Employee Portfolio Management Plan
Crystal Martinez
July 9, 2012
MGT/311
Gerald Tramposh

The objective of this word document if to be in the place of 3 workers at RiordanManufacturing. These 3 workers recently took the different self-assessments to assist the manager in conducting the teams. The abstract will talk about the different types of methods by which these 3 employees’ outcomes impact the effectiveness of the company and make suggestions for further valuation.
The 3 workers that have submitted their exams to me are: Derrick Flores, Angel Cantu, and Bianca Martinez. Derrick Flores has obtained 79 in the exam “How happy and I with my job?” Since his rating was below average he is an extremely happy individual. Derrick Flores is also considered to be a very upbeat individual, but he takes criticism lightly and he needs to learn how to manage critism. In a working environment there is critism everywhere. Derrick Flores also took the test IIA2 and his rating was 29 that entails that he is a considered applicant. These are points that Derrick Flores received from his assessments and he needs to establish having a cause for everything he does. In the IIC2 exam, Derrick received a 34, meaning that he possesses a greater psychological intelligence. Derrick should learn on how to be less biased while evaluating herself and other people. Angel has had exactly the same self assessments exams as Derrick and her results were different. In the 1st exam she received a 75 stating that she is a normal happy individual except when it comes to work. In the IIA2 exam she obtained 30 which showed us that he has a greater psychological intelligence. Advice that i plan to give to Angel is to improve her level of attention, because if an employee improves in the attention level she will have productive and completed work. Bianca Martinez is my third employee that has also taken the same exact exams as Derrick and Angel and her ratings were not the same. In the first exam, Bianca Martinez received a 60 which means she is not happy with any of her jobs. In the IIA2 Bianca Martinez received a 25 which means that she has a much more of a collective style of making several decisions. On Bianca’s third exam, she shows a rating of 30 which means that she is an individual with usual levels of psychological intelligence. My input for Bianca is to act more rapidly on decision making since she has more a collective style to make rational and more decisions and not to decrease the quality or efficiency of the decision taken.