arbitration Arbitration is a legal technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons, by whose decision they agree to be bound. When a dispute arises within a learning team, arbitration is used when the arbitrator is brought in to resolve a dispute. This usually resolves disputes in a timely fashion because the arbitrator renders a decision based on facts. Negotiation Negotiation is a procedure whereby the parties to a dispute engage in negotiations to try and reach a voluntary settlement of their dispute. (Source: LAW/531 – Chapter3: Judicial, Alternative, and Online Dispute Resolution). This is the simplest form of the ADR in which the teammates would negotiate before approaching any other forms. Mediation Mediation is a form of negotiation...
Words: 357 - Pages: 2
...alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is used in resolving disputes among individuals. The most common form of ADR includes arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and judicial referee (Cheeseman, 2010). In the learning team environment conflicts and disputes among team members have the potential to occur. Because disputes need to be resolved within a timely manner to avoid falling behind in deliverables, an ADR clause may be necessary to help resolve conflicts and disputes. The purpose of this paper is to prepare an ADR clause conducive to a learning team environment. The ADR clause, disputes subject to an ADR, and provisions necessary to enable an ADR will be identified. Unresolved conflicts and disputes in a learning team environment are subject to the alternative dispute resolution clause. Conflicts and disputes can include lack of participation, lack of preparing and submitting required deliverables on time, violations of academic integrity, and the code of conduct including plagiarism, whether intentional, or unintentional (University of Phoenix, website, 2010). Team members will first attempt to resolve conflicts and disputes as a cohesive unit through communication and negotiation; however if team members are unable to resolve issues within a 24-hour period, the ADR clause will be implemented, and proceedings will begin. Team members will agree to using mediation in an attempt to resolve disputes. Mediation is a form of negotiation in...
Words: 408 - Pages: 2
...Grocer’s Supply Incorporated & Mitsubishi Forklift case was processed through the court system and detail the method of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which was used, as opposed to litigation that may have occurred. In conclusion, it will survey the differences in expenditures and advantages of traditional litigation as compared to Alternative Dispute Resolution in this specific case. Alternative Dispute Resolution The Employer’s Secret Alternative Dispute Resolution is any processes of resolving issues without the use of traditional litigation. It involves negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. As courts begin to become backlogged coupled with the increasing expenses associated with litigations more companies have begun implementing ADR agreements. Some ADR agreements are voluntary while others are mandatorily written into contracts and employment agreements. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a method which aids companies and/or individuals settle disputes without having to utilize traditional litigation. The ADR procedures are inclusive of arbitration, mediation, and unbiased assessment utilizing the law concerning those matters issues. ADR are less formal and less taxing; in addition, they are confidential unless a public forum is requested by either party. The most utilized methods of ADR are mediation and arbitration. Negotiation is the foremost method of dispute resolution. Negotiation is when all parties involved attempt to resolve the dispute...
Words: 605 - Pages: 3
...emotionally draining and unpredictable. With litigation, you never know the outcome until a judge or jury decides. Alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation, has been gaining popularity as a method to resolve some of the shortcomings of litigation. Arbitration and mediation are alternatives to litigation and sometimes used in conjunction with litigation to attempt to avoid litigating a dispute to its conclusion. Arbitration and mediation use a neutral third party. Both can be binding; however, it is customary to employ mediation as a non-binding procedure and arbitration as a binding procedure. Arbitrators act similar to a judge d making decisions about evidence and giving written opinions, which can be binding or non-binding. Arbitration is conducted with one arbitrator. The most common procedure is for each side to select an arbitrator and for those two arbitrators to select a third arbitrator. The dispute is presented to the three arbitrators chosen, with a majority of the arbitrators rendering a written decision. Mediation, on the other hand, is conducted before a single mediator who does not judge the case but helps assist a discussion and eventually resolve the dispute. Mediation has been found to be effective in resolving of cases and greatly reduces the trial docket of courts. Mediation has such a great success rate because the parties are brought together in a neutral environment where they can freely and confidentially present their position in front...
Words: 682 - Pages: 3
...Robert Reimer Traditional Vs. Nontraditional Litigation According to Cheeseman (2010), “Litigation is a process of bringing, maintaining and defending a lawsuit.” The litigation process involves resolving disputes in the court by taking an argumentative approach to prove the point. The litigation process has different phases – pleading, discovery, dismissals, pretrial judgments, settlements conference. In the litigation process the court decided the case in which one party wins over the other or the case or dispute is dismissed. Many times the cases do not go to trial because the parties may decide to use Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR). According to Cheeseman, (2010), “ADR are methods of resolving disputes other than litigation.” ADR methods include arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, and fact-finding. The discussion in this paper will compare and contrast between the traditional and nontraditional litigation. The process of traditional litigation starts by pleading in which a complaint is filed in the court by the plaintiff. The defendant is served with a summons and the copy of the complaint. The defendant is given a certain period to answer to the complaints filed by the plaintiff. The defendant can also file a counter compliant if he or she decides to countersue the plaintiff. After the complaints are files in court the next process is to proceed to pretrial process supervised by the court. Both parties...
Words: 916 - Pages: 4
...The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) allows an opportunity for the LRC and the CRC to resolve this dispute without the court. The ADR is faster, does not cost as much and the stress of the ARD is nowhere near to going to court. An ADR has a high level of satisfactory results. An ADR is good for solving disputes in business and partnerships that are in disputes. There are three methods that can be pursued with this ADR case. The three methods are Arbitration, Mediation, and Case Evaluation. A person in the ADR process is someone who is trained, neutral in the case, and chosen by both the LRC and the CRC or the court. Mediation The ARD uses a mediator to assist each party to come to a resolution that is acceptable to both in the dispute. The mediator is not the one who decides but mediates it for them to decide how to resolve. What is unique about the ARD is it allows both parties to express themselves in a confidentially to work out a resolution with flexibility. Arbitration This method allows for a arbitrator to hear the arguments, look over the evidence and make decisions that will resolve the disputes. The difference in arbitration and having someone to mediate is that arbitration is less formal, quicker, while cheaper than a traditional lawsuit. There are two types of arbitration, non-binding and binding. A binding arbitration results in the arbitrator's decision being the final decision which can be no trials to appeal the decision...
Words: 509 - Pages: 3
...environment, there are no escaping disputes. There are many avenues to resolve these disagreements when they cannot be resolved amicably. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to any means of settling disputes outside of the courtroom. ADR typically includes early neutral evaluation, negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. As burgeoning court queues, rising costs of litigation, and time delays continue to plague litigants, more states have begun experimenting with ADR programs. Some of these programs are voluntary; others are mandatory. While the two most common forms of ADR are arbitration and mediation, negotiation is almost always attempted first to resolve a dispute. It is the preeminent mode of dispute resolution. Negotiation allows the parties to meet in order to settle a dispute. The main advantage of this form of dispute settlement is that it allows the parties themselves to control the process and the solution. Mediation is also an informal alternative to litigation. Mediators are individuals trained in negotiations, who bring opposing parties together and attempt to work out a settlement or agreement that both parties accept or reject. Mediation is used for a wide gamut of case-types ranging from juvenile felonies to federal government negotiations with Native American Indian tribes. Mediation has also become a significant method for resolving disputes between investors and their stock brokers. Arbitration is a simplified version of a trial involving...
Words: 320 - Pages: 2
...Learning Team Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause Mariela Quinones LAW/531 Monday, April 5, 2010 Jonathan Jamieson Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Alternative dispute resolution refers to a variety of methods in which conflicts and disputes are resolved without litigation. It is an alternative system that responds to the needs of parties involved in disputes. Some types of ADR are arbitration, mediation, medarb, minitrial, rent a judge, summary jury trials, early neutral evaluation, and peer review (Jennings, 2006, p. 111-119). These methods provide fast and effective results without the higher cost and long term of a litigation process. Learning Team Conflicts Conflicts, disputes, or disagreements among team members will be initially settle and handle through proper communication and negotiation between team members. ADR will be exclusive for those disputes and problems that can not be resolve in a timely manner and are affecting the team to achieve goals and deliver their projects. Some conflicts are necessary to bring new perspectives and different points of view among a diverse group of people. They enhance positive productivity, responsiveness, and effectiveness in achieving goals. Disagreements that are subject to an alternative dispute clause • Violation of conduct code. • Lack of participation. • Minimum communication. • Poor performance. • Negative attitude toward the team. • Late delivery of assignments...
Words: 406 - Pages: 2
...Mediator Qualification Paper “Confidentiality in mediation is based upon a complex combination of constitutional rights including the First Amendment: free speech/the right of the public to know; the Fourth Amendment: the right to be left alone; the Fifth Amendment: granting protection from incriminating oneself; and the Fourteenth Amendment: liberty rights to make individual and family decisions. In addition, tort law protects parties from invasion of privacy by others.”(para.1 etc) Therefore my opinion on the confidentiality versus good-faith requirement controversy, which applies to Texas, has bitter sweet results. It seems that courts can use confidentiality and good faith when they find it appropriate to obtain what they want. Therefore to me it does not meet the confidentiality fundamental basics of the First, Fourth, and fifth Amendments. According to, “Texas courts of appeals have consistently held that orders to mediate in good faith are void in the face of the state’s confidentiality statutes.47 According to one Texas Court of Appeals: “While a court may compel parties to participate in mediation, it cannot compel the parties to negotiate in good faith or to settle their dispute,” and the ADR statutes require “that communications and records made in an ADR procedure remain confidential; consequently, the manner in which the participants negotiate should not be disclosed to the trial court” (para. 1 etc). Is there one statute or regulation that covers all mediators...
Words: 858 - Pages: 4
...Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause Introduction Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a method that many organizations use instead of litigation. ADR provides less costly alternatives such as arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trials, fact-finding, and the use of judicial referees (Cheeseman, 2010). ADRs also can be affective in a controlled environment, such as an educational learning team, as well. Arbitration and mediation can be used to help solve miscommunication, lack of participation, and personality conflicts within the team setting. Arbitration The main issues that teams face are the lack of communication and participation. A Learning Team Charter can be a helpful tool when defining what is out of each team member. The charter should also include how miscommunication, lack of participation, and personality conflicts should be handled. These issues should first be dealt within the team itself. If an agreement cannot be attained or behaviors do not change, a third party, such as the instructor, should be alerted of the situation and help with the arbitration. The third party should be informed of all of the facts and the measure that have been taken to improve the situation. This information can be used to determine if and what further action should be taken. Mediation also can be used when dealing with personality conflicts between team members. A mediator can provide valuable information regarding different tactics that can...
Words: 330 - Pages: 2
...of Phoenix Law 531 October 02, 2010 Alternative Dispute Resolution When working with a learning team, disagreements may occur. For this reason an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clause has been added to our team charter. Mediation will be used to handle all disputes between team members. This ADR clause can be found under the Ensuring Fair and Even Contribution and Collaboration section of the team charter. In the event that a dispute arises between team members, the parties agree to participate in at least one hour of mediation in attempt to settle the dispute. The mediator will be chosen by one of the other teams within our class. The mediator can not be on our team or have an interest in the case. Both parties must agree on the mediator. Both parties must submit in writing to the mediator their side of the dispute before mediation takes place. No all disputes will be subject to mediation. Only those disputes that impede team success or hinder team productivity will be reviewed for mediation. If the mediator feels that the dispute is not worthy of mediation, a vote will be taken by the remanding team member. The non disputing team members can vote for or against mediation. This mediation is not enforceable. If the dispute is still not resolved after mediation, the disputing team members will be removed from the team. References Cheeseman, H. R. (2010). Judicial, Alternative, and Online Dispute Resolution. In Business Law (pp. 34-50). : Prentice...
Words: 255 - Pages: 2
