Constraint-induced movement therapy
Name:
Institution:

Question #1
Constraint-induced movement therapy, CI often forces usage of the affected arm while restraining the other healthy arm. Well, with Constraint-induced therapy, the therapist often compels the survivor’s healthy arm in a lob. Consequently, the survivor is forced to use the affected arm intensively and repetitively for approximately two weeks. Often after stroke, the survivor attempts unsuccessfully to put into practice the affected arm, though, their initial failure always discourages them to use that particular side. To use the Constraint-induced therapy, the survivor should have the capacity to extend their wrist as well as move their arm and even fingers. Several studies expose that CI therapy develops movement on the affected arm (Hakkennes, 2005).
CI therapy is regarded as a way of refining the attainment of a motor skill by compelling the accumulation of more deliberate practice trials. After a stroke, several patients adopt various approaches that efficiently substitute the goal-projected movements that can usually have been allotted to the affected arm. Several of these approaches lead to using the unaffected arm more repeatedly, fundamentally leading to a reduced necessity for using the affected arm. In fact, in the view of Zipp (2012), each timely completion of any task by the utilization of the affected arm strengthens the non-use of that particular limb. Therefore, CI therapy is regarded as a way to defeat learned non-use, and this happens by forcing the stroke patient to use the healthy leg. Well, by this justification, the patient who can compensate for the forfeiture of function within the affected arm by halting the utilization of that particular arm has principally terminated to amass practice trials.
Constraint-induced therapy related to the concept of motor learning in some