Premium Essay

Animal Testing Pros

Submitted By
Words 1577
Pages 7
Animal testing has been a hot topic of debate for centuries, dating experimentation all the way back to ancient Greece with Aristotle. Two polar opposite sides clash on the daily; those who want animal testing banned, and those who want it regularly applied. While researching on the internet, the first impression you receive is from animal rights organizations loudly protesting the laboratory critters--vocalizing opinions about how “animal testing should be banned from laboratories”; but is what they say the full story? Animal testing has been the source of countless human achievements including a better understanding of life and valuable cures for diseases, and several laws demand the use of animal testing before human trials. Animal experimentation …show more content…
Most organizations claim: “Animal testing should be banned because most animals subjected to testing go through unnecessary pain; those who survive are promptly euthanized”. Animal testing is outlined by guiding principles for the ethical use of animals-”The Three R’s”
The Three R’s are used in labs and are “Replacement, Reduction, Refinement”. Replacement: Findinging an alternative to having to use animals in the researched, Reduction: limiting the amount of animals they need to use for the experiment, or obtain more results for the animals used, and Refinement: using methods to make the process as painless as possible and reducing the stress that the animal experiments. While not all laboratories dance along these guiding principles, it proves that some do animal experimentation as a necessary evil for results but try to make it as painless as possible; that’s why animal testing shouldn’t be banned. We need it for human advancement, and some people try to make it as humane as possible; trying to avoid it if they can. While most …show more content…
This isn’t necessarily true; animal testing has made several life saving discoveries- and no good alternative exists for producing reliable reactions of products on a living body system-”“Animal Testing - ProCon.org.” Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?” Animals have been used for testing everything from disease cures to cosmetics- just to see if the product is safe to use. You may ask, isn’t this cruel? Well, yes, in ways it is, but would it be more ethical to test on humans instead? Another point to why animals are not so unreliable when it comes to proving sources is because of how shockingly similar our anatomies actually are; Chimps share 99% of their DNA with humans and mice are 98% genetically similar. While humans are arguably very similar to other animals, it’s also extremely hard to replicate the exact anatomy, since genetics aren’t everything. Since all mammals descended from the same common ancestor we share several similar organ sets (heart, kidneys, lungs, etc.) that function in essentially the same way. Animal testing doesn’t have to be cruel to be effective as several laws try to enforce this. The IACUC states, “ In the U.S., under the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (the Guide), published by the National Academy of Sciences, any procedure can be performed on an animal if it can be successfully

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Pro Animal Testing

...Animal testing for medical purposes is controversial for many reasons. Many view animal testing to be cruel to animals and making ineffective vaccines that don’t work. Animal testing started being practiced before 500 BC. Animal testing is necessary for medical purposes. As a result of using animals in medical studies, many cures have been found for diseases that causes epidemics. As controversial as this topic is, there is no argument that can say animal testing was useless. Animal testing started around 500 BC and has found many cures for the human race to live longer years. Based on procon.org, “California Biochemical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research...

Words: 1298 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing

...Position Paper – The Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation The Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation Animal research has had a major role in many scientific and medical advances. It has both its advantages and disadvantages. “Moreover,” animal experimentation is an extremely controversial subject that has divided people into a group that either support animal testing or oppose it all together, and another that advocates the use of alternatives. There are many pros and cons when it comes to this subject. People all over the world have different opinions on weather animal lab testing is humane and necessary. Animal experimentation is unethical due to the practice of animal torture and suffering, animal choice and death of these animals. Animal experimentation (noun): any type of experiment performed on living animals, especially in order to test the effects of chemical compounds such as new drugs, cosmetics, food additives and pesticides (Animal experimentation, 2001). All over the world, people think differently on whether animal experimentation is an appropriate way to test medicines and products. Each year in the United States, an estimated 70 million animals are maimed, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and otherwise hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Substances we use every day, such...

Words: 1471 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Pro Animal Testing Essay

...Animal Testing Spring Ma “Across the globe, new products ranging from drugs for cancer, diabetes, and heart disease to cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoos, etc., are tested on animals (The Surprising Pros of Animal Testing You Never Thought About).” Today, with the medical technology advancing at such high velocities, it is certain that animals have been a major contributor of the achievements. Over the past 30 years, science has seen 24 substantial biomedical improves. According to the American Cancer Society, these discoveries all would have been impossible with the assist of animals. Seeing the significance animal testing has devoted to the science industry, it is certain that animal testing ought to be continued....

Words: 541 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pro Animal Testing Essay

...Animal Testing Could be Cure Killing animals for scientific experiments could be waste of time or new treatments for humans. Animal testing has been done many times; however, according to ‘Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?’ “Animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics.”(Procom’s 2) Animal testing has three advantages which are helps researchers to find drugs and treatments, improves human health and help ensure safety of drugs. First, researchers can find drugs and treatments by doing experiments on different animals. For instance, the snake has poison that can kill human, but some professors in Biological science field were able to find a treatment by using the same poison from that snake. Moreover, researchers can apply the same process on other animals. For example, according to ‘Why Do Medical...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pro Animal Testing Research Paper

...Animal testing has been recognized as one of the most controversial bioethical issues within the 20th to 21st century. Bioethics can first be defined as the study of the ethical and moral implications of medical research and practice. The major issue that has risen over the last century is whether or not animals should be tested in scientific or commercial purposes. Is it ethical to perform specific experimentations on various animals, if that animal is faced with life and death situations? Some individuals in our society say yes while others say no. Animal testing has remained to be a global issue for a very long time now and people wonder if this issue will ever come to an end. Animal testing has been researched and experimented with more...

Words: 1217 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Animal Testing: Pros and Cons

...Animal Testing Introduction The application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to Pharmaceutical products has been considered to be a normal strategy for many years. Laboratory animals are generally used in three primary fields: biomedical research, product security evaluation and education. (Animal Experiments) It has been estimated that approximately, 20 million animals are being used for testing and are killed annually; about 15 million of them are used to test for medication and five million for other products. Reports have been generated to indicate that about 10 percent of these animals are not being administered with painkillers. The supporters of animal rights are pressurizing government agencies to inflict severe regulations on animal research. However, such emerging criticisms of painful experimentation on animals are coupled with an increasing concern over the cost it would have on the limitation of scientific progress. (Of Cures and Creatures Great and Small) Around the world, animals are utilized to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. Each and every medication used by humans is first tested on the animals. Animals were also applied to develop anesthetics to ease human ailments and suffering during surgery. (Animal Experiments) Currently, questions have been raised about the ethics surround animal testing. As a result several regulations have been put in place to evaluate and control the...

Words: 3584 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Pro Animal Testing Beneficial

...“Traditional animal testing is expensive, time-consuming, uses lots of animals and from a scientific perspective the results do not necessarily translate to humans.”- Dr. Christopher P. Austin. People believe that animal testing is helpful, but really it’s mostly harmful. 3 reasons that could convince you that tests are harmful, consider the following: animals and humans are not exactly the same, Animals are not treated like living organisms. Treatments and other things add up in $. If these reasons don’t convince you I don’t know what will! We're going to start off with how animals and humans are not exactly the same. Therefore, the reaction of a drug in an animal's body will most likely react differently than in a human's body (obviously)....

Words: 554 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...kill animals! ‘’Thousands of animals are killed per annum to check out new medicine or procedures on them to envision if they're safe or effective’’ (Animalequality). The result with animal testing is that we've several new medicines that facilitate save several our lives and keep United States functioning properly. Although it's going to kill several animals within the finish it's a sacrifice we've to decide on to form for the higher of our race. It’s additionally higher to use animals than its humans. There is also no alternative to using other than using animals for testing. Living systems like persons and animals are extraordinarily complicated. Finding out cell cultures in a very Petri dish, whereas generally helpful, doesn't...

Words: 1432 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...Introduction About 95% of animals that are tested on are not protected by law and the other 5% are only given minimal protection. Each year millions of animals are harmed by the unlawful testing. Cosmetic and pharmaceutical companies should not be allowed to test their experimental products on animals and harm the animals, instead companies should find alternative solutions. Animals have been subjected to testing since the early Greek Scientists such as Aristotle and Erasistratus started the use of testing on animals. After, Aristotle and Erasistratus started testing on animals many physicians began to test surgical procedures on animals before they performed the procedures on humans. In the late 1930s, the United States Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act passed a law that enforced companies to test their products on animals before the product can be released to the public and then, other United States Administrations decided that it was a...

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...“He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” ― Immanuel Kant. Likewise, we can judge the amount of justice animals get in animal testing. While some believe animals should be tested on because it is necessary, most test on animals are not necessary, fail often, and are inhumane. Tests on animals are not necessary and are incorrect. First of all, most experiments are flawed; 87% of animal tests fail, causing animal lives to be sacrificed for nothing, according to procon.org. This means that people are being inconsiderate about wasted animals subjects. In the same fashion, 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials anyways. To add, there are many alternatives to animal testing, and new technology that does not require animal subjects. WIth all these failed tests, animals are dying for...

Words: 519 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...Did you know that “the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2016 that 71,370 animals suffered pain during [animal tests]” (ProCon). The fact that over 71,370 animals are suffering through tests begs the question as to why we continue if that many animals are being harmed. However, the rise of animal testing in products has brought up a controversial issue since the late nineteenth century when it first became popular. Animal testing is experiments put on animals to help understand the possible outcomes it can put on humans. Today, animals get tested for different products often found in cosmetics, prescriptions, and household cleaning supplies. The cons associated with animal testing today by far outweigh the possible pros that could come from it. Although most people would agree with testing products before humans use them in everyday life,...

Words: 691 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...Have you ever heard of animal testing, if you have then you might have heard it is a cruel and barbaric way to find cures that don’t even work? Also you may have heard from someone on the other end of the totem pole who believe that animal testing and the affects that come with them are a sad but necessary part of life and that is what stands out to be true. If You want to learn more facts and opinions from both sides so you can draw your own conclusion I implore you to keep reading. ​Body paragraph one: ​Many view animal testing as cruel and barbaric though they don’t see the benefits that come out of it. Although some animals are permanently injured and some die so many lives, humans and animals are saved. Before you judge based off of rumors...

Words: 404 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...There are various kinds of animal testing, however the most controversial testing that gets the most debate is biomedical research and product testing. In biomedical research "Animals are used to understand basic biology, as “models” for studying human biology and disease, and as test subjects for the development and testing of drugs, vaccines, and other biologicals to improve and advance human health" (Animals in Research Web). Along with that, product testing is the process of using animals in order to "predict toxicity, corrosivity, and other safety variables as well as the effectiveness of new products, traditional testing of chemicals, consumer products, medical devices, and new drugs" (Animals in Research Web). The exercise of animal...

Words: 1744 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Animal Testing: Pros And Cons

...Animal testing has been around for decades. Even though many other technological alternatives have been discovered, thousands of innocent animals lose their lives to senseless testing. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) protects some species but not the majority, “The AWA does not cover rats, mice, fish, or birds which comprise around 95% of the animals used in research” (“Should Animals”). These animals are born in facilities in order to be used for testing. From the moment they are born they have a death sentence. These animals never leave the four walls of their cages until they are used for testing before they are eventually killed. There are many statistics that show that animal testing has not helped as much as people might think. According...

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...Every year, about 100 million animals are experimented on in the United States alone. Animals are used in biomedical research to test the effects of drugs, so that humans are not harmed by unforeseen side effects. Although it can lead to new findings, animals experimentation should not be allowed because it does not give accurate results, there are alternative methods, and it wastes resources. First, animal testing does not give accurate results. According to Michael O. Leavitt, former secretary of the US department of Health and Human Services, 9 out of every 10 drugs that are experimented on animals fail in clinical studies (Goodman, 2012). Testing a drug on an animal can only show about one fifth of possible side effects, due to the fact...

Words: 488 - Pages: 2