If Anthony chose the individualism approach he would likely do what he thought was in his personal best interests. Anthony’s internal morals and values would determine his decision in this approach. I cannot say what the result would be as the article did not give a clear indication of Anthony’s personal morals or values. When Determining what his obligation are to his subordinate, Kevin Pfeiffer, what decision would Antonio Melendez most likely reach if he employed the individualism approach?

Q2: Put yourself in Antonio’s position and decide realistically what you would do. Is your response at a preconventional, conventional, or postconventional level of moral development? How do you feel about your response? A: I would NOT likely choose a preconventional response. I would also NOT likely choose the conventional response. I am VERY postconventional in my actions and reactions in almost every situation. I have definitely suffered some consequences for it, however they have obviously not been significant enough to change my ways. Q3: If Antonio or Kevin were fired because they reported Empress’s fraud, would they be justified in removing all traces of their employment at the cruise line from their resumes so they don’t have to explain to a prospective employer why they were fired? Why or why not? A: No, there is always a way to paint the picture in a beneficial light whether you chose the ethical or immoral response. Ultimately, you get to choose how much and which details of the parting of ways gets shared with prospective new employer
1: When determining what his obligations are to his subordinate, Kevin Pfeiffer, what decision would Antonio Melendez most likely reach if he applied the utilitarian approach to decision making? What conclusions would probably result if he employed the individualism approach?