Free Essay

Animal

In:

Submitted By rohitlakhani26
Words 6286
Pages 26
Animal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Animal (disambiguation).
"Animalia" redirects here. For other uses, see Animalia (disambiguation).
Page semi-protected
Animals
Temporal range: Ediacaran – Recent
PreЄЄOSDCPTJKPgN
Animal diversity.png
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukaryota
(Unranked) Opisthokonta
(Unranked) Holozoa
(Unranked) Filozoa
Kingdom: Animalia
Linnaeus, 1758
Phyla
Subkingdom Parazoa
Porifera
Placozoa
Subkingdom Eumetazoa
Radiata (unranked)
Ctenophora
Cnidaria
Bilateria (unranked)
Orthonectida
Rhombozoa
Acoelomorpha
Chaetognatha
Superphylum Deuterostomia
Chordata
Hemichordata
Echinodermata
Xenoturbellida
Vetulicolia †
Protostomia (unranked)
Superphylum Ecdysozoa
Kinorhyncha
Loricifera
Priapulida
Nematoda
Nematomorpha
Onychophora
Tardigrada
Arthropoda
Superphylum Platyzoa
Platyhelminthes
Gastrotricha
Rotifera
Acanthocephala
Gnathostomulida
Micrognathozoa
Cycliophora
Superphylum Lophotrochozoa
Sipuncula
Hyolitha †
Nemertea
Phoronida
Bryozoa
Entoprocta
Brachiopoda
Mollusca
Annelida
Synonyms
Metazoa Haeckel, 1874
Animals are multicellular, eukaryotic organisms of the kingdom Animalia (also called Metazoa). Their body plan eventually becomes fixed as they develop, although some undergo a process of metamorphosis later on in their lives. Most animals are motile, meaning they can move spontaneously and independently. All animals must ingest other organisms or their products for sustenance (see Heterotroph).

Most known animal phyla appeared in the fossil record as marine species during the Cambrian explosion, about 542 million years ago. Animals are divided into various sub-groups, some of which are: vertebrates (birds, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, fish); molluscs (clams, oysters, octopuses, squid, snails); arthropods (millipedes, centipedes, insects, spiders, scorpions, crabs, lobsters, shrimp); annelids (earthworms, leeches); sponges; and jellyfish.

Contents [hide]
1 Etymology
2 Characteristics
2.1 Structure
2.2 Reproduction and development
2.3 Food and energy sourcing
3 Origin and fossil record
4 Groups of animals
4.1 Ctenophora, Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria and Bilateria
4.2 Deuterostomes
4.3 Ecdysozoa
4.4 Platyzoa
4.5 Lophotrochozoa
5 Model organisms
6 History of classification
7 See also
8 References
9 Bibliography
10 External links
Etymology
The word "animal" comes from the Latin word animalis, meaning "having breath".[1] In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia. Sometimes, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals and other vertebrates are meant in non-scientific use.[2] The biological definition of the word refers to all members of the kingdom Animalia, encompassing creatures as diverse as sponges, jellyfish, insects, and humans.[3]

Characteristics
Animals have several characteristics that set them apart from other living things. Animals are eukaryotic and multicellular,[4] which separates them from bacteria and most protists. They are heterotrophic,[5] generally digesting food in an internal chamber, which separates them from plants and algae.[6] They are also distinguished from plants, algae, and fungi by lacking rigid cell walls.[7] All animals are motile,[8] if only at certain life stages. In most animals, embryos pass through a blastula stage,[9] which is a characteristic exclusive to animals.

Structure
With a few exceptions, most notably the sponges (Phylum Porifera) and Placozoa, animals have bodies differentiated into separate tissues. These include muscles, which are able to contract and control locomotion, and nerve tissues, which send and process signals. Typically, there is also an internal digestive chamber, with one or two openings.[10] Animals with this sort of organization are called metazoans, or eumetazoans when the former is used for animals in general.[11]

All animals have eukaryotic cells, surrounded by a characteristic extracellular matrix composed of collagen and elastic glycoproteins.[12] This may be calcified to form structures like shells, bones, and spicules.[13] During development, it forms a relatively flexible framework[14] upon which cells can move about and be reorganized, making complex structures possible. In contrast, other multicellular organisms, like plants and fungi, have cells held in place by cell walls, and so develop by progressive growth.[10] Also, unique to animal cells are the following intercellular junctions: tight junctions, gap junctions, and desmosomes.[15]

Reproduction and development
See also: Sexual reproduction § Animals and Asexual reproduction § Examples in animals

A newt lung cell stained with fluorescent dyes undergoing the early anaphase stage of mitosis
Nearly all animals undergo some form of sexual reproduction.[16] They have a few specialized reproductive cells, which undergo meiosis to produce smaller, motile spermatozoa or larger, non-motile ova.[17] These fuse to form zygotes, which develop into new individuals.[18]

Many animals are also capable of asexual reproduction.[19] This may take place through parthenogenesis, where fertile eggs are produced without mating, budding, or fragmentation.[20]

A zygote initially develops into a hollow sphere, called a blastula,[21] which undergoes rearrangement and differentiation. In sponges, blastula larvae swim to a new location and develop into a new sponge.[22] In most other groups, the blastula undergoes more complicated rearrangement.[23] It first invaginates to form a gastrula with a digestive chamber, and two separate germ layers — an external ectoderm and an internal endoderm.[24] In most cases, a mesoderm also develops between them.[25] These germ layers then differentiate to form tissues and organs.[26]

Food and energy sourcing
Main article: Animal nutrition
All animals are heterotrophs, meaning that they feed directly or indirectly on other living things.[27] They are often further subdivided into groups such as carnivores, herbivores, omnivores, and parasites.[28]

Predation is a biological interaction where a predator (a heterotroph that is hunting) feeds on its prey (the organism that is attacked).[29] Predators may or may not kill their prey prior to feeding on them, but the act of predation almost always results in the death of the prey.[30] The other main category of consumption is detritivory, the consumption of dead organic matter.[31] It can at times be difficult to separate the two feeding behaviours, for example, where parasitic species prey on a host organism and then lay their eggs on it for their offspring to feed on its decaying corpse. Selective pressures imposed on one another has led to an evolutionary arms race between prey and predator, resulting in various antipredator adaptations.[32]

Most animals indirectly use the energy of sunlight by eating plants or plant-eating animals. Most plants use light to convert inorganic molecules in their environment into carbohydrates, fats, proteins and other biomolecules, characteristically containing reduced carbon in the form of carbon-hydrogen bonds. Starting with carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), photosynthesis converts the energy of sunlight into chemical energy in the form of simple sugars (e.g., glucose), with the release of molecular oxygen. These sugars are then used as the building blocks for plant growth, including the production of other biomolecules.[10] When an animal eats plants (or eats other animals which have eaten plants), the reduced carbon compounds in the food become a source of energy and building materials for the animal.[33] They are either used directly to help the animal grow, or broken down, releasing stored solar energy, and giving the animal the energy required for motion.[34][35]

Animals living close to hydrothermal vents and cold seeps on the ocean floor are not dependent on the energy of sunlight.[36] Instead chemosynthetic archaea and bacteria form the base of the food chain.[37]

Origin and fossil record
Further information: Urmetazoan

Dunkleosteus was a 10-metre-long (33 ft) prehistoric fish.[38]
Animals are generally considered to have evolved from a flagellated eukaryote.[39] Their closest known living relatives are the choanoflagellates, collared flagellates that have a morphology similar to the choanocytes of certain sponges.[40] Molecular studies place animals in a supergroup called the opisthokonts, which also include the choanoflagellates, fungi and a few small parasitic protists.[41] The name comes from the posterior location of the flagellum in motile cells, such as most animal spermatozoa, whereas other eukaryotes tend to have anterior flagella.[42]

The first fossils that might represent animals appear in the Trezona Formation at Trezona Bore, West Central Flinders, South Australia.[43] These fossils are interpreted as being early sponges. They were found in 665-million-year-old rock.[43]

The next oldest possible animal fossils are found towards the end of the Precambrian, around 610 million years ago, and are known as the Ediacaran or Vendian biota.[44] These are difficult to relate to later fossils, however. Some may represent precursors of modern phyla, but they may be separate groups, and it is possible they are not really animals at all.[45]

Aside from them, most known animal phyla make a more or less simultaneous appearance during the Cambrian period, about 542 million years ago.[46] It is still disputed whether this event, called the Cambrian explosion, is due to a rapid divergence between different groups or due to a change in conditions that made fossilization possible.

Some paleontologists suggest that animals appeared much earlier than the Cambrian explosion, possibly as early as 1 billion years ago.[47] Trace fossils such as tracks and burrows found in the Tonian era indicate the presence of triploblastic worms, like metazoans, roughly as large (about 5 mm wide) and complex as earthworms.[48] During the beginning of the Tonian period around 1 billion years ago, there was a decrease in Stromatolite diversity, which may indicate the appearance of grazing animals, since stromatolite diversity increased when grazing animals went extinct at the End Permian and End Ordovician extinction events, and decreased shortly after the grazer populations recovered. However the discovery that tracks very similar to these early trace fossils are produced today by the giant single-celled protist Gromia sphaerica casts doubt on their interpretation as evidence of early animal evolution.[49][50]

Groups of animals

The relative number of species contributed to the total by each phylum of animals.
Ctenophora, Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria and Bilateria
Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the Porifera and Ctenophora diverged before a clade (ParaHoxozoa) that gave rise to the Bilateria, Cnidaria and Placozoa.[51] Another study based on the presence/absence of introns suggests that Cnidaria, Porifera and Placozoa may be a sister group of Bilateria and Ctenophora.[52] A December, 2013, study,[53] and a June, 2014, study[54] both concluded, using entirely distinct methodologies, that the cladogram of animals is:

Choanoflagellata

Animal

Ctenophora

Porifera

Placozoa

Cnidaria

Bilateria

Orange elephant ear sponge, Agelas clathrodes, in foreground. Two corals in the background: a sea fan, Iciligorgia schrammi, and a sea rod, Plexaurella nutans.
The sponges (Porifera) were long thought to have diverged from other animals early.[55] They lack the complex organization found in most other phyla.[56] Their cells are differentiated, but in most cases not organized into distinct tissues.[57] Sponges typically feed by drawing in water through pores.[58] Archaeocyatha, which have fused skeletons, may represent sponges or a separate phylum.[59] However, a phylogenomic study in 2008 of 150 genes in 29 animals across 21 phyla revealed that it is the Ctenophora or comb jellies which are the basal lineage of animals, at least among those 21 phyla. The authors speculate that sponges—or at least those lines of sponges they investigated—are not so primitive, but may instead be secondarily simplified.[60]

Among the other phyla, the Ctenophora and the Cnidaria, which includes sea anemones, corals, and jellyfish, are radially symmetric and have digestive chambers with a single opening, which serves as both the mouth and the anus.[61] Both have distinct tissues, but they are not organized into organs.[62] There are only two main germ layers, the ectoderm and endoderm, with only scattered cells between them. As such, these animals are sometimes called diploblastic.[63] The tiny placozoans are similar, but they do not have a permanent digestive chamber.

The remaining animals form a monophyletic group called the Bilateria. For the most part, they are bilaterally symmetric, and often have a specialized head with feeding and sensory organs. The body is triploblastic, i.e. all three germ layers are well-developed, and tissues form distinct organs. The digestive chamber has two openings, a mouth and an anus, and there is also an internal body cavity called a coelom or pseudocoelom. There are exceptions to each of these characteristics, however — for instance adult echinoderms are radially symmetric, and certain parasitic worms have extremely simplified body structures.

Genetic studies have considerably changed our understanding of the relationships within the Bilateria. Most appear to belong to two major lineages: the deuterostomes and the protostomes, the latter of which includes the Ecdysozoa, Platyzoa, and Lophotrochozoa. In addition, there are a few small groups of bilaterians with relatively similar structure that appear to have diverged before these major groups. These include the Acoelomorpha, Rhombozoa, and Orthonectida. The Myxozoa, single-celled parasites that were originally considered Protozoa, are now believed to have developed from the Medusozoa as well.

Deuterostomes

Superb Fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus
Deuterostomes differ from the other Bilateria, called protostomes, in several ways. In both cases there is a complete digestive tract. However, in protostomes, the first opening of the gut to appear in embryological development (the archenteron) develops into the mouth, with the anus forming secondarily. In deuterostomes the anus forms first, with the mouth developing secondarily.[64] In most protostomes, cells simply fill in the interior of the gastrula to form the mesoderm, called schizocoelous development, but in deuterostomes, it forms through invagination of the endoderm, called enterocoelic pouching.[65] Deuterostome embryos undergo radial cleavage during cell division, while protostomes undergo spiral cleavage.[66]

All this suggests the deuterostomes and protostomes are separate, monophyletic lineages. The main phyla of deuterostomes are the Echinodermata and Chordata.[67] The former are radially symmetric and exclusively marine, such as starfish, sea urchins, and sea cucumbers.[68] The latter are dominated by the vertebrates, animals with backbones.[69] These include fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.[70]

In addition to these, the deuterostomes also include the Hemichordata, or acorn worms.[71] Although they are not especially prominent today, the important fossil graptolites may belong to this group.[72]

The Chaetognatha or arrow worms may also be deuterostomes, but more recent studies suggest protostome affinities.

Ecdysozoa

Yellow-winged darter, Sympetrum flaveolum
The Ecdysozoa are protostomes, named after the common trait of growth by moulting or ecdysis.[73] The largest animal phylum belongs here, the Arthropoda, including insects, spiders, crabs, and their kin. All these organisms have a body divided into repeating segments, typically with paired appendages. Two smaller phyla, the Onychophora and Tardigrada, are close relatives of the arthropods and share these traits.

The ecdysozoans also include the Nematoda or roundworms, perhaps the second largest animal phylum. Roundworms are typically microscopic, and occur in nearly every environment where there is water.[74] A number are important parasites.[75] Smaller phyla related to them are the Nematomorpha or horsehair worms, and the Kinorhyncha, Priapulida, and Loricifera. These groups have a reduced coelom, called a pseudocoelom.

The remaining two groups of protostomes are sometimes grouped together as the Spiralia, since in both embryos develop with spiral cleavage.

Platyzoa

Pseudobiceros bedfordi, (Bedford's flatworm)
The Platyzoa include the phylum Platyhelminthes, the flatworms.[76] These were originally considered some of the most primitive Bilateria, but it now appears they developed from more complex ancestors.[77] A number of parasites are included in this group, such as the flukes and tapeworms.[76] Flatworms are acoelomates, lacking a body cavity, as are their closest relatives, the microscopic Gastrotricha.[78]

The other platyzoan phyla are mostly microscopic and pseudocoelomate. The most prominent are the Rotifera or rotifers, which are common in aqueous environments. They also include the Acanthocephala or spiny-headed worms, the Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and possibly the Cycliophora.[79] These groups share the presence of complex jaws, from which they are called the Gnathifera.

Lophotrochozoa

Roman snail, Helix pomatia
The Lophotrochozoa, evolved within Protostomia, include two of the most successful animal phyla, the Mollusca and Annelida.[80][81] The former, which is the second-largest animal phylum by number of described species, includes animals such as snails, clams, and squids, and the latter comprises the segmented worms, such as earthworms and leeches. These two groups have long been considered close relatives because of the common presence of trochophore larvae, but the annelids were considered closer to the arthropods because they are both segmented.[82] Now, this is generally considered convergent evolution, owing to many morphological and genetic differences between the two phyla.[83]

The Lophotrochozoa also include the Nemertea or ribbon worms, the Sipuncula, and several phyla that have a ring of ciliated tentacles around the mouth, called a lophophore.[84] These were traditionally grouped together as the lophophorates.[85] but it now appears that the lophophorate group may be paraphyletic,[86] with some closer to the nemerteans and some to the molluscs and annelids.[87][88] They include the Brachiopoda or lamp shells, which are prominent in the fossil record, the Entoprocta, the Phoronida, and possibly the Bryozoa or moss animals.[89]

Model organisms
Main articles: Model organism and Animal testing
Because of the great diversity found in animals, it is more economical for scientists to study a small number of chosen species so that connections can be drawn from their work and conclusions extrapolated about how animals function in general. Because they are easy to keep and breed, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have long been the most intensively studied metazoan model organisms, and were among the first life-forms to be genetically sequenced. This was facilitated by the severely reduced state of their genomes, but as many genes, introns, and linkages lost, these ecdysozoans can teach us little about the origins of animals in general. The extent of this type of evolution within the superphylum will be revealed by the crustacean, annelid, and molluscan genome projects currently in progress. Analysis of the starlet sea anemone genome has emphasised the importance of sponges, placozoans, and choanoflagellates, also being sequenced, in explaining the arrival of 1500 ancestral genes unique to the Eumetazoa.[90]

An analysis of the homoscleromorph sponge Oscarella carmela also suggests that the last common ancestor of sponges and the eumetazoan animals was more complex than previously assumed.[91]

Other model organisms belonging to the animal kingdom include the house mouse (Mus musculus) and zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Carolus Linnaeus, known as the father of modern taxonomy
History of classification
Aristotle divided the living world between animals and plants, and this was followed by Carolus Linnaeus (Carl von Linné), in the first hierarchical classification.[92] Since then biologists have begun emphasizing evolutionary relationships, and so these groups have been restricted somewhat. For instance, microscopic protozoa were originally considered animals because they move, but are now treated separately.

In Linnaeus's original scheme, the animals were one of three kingdoms, divided into the classes of Vermes, Insecta, Pisces, Amphibia, Aves, and Mammalia. Since then the last four have all been subsumed into a single phylum, the Chordata, whereas the various other forms have been separated out. The above lists represent our current understanding of the group, though there is some variation from source to source.

See also
Book icon
Book: Animal
Animal coloration
Ethology
Fauna
List of animal names
Lists of animals
List of animals by number of neurons
Lists of organisms by population
Zoology
References
Jump up ^ Cresswell, Julia (2010). The Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954793-7. "'having the breath of life', from anima 'air, breath, life' ."
Jump up ^ "Animals". Merriam-Webster's. Retrieved 16 May 2010. "2 a : one of the lower animals as distinguished from human beings b : mammal; broadly : vertebrate"
Jump up ^ "Animal". The American Heritage Dictionary (4th ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company. 2006.
Jump up ^ "Panda Classroom". Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 30 September 2007.
Jump up ^ Bergman, Jennifer. "Heterotrophs". Archived from the original on 29 August 2007. Retrieved 30 September 2007.
Jump up ^ Douglas, Angela E.; Raven, John A. (2003). "Genomes at the interface between bacteria and organelles". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 358 (1429): 5–17; discussion 517–8. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1188. PMC 1693093. PMID 12594915.
Jump up ^ Davidson, Michael W. "Animal Cell Structure". Archived from the original on 20 September 2007. Retrieved 20 September 2007.
Jump up ^ Saupe, S. G. "Concepts of Biology". Retrieved 30 September 2007.
Jump up ^ Minkoff, Eli C. (2008). Barron's EZ-101 Study Keys Series: Biology (2nd, revised ed.). Barron's Educational Series. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-7641-3920-8.
^ Jump up to: a b c Adam-Carr, Christine; Hayhoe, Christy; Hayhoe, Douglas; Hayhoe, Katharine (2010). Science Perspectives 10. Nelson Education Ltd. ISBN 978-0-17-635528-9.
Jump up ^ Hillmer, Gero; Lehmann, Ulrich (1983). Fossil Invertebrates. Translated by J. Lettau. CUP Archive. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-521-27028-1. ISSN 0266-3236.
Jump up ^ Alberts, Bruce; Johnson, Alexander; Lewis, Julian; Raff, Martin; Roberts, Keith; Walter, Peter (2002). Molecular Biology of the Cell (4th ed.). New York: Garland Science.
Jump up ^ Sangwal, Keshra (2007). Additives and crystallization processes: from fundamentals to applications. John Wiley and Sons. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-470-06153-4.
Jump up ^ Becker, Wayne M. (1991). The world of the cell. Benjamin/Cummings. ISBN 978-0-8053-0870-9.
Jump up ^ Magloire, Kim (2004). Cracking the AP Biology Exam, 2004–2005 Edition. The Princeton Review. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-375-76393-9.
Jump up ^ Knobil, Ernst (1998). Encyclopedia of reproduction, Volume 1. Academic Press. p. 315. ISBN 978-0-12-227020-8.
Jump up ^ Schwartz, Jill (2010). Master the GED 2011 (w/CD). Peterson's. p. 371. ISBN 978-0-7689-2885-3.
Jump up ^ Hamilton, Matthew B. (2009). Population genetics. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-4051-3277-0.
Jump up ^ Adiyodi, K. G.; Hughes, Roger N.; Adiyodi, Rita G. (2002). Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, Progress in Asexual Reproduction, Volume 11. Wiley. p. 116.
Jump up ^ Kaplan (2008). GRE exam subject test. Kaplan Publishing. p. 233. ISBN 978-1-4195-5218-2.
Jump up ^ Tmh (2006). Study Package For Medical College Entrance Examinations. Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 6.22. ISBN 978-0-07-061637-0.
Jump up ^ Ville, Claude Alvin; Walker, Warren Franklin; Barnes, Robert D. (1984). General zoology. Saunders College Pub. p. 467. ISBN 978-0-03-062451-3.
Jump up ^ Hamilton, William James; Boyd, James Dixon; Mossman, Harland Winfield (1945). Human embryology: (prenatal development of form and function). Williams & Wilkins. p. 330.
Jump up ^ Philips, Joy B. (1975). Development of vertebrate anatomy. Mosby. p. 176. ISBN 978-0-8016-3927-2.
Jump up ^ The Encyclopedia Americana: a library of universal knowledge, Volume 10. Encyclopedia Americana Corp. 1918. p. 281.
Jump up ^ Romoser, William S.; Stoffolano, J. G. (1998). The science of entomology. WCB McGraw-Hill. p. 156. ISBN 978-0-697-22848-2.
Jump up ^ Rastogi, V. B. (1997). Modern Biology. Pitambar Publishing. p. 3. ISBN 978-81-209-0496-5.
Jump up ^ Levy, Charles K. (1973). Elements of Biology. Appleton-Century-Crofts. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-390-55627-1.
Jump up ^ Begon, M., Townsend, C., Harper, J. (1996). Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities (Third edition). Blackwell Science, London. ISBN 0-86542-845-X, ISBN 0-632-03801-2, ISBN 0-632-04393-8.
Jump up ^ predation. Britannica.com. Retrieved on 2011-11-23.
Jump up ^ Marchetti, Mauro; Rivas, Victoria (2001). Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment. Taylor & Francis. p. 84. ISBN 978-90-5809-344-8.
Jump up ^ Allen, Larry Glen; Pondella, Daniel J.; Horn, Michael H. (2006). Ecology of marine fishes: California and adjacent waters. University of California Press. p. 428. ISBN 978-0-520-24653-9.
Jump up ^ Clutterbuck, Peter (2000). Understanding Science: Upper Primary. Blake Education. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-86509-170-9.
Jump up ^ Gupta, P.K. Genetics Classical To Modern. Rastogi Publications. p. 26. ISBN 978-81-7133-896-2.
Jump up ^ Garrett, Reginald; Grisham, Charles M. (2010). Biochemistry. Cengage Learning. p. 535. ISBN 978-0-495-10935-8.
Jump up ^ New scientist (IPC Magazines) 152 (2050–2055): 105. 1996.
Jump up ^ Castro, Peter; Huber, Michael E. (2007). Marine Biology (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. p. 376. ISBN 978-0-07-722124-9.
Jump up ^ Monster fish crushed opposition with strongest bite ever
Jump up ^ Campbell, Niel A. (1990). Biology (2nd ed.). Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co. p. 560. ISBN 978-0-8053-1800-5.
Jump up ^ Richard R. Behringer, Alexander D. Johnson, Robert E. Krumlauf, Michael K. Levine, Nipam Patel, Neelima Sinha, ed. (2008). Emerging model organisms: a laboratory manual, Volume 1 (illustrated ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-87969-872-0.
Jump up ^ Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Monroe W. (2008). Strickberger's evolution: the integration of genes, organisms and populations. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 278. ISBN 978-0-7637-0066-9.
Jump up ^ Hamilton, Gina. Kingdoms of Life – Animals (ENHANCED eBook). Lorenz Educational Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-4291-1610-7.
^ Jump up to: a b Maloof, Adam C.; Rose, Catherine V.; Beach, Robert; Samuels, Bradley M.; Calmet, Claire C.; Erwin, Douglas H.; Poirier, Gerald R.; Yao, Nan; Simons, Frederik J. (17 August 2010). "Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Australia". Nature Geoscience 3 (9): 653. Bibcode:2010NatGe...3..653M. doi:10.1038/ngeo934.
Jump up ^ Costa, James T.; Darwin, Charles (2009). The annotated Origin: a facsimile of the first edition of On the origin of species. Harvard University Press. p. 308. ISBN 978-0-674-03281-1.
Jump up ^ Schopf, J. William (1999). Evolution!: facts and fallacies. Academic Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-12-628860-5.
Jump up ^ Milsom, Clare; Rigby, Sue (2009). Fossils at a Glance. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-9336-8.
Jump up ^ Campbell, Neil A.; Reece, Jane B. (2005). Biology (7th ed.). Pearson, Benjamin Cummings. p. 526. ISBN 978-0-8053-7171-0.
Jump up ^ Seilacher, Adolf; Bose, Pradip K.; Pfluger, Friedrich (1998). "Animals More Than 1 Billion Years Ago: Trace Fossil Evidence from India". Science 282 (5386): 80–83. Bibcode:1998Sci...282...80S. doi:10.1126/science.282.5386.80. PMID 9756480.
Jump up ^ Matz, Mikhail V.; Frank, Tamara M.; Marshall, N. Justin; Widder, Edith A.; Johnsen, Sönke (2008). "Giant Deep-Sea Protist Produces Bilaterian-like Traces". Current Biology 18 (23): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.028. PMID 19026540. Archived from the original on 16 December 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
Jump up ^ Reilly, Michael (20 November 2008). "Single-celled giant upends early evolution". MSNBC. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
Jump up ^ Ryan, JF; Pang, K; Comparative Sequencing Program, Nisc; Mullikin, James C; Martindale, Mark Q; Baxevanis, Andreas D (2010). "The homeodomain complement of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi suggests that Ctenophora and Porifera diverged prior to the ParaHoxozoa". Evodevo 1 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/2041-9139-1-9. PMC 2959044. PMID 20920347.
Jump up ^ Lehmann J, Stadler PF, Krauss V (2012) Near intron pairs and the metazoan tree. Mol Phylogenet Evol doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.11.012
Jump up ^ "The Genome of the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its Implications for Cell Type Evolution". Science 342 (6164). 13 December 2013. doi:10.1126/science.1242592.
Jump up ^ "The ctenophorre genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems". Nature 510 (7503). 5 June 2014. doi:10.1038/nature.13400.
Jump up ^ Bhamrah, H. S.; Juneja, Kavita (2003). An Introduction to Porifera. Anmol Publications PVT. LTD. p. 58. ISBN 978-81-261-0675-2.
Jump up ^ Sumich, James L. (2008). Laboratory and Field Investigations in Marine Life. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 67. ISBN 978-0-7637-5730-4.
Jump up ^ Jessop, Nancy Meyer (1970). Biosphere; a study of life. Prentice-Hall. p. 428.
Jump up ^ Sharma, N. S. (2005). Continuity And Evolution Of Animals. Mittal Publications. p. 106. ISBN 978-81-8293-018-6.
Jump up ^ McGraw-Hill encyclopedia of science & technology: MET-NIC., Volume 11 (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. 1997. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-07-911504-1. Retrieved 19 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Dunn, Casey W. et al. (April 2008). "Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life". Nature 452 (7188): 745–9. Bibcode:2008Natur.452..745D. doi:10.1038/nature06614. PMID 18322464.
Jump up ^ Langstroth, Lovell; Langstroth, Libby (2000). Newberry, Todd, ed. A Living Bay: The Underwater World of Monterey Bay. University of California Press. p. 244. ISBN 978-0-520-22149-9.
Jump up ^ Safra, Jacob E. (2003). The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 16. Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 523. ISBN 978-0-85229-961-6.
Jump up ^ Kotpal, R. L. Modern Text Book of Zoology: Invertebrates. Rastogi Publications. p. 184. ISBN 978-81-7133-903-7.
Jump up ^ Peters, Kenneth E.; Walters, Clifford C.; Moldowan, J. Michael (2005). The Biomarker Guide: Biomarkers and isotopes in petroleum systems and Earth history 2. Cambridge University Press. p. 717. ISBN 978-0-521-83762-0.
Jump up ^ Safra, Jacob E. (2003). The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 1; Volume 3. Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 767. ISBN 978-0-85229-961-6.
Jump up ^ Valentine, James W. (July 1997). "Cleavage patterns and the topology of the metazoan tree of life". PNAS (The National Academy of Sciences) 94 (15): 8001–8005. Bibcode:1997PNAS...94.8001V. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.15.8001. PMC 21545. PMID 9223303.
Jump up ^ Hyde, Kenneth (2004). Zoology: An Inside View of Animals. Kendall Hunt. p. 345. ISBN 978-0-7575-0997-1.
Jump up ^ Alcamo, Edward (1998). Biology Coloring Workbook. The Princeton Review. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-679-77884-4.
Jump up ^ Holmes, Thom (2008). The First Vertebrates. Infobase Publishing. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-8160-5958-4.
Jump up ^ Rice, Stanley A. (2007). Encyclopedia of evolution. Infobase Publishing. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-8160-5515-9.
Jump up ^ Tobin, Allan J.; Dusheck, Jennie (2005). Asking about life. Cengage Learning. p. 497. ISBN 978-0-534-40653-0.
Jump up ^ Safra, Jacob E. (2003). The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 19. Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 791. ISBN 978-0-85229-961-6.
Jump up ^ Dawkins, Richard (2005). The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 381. ISBN 978-0-618-61916-0.
Jump up ^ Prewitt, Nancy L.; Underwood, Larry S.; Surver, William (2003). BioInquiry: making connections in biology. John Wiley. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-471-20228-8.
Jump up ^ Schmid-Hempel, Paul (1998). Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-691-05924-2.
^ Jump up to: a b Gilson, Étienne (2004). El espíritu de la filosofía medieval. Ediciones Rialp. p. 384. ISBN 978-84-321-3492-0.
Jump up ^ Ruiz-Trillo, Iñaki; Riutort, Marta; Littlewood, D. Timothy J.; Herniou, Elisabeth A.; Baguña, Jaume (1999). "Acoel Flatworms: Earliest Extant Bilaterian Metazoans, Not Members of Platyhelminthes". Science 283 (5409): 1919–1923. Bibcode:1999Sci...283.1919R. doi:10.1126/science.283.5409.1919. PMID 10082465.
Jump up ^ Todaro, Antonio. "Gastrotricha: Overview". Gastrotricha: World Portal. University of Modena & Reggio Emilia. Retrieved 2008-01-26.
Jump up ^ Kristensen, Reinhardt Møbjerg (2002). "An Introduction to Loricifera, Cycliophora, and Micrognathozoa". Integrative and Comparative Biology 42 (3): 641–651. doi:10.1093/icb/42.3.641. PMID 21708760.
Jump up ^ "Biodiversity: Mollusca". The Scottish Association for Marine Science. Archived from the original on 8 July 2006. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
Jump up ^ Russell, Bruce J. (Writer), Denning, David (Writer) (2000). Branches on the Tree of Life: Annelids (VHS). BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES.
Jump up ^ Eernisse, Douglas J.; Albert, James S.; Anderson, Frank E. (1 September 1992). "Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: A phylogenetic analysis of spiralean metazoan morphology". Systematic Biology 41 (3): 305–330. doi:10.2307/2992569. JSTOR 2992569.
Jump up ^ Kim, Chang Bae; Moon, Seung Yeo; Gelder, Stuart R.; Kim, Won (1996). "Phylogenetic Relationships of Annelids, Molluscs, and Arthropods Evidenced from Molecules and Morphology". Journal of Molecular Evolution (New York: Springer) 43 (3): 207–215. doi:10.1007/PL00006079. PMID 8703086.
Jump up ^ Collins, Allen G. (1995). The Lophophore. University of California Museum of Paleontology.
Jump up ^ Adoutte, André; Balavoine, Guillaume; Lartillot, Nicolas; Lespinet, Olivier; Prud'Homme, Benjamin; De Rosa, Renaud (2000). "The new animal phylogeny: Reliability and implications". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (9): 4453–4456. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.4453A. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4453. PMC 34321. PMID 10781043.
Jump up ^ Passamaneck, Yale J. (2003). "Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution" (PDF). Molecular Phylogenetics of the Metazoan Clade Lophotrochozoa. p. 124.
Jump up ^ Sundberg, Per; Turbeville, J. M.; Lindh, Susanne (2001). "Phylogenetic relationships among higher nemertean (Nemertea) taxa inferred from 18S rDNA sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20 (3): 327–334. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.0982. PMID 11527461.
Jump up ^ Boore, Jeffrey L.; Staton, Joseph L. (2002). "The mitochondrial genome of the Sipunculid Phascolopsis gouldii supports its association with Annelida rather than Mollusca" (PDF). Molecular Biology and Evolution 19 (2): 127–137. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004065. PMID 11801741. Archived from the original on 28 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
Jump up ^ Nielsen, Claus (2001). "Bryozoa (Ectoprocta: 'Moss' Animals)". Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd). doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001613. ISBN 0-470-01617-5. Retrieved 2008-01-19.
Jump up ^ Putnam, Nicholas H. et al. (2007). "Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization". Science 317 (5834): 86–94. Bibcode:2007Sci...317...86P. doi:10.1126/science.1139158. PMID 17615350.
Jump up ^ Xiujuan Wang; Lavrov, Dennis V. (27 October 2006). "Mitochondrial Genome of the homoscleromorph Oscarella carmela (Porifera, Demospongiae) Reveals Unexpected Complexity in the Common Ancestor of Sponges and Other Animals". Molecular Biology and Evolution 24 (2): 363–373. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl167. PMID 17090697.
Jump up ^ Linnaeus, Carolus (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae :secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. (in Latin) (10th ed.). Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii). Archived from the original on 10 October 2008. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
Bibliography
Claus Nielsen Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. — 3rd ed. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. — 402 p. — ISBN 978-0-19960602-3
Knut Schmidt-Nielsen. Animal Physiology: Adaptation and Environment. (5th edition). Cambridge University Press, 1997.
External links
Find more about Animalia at Wikipedia's sister projects
Search Wiktionary Definitions and translations from Wiktionary
Search Commons Media from Commons
Search Wikiquote Quotations from Wikiquote
Search Wikisource Source texts from Wikisource
Search Wikibooks Textbooks from Wikibooks
Search Wikiversity Learning resources from Wikiversity Data related to Animalia at Wikispecies
Animal at the Encyclopedia of Life
Tree of Life Project
Animal Diversity Web – University of Michigan's database of animals, showing taxonomic classification, images, and other information.
ARKive – multimedia database of worldwide endangered/protected species and common species of UK.
The Animal Kingdom
Scientific American Magazine (December 2005 Issue) – Getting a Leg Up on Land About the evolution of four-limbed animals from fish.
[show] v t e
Extant phyla of kingdom Animalia by subkingdom
[hide] v t e
Eukaryota
Domain Archaea Bacteria Eukaryota (Kingdom Plant Hacrobia Heterokont Alveolata Rhizaria Excavata Amoebozoa Animal Fungi)
Bikonta
AH/SAR
AH
Archaeplastida, or Plantae sensu lato
Viridiplantae/Plantae sensu stricto Rhodophyta Glaucophyta
Hacrobia, or non-SAR chromalveolata
Haptophyta Cryptophyta Centroheliozoa
SAR
Halvaria
Stramenopiles,
or heterokonts
Ochrophyta Bigyra Pseudofungi
Alveolata
Ciliates Myzozoa Apicomplexa Dinoflagellata
Rhizaria
Cercozoa Retaria Foraminifera Radiolaria
Excavata
Discoba Euglenozoa Jakobea Percolozoa Loukozoa Metamonad Malawimonas
Apusozoa
Apusomonadida Apusomonas Amastigomonas Ancyromonadida Ancyromonas Hemimastigida Hemimastix Spironema Stereonema
Unikonta
Amoebozoa
Lobosea Conosa Phalansterium Breviata
Opisthokonta
Holozoa
Mesomycetozoea
Dermocystida Ichthyophonida
Filozoa
Filasterea
Capsaspora Ministeria
Choanoflagellate
Codonosigidae Salpingoecidae Acanthoecidae
Metazoa,
or "Animalia"
Eumetazoa Bilateria Cnidaria Ctenophora Mesozoa Dicyemida Orthonectida Parazoa Placozoa Porifera
Holomycota
Fungi
Dikarya Ascomycota Basidiomycota Glomeromycota Zygomycota Blastocladiomycota Chytridiomycota Neocallimastigomycota Microsporidia
Nucleariidae
Nuclearia Micronuclearia Rabdiophrys Pinaciophora Pompholyxophrys Fonticula
Incertae sedis
Diphyllatea Collodictyon triciliatum Diphylleia rotans Sulcomonas lacustris Kamera lens Picozoa
Sources: Adl et al. (2005), Adl et al. (2012), Cavalier-Smith (2008).
[show] v t e
Elements of nature
Caribou from Wagon Trails.jpgAnimals portal Issoria lathonia.jpgBiology portal
Categories: AnimalsZoologyKingdoms (biology)
Navigation menu
Create accountLog inArticleTalkReadView sourceView history

Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikimedia Shop
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Acèh
Afrikaans
Alemannisch
አማርኛ
Ænglisc
العربية
Aragonés
ܐܪܡܝܐ
Armãneashce
Arpetan
অসমীয়া
Asturianu
Avañe'ẽ
Aymar aru
Azərbaycanca
Bamanankan
বাংলা
Bân-lâm-gú
Basa Banyumasan
Башҡортса
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎
Bikol Central
Bislama
Български
Boarisch
Bosanski
Brezhoneg
Буряад
Català
Чӑвашла
Cebuano
Čeština
ChiShona
ChiTumbuka
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deitsch
Deutsch
Diné bizaad
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Эрзянь
Español
Esperanto
Estremeñu
Euskara
فارسی
Fiji Hindi
Føroyskt
Français
Frysk
Gaeilge
Gaelg
Gàidhlig
Galego
贛語
ગુજરાતી
한국어
Hausa
Հայերեն
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Ido
Ilokano
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingua
Interlingue
ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ/inuktitut
Iñupiak
IsiZulu
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Kapampangan ქართული कॉशुर / کٲشُر
Қазақша
Kernowek
Kinyarwanda
Kiswahili
Kongo
Kreyòl ayisyen
Kurdî
Кыргызча
Лакку
Лезги
ລາວ
Latgaļu
Latina
Latviešu
Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuvių
Ligure
Limburgs
Lingála
Lojban
Lumbaart
Magyar
Македонски
Malagasy
മലയാളം
Malti
मराठी
მარგალური
مازِرونی
Bahasa Melayu
Baso Minangkabau
Mirandés
Монгол
မြန်မာဘာသာ
Nāhuatl
Na Vosa Vakaviti
Nederlands
Nedersaksies
Nēhiyawēwin / ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ
नेपाली
नेपाल भाषा
日本語
Napulitano
Nordfriisk
Norsk bokmål
Norsk nynorsk
Nouormand
Novial
Occitan
Олык марий
Oromoo
Oʻzbekcha
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
पालि
پنجابی
پښتو
Перем Коми
Piemontèis
Tok Pisin
Plattdüütsch
Polski
Português
Ripoarisch
Română
Runa Simi
Русиньскый
Русский
Саха тыла
संस्कृतम्
Scots
Shqip
Sicilianu
සිංහල
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Soomaaliga
کوردی
Sranantongo
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Basa Sunda
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
Tarandíne
Татарча/tatarça
తెలుగు
ไทย
ትግርኛ
Тоҷикӣ
Lea faka-Tonga
ᏣᎳᎩ
Tsetsêhestâhese
Tshivenda
Türkçe
Türkmençe
Українська
اردو
ئۇيغۇرچە / Uyghurche
Tiếng Việt
Võro
Walon
文言
West-Vlams
Winaray
Wolof
ייִדיש
Yorùbá
粵語
Zazaki
Zeêuws
Žemaitėška
中文
Edit links
This page was last modified on 8 August 2014 at 12:33.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policyAbout WikipediaDisclaimersContact WikipediaDevelopersMobile viewWikimedia Foundation Powered by MediaWiki

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Animals

...Can Animals Demonstrate Intelligence, or Do They Just Act on Instinct? Animals' behaviors can be recognized as a complicated process in animals' lives circles which includes a mixture between instinct and intelligence. The way that most of animals use to communicate with each other is a clear sample to know how much complicated they are. Most differences between animals' behaviors may relate to their intelligence such as defense tactics, or act on instinct like nursing. The difference between animals' intelligence and acting on instincts is that they can learn how to do things like hunting which explains intelligence but feeling of hunger is instinct because of some internal or external factors like the hormones process in the body or skin's low temperature. However animals are in between of acting in instinct and demonstrating intelligence. The scientists focused on animal intelligence and demonstrated that they can learn from humans and from each other. For example the apes have learned the sign language by many signs which need time to memorize, afterwards scientists discovered that they can communicate with apes with these signs. This means that apes have an intelligence which is different from other animals to give them special character among them. Most animals act on instincts in some situations or at least in one stage of their lives. For instance, when birds are young they open their mouths for eating from their mother. Also, sea turtles after they hatched they...

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Animals

...Do Animals Have the same Rights as Humans? Today millions of Americans and others around the world have pets. Whether it is a dog or cat, fish or bird, hamster or a mountain lion, owners love their pets. To many they are loved as one of the family and considered to possess the loving and functional qualities of a human. Unfortunately, any way these people like to view their animals, does not change the fact that they are still in fact animals. Animals do not possess the cognitive reasoning humans do. They will respond to a stimulus which can be used through classical conditioning to produce a desired result but the training of something does not give it value. Apart from the capacity of animals, there is something else that separates humans from them. If you believe in a soul or spirit that lasts more than this physical life then that is the main difference between animals and humans. I believe God made Man in His image and was given rule over the earth. This however does not mean that animals are to be treated without respect. Humans have a responsibility, being the dominant species on the earth, to care for the rest of our resources. For example, animals can be used to test psychological tendencies and effects of certain drugs or health issues. It would be much wiser to let the death of a rat help produce a way to save the lives of many humans. However, cruelty and inhumane ways of treating animals, usually for no reason, is a careless treatment of the gifts we are given...

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Animals

...A Voice for the Animals It should be against the law to have a license or even to buy an exotic animal to have as a pet. Having exotic animals as pets is an inherent risk to human health and safety. Owning these animals is also a risk for them they need to be able to roam free not caged up like a prisoner. They may seem cute and cuddly but they have a lot of responsibilities, they can turn on you, and expensive to have. Some owners have these animals and neglect them and that’s just an un humane thing to do. When people get these animals they don’t think about their health. Some of these animals carry diseases and people don’t know it till they have it. Experts have studied that at least one in three reptiles’ harbors salmonella and shigella. Salmonella is a bacterium that can kill you it is found in animal feces and contaminated food. People who have animals such as: Reptiles, baby chicks and ducklings, and small rodents such as hamsters are particularly likely to carry Salmonella. Shigella is also a bacterium that can infect the digestive tract and cause a wide range of symptoms. When someone has a monkey and chimpanzee, they can get this virus because it’s contagious. These animals should be in there natural environment instead of someone’s home or backyard. The animals are used to roaming around freely for hour’s even days depending on the animal and type. For example tigers travel about 6-12 miles a day and they hunt at night how can you take their routine...

Words: 677 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Animal

...JONES, CNN STUDENT NEWS: Today's Shoutout goes out to Mr. Lancellotta's social studies classes at Deering Middle School in West Warwick, Rhode Island! What is a group of dolphins called? If you think you know it, then shout it out! Is it a: A) Pack, B) Pod, C) Pride or D) Gaggle? You've got three seconds -- GO! A group of dolphins is called a pod. It can also be called a school. That's your answer and that's your Shoutout! Animal Intelligence TINKER: Now dolphins don't have to spend time in schools to learn stuff. Alright, I know. It's a little early to break out the puns. But it turns out, these animals might not need to. Some scientists have been studying dolphins' intelligence, and say the creatures might be a lot smarter than any of us think. Randi Kaye explains the porpoise of this research. (BEGIN VIDEO) RANDI KAYE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Spend a day with a dolphin, and you're quickly reminded of why they've always captured our imaginations. They are playful, sociable and just incredibly fun to be around. But scientists say there's a lot more to these animals, and they're just beginning to understand the intricate thinking of these so-called, big-brained mammals. Here you go, Nani. Good girl. We came here to the Baltimore Aquarium to see just how intelligent dolphins are. You see them playing with their trainers all the time, but scientists who study them say there's a lot more happening there than just play, that their intelligence actually rivals ours. Here you go. To see...

Words: 454 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Animal

...Animal Diversity Time Requirements: Exercise 1: 15 mins. Exercise 2: 15 mins. Exercise 3: 30 mins. Exercise 4: 10 mins. Exercise 5: 15 mins. Exercise 6: 20 mins. Exercise 7: 30 mins. Exercise 8: 10 mins. Exercise 9: 30 mins. Materials Required: ITEM NUMBER (per group) LOCATION Any living or preserved plant *specimens (listed below) Display Cart/Counter Microscopes (compound and dissecting) Display Counter Colored pencils 1 set Cart/Counter *Specimens: Preserved or Living Prepared Slides Grantia Grantia choanocytes Hydra Planaria Tapeworm Clam Termite Brittle star Crayfish Earthworm Frog Mammal skulls Sand dollar Sea cucmber Sea star Lab Safety: Wear safety goggles/glasses and gloves while handing specimens (it is preferred that specimens remain in the appropriate containers untouched). Lab coats or aprons may be available upon request. Demonstrations/Tutorials: To display each life cycle with specimens and slides, see the following display suggestions – Clean up and Disposal of Waste 1. Return any materials to original locations. 2. Try to preserve any living specimens for future labs. Lab Alternatives – Computer Based p. 113 Exercise 1 – Phylum Porifera – Sponges Given that all sponges are filter feeders, why does it follow that all sponges are aquatic? Filter feeding is the filtering of nutrients and plankton suspended in water therefore for sponges to feed effectively they must be aquatic ...

Words: 4763 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Animal Testing On Animals Essay

...products on animals. It endangers animals and reduces the number count of that species, it is wasteful, unneeded, and most of all, it's immensely unethical. The animals are used for testing because often a product has a chemical or chemical mixture with unknown effects on a human, and they don't want to have a risk of being sued. They believe that an animal's life is less valuable than that of a human's. Like mentioned earlier, this method of testing products can endanger animals, but also dramatically decreases the number count of that breed. Some products are even tested upon endangered animals (illegal and extremely uncommon), leaving even less of that kind of animal. Even if certain animals live trough the traumatizing experience, they usually (almost always) live with an irregularity or abnormality, which gives them a rather unfair disadvantage in their natural habitat. Be it physically, mentally, or anything else, it is still unfair and shouldn't be...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Animals

...Respecting All Animals: There’s No Difference x x Prof. x x Respecting All Animals: There’s No Difference The majority of people in this world consider animals just creatures put here on earth to serve a purpose, even more so-most react to their slaughter ,simply with a shrug of the shoulder, unimportant, and more commonly “a way of life” Many consider living conditions that would not be suitable for a person, to be suitable for a living animal. These animals are subjected to heinous conditions and treatment, supposedly for good reason. Of course, it seems to be a common principle amongst certain people to think that animals are not capable of possessing feelings, so maybe this is why the cruelty seems tolerated? As once acknowledged by René Descartes in Understanding Philosophy, regarded animals as “simply physical bodies that lacked minds or souls; thus, animals were similar to organic machines.” (Mosser, 2014, chap. 6.4) I will be analyzing how each of these issues contributes to the unethical and disrespectful treatment of our fellow animals and why we should no longer tolerate it. First off, the most important thing to point out is the fact that animals are used for many things, in constant disregard for their feelings I might add. Just like the previously mentioned living conditions- animals are subjected to the most inhumane practices that would not ever be suitable for the treatment of people. I suppose this is the exact reasoning behind the experimentation...

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Animal Testing

...Each year in the United States, an estimated 70 million animals are hurt and killed in the name of science by private and public institutions that test household products and cosmetics, among other things. Animals are put at risk in order to protect humans. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. Human beings and many animals have similar organ systems and body processes. Experiments on animals help scientists increase knowledge about the way the human body works. In the United States, scientists perform experiments on more than twenty million animals each year. Medical researchers study animals to get a better understanding of body processes in humans and animals. They use many animals to study the causes and effects of illnesses, such as cancer and heart disease. Vivisection is the most controversial issue of animal rights. Vivisection actually means “cutting a living thing”. Some popular companies that still test on animals are Band-Aid, Clorox, Febreze, Maybelline, and many more. Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cold cages in labs across the country. They suffer in pain, ache with loneliness and long to be free. All they can do is sit in their cages and wait, in fear, for the next experiment to begin. The stress actually causes the animals to begin strange behavior like pulling out their hair and biting at their own skin. They jump in fear whenever someone walks past...

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Animal Stereotypes

...Animals are intelligent because animals can be trained to do smart things and animals use talents to learn and protect themselves and others. Animals use important skills to do important things, like how animals use snooping and eavesdropping got learn information. Also, how animals learn tricks to do smart things. Animals can and can't be so smart at certain times, but animals can also forget special information. They all in all are very smart, and here are reasons why. “An animal can think in a human way and can express human ideas in human language.” This sentence from “How Smart are Animals?” shows that animals can learn certain important ideas or facts that humans can also learn. The sentence also shows that animals can be very smart, and animals are also as smart as humans. Scientists somehow find it very hard to study animals, because of how smart they are. “Many pitfalls await the scientist trying. To interpret animal’s behavior and make inferences about their intelligence,” this shows that animals are very intelligent....

Words: 459 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Animal Testing

...Animal testing is also known as the use of animals for scientific experiments. Most animal testing is done by universities, pharmaceutical companies, and medical schools. Most animals used for research are breed for the specific purpose of testing and few animals used for testing are captured from the wild. They use animals for basic research such as behavior studies and genetics while other animal testing is done for the benefit of humans. This research includes drug testing, surgical procedures, medical equipment, and somewhat inconsequential applications like; cosmetics, and other household products. Here are some pro’s and cons that are mostly mentioned about animal testing: Pro’s o Finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. There are already some lifesaving medical breakthroughs that are the result of animal testing, like open heart surgery, organ transplants, effective insulin, vaccines for deadly diseases, … o It is the most accurate way to learn the effects of substances in a living body o Ensuring the safety of drugs and other substances o Human harm is reduced and human lives are saved but also animal lives are saved because of animal testing. o Many of the medications and procedures that we currently use today wouldn’t exist and the development of future treatments would be extremely limited. o Many argue that the lives of animals may be worthy of some respect, but the value we give on their lives does not count as much as...

Words: 510 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Animals in Disgrace

...Coetzee uses animals in his novel Disgrace to become metaphorical images of the characters and in some way the characters become animal-like characters. It also reflects the struggles that they go through in the post-colonial era. Animals are significant in the novel Disgrace become metaphorical to the people in the novel and how their situations that they find themselves in change them to become the animals. A certain situation can make them result into a certain animal, but they also change from one animal to another animal, depending on what curve ball life troughs at them. According to Patton (2009) it is clear that from the beginning of the novel David Lurie has a strong distinction between humans and animals. He believes that “We are from different order of creation from the animals.” (Coetzee: 1999, 74). Humans are not equal to animals in any way, humans have a soul that is not bound to them, before we are born we were already a soul, and when a person dies his soul leaves his body, where as an animal’s “souls are tied to their bodies and die with them.” (Coetzee, 1999, 78).David believes that animals do not have a proper soul, but his seeing changes and by the end of the novel, he finds that humans are equal to animals. He is in the room, the room where he and Bev organize the death of the animals, and David comes to a realisation and he thinks to himself “here the soul is yanked out of the body…” (Coetzee: 1999, 219). According to Meier (2006): David Lurie explains...

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Pain of Animals

...In “The Pain of Animals,” (originally published in 1989) David Suzuki’s subject is the pain humans inflict on animals by using them in scientific experiments, hunting them, and keeping them in zoos. Suzuki’s thesis is that we use animals for these purposes because their bodies, nervous systems, and responses are much like ours. This similarity between humans and animals means, however, that animals feel fear and pain just as we do. Suzuki’s main purpose is to convince us that it is immoral to inflict pain on animals. Suzuki develops this argument first by telling a story about his own changing attitudes towards animals. The “piercing shriek of terror and anguish” (p. 269) of the squirrel he hit with a slingshot convinced him as a teenager that animals feel pain just as we do. His experiences with fishing made him realize that humans, as predators, use animals without thinking of their pain. He began to question our right to use animals without considering their “pain and fear” (p. 270). Suzuki then gives a series of examples of how we inflict pain on animals in zoos and in scientific experiments the most controversial of these involves the treatment of animals that that are most like us: the chimpanzees. He cites from the experience of Jane Goodall and other experts on primates, to suggest that humans seem to think these animals are expendable: that they can be sacrificed for our selfish goals. The details about a film on the suffering...

Words: 304 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Animal Testing

...Animal Testing Many the big issues, for many years, has been about animal testing. The argument of is animal testing good or bad has been a bother for numerous amounts of people. Many people believe that animal testing is terrible because sometimes it causes animals to suffer and even die. Most scientist say animal testing is used to help the nation. They test different products to see if it's safe for humans to use. Many forget the benefits from animal testing and how much good it has done to humankind. A few ways animal testing has benefited mankind is by testing medications, substances that may affect people, and other product such as beauty products. Scientist have been able to Discover many cures for diseases because of animal testing. Because of, millions of people have been able to live a long life. Scientists also test medications on animals to see if there are safe for humans to use. Animals have saved millions because of their uses for medical and scientific research. Each time a person takes a medication or is given anything for medical usage, animals have contributed to that. Dangerous chemicals testing has also helped mankind. The purpose of animal testing is to see if any chemicals or substances are a danger to the people. Scientists have learned so much about what helps humans and what harms them. We are still, to this day, discovering what is safe for the people in the world. Animals get to be a part of helping humanity grow. Everyone wants to look...

Words: 524 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Animal Testing

...incredible gift of medicine would not be possible without animal testing . Despite these overwhelming benefits , however , some individuals are calling for animal testing to be banned because of alleged cruelty. Those who are against the use of animal testing argue that it is inhumane to use animals in save human’s existence. However I completely disagree with such approach. It would be much more inhumane to test new drugs or some other medical elements on children or adults because all people are like big family and therefore people should not put their lives under risk. The second reason why I am in favour of animal testing is that the result of medical experiments are not often applicable to humans .this maybe partly true as some drugs have had to be withdrawn despite being tested on men , therefore as we simply do not have alternative methods of testing , because computer models are not so advanced enough and testing on plants is much less applicable to humans than test on animals such as monkeys . Unless we have a better system we have to use animal testing to provide human’s safety when scientist using drugs A further point often raised against animal testing is that it is cruel . some of the test certainly seem painful , but the great majority of people on this planet eat meat or wear leather without any guilt . SO in this case where is their sympathy for animals? Furthermore , animals clearly do not feel the same way as humans and scientists...

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Animal Cruelty

...I worked on the legal aspect of animal testing ethics. I researched what factors had lead to the development of current laws in the US and other nations. The US has fairly few laws in place when compared to other nations, and focused mainly on more evolved animals. Nations like Australia and New Zealand have more extensive laws, banning all commercial research and requiring in-depth justification reports and constant updates. Finally, in Japan, we see that there is only one law, and unlike other nations where activists or some similar organization pushed for it, the religious beliefs of society actually served as the basis. I also discussed the effectiveness of these laws. In the US, the laws focus mainly on primates, dogs, and cats, which are rarely used in modern research. Since most research uses rats, fish, or other less evolved organisms, researchers are less influenced by laws. Furthermore, if researchers are found to have broken the law, the bureaucracy of it all results in slow action, if any at all. Besides that, I also worked on how our group would integrate the EQ into our presentation. This project was based off of the chapter that looks at how psychologists perform research, and the EQ of how we experience the world and what affects it. The treatment and use of animals in research has been a major issue in current society. Some people view animals as being less than human, or that the benefits that animal testing provides to humans makes it all right. These people...

Words: 315 - Pages: 2