Free Essay

Argument Against Gmos

In:

Submitted By connorisag
Words 1879
Pages 8
As we have sped into the 21st century, we have run into the issue of keeping up food supply with the demands of the growing population. To keep up with these new demands, large food companies have enlisted the help of scientists to engineer our foods to make them easier, faster, and cheaper to grow. Unfortunately, using Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) is bad not only for the health of us humans, but also the health of our environments. I believe that we should stop using genetically modified foods so that we can avoid liver disease, kidney disease and an increased risk of cancer in humans, and stop the rise of antibiotic resistance in animals and on crops. Throughout the past several decades, as we have funded the genetic engineering of our food, the higher ups of the food companies have turned a blind eye to the health risks that consuming engineered food have to us, and have conveniently forgotten to inform the everyday consumer of these risks. In “Evidence Grows of Harmful Effects of GMOs on Human Health” by Helke Ferrie, who has a MA in Physical Anthropology and has spent much time working with the World Health Organization, states that according to Canadian research “93% of all fetuses and their mothers tested were found to be contaminated with toxins associated with GM foods” (Ferrie 2) and that there is proof “GM soy products cause pre-cancerous changes to the ovaries and uterus of animals that consume them” (Ferrie 2). To begin with, the most important stage of development of the human life is while a child is in their mother’s womb, growing and preparing to enter the germ and disease filled world. Most, if not all, disabilities or handicaps that children have come from teratogens that the mother has put in her body during the first 7 months of pregnancy. For 93% of fetuses to have toxins in them very unfortunate because it will cause them many problems later on in life. Second, if there is solid proof that genetically modified soy is causing harm to animals, more than likely it will have the same effects in humans, especially children who don’t have fully developed immune and digestive systems. According to Ferrie, California is about to ban GM fish products, after a long battle to even have it be labelled, and because of this, “Monsanto’s shares fell after” this news reached the public (Ferrie 2). In “Canada and U.S. still support GM Foods, despite ill-effects” by Helke Ferrie, she states that “The American Academy of Environmental Medicine has formally warned against GMO consumption” (Ferrie 3), yet with it in “60% of all processed foods” (Ferrie 3) that is becoming virtually impossible. We are not only pumping our fellow humans full of GMOs, but we have gotten to the point that we are pumping our chickens, cows and pigs full of them as well to make them grow bigger faster. “About 70% of conventionally raised broiler chickens are loaded with antibiotics…’ (Ferrie 3) and “rats fed biotech food became like ADHD kids” (Ferrie 3). By consuming all of these GM foods and antibiotic and hormone loaded animals, we are putting these toxins in our body. Unfortunately our bodies can only filter out so much of what we put into it before it gets tired. When our bodies can no longer expel the toxins, it sits and builds up in our muscles and fat, which then cause us many health problems like cancer and liver failure and kidney failure. Not only that, but if you then have kids, it can be “transferred from a pregnant woman to the baby via sperm or egg” (Ferrie 3). In general, eating all of these modified and engineered and altered foods is not in the best interest of our health and our environment and the future generations. Many may argue that we are making the world a better place by using GMOs and injecting our animals. In a way, it does keep the cost of food reasonable, as well as making it easier and faster to produce. In “Role of Genetic Engineering in Horticultural Crop Improvement – A Review” by Ajay Kumar Thakur, Devendra Kumar Chauhan, Nehanjali Parmar, and Vandana Verma, who all work at the University of Horticulture and Forestry in India, they state that “genetic improvement that could combat… pests would be of significant benefit” (Thakur, Chauhan, Parmar, Verma 2) because it means that we would be using less pesticides and it would also keep the overall price of production low. The gene that allows this to be possible is isolated from Bacillus Thuringiensis and is then introduced to the plants original DNA. Another main aspect to consider is that are making the crops more resistant to “disease caused by several fungi, bacteria and viruses” (Thakur, Chauhan, Parmar, Verma 2). By doing this we making sure that the money we put into raising a crop is not wasted as often from being wiped out by one of the said diseases. Essentially, it makes the crops more cost effective and brings in more money since there is less wastage. There is also the issue of using herbicides to kill weeds. When we genetically modify the plants to be herbicide resistant, we make sure that when we spray the fields, rather than having to hand weed, we won’t be killing the crops, only the weeds. While it can be argued that the plants still absorb some of the herbicide, for the most part they don’t seeing as they pass all of the safety testing implemented by food agencies. In “Why GM” from the African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition & Development, we are told that not only do we make the growing of crops more effienct by modifying them, we “improve the nutritional value” (African Food Journal 1) as well. While it is still called an “imprecise art” (African Food Journal 1), we can see that genetic modification has been immensely successful thus far seeing as it appears in most of our foods today. There have been “generations” of plants to test out the modifications, and with each generation we get closer and closer to perfecting the crops. “The first generation plants have traits that help farmer to manage their land or reduce costs” (African Food Journal 1) while the second generation “has traits that enhance the nutritional value of food and animal feed” (African Food Journal 2). The third generation “is looking at how plants might be used as factories to make pharmaceutical products” (African Food Journal 3). Through this process we see the many benefits to the growing world population, especially when it comes to reducing the price. By reducing the price we are making the food more accessible to populations that are on the lower end of the economic ladder, thus eliminating hunger and starvation, to a degree. While it may be all great and wonderful that we are using science to our advantage, we are not taking into account the havoc we are reaping on our bodies and the world we live in. In “Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods” by Artemis Dona and Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis, they state that it is of great concern the “possibility that antibiotic resistance genes used as markers in transgenic crops may be horizontally transferred to pathogenic gut bacteria, thereby reducing the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy” (Dona, Arvanitoyannis 2) In other words, when we digest a plant that has been modified to be resistant to almost everything, we then absorb some of those modifications into our systems which then makes it very difficult to find medicines that we are not resistant to. In effect, this makes us more likely to contract an illness that is very severe that we cannot get rid of. GM foods also have negative effects on animals. “Rats fed with flavr-savr GM tomatoes” (Dona, Arvanitoyannis 3) showed signs of stomach erosion and necrosis, Stomach erosion and necrosis lead to life threatening internal bleeding, especially if the person that this happens to is elderly or on anti-inflammatory agents. There has also been suffient evidence that GM soybeans have an impact on the pancreas (Dona, Arvanitoyannis 3), which can then lead to diabetes, among other things. In “Agricultural Use of Antibiotics and the Evolution and Transfer of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria” by G.G. Khachatourians, it is mentioned that “Intensive animal production involves giving livestock animals large quantities of antibiotics to promote growth and prevent infection” (Khachatourians 1). By doing this we are forcing the bacteria to evolve and become resistant to the medicine meant to kill them. It becomes a never ending cycle that ends only when we cannot come up with an antibiotic strong enough to kill the bacteria. When this happens it causes humans problems because we contract the disease, but then cannot get rid of it because we made it resistant to all of our drugs. In effect, while it may be useful and easy to modify our foods today, we are not taking into account that we are making the world a less wonderful place for our future generations. Though there may be benefits, nothing can outweigh the awful negative side effects that consuming GMOs has on us. We may not notice today, or even tomorrow, but one day we will wake up gripping our stomachs because we are in pain from the nasty antibiotic resistant E. Coli that was have contracted and we won’t be able to do anything about it because we created this monster and we cannot destroy it. We have to consider that when we are putting our trust into the big corporate monsters who make our food, are they really looking out for our best interests, or the interests of their pockets? When we have so much proof the GMOs are bad for us, we should be fighting for the right to know exactly where they are in our foods and make the decision to not eat them, but it becomes near impossible to do that when we are unable to get a law passed to label them. We need to look to the future and decide if we want to continue on this track of failing health and killing the environment, or stop it and try to go back to the way nature intended it to be.

Works Cited
Dona, Artemis, and Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis. "Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods."Taylor
Franices Online. N.p., 06 Nov. 2008. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
Ferrie, Helke. "Canada and U.S. Still Support GM Foods, despite Ill-effects." CCPA Monitor. N.p., 01 Oct.
2009. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
Ferrie, Helke. "Evidence Grows of Harmful Effects of GMOs on Human Health." CCPA Monitor. N.p., 01
Oct. 2011. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
Khachatourians, G. G. "Canadian Medical Association Journal." Agricultural Use of Antibiotics and the
Evolution and Transfer of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. CMAJ, n.d. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
Thakur, Ajay K., Devendra K. Chauhan, Nehanhali Parmar, and Vandana Verma. "ROLE OF GENETIC
ENGINEERING IN HORTICULTURAL CROP IMPROVEMENT – A REVIEW." Agricultural Reviews.
N.p., 01 Sept. 2012. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
"Why GM?" African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition & Development. N.p., 01 July 2012. Web. 11
Apr. 2014.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Gmo

...Population Growth) With such a rapid increase a threat against food supply evolves, creating a need to be able to provide and sustain food supply. Whether or not the earth will be able to provide an adequate food supply needed to sustain the growing population is the question many began to ask. Theorist like Thomas Malthus spoke about the existing question. Malthus proposed that “the power of the population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence [….] the population would inevitably...

Words: 1191 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Gmos

...genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is one of massive proportions. The technology is revolutionary, yet it also displaces the order of nature with the manipulation and altering of the code of life: DNA. GMO foods are foods that have been genetically modified to produce some desired effect, like pesticide resistance, within crops, plants and animals. As with many artificial goods, when they alters and impacts the natural world and the food chain, they becomes a topic of concern. GMOs are fantastic in terms of health as they are mostly beneficial while bearing little risk. However, while GMOs are a positive force in terms of health, the rest of the technology is primarily negative. They disrupt biodiversity by introducing modified...

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Gmos

...The topic of GMOs or genetically modified organisms, has been widely debated in recent years. GMO use in food has been focused on crops to increase their yield and use. The main concerns about GMOS are actually not human safety but more the economic and potential environmental issues. There are many people that are concerned about GMOs impact on their health. As a result, they seek to find foods marked GMO free so they can consider it “healthy” regardless of the price. This is an effect from the anti GMO industry in an effort to sell you higher priced food. This has an economic impact to businesses and consumers. Increased food pricing helps the industry become more profitable. In terms of the environment, pesticide resistance is a concern involving GMOs but not GMOs directly. The GMOs are bred with the ability to resist pesticides. As a result farmers use a lot to ensure that all the weeds are killed. While leading scientific organizations believe GMOs as a whole are safe for consumption, the overuse of these pesticides could potentially affect the environment. This area requires additional research and exploration....

Words: 640 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Gmo

...modified organism, or GMO, is an organism that has had its DNA altered or modified in some way through genetic engineering (Livescience). Genetically modified foods are becoming more and more popular around the world. There has been a big argument for years on whether genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Recently, the FDA approved farm Genetically modified salmon as a certified meal. This makes it the first genetically modified animal to be approved for consumption. It has been a long time coming, but after being accused of delaying the decision for years they finally said that you can safely eat the salmon. The inserted genes remained stable in the salmon over several generations. The decision might quiet down a debate...

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Gmos

...GMOs should not be labeled George Washington was quoted as saying “I know of no pursuit and which more real and important services can be rendered to any country than by improving its agriculture, its breed of useful animals, and other branches of a husbandman’s cares.” While being said by one of the founding fathers of the United States, not all people agree on agricultural practices, or which president was the best. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) are under attack by the uneducated, closed minded, and environmentalists. GM products should not have restrictions on labeling that would hurt United States farmers and cost the consumers billions and possibly trillions of dollars. While the cost is high and payout is low the fight still continues to rage on leaving the majority...

Words: 1286 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Violence Surrounding Marijuana

...legalizing it and therefore taking away the drug cartels number one source of income. The U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy ... says that more than 60 percent of the profits reaped by Mexican drug lords are derived from the exportation and sale of cannabis to the American market (Armentano2). It is ridiculous to think that the United States can put out a statistic like this and ignore the fact that if they legalized the drug there would be less violence because there would be no point for Mexican drug cartels to try and smuggle the drug into the U.S. In the article “Blame Prohibition, Not Pot Smokers for Violence in Mexico”, published by AlterNet.org, Tony Newman tells us how the people who run the “Just Say No” campaign against drugs have a new scheme in which they plan to blame people who smoke pot for the violence in Mexico. They are hoping to stop younger people from smoking marijuana if they associate it with the murder of people by the drug cartels in Mexico. There are a few problems with these campaigns: They are inaccurate in some cases, and downright dishonest in others.Office of National Drug Control Policy It is disingenuous to connect the average American's marijuana consumption to the horrific violence of Mexico's drug war. The average pot smoker's growing and purchasing of marijuana has no relationship to the violence along the border that is the result of large-scale drug trafficking. It isn’t hard to understand that the legalization of marijuana...

Words: 1068 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Position Paper-Khadijah Shabazz

...Position Paper Khadijah Shabazz CNSL 5203 Dr. Sampson Prairie View A&M University 9/20/2015 The legalization of drugs is one of the most controversial and debated topics of the 21st century. There are both negative and positive reasons to legalize them as well as negative and positive reasons to keep them prohibited. According to LEAP, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, drug prohibition is the true cause of much of the social and personal damage that has historically been attributed to drug use. It is prohibition that makes these drugs so valuable – while giving criminals a monopoly over their supply ("Why Legalize Drugs? | LEAP").LEAP goes on to say that criminal gangs are driven by the huge profits from this monopoly, criminal gangs bribe and kill each other, law enforcers, and children and as such their trade is unregulated and they are, therefore, beyond our control ("Why Legalize Drugs? | LEAP"). It is LEAP’s belief that by eliminating prohibition of all drugs for adults and establishing appropriate regulation and standards for distribution and use, law enforcement could focus more on crimes of violence, such as rape, aggravated assault, child abuse and murder, making our communities much safer ("Why Legalize Drugs? | LEAP"). Another positive aspect of the legalization of drugs is financial gains. According to the International Business Times in a study for the Cato Institute, Jeffrey A. Miron, senior lecturer on economics at Harvard University and a senior...

Words: 1233 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Legalization of Marijuana

... But there have always been varying ulterior motives. According to Baylor University Professor of Sociology, Dr. Diana Kendall, the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 was passed solely to criminalize marijuana by taxing it; this would dissuade migrant Mexican workers who smoked marijuana to seek employment elsewhere and not take jobs from U.S. citizens as the country struggled during the Great Depression (Kendall, 2010). Last year, voters in Colorado and Washington State approved legislation that supported the commercial growth, sale, possession and use of recreational marijuana. In response, United States Department of Justice, Deputy Attorney General James Cole, promulgated policy that established the posture for enforcing marijuana laws against people or organizations to that: Distribution of marijuana to minors; revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels; the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some...

Words: 1535 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Feasibility of Universal Drug Liberalization

...Global Politics: The feasibility of universal drug liberalization as an emerging phenomenon RWaterhouse Globalization & The War on Drugs: Assessing alternatives to criminalization The purpose of this paper is to address universal drug liberalization as a feasible alternative to the current drug control regime specifically in North America and potentially applicable elsewhere. With an in depth analysis of the historical regulation, implementation of law, and resulting consequences we will be able to see how nations are effected by complex drug politics and why there has been a global paradigm shift in looking spiritedly at the ideal of decriminalization. I argue in favor of liberalization by bringing to attention the violence associated with the commodification of illegal drugs, what the re-directed costs of control could mean for domestic investment into proactive drug awareness education, and finally recognizing Portugal’s success and weaknesses in the adoption of a compete legalization agenda. Following will be a discussion of concluding thoughts centered on the efficacy and feasibility of universal liberalization in today’s globalized world. Historical Context Libertarianism has almost always had position in political discourse but has been majorly popularized through public attention within the era of globalization. (article) Control of drug consumption has always been a contemporary ingredient in the political reform of Canada and the America’s and...

Words: 404 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

War on Drugs

...The so-called “War on Drugs,” as declared by the Nixon administration in the signing of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, marked the beginning of the current era of mandatory minimum sentencing, racism, privatized prisons, and a powerful constituency that profits as a result of the prohibition of drugs. Psychoactive substances have been apart of the human experience as long as humans have walked the earth. There is little hope that drug production will ever be curtailed, so long as there is a demand; a demand that has remained steady even though it has been forty years since the beginning of said war. As Judge James P. Gray from the Superior Court of Orange County has so plainly put it: “Where did this policy come from? Unfortunately I have conducted an inquiry into this and I have determined that drug prohibition laws came for reasons of racism, empire building, and ignorance.”(Booth) The War on Drugs is politically motivated as a means of profiting. One may ask them self how government can financially benefit from such policies. In fact, they benefit in a myriad of ways. The government spends an exorbitant amount of money in an attempt to combat drug production and drug usage. The U.S. government has spent over a trillion—that’s right a trillion—dollars in its attempt to eradicate the drug problem. With so much time, effort and money there should be something to show, right? Wrong. Today drugs are more prevalent, more potent and cheaper than...

Words: 1759 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Gmo Persuasive Essay

...Table of Content 1. Introduction 2 2. GMO OMG: A Fathers Quest 4 3. GM Food ? Cultivating Fear: Expert position 9 4. Conclusion 14 Bibliography 15 1. Introduction Food is a huge part of our daily routine - most people eat at least three meals a day and think about what they are going to eat the rest of the day. The saying - We are what we eat; transforms genetically modified food into an unknown threat to our health in the case of GM food. The result is that when our source of nutrition is modified - controversies arise. This becomes apparent when investigating the GM-food debate; a controversial issue that has attracted attention in both media and public opinion.[footnoteRef:1] [1: Genetically Modified, because of rapid developments within the biotechnology-industry such as the CRIPSR-Cas9 system, GMOs are making major scientific advancements. ] One way of obtaining information about GM-food is by watching documentaries. They are presumed to be unbiased and truthful, a reliable source of information on the subject. However, the content of a documentary is generally chosen in order to make the message it wants to convey most convincing. The success of a documentary in conveying the message is determined by how credible it is perceived to be. According to Spence et al. in Crafting...

Words: 4553 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Should Genetically Modified Organisms Be Used To Enhance Food?

...techniques was the food industry. By genetically modifying foods, industries could improve yield rates which made it popular for business. A high surplus meant that companies could output and feed their citizens more efficiently than ever. However, uncertainty exists, and even the most careful of calculations cannot guarantee the effects of genetically modifying an organism, or in this case, food. This uncertainty scares people, and as a result, the argument of whether or not to use genetically modifying techniques to enhance food is a constant issue...

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Argumentative Essay: Genetically Modified What?

...GMO: Genetically Modified What? When you spot a food item that is labeled a “GMO”, do you know what that means? There are many people who don’t know what the abbreviated term means or even what it is, but simply it stands for “genetically modified organism”, in this case: genetically modified food. This means that much of the food consumed regularly has been altered in some way over the course of time. Essentially, it is not made from the earth; it is not classified natural. According to writer Yelena Sukhoterina, “In 38 countries, GM crops are banned on the government level, with the backing of the country’s scientists, doctors, and environmental agencies” (Sukhoterina). However, out of those countries, the United States is not one of them. Currently speaking, there are few select states that are fighting against the big GMO seed corporations, specifically they are fighting to have food labeled whether it is or isn’t GMO free. Today there is a massive controversy with GMOs and whether or not they are beneficial to our health. Although some are ignorant to believe that food is...

Words: 1627 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Gmo's

...Research Paper 1         The issue of genetically modified organisms, often referred to as GMOs, is one of the most important arguments we can have as a society. A huge part of the argument stems from genetically modified foods.  Some people regard genetically modified wheat and corn for their drought resistance and ability to feed millions of people in parts of the world that desperately need food. The other side of the argument stems from unwanted side effects caused by GMOs such as the creation of herbicide-resistant super weeds to the loss of biodiversity and uncontrollable transfer of modified genes into the environment (Whitman 4). The benefits vs. risks that GMO’s pose in regard to the environment and human health are still inconclusive. Only rigorous scientific research and time will yield conclusive results, along with possible advancements in technology that will help address most concerns. What is clear is that we need GMO’s to be able to feed the world’s population and that the potential risk GMO’s pose to human health and the environment can vary tremendously. The labeling of GM food is necessary will address the question of accountability of the impact GMO’s and large corporations have with their “proprietary crops” to the environment and health, along with minimizing potential risk.   The argument that corporate driven agriculture and bio technology are ill suited to address global hunger...

Words: 2999 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Gmo Crops Bad

...The third potential risk concerning GM crops is the potential disruption of the food web. This concern is based on the argument that a reduction of the number of major pests caused by insect resistant plants will increase the number of minor pests. There is fear that these minor pests will in turn become the new major pests (Zhang 2016). However, the main flaw in this argument is the assumption that there is an unlimited number of pests, and when we eliminate the danger of one, a new pest will simply pop up. In reality, there is a very small number of major pests to the most commonly grown crops. Once we address the threat of these major pests, the majority of the pest problem will be alleviated. The biological arguments against GM in general...

Words: 952 - Pages: 4