Free Essay

Confrontations

In:

Submitted By mungpu
Words 767
Pages 4
1. What is a crucial confrontation? What are the consequences of not holding crucial confrontations or of confronting poorly? Crucial confrontation is a skill to deal with broken promises and failed expectations to improve performance and relationships. The consequences of not holding crucial confrontations or of confronting poorly are damage relationships, repeat pattern of undesired behaviors and performance.

2. Describe the Path to Action. What causes our emotions? Path to Action is retracing steps from when you first see & hear to how you tell yourself stories to how you feel and finally act on it. Your brain follows these steps that lead to your conclusions about the other person’s behaviors. Emotions are cause by our feelings. Our feelings are affected by something that the other person might have said or something that he or she did.
3. How do the stories we tell affect the way we handle crucial confrontations? The stories you tell yourself about why others did what they did can affect how you view those people. It may be that you are telling yourself ugly stories. You may be only seeing what you want to see because of your feelings. In order to have the right confrontation, don’t tell yourself ugly stories, share your good intentions and seek common ground. This is called starting with safety.
4. What are the six sources of influence that affect human behavior? The six sources of influence are Personal Motivation, Personal Ability, Social Motivation, Social Ability, Structural Motivation and Structural Ability.
5. How can the six-source model help us tell different stories and influence our emotions? By using the six source model, we can see personal, social, and environmental factors that affect motivation and ability which causes the behaviors in the other person. That way, we may change our stories or have a better understanding about why the person behaved the way he or she did and have the right information and emotions to confront that person and resolve the issues.
6. When describing the gap, why do we have to worry about making it safe? What makes people feel unsafe? We have to worry about making it safe because we don’t want to look like we are attacking the person. Making it safe is important because the other person might feel threatened, offended or is on defensive. People feel unsafe when they know they might have done something wrong or when they feel they are being accused.
7. Why is it tempting for us to use power to attain results? What are the costs of using our power? It is tempting for us to use power to attain results because we want to get it over with. We usually want quick results. We also can feel vulnerable when others disagree with us or choose not to do something. We don’t want them to have power over us so we use our power. Also, we think power is the only way to go. We argued that people only respond to power. We also tend to follow the footsteps of our leaders who show or use power. We do the same thing and use power and this is mainly because we think we can get away with it. We act as though we are doing what we are supposed to do or doing the right thing when in fact, we are using our power.

8. What are several ways to help others see the natural consequences of their actions? One way to make the invisible visible is to hold up a mirror by communicating how the person’s actions will be seen by others. You can also link to the person’s sense of self by showing how their actions disagree with who they are. You can even reveal how the right behaviors can be a benefit to them in the future. This is called connect to existing carrots and sticks.
9. What are two common mistakes we make when asking others for their ideas? Common mistakes that we need to avoid when asking others for their ideas are avoiding the temptation to leap in with a suggestion; don’t poisoning the well; don’t discourage others, don’t worry about having to know everything; don’t play “Read My Mind”, and don’t feel the need to solve everything.
10. What does “Pop the Question” mean? “Pop the Question” has to do with asking if the person will be motivated to do the desired behaviors if ability barriers are removed. If the person is already motivated, you can ask if he or she is able to do the desired tasks or behaviors now.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Confrontation in Frankenstein

...ESSAY CONFRONTATION IN FRANKENSTEIN. Frankenstein is a novel that was written in 1818 by Mary Shelley. It deals with a young science student named Victor Frankenstein, who gives birth to a being in a scientific experiment. The novel revolves around the conflict between two characters : Victor Frankenstein and the creature, who are linked in a complex, multidimensional relationship. In fact, the creature and its creator become enemies the first time they meet and battle against each other through the entire story. Moreover, it is easily noticeable that their confrontation has several aspects to it. First, we will study their confrontation to each other through the story. Then, we will see how these two characters are involved in a confrontation with the human kind. Finally, we will ponder on the way the characters and their conflicts mirror the confrontation between nature and science. First of all, by reading Mary Shelley's novel, we can see that Frankenstein and the creature are struggling with each other until the end of the book. Actually, we have on one hand the Frankenstein monster who is dependent on his creator because he is the only man with enough knowledge to create another of his kind. On the other hand, we have Frankenstein who is dependent on his creation, because it is physically stronger than he and able to murder his family and friends. For these reasons, each of these two characters is able to blackmail the other, and so they...

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Confrontation Clause Case Study

...Court are (1) whether the testifying expert violated the Confrontation Clause when he (a) opined about the victim’s cause of death and (b) recited his stomach contents, and (2) if so, whether the violation harmed the defendant. BRIEF ANSWER Dr. Dyer’s independently-derived opinions did not violate the Confrontation Clause because they were subjected to the defendant’s cross-examination. However, Dyer’s testimony on the stomach contents is a violation of the Confrontation Clause because it was based on the...

Words: 1789 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Indian-Pakistani Confrontation from the Partition of the British Indian Empire to These Days. over the Kashmir Issue

...Indian-Pakistani confrontation from the partition of the British Indian Empire to these days. Over the Kashmir issue DATE: 06/JAN/2013 Introduction to the Indian-Pakistan conflict: Since 1946 the British began dynamically to negotiate a shift of authority, but this did not prove to be an easy affair, for as independence was established in August 1947 it was not to a single unitary state, but to two- India and Pakistan. The detachment of India occurred as Congress and the Muslim League had principally incompatible thoughts about how to represent a single successor state to British rule. Put plainly, The Muslim League preferred a weak political centre and the devolution of power to groups of provinces, which would permit the Muslim-majority areas a superior deal of self-government, while Congress sought the construction of a sturdy centralized state in order to become conscious on its social and economic goal. With neither side enthusiastic to compromise at the country on the brink of chaos. The easiest resolution was partition. The outcome was that the Muslim-majority areas of Baluchistan, Sind, the North-West Frontier, the western half of the Punjab and Eastern half of Bengal were amalgamated into the state of Pakistan underneath the premiership of the leader of the Muslim League. Muhammad Ali Jinnah. In the meantime India gained its independence under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru, the leader of the Congress party. In addition, it hastily added to its territorial...

Words: 1243 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Between 1953-61 Us-Soviet Relations Were Based on Confrontation Rather Than Co-Existence. How Far Do You Agree with This View?

...in policies. Confrontation in this period did not necessarily only apply to direct military intervention, with both sides talking pugnaciously towards one another, making grand threats to the other’s safety. It could also be argued however that this was a period of co-existence with both nations respecting the other's sphere of influence, shown in both the US reaction to the Hungarian Uprising of 1956 and Khrushchev policy of 'Peaceful Co-existence'. Dwight Eisenhower's presidency played a role in the perception of confrontation. Eisenhower’s approach to foreign policy and the Soviet Union differed to that of Truman, who had been president before him. Eisenhower was believed to be more hard-line than Truman, being highly critical of Truman’s foreign policy as he did not take a strong enough stance against communism. Eisenhower’s ‘New Look’ policy suggested that the communists were pursuing expansionist policies and outlined the idea of ‘massive retaliation’, which threatened nuclear force in retaliation to any extent of attack, also outlined by his foreign secretary Dulles. To start, Eisenhower’s approach to foreign policy did not seem to provide a conciliatory approach to the USSR. It also introduced the policy of brinkmanship, one which would not bring about a peaceful coexistence as it focused on the use of nuclear weapons and therefore, confrontation. During Eisenhower's time in office, espionage became a huge weapon towards the opposite nation. Confrontation became more...

Words: 1636 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Jacobs Concerning Group Using Dyads

...Constructive Confrontation Menu Shortcut Page Constructive confrontation is an approach to dealing with intractable conflicts that is being developed by Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. This approach is based on the assumption that while conflict is inevitable in all societies, the destructive nature of most conflicts is avoidable. By using constructive confrontation, disputants and third parties can transform destructive conflicts into constructive ones--ones which are not necessarily resolved, but ones which lead to a growing and strengthening of the parties and the relationship between them. This approach to conflict has several key elements. First are that many conflicts neither can be, nor should be, resolved. This is similar to Bush and Folger's view that settlement should not be the goal of transformative processes. Rather, constructive confrontation provides disputants and third parties with a set of tools to confront (i.e, engage in) conflict in a way that generates more benefits than it does costs. Benefits include a better understanding of one's own interests, values, and needs, and how to pursue them (Bush and Folger's empowerment) as well as a clearer understanding, of the interests, values, and needs of the other side (Bush and Folger's recognition). A second key element of constructive confrontation is a distinction between the core conflict and "conflict overlay" problems. The core conflict is made up of the fundamental interests, values, and or needs which...

Words: 773 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Supreme Court of the United States

...the Supreme Court of the United States, Michael D. Crawford v. Washington. Michael Crawford was tried for assault and attempted murder for stabbing a man who was named, Kenneth Lee. Crawford stabbed Lee at his apartment on on August 5,1999. Police arrested petitioner later that night. Crawford claimed he had acted in self-defense when he believed Lee had picked up a weapon. Lee denied doing anything that might make Crawford believe he was trying to attack him. Michael Crawford contended that Lee had attempted to rape his wife, Sylvia. The police arrested him for the stabbing, and after giving both Michael and his wife, Sylvia, Miranda warnings, they interrogated both husband and wife twice. The statement Michael challenged under the Confrontation Clause came from a tape recorded interrogation of Sylvia. In her second interrogation, she gave a version of the fight between Michael and the alleged victim that at least appeared inconsistent with her husband’s self-defense claim. Sylvia’s tape recorded statement was introduced at trial against Michael even though he had no opportunity for cross examination. In reviewing the statement’s admission by the trial court, the Washington Court of Appeals and Washington Supreme Court applied slightly different tests grounded in the framework described by Ohio v. Roberts, a system that looks for “adequate ‘indicia of reliability. However, the two courts reached opposite results. The court of appeals reversed the conviction, finding no “particularized...

Words: 3781 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Organizational Culture

...promoting openness. In some organisations, even the chief executive does not have a separate exclusive cabin; floor space is shared by other colleagues at different levels in the organisation. This willingness to share and this openness results in greater clarity of objectives and free interaction among people. As a result of openness, there should be more unbiased performance feedback. Indicators of openness in an organisation will be productive meetings and improved implementation of systems and innovations. CONFRONTATION Confrontation can be defined as facing rather than shying away from problems. It also implies deeper analysis of interpersonal problems. All this involves taking up challenges. The term confrontation is being used with some reservation and means putting up a front as contrasted with putting one's back (escaping) to the problem. A better term would be confrontation and exploration (CE). Let us use the term confrontation in this sense of confrontation and exploration, i.e. facing a problem and working jointly with others to find a...

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Relating Employee Engagement and Hrd Climate: a Challenge for Hr Professionals

...factors which ultimately results in engagement of employees in their work. The purpose of the study was to measure the employee engagement level and to study the relationship between employee engagement and HRD climate and impact of HRD climate on employee engagement in one of the leading digital e-commerce company in National Capital Region (NCR). OCTAPACE profile (Pareek, 2003) was used to measure the HRD climate. OCTAPACE measures eight dimensions of HRD climate viz. openness, collaboration, trust, pro-action, autonomy, authenticity, confrontation and experimentation. The study was conducted on 108 respondents. Data was analyzed using correlation and regression analysis in SPSS. The various dimensions of HRD climate were observed individually and reults indicated that there exists a positive correlation between employee engagement and HRD climate The correlation analysis revealed that openness, collaboration, proaction and confrontation were positively and significantly correlated with employee engagement. It was very encouraging to know that 37% variation in employee engagement was explained by the various dimensions of HRD...

Words: 3576 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Hostage Crisis

...Forceful confrontation had to be looked at. Were forceful confrontations right in all situations or should a more peaceful approach be looked at to save lives if possible? The events at Munich motivated the New York City Police Department (NYPD) to evaluate the effectiveness and value of forceful confrontation in hostage incident management and gave law enforcement what Roger Depue, retired Chief of the Behavioral Sciences Unit at the FBI Academy, called “its most effective, nonviolent tool. (McMains & Mullins, 2014).” From the tragedy that occurred in Munich, detective Harvey Schlossberg and Lieutenant Frank Boltz, developed tactics that led to the resolution of high-conflict incidents without the loss of life experienced in Munich. Focus was on slowing down the incident so that time was an advantage to the negotiator (McMains & Mullins, 2014). The way crisis situations were handled had...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Swot

...SWOT and Confrontation matrix | |Positive |Negative | |Intern |Strengths |Weaknesses: | | |S1. Excellent accessibility |W1. Dependent on money lenders | | | | | | |S2. International meeting place of considerable allure | | | | |W2. Negative publicity | | |S3. Dokmodel | | | | |W3. Expensive parking | |Extern |Opportunities |Threats: | | |O1. Growth in the student numbers |T1. Uninhabited houses/ unused offices | | | |T2. No room to expand | | ...

Words: 979 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Uniformity

...military forces to analyze their uniformity approach and how members are affected by uniformity. Most law enforcement agencies or departments are judged based on common identities and continuous uniform structure. Each department, agency, or military who adopts Uniformity empowers the units to function better. The purpose of intensive uniformity training throughout law enforcement agencies is to establish discipline, high-readiness capability which is fully trained, and able to deploy quickly with minimal mistakes. However, Soederbeg had evidence that Warsaw Pact Syndrome, “to grow up in a society where things more or less stay the same for a long period” (p. 26), can cause multinational identities to continuously cause confrontation. In the confrontation between The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) officers and Polish officials during the Memorandum of Agreement, which functions as a standard working-policy between different agencies, resulted in a very hostile environment between both parties after parties agreed to terms. Elder Polish Officials continuous...

Words: 404 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Geopolitical Risk

...life of old order concepts, and still also a prevailing thinking in categories of East- West and North-South confrontation. Today, this certainly happens in categories which are rather free from ideologies, but still according to ge opolitical perceptions of balances and counter- balances. And one must not forget that the main opponents in the Cold War, the U.S.A. and Russia, still maintain their strategic nuclear ar senals and, therefore, an antagonistic base component in their relations. Beyond that it is also necessary to develop courage for new scenarios, for new thinking, indeed perhaps for something like ‘mind games’ - in an essay - based, of course, on perceptions from the past and the present. Extrapolations are indeed permitted when dealing with future scenarios. Also, potential constellations have to be aimed at which guide beyond historic reflections or so-called current analyses. Therefore, the reader will occasionally also come across subjunctives in this essay. The future is open ; occasionally, we may also encircle it with ‘unbrushed thinking’. Is the East-West conflict really over? Or has it only declined in importance because of a much weaker Russia - compared with the Soviet Union - , her concentration in a limited area compared with its former global dimension, and the change from a comprehensive confrontation (ideological, political, economic and military) to a co mpetition for zones of influence. If this is so - and...

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Coun 509 Db4

...explain her reason for coming to counseling, the counselor can use silence as a non-judgmental form of confronting sin (Peters, n.d.). By the counselor sitting in silence without anybody movement of approval or disapproval, it allows Jean time to reflect on her own sinful actions (Peters, n.d.). Additionally, this form may lead to reflecting out loud, which is another form of confrontation that will be beneficial in the counseling session with Jean (Peters, n.d.). Perhaps, by the counselor encouraging the counselee to reflect on her own actions out loud will turn on a light bulb somewhere, without the counselor taking the active role in directly addressing the sin head on. Additionally, as the relationship continues to form the counselor can being to ask open-ended questions about Jean’s actions that will assist in her seeing the rightness or wrongness of her actions (Peters, n.d.). This may help with Jean’s questionable feelings of guilt about some of her behavior that could have led to the attempted suicide. Each type of confrontation slowly progresses into the other style, by utilizing these confrontation styles it allows the counselee (Jean) to get more and more comfortable with the counselor as well as...

Words: 409 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case Study: Integrating Ole Miss A Civil Rights Milestone

...Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. “President’s Original Speech with Notes: The James Meredith Case.” Integrating Ole Miss a Civil Rights Milestone. Accessed November 5, 2017. http://microsites.jfklibrary.org/olemiss/confrontation/doc10.html. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. “Telegram from James Farmer. National Director of the Congress of Racial Equality to President Kennedy.” Integrating Ole Miss a Civil Rights Milestone. Accessed October 27, 2017. http://microsites.jfklibrary.org/olemiss/confrontation/doc15.html. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. “Telegram from Roy Wilkins, Executive Director of the NAACP to President Kennedy.” Integrating Ole Miss a Civil Rights Milestone. Accessed October 30, 2017. http://microsites.jfklibrary.org/olemiss/confrontation/doc14.html. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. “Telegram to President Kennedy from Alabama Governor John Patterson.” Integrating Ole Miss a Civil Rights Milestone.Accessed November 2, 2017. http://microsites.jfklibrary.org/olemiss/confrontation/doc11.html. Secondary...

Words: 392 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Business Culture in America

...business partners for the first time, American’s culture expect a handshake, not a hug. Address your business partner as "Mr." or "Ms." followed by the person's last name. He will generally invite you to call him by his first name. After the initial contact, communication similarities end. Americans prefer blunt speech. Tactfulness is seen as wasting time. Americans pride themselves on their egalitarian culture, and everyone is encouraged to speak up and disagree with a higher-ups. Passionate confrontation may take the more reserved Canadians aback. These confrontations, however, almost never stem from personal animosity, but rather from the business culture of the country. In America, management still is very individualistic. Managers are held personally accountable for decisions. They assume any consensus will dissolve as soon as an initiative hits rocky ground, so American managers are less willing to compromise and play politics. However, this approach can lead to resentment and confrontation if subordinates believe their voices are not being heard. Formal business dress: dark business suits and ties for men, and pants or skirts with a suit jacket for women. Beyond that, however, dress code varies widely with the location, industry, and corporate culture of each institution. In America, more progressive industries, such as technology, tend to have more relaxed dress codes....

Words: 259 - Pages: 2