...ELI LILLY IN INDIA RETHINKING THE JOINT VENTURE STRATEGY Abhay Kishore – 01 Abhishek Kunal – 05 Anil Kumar Jadli – 11 J.Harish – 25 Khushal Malik – 28 Sharad Singh – 49 PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY – Global Trend • • • • Mainly concentrated in the United States, Europe, and Japan Developing a drug from discovery to launch took 10 to 12 years. Cost of development of drug is between $500-$800 million. Drugs were strictly controlled by government agencies: o o o o Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – USA, CPMP – Europe 12% 8% North America Europe 38% 18% Asia Japan MHW – Japan DPCO & Indian Patent Act - India • • Size of industry : USD 960 billion in 2012. Few Firms control entire market (Oligopoly). 24% ROW • 4 Firms – Control 20% , • 20 Firms – 50-60%, • 50 Firms – 65-75% PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY – Global Trend • Covered the chemical substance itself • Offered typically 20 years of protection • Usually a lag time of 1012 years by the time the patent was obtained and the launch date • Covered the method of processing or manufacturing the product • Very little protection because it was easy to slightly modify the process Global Issues in Pharma Sector • Prices in of the drugs varied in developed countries • US & Canada by factor 1.2 to 2.5. • Europe by factor 1.1 to 2.5. Parallel Trade: an outside company sells a patented product in a market not designated to sell the drug. o • Independent firm exploited parallel trade by using the differentials...
Words: 2071 - Pages: 9
...Eli Lilly case questions 1) Did Eli Lilly pursue the right strategy to enter the Indian market? It was a right strategy for Eli Lilly that started a joint venture with Ranbaxy to enter the Indian market. First of all, Ranbaxy was the second largest pharmaceutical company that manufactures bulk drugs and generic drugs in India, with a domestic market share of 15 per cent. It had established broad distribution network, and it was the second largest exporter of all products in India. Ranbaxy’s capital costs were 50 per cent to 75 per cent lower than those of comparable U.S. plants. Second, the timing was perfect for Eli Lilly to enter the Indian market. During 1970s, the Patents Act 1970 and the Drug Price Control Order (DPCO) was issued. And India was opening its drug market. Third, there was possibility to conduct cheap clinical trials in India. 2) Considering the evolution of the JV, evaluate the challenges that JV leaders faced in each phase. Andrew Mascarenhas was the first managing director of the joint venture. He created the JV’s team, positioned the JV in the market, set its operations developing the marketing strategy. Challenges he faced were hiring sales force and recruiting doctors and financial staff. He trained them on the company's value, philosophy and code ethical conduct. The JV reached break-even and was becoming profitable at the end of his managing time. Chris Shaw built systems and processes to bring stability to the fast growing organization...
Words: 496 - Pages: 2
...Eli Lilly in India Case Study BUS 545 – Global Business Management May 31, 2015 Andrew Juarez Professor Barnett Executive Summary This report provides an analysis and evaluation of the case study “Eli Lilly in India”. The general overview of the case study is the discussion of the Joint Venture agreements between two parties. Eli Lilly a reputable pharmaceutical company entered the Indian market in a joint venture agreement with Ranbaxy. The joint venture between both parties was initially a positive move, they both had an increased market share, and were driving earnings, and the relationship between both companies was positive without negative circumstances. Thus, the issue problem arose when the partnership was at an impasse, both of the companies had different perspectives on the future of the joint venture, while Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited felt that generics would be most suitable for the future development of the company, Eli Lilly and Company were focused on growth and innovation. They had both made their mark within the growing Indian economy, though other firms began to flood the market. The decision had to be made whether Eli Lilly would continue to use Ranbaxy as an intermediate or would it be better for them to rethink the joint venture as they were seeking something that Ranbaxy wasn’t, stable growth in the global business environment. The company background, the current situation and any competitive issues. Eli Lilly & company works to discover...
Words: 1097 - Pages: 5
...Question1: Did Eli Lilly pursue the right strategy to enter the Indian market? In 1993 Eli Lilly, one of the leading pharmaceutical firms in the USA, started a joint venture in India with the leading Indian company Ranbaxy. The decision was dictated by the conditions of the US market and opportunities of the Indian market. Costlier manufacturing practices due to strict governmental control, soaring prices in 1990s, invasion of cheap generics to the USA market as opposed to low costs in India and new regulations that opened Indian market to foreign investments (up to 51%) created tempting conditions to enter one of the emerging huge markets of the world. Alliance with Ranbaxy was a smart strategy for Eli Lilly to establish its presence in India. Ranbaxy was the second largest manufacturing company of bulk drugs and generics with domestic market share of 15% in India with established distribution network and the second largest exporter to different countries, including Russia (which Eli Lilly was attempting to reach), with capital cost 50-75% lower than those of comparable US plant and R&D expenses of 2-5% of sales. Besides, Ranbaxy developed its own process for Eli Lilly's patented drug Cefaclor. Since Eli Lilly's product patent for Cefaclor expired in 1992 and the firm was expecting to protect its monopoly with process patents which were due to expire only in 1994, this gave great scope for a mutually advantageous agreement between the two companies. There was also possibility...
Words: 960 - Pages: 4
...Joint Ventures do not always work and when they do they don’t work indefinitely. What Eli Lilly and Ranbaxy are facing now is the dilemma of rather to continue with their JV, Eli Lilly Ranbaxy, or should they separate and continue each one by its own means. The situation represents both a problem and an opportunity to both companies, as there are important trade-offs to be considered before any decision is taken. The Environment In the last decade the environment for the pharmaceutical industry changed radically in India. Before the 1990’s there were no regulations for patent recognition and the government had an active role in establishing drug prices through the DPCO, which were situated amongst the lowest in the world. Profit margins were also regulated at around 6% of sales. As a result many of the multinationals started exiting the Indian market. As India enter the GATT and the WTO in 1994 patent protection would become active in India from 2004-2005. In the international arena, patent regulation was also little by little becoming stronger and many of the big players were going through M&A processes that further increased the sales concentration in few companies. These companies had a hard time competing with local laboratories that produced generic drugs with no R&D expenses and at a fraction of the price. Eli Lilly Ranbaxy portraits the example of the traditional JV in which Ranbaxy, a company from less-industrialized country, offered the knowledge and distribution...
Words: 1256 - Pages: 6
...1. Did Eli Lilly pursue the right strategy (i.e., should it have used a joint venture) to enter the Indian market? Why or why not? You should refer to Chapter 6 of the notes for guidance. With the upward trend of globalization, cross-border commercialization has become inherent in business strategies pursuing not only improved competitiveness but to avoid market share erosion. Expanding to new markets, reducing friction with socio-cultural and legal barriers, reduce capital costs, securing raw materials and implementing economies of scale are just a few motivations which to look abroad for and consider the intricacies of operating in another country. Changes in India’s economic policies from an import substitution to an export-driven one, was the legal foundation that allowed Eli Lilly to pursue its interest to market its drugs in India, where it already had relationships with local manufacturers to produce human or animal insulin for the Soviet Union market, but did not for the Indian market (Bartlett & Beamish, 2014, p. 524) The opportunity presented by Ranbaxy, the second largest pharmaceutical company in India, to supply certain active ingredients or intermediate products to formulate and complete Lilly’s, and for the Joint Venture (JV) to sell and distribute those products, was the perfect opportunity to enter a “new” market while sharing the costs and risks with a well-known and respected partner. With the then existing market conditions (Sales turnover caps, mandatory...
Words: 863 - Pages: 4
...ADMN417 Assignment 2: Eli Lilly in India: Rethinking the Joint Venture Strategy Executive summary: Eli Lilly entered into a joint venture with Ranbaxy in India in 1992. A decade later both must decide whether this relationship remains mutual beneficial. Both companies have enjoyed a strong working relationship with identical value system as well as strong growth. Ranbaxy has become international and thus needs to concentrate more on generics and growth in US and UK; the joint venture with Eli Lilly no longer seems to be central to Ranbaxy’s current goals. With major changes in India’s regulation and patent protection, Eli Lilly can now enter the Indian market independently and soon would enjoy product patent protection. Dr. Lorenzo Tallarigo, president of Intercontinental Operations at Eli Lilly should end the joint venture with Ranbaxy in India. Eli Lilly will purchase all outstanding shares held by Ranbaxy at a fair market value, rebrand its name in India to simply Eli Lilly, and maintain current staff from the joint venture. The current operation from the previous joint venture should be maintained without any additional major changes since profits are already assured beyond 2005. Ranbaxy will be able to focus on the international markets with additional capital and Eli Lilly to continue growth in India. Problem statement: A decade after the formation of the joint venture, several changes have occurred in both the external environment as well as the expectation of...
Words: 1482 - Pages: 6
...Eli Lilly in India: Rethinking the Joint Venture Strategy To: Dr. Lorenzo Tallarigo, President of Intercontinental Operations From: Senior Operations Director Re: Strategic direction for joint venture between Eli Lilly Co and Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited Problem After enjoying a successful JV partnership with Ranbaxy for the last few years, the strategic decision that Lilly now has to make is how to move forward. The Indian pharmaceutical industry has witnessed some significant changes and it seems that the business goals of both companies have diverged as well. Situation Overview Thus far it appears that Eli Lilly’s decision to enter the Indian market has been a wise one. It has enjoyed a successful partnership with Ranbaxy, which has also allowed its brands to gain recognition within the local market. Considering other metrics, including sales growth, access to new distributors and innovative product development, the JV has proven to be successful as well. Both parties agree that the JV has proven mutually beneficial, however circumstances have changed considerably since the venture was first initiated. Ranbaxy has expanded its own operations internationally and expanded its global reach through various acquisitions. In addition, the business strategies of both firms have taken a divergent direction. Lilly would like to continue to focus on the development of its patented global drugs, through innovation and discovery. On the other hand, Ranbaxy believes that its...
Words: 1871 - Pages: 8
...Eli Lilly in India : Rethinking the Joint Venture Strategy Pharmaceutical companies spend more than 20% of their sales on research and development (R &D). Patents for product ( for 20 years) and process were essential means by which a firm protected its proprietary knowledge and they could command higher prices for their products. Many multinational pharmaceutical firm subsidiaries in India imported drugs from their country of origin and made a huge profit. However in 1970¶s, the patents for all pharmaceutical and agricultural products were abolished and process patents permitted for 5 to 7 years. The Drug Price Control Order (DPCO) instituted price controls by government, multinationals market share dropped from 80% in 1970 to 35% in mid 1990s so they were forced to exit from India due to lack of patent protection in India. In November 1984 Dr. Manmohan Singh , the finance minister encouraged foreign direct investment and increased the maximum limit of foreign ownership from 40% to 51%. Colonel Eli Lilly founded Eli Lilly and Company in 1876. It was a world leader in injectable antibiotics and in supplying insulin. Ranbaxy in early 1990¶s was India¶s largest manufacturer of bulk drugs and generic drugs. Ranbaxy approached Lilly to supply certain active ingredients or sourcing of intermediate products to Lilly in order to provide low cost sources of intermediate pharmaceutical ingredients. Success of Joint Venture i) Lilly used Ranbaxy¶s help for getting government approvals...
Words: 603 - Pages: 3
...companies that joint to collaborate their research and pharmaceutical technologies to start a joint venture in India. Both have valuable resources that have benefited both companies during the joint venture. Now both are questioning if there is still any value in maintaining the joint venture in India and will be deciding what will be the best route to take. Ranbaxy Laboratories wants to be bought out, but Eli Lilly is worried of the financial implications of such move. There were two pharmaceutical companies that were looking for ways to expand globally to position themselves in a competitive advantage from their competitors. One was located in the United States, which was Eli Lilly and Company and the other one was located in India, which was Ranbaxy Laboratories. Research and development was crucial to Lilly’s long-term success. Ranbaxy Laboratories was a firm that was evolved into a serious research-oriented firm. With the change, in the government, India was attracting foreign investors in the pharmaceutical industry. Lilly decided to form the joint venture in India to focus on marketing Lilly’s drugs there, and a formal JV agreement was signed in November 1992. The main key issues of this case are as follow. The pharmaceutical industry had come about through both forward integration from the manufacture of organic chemicals and a backward integration from druggist-supply houses. The industry’s rapid growth was aided by increasing worldwide incomes and a universal demand for...
Words: 1152 - Pages: 5
...Chapter 1 expanding abroad: motivations, means, and mentalities Case 1-1 Cameron Auto Parts * Alex Cameron got the family biz when graduated in 2001, when the American economy fell into a recession * History * Auto Pact, big three ship car parts between Canada & US, with tariff free * Cameron focus on small engine parts and auto accessories * Car Sales dropped in 2000, because declining North America and entry of Japanese * High pressure for modernization and cost reduction * Operational survival: cut workforce, overtime, part-time, subcontracting * Recovery and diversification * The short-term future seemed positive, but the popularity of Japanese car forced it to diversify * Working as an OEM Cameron did little to be innovative * Alex brought in a team of designers, concentrating on developing products with a wider ‘non-automotive’ market appeal * The first year no progress, Alex lured away a key engineer from the Canadian firm, and mid-2003, developed its own line of flexible couplings * Marketing the new product * Hired eight field sales representatives, stress product quality, service and speed of delivery, but not price. * Financing plant capacity * Increasing sales of flexible couplings required a new separate plant, but the financial position is not strong enough to support it * Foreign markets * Took a European Patent * A licensing opportunity ...
Words: 18260 - Pages: 74
...[pic] Course Syllabus Managing International Business Graduate Program in General Management Class of Executive July 2008 Course Leader: Handry Satriago Oct 2009 – Feb 2010 IPMI Business School Graduate Program The Indonesian Institute for Management Development Jakarta, Indonesia Course Name : Managing International Business (MIB) Class : Executive Program, July 2008 Facilitators : Handry Satriago (Course Leader) Guest Speakers : Subject to confirmation from the guest speakers - Riri Riza/Mira Lesmana, MILES Film (Session 5) Topic: Indonesia Movie Industry - Richard Matalon, President Director L’Oreal Indonesia (Session 12) Topic: L’Oreal strategy entering Indonesia - Vikram Reddy, GM Four Seasons Hotel Jakarta (Session 16) Topic: Four Seasons Global Strategy Background Companies today confront an increasing array of choices of markets, of locations for value adding activities, and of modes of crossing borders. This course focuses on the international dimensions of strategy and organization, and provides a framework for formulating strategies in an increasingly complex world economy, and for making those strategies work effectively. Operation in an international environment gives the manager access to new markets, additional natural resources, and low-cost-factor...
Words: 6165 - Pages: 25
...Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Global pharma looks to India: Prospects for growth Table of contents Introduction 03 Background 04 A fast growing economy An expanding pharmaceutical market Government-provided healthcare improving, but private healthcare dominates Domestic market overview 09 Background Consolidation underway, despite challenges Contract manufacturing Vaccines Over the counter market holds significant potential Reaching the untapped rural market Growing Research & Development 15 Overview Clinical trials Biotech and biosimilars on track for growth Other growth areas Bioinformatics 20 Stem cell research Medical devices Global Pharma’s evolving business models and options in India 23 Background Export-oriented business (Contract Research and Manufacturing Services) Licensing Franchising Joint ventures Wholly-owned subsidiaries Practical concerns 27 Infrastructure Tax environment Counterfeiting Intellectual property Conclusion 30 Related reading: Pharma 2020 31 References 32 Acronyms 38 Introduction The pharmaceutical industry’s main markets are under serious pressure. North America, Europe and Japan jointly account for 82% of audited and unaudited drug sales; total sales reached US$773 billion in 2008, according to IMS Health. Annual growth in the European Union (EU) has slowed to 5.8%, and sales are increasing at an even more sluggish rate...
Words: 17333 - Pages: 70
...SU S AIN T ABI LI I M PA C T E EC ON OMIC S O CI A L & EN D R . R E D D Y ’ S L A B O R AT O R I E S L I M I T E D | A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 0 0 9 – 1 0 RO VI V NM EN TA L • T Y • TI SI PO C R E AT I N G A C ONTENTS 24 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 42 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 45 MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 72 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 2 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER 46 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 89 IGAAP STANDALONE FINANCIALS 4 KEY HIGHLIGHTS 60 ADDITIONAL SHAREHOLDERS’ INFORMATION 70 FIVE YEARS AT A GLANCE 141 IGAAP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALS 6 THE DNA OF SUSTAINABILITY 187 EXTRACT OF IFRS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALS 190 STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 212 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 191 INFORMATION ON THE FINANCIALS OF SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 192 NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 14 HUMAN RESOURCES 71 RATIO ANALYSIS 16 SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 18 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 2 | S U S TA I N A B I L I T Y — C R E AT I N G A P O S I T I V E E C O N O M I C , S O C I A L A N D E N V I R O N M E N TA L I M PA C T CHAIRMAN’S LETTER 2009-10 has been a satisfactory year for your Company. Let me start with the financial results. Consolidated revenues for 2009-10 was Rs. 70,277 million. Excluding revenues from sumatriptan — your Company’s Authorized Generic version of Imitrex® which was launched in 2008-09 — revenue grew by 9%. In US dollar terms, 2009-10 revenue was US$ 1.56 billion. I am...
Words: 111729 - Pages: 447
...S T R A T E G Y – II S T R A T E G Y – II S T R A T E G Y – II S T R A T E G Y – II S T R A T E G Y – II www.ibscdc.org 1 Transformation Corporate Transformation Korean Air: Chairman/CEO Yang-Ho Cho’s Radical Transformation A series of fatal accidents, coupled with operational inefficiencies snowballed Korean Air into troubled times. Then, at the beginning of the 21st century, its CEO/ Chairman, Yang-Ho Cho undertook various transformation initiatives - for instance, improving service quality and safety standards, technology integration, upgrading pilot training, better business focus; putting in place a professional management team, improving corporate image through sponsorship marketing, etc. He gave a new corporate direction in the form of '10,10,10' goal. However, Korean Air is held up by a slew of challenges. Among which are inefficiencies of - Chaebol system of management, possible clash of its cargo business with its own shipping company, limited focus on the domestic market and growing competition from LCCs. How would Korean Air manage growth as a family-owned conglomerate? The case offers enriching scope for analysing a family business’s turnaround strategies, with all the legacy costs involved. Pedagogical Objectives • To discuss the (operational) dynamics of Korean Chaebols - their influence/ effects on the country’s industrial sector and the economy as a whole • To analyse how family-owned businesses manage the transition phase - from a supplier-driven...
Words: 71150 - Pages: 285
