Free Essay

Focus on the Leader

In:

Submitted By mshort6427
Words 2908
Pages 12
Focus on the Leader

Michael Short

Dowling College

Abstract

Dr. Scott Morris is the founder and director of the Church Health Center in Memphis Tennessee; America’s largest faith-based clinic. Dr. Morris is also the associate minister at St. John's United Methodist Church in Memphis. Dr. Morris’s ministries provide health care for the working poor and uninsured in Memphis and promote both a healthy physical body and a healthy spiritual body. Dr. Morris as a pastor and a medical doctor has written a new book, Health Care You Can Live With: Discover Wholeness in Body and Spirit in which be provides a unique view of the church and the medical industry and how they can each be a place of healing. He is a firm believer that health care through the government will not work, but has proven through his Church Health Center in Memphis that there is a real way for health care to work. See figure 1 in the appendix for a picture of Dr. Morris.

Focus on the Leader

The GOOD

Dr. Morris’s leadership of the Church health Center in Memphis is outstanding. When the governments’ health care program is incapable of functioning effectively, from Dr. Morris’s book, Health Care You Can Live With, (see Figure 2 in the appendix for a view of the book’s cover), we have learned that his nonprofit health care center is treating 55,000 patients a year with only a 13 million dollar budget. This is equivalent to 100 million dollars a year that the government would spend for the same services provided by Dr. Morris’s Church health Center. The Church health Center focuses on prevention of illness. For every dollar, Dr. Morris spent on health care their goal is to spend a dollar on prevention of illness. From Dr. Morris’s book, Health Care You Can Live With, Phyllis Tickle, author of The Great Emergence, is quoted, “Nobody is better positioned to speak with both informed authority and compassion about the wrenching problem of establishing genuine health care for all Americans. His lively and seasoned presentation will appeal to every interested reader. More to the point, perhaps, is the fact that Morris s words should be required reading for every single person politician, cleric, social worker, insurance executive, physician or medical administrator whose work in any way impacts health in this country.”

The Five Factor Model (FFM) of Personality as defined in Leadership Enhancing the Lessons of Experience (2009) consists of surgency, agreeableness, dependability, adjustment, and intelligence or openness to experience. Dr. Morris, based on the results of his life in the ministry and that of director of the Church Health Center, can be assigned several of the traits the FFM uses in determining leadership potential. Being a spiritual person in modern America is not the most common area we would think of for leadership. Now we think of religious people of all faiths as having a calling since they have proclaimed in most cases Jesus as their savior. If they go into the ministry, you might think of them as being intellectual. They will have to study all of the Bible and many other theological texts. Still unless, religious leaders in America become a Billy Graham, or Martin Luther King Jr., we may not be familiar with them or think of them in terms of leadership. So when ministers and priests exhibit leadership at this lower level of Church hierarchy, we do not think of it except as a calling from God. Certainly that is appropriate, but does cloud the sight of leadership. From the article, History's Major Religious Leaders, Time Magazine did a poll to find the person of the century. The magazine's Web site invited readers to vote. Results varied based on the background of those responding to the poll, and this can be seen based on who they felt was of most impact. Quoting the results from the article, History's Major Religious Leaders, “ It's clear from this poll that many individuals voted for the contemporary major religious leader who represents their own faith (Protestants voted for Billy Graham, Catholics voted for Pope John Paul II, Latter-day Saints voted for Gorden B. Hinckley). Other people voted for an ideological leader important to them (Martin Luther King Jr., Mohandas Gandhi or Ronald Reagan). Jews and Israelis voted for Yitzhak Rabin. People who value pop culture put Elvis Presley at the top. Adolf Hitler's third place ranking is probably a result of people trying to make an accurate historical assessment of who had the most impact. They certainly don't endorse his actions, but recognize his importance.”. So we can see that, at the highest level, many people can see leadership in religious leaders, but they look at this in relationship to their own beliefs first. I feel that a Methodist would, therefore, see leadership qualities in Dr. Scott Morris quicker than someone of another religious belief such as a Catholic, Muslim or Buddhist, or an atheist. Continuing with how this applies to Dr. Scott Morris and the Five Factor Model of surgency, agreeableness, dependability, adjustment, and intelligence or openness to experience we should relate more to Leadership either based on religious observations or more practical organization leadership. Dr. Morris may be best described in my vocabulary as a benevolent dictator. He controls all financial decisions at the Health Care Center “Personally”. So he is controlling, but he obviously does this with the best interest of his yearly 55000 patients that he served, in his outreach medical program, for the unissued or under insured working poor. I believe that he shows a great amount of surgency, with a benevolent ambition to lead or help others while being very sociable with a large number of people who admire and respect him. He has a passion that is driving him to provide help to others as spoken of in the Bible. Many other cities have copied the Church health Center as it obviously works. Whereas most government and private insurance systems are faring badly in comparison. Dr. Scott Morris also shows strong agreeableness. He obviously has great interpersonal skills. He is a practicing family doctor; in his own book he relates several amusing scenarios of how this works such as the mideastern female patient who under her burke had on a I’m Irish T-Shirt. Dr. Morris has proven he is able to help peoples of all races and religions with very little or no negative consequences. Dr. Morris is a great dependability leader. This may be from his religious background. He basically practices what he preaches. Dr. Morris is a very sympathetic person which works well with his “calling” to help others, especially those that are poor and can’t help themselves or the working poor people struggling greatly to help themselves. He never gets into trouble as far as I have been able to research which puts him higher on the religious leadership scale than many others, who have let their personal dark-side cause their down fall. Dr. Morris is also very intelligent. He has shown this in his multifaceted approach to his life. He is a minister, a calling which requires theological degrees and years of education. He is a doctor, who as we all know, is a profession that requires a lot of education and then additional studies, internship, and training practices on an ongoing basis to keep current on medical information and techniques. He is also a director of what is basically a small to mid-size multi-million dollar company. Dr. Morris is keeping up with many divergent duties and diverse topics, but still manages to publish to the Commercial Appeal Newspaper in Memphis on a frequent basis. It is my belief that Dr. Scott Morris may be one of the rare level 5 leaders as described in out text, Leadership Enhancing the Lessons of Success, in Highlight 7.2 on page 211. He displays all of the characteristics of FFM but in a positive manner which motivations others and builds teamwork. The outcome is an overachieving organization that is an example of how to do it right.

The BAD

Just as Dr. Scott Morris defined what the GOOD might be we know that there is cosmic balance and that evil does exist; sometimes known as the battle of light versus dark. So we need to look at a little of the bad which exits in everyone to some degree. These bad traits are called the Dark-Side Personality Traits. These consists of some degree of, in a negative aspect, of being excitable, skeptical, cautious, reserved, leisurely, bold, mischievous, colorful, imaginative, diligent, dutiful as it relates overall to Dr. Morris’s leadership traits. For this discussion a city leader in Memphis whose infamous deeds are still discussed is … drum roll… Edward Hull "Boss" Crump. He was better known as E. H. Crump. He was even better known as “Boss” Crump, which is what I will refer to him as. (See Figure 3 in the appendix for a picture of “Boss” Crump.

Even though “Boss” Crump grew up poor once he moved to Memphis he soon began to climb the ladder of success. He was described by David Tucker in the biography he wrote for Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture., Edward Hull "Boss" Crump as being an “ambitious seventeen-year-old bookkeeper, married the daughter of a wealthy merchant, and bought the carriage manufacturing firm where he worked.”. Marrying money is the quickest way to success that I know of; but maybe, just maybe, that was not by intent but love.

In 1905 “Boss” Crump entered politics winning election as a councilman. In 1909, he won the mayor election and began the commission form of government. He had great management organization skills but none of the oratory prowess of a modern politician like Barrack Obama, which is now a major requirement due to television. He did not do a single political speech but relied on his understanding of human nature and organizing others who could make speeches for him and negotiate deals on the back streets of Memphis where saloon keepers and ward bosses support was critical in the early 1900s in Memphis. “Boss” Crump ran an efficient city government, getting more effort from the health, fire, and police departments. He built a personal political power machine that is famous to this day in Memphis. However, there was the Dark-Side to be award of; “Boss” Crump conducted a brief publicity war on vice, but then permitted the underworld to run wide-open. We are still doing this each election year in Memphis with our pre-election anti-adult bar efforts that disappear immediately after the election. Back in the day, the “Boss” allowed gambling, prostitution, and alcohol which all contributed protection money. In fact , David Tucker’s biography of Crump reveals that “Police Chief William J. Hayes later testified in court that underworld figures contributed as much as eighty thousand dollars in a single year.”. “Boss” Crump used this dirty money for his own private purposes and also paid poll taxes to control elections which were still allowed in those early twentieth century years. Just as with Memphis’s most recent ex-mayor Mayor, Willie Wilbert Hereton; municipal corruption never led the voters to throw “Boss” Crump out of office. Concerned citizens turned to the courts to oust the “Boss” Crump machine. In 1909 Tennessee adopted a statewide prohibition law. When Crump refused to enforce the law in Memphis, the then Governor Ben Hooper pushed an ouster law in 1915 which provided the judicial method for removal of public officials from office who refused to enforce state laws. Crump resigned his office just ahead of court action but he never admitted guilt. Instead, he presented himself as a victim of conspiracies by evil private power corporations that feared his plan for public power corporations. Crump's public relations campaign succeeded so completely that his fabrication was accepted as true even though no evidence supported the alibi. This, amazingly enough, sounds exactly like what W.W. Hereton had said many times except with slick Willie it was usually done as a racial conspiracy theory. Crump remained out of politics a decade until returning in 1927 as a political boss and then won a single congressional term. But “Boss” Crump ran the Memphis based machine and in 1932 his candidate for governor, Henry H. Horton, won. “Boss Crump” influenced and controlled state wide politics for the next sixteen years. Crump, always very cordial, he worked hard over the course of many years to oblige the demands of individuals and groups. He commanded absolute authority in Memphis and Shelby County. During the Great Depression those who needed work or feared they might need assistance could not afford to oppose the political machine. Again this sounds very much like the modern era where we are facing a worldwide financial crisis and are told we cannot afford to stand in the way of government bailouts and increased deficient spending. Perhaps then as now the truth is the individual cannot afford to speak the truth or make a stand at the expense of their personal security. Under Crump's absolutism, which is defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as a form of government in which all power is vested in a single ruler or other authority, garbage was picked up daily, the streets were cleaned, the fires put out, and criminals arrested. “Boss” Crump kept the taxes low and even reduced property taxes a few pennies a year. Actually, in retrospect, it looks like “Boss” Crump did a much better job that W.W. Hereton at running an efficient government even though both of their tenures as Mayor produced many corrupt political actions. Crump's absolutism, eventually was ended by Estes Kefauver's 1948 Senate race. Crump's absolutism was broken with the election of Kefauver, but his control over Memphis government continued until his death on October 16, 1954. Memphis honored the Boss with an eight-foot-tall statue in Overton Park, making him the only political leader (the others are a Confederate warrior and two entertainers) memorialized by the city in bronze. I suspect that one day soon we will have one made for our other great Mayor W.W. Hereton.

The UGLY Since this is not a spaghetti western we have chosen not to define the ugly. We leave that up to you to determine who might be controlling the vertical and the horizontal of the Dark-Side.

Between these two mayors we can see many of the Dark-Side traits. With modern television providing recordings of voice and video it is easier now to document these tendencies. At least one of them was known as having an excitable nature with emotional outbursts. Both of the mayors seemed to possess the same skeptical nature. They were both distrusting of others and changed the integrity and loyalty of their followers. They were both bold leaders who took all the credit for the wins and passed the blame for the failures leaving many in the dirt after they ran over them. They were mischievous gentlemen. They could be very charming but obviously did a lot of breaking of rules, policies and laws. They were both colorful and were the center of attention. However, W.W. Hereton would be a major versus the minor of “Boss “Crump who was not a public speaker. They were diligent. Both men controlled the show and made the decisions. In summary Dr. Scott Morris possesses the positive traits of a true leader where as in the political arena, and each was successful for many years, both “Boss” Crump and W.W. Hereton share many of the negative Dark-Side Personality traits. References

Amazon.com: Health Care You Can Live With: Discover Wholeness for Body and Spirit (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.amazon.com/Health-Care-You-Can-Live/dp/1616262478

American Heritage Dictionary (d.n.). Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.answers.com/topic/absolutism

History's Major Religious Leaders. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2011 from

http://www.adherents.com/adh_leaders.html

Hughes, Richard L., Ginnett, Robert C., Curphy, Gordon (2009) Leadership Enhancing the

Lessons of Success. Published by McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Jones, Lindsay. (February 4, 2011) Q&A with Dr. Scott Morris. MBQ. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.mbqmemphis.com/qa-dr-scott-morris

Miller, William D.(1964) Mr. Crump of Memphis. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1964. Reprint, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Downloaded from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress April12, 2011from 1981 http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=C000955

Morris, Scott.. (2009) Health Care You Can Live With: Discover Wholeness in Body and Spirit. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.christianbook.com/health-with-discover-wholeness-body-spirit/g-morris/9781616262471/pd/262471

Time Magazine Poll “The King of the Century". (December 27, 1999) San Jose Mercury

News; URL: http://www7.mercurycenter.com:80/premium/nation/docs/timebox27.html

Tucker, David. Edward (December 25, 2009) Hull "Boss" Crump. Tennessee Encyclopedia

of History and Culture. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from

http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entry.php?rec=334

Appendix

Figure 1. Dr. Scott Morris (MBQ February 4, 2011) [pic]
Figure 2. Dr. Scott Morris on his new book Health Care You Can Live With: Discover Wholeness in Body and Spirit (Q&A with Dr. Scott Morris)
[pic]

Figure 3. E.H. “Boss” Crump from [pic]

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Lit1

...is part of a series which previews the new skills Amtrak’s leaders are developing as part of the Amtrak Leadership Development Excellence (ALDE), Part 1 program. Amtrak’s newest leadership development program ALDE, Part 1 uses the DiSC assessment to help our leaders improve productivity, teamwork and communication. Leadership styles may be described as: Dominance: Focus on results, the bottom line; Influence: Focus on influencing or persuading others; Steadiness: Focus on cooperation, sincerity, dependability; or Conscientiousness: Focus on quality and accuracy. DEFINITIONS Leader: A person who leads or commands a group, organization or a country. Leadership: The action of leading a group of people or an organization (guidance, control, direction, management). Leadership Traits (according to INC. Magazine) These are 9 Traits That Define Great Leadership: Many leaders are competent but few qualify as remarkable. 1. Awareness: Leaders understand the difference between managing a group and being a follower within that group. Once they accept this, it will form their image, their actions, and their communication. They will conduct themselves in a way that sets them apart from their peers--not in a manner that suggests they are better than others, but in a way that permits them to retain an objective perspective on everything that's going on in their organization. 2. Decisiveness: All leaders must make tough decisions, it goes with the job. They understand...

Words: 2602 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Starbucks' Structure Case Study

...become a leader or a manager? Is there a difference between the two? Can people be trained to become leaders or a managers? Just like many other questions that might be asked in business; these questions have no one, definite answer. Let's begin first by acknowledging the definitions of the two root words; the word manage means to handle, where as the word lead means to go. Similarly as the two words have different definitions, they also have different purposes. To help individuals increase their potentials in business, an internationally recognized motivational speaker by the name of Marc Sanborn has developed certain "theories" that, much like in science or art, prove some things to be more true than others by providing supporting facts to prove the validity of certain ways of thinking. Many of Marc's theories validate the fact that in general, good managers tend to be good leaders, but good leaders are not always good managers. It is said, Any company that cannot imagine the future won't be around to enjoy it. Therefore before any manager or leader can affect changes in their business they have to do what Marc describes as visioning; they must mentally "look" into what they want to see as the potential outcome of any given situation. Managers are concerned with the problem at hand; they focus on what has to be done. Leaders on the other hand, notice what has to be done, but spend their time figuring out how to get it done. Marc states "managers vision the destination, leaders vision...

Words: 1099 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Leadership & Management in Nursing Shortage & Nurse Turnover

...Leadership & Management in Nursing Shortage & Nurse Turnover We are all leaders and managers at some point in our lives. There are many opinions about the differences in leadership and managerial styles of leading. There are those who use the terms interchangeably and believe they are the same, those who believe that “leaders” and “managers” are opposites, and those who are in between. Although there are fundamental differences, individuals can be successful in both roles, and organizations need both to be successful. The purpose of this paper is to define and discuss the approaches in leadership and management styles in relation to the nursing shortage and nurse turnover using theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager, and to identify this student’s professional philosophy of nursing and personal leadership style. Definitions of Leadership & Management Styles Leadership and management are two terms that are frequently compared. They are not the same, but they are linked. Some people have one or the other skill sets while others may have both. According to the Educational Business Articles (EBA) (n. d.), leaders focus on achieving tasks by keeping the team inspired, motivated and empowered (transformational leadership). It also involves expecting the best out of everyone for the benefit of achieving the team’s goal (EBA, n. d.). Some effective leadership characteristics are: vision, motivation, inspiration, persuasion, teamwork, building relationship...

Words: 1321 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Aihdgijsd Fgkfsnm G

...Leadership Theories There are successful leaders and then there are leaders who fail. Some people think of it as luck, but the truth is that there is no out of the world combination of characteristics that make some leaders successful. Often different characteristics matter at different situations. So what makes a great leader? Is it the personality traits of people or characteristics of the situation that makes people better than others? Studies conducted to find out how exactly certain people excel in their positions have given birth to a number of formal leadership theories. In this paper I will discuss about three different leadership theories; behavioral theories, contingency theories, and power & influence theories. Behavioral Theories As the name suggests behavioral theories emphasis on how leaders behave. For example; some leaders get involved with their team and some dictate terms in decision making. According to Kendra Cherry “Behavioral theories of leadership are based upon the belief that great leaders are made, not born” (para 9). This particular theory mainly focuses on the actions of leaders. An assumption of this theory is that people can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation. Three types of leaders can be identified under the behavioral theory; I. Autocratic leaders II. Democratic leaders III. Laissez-faire leaders A study conducted by the Ohio State University, have found two groups...

Words: 957 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Project Leader

...Aligning your corporate culture with business goals Leaders of high-performance companies understand that a corporate culture that is aligned with its strategic priorities helps the organization achieve business success. The challenge: achieving alignment and sustaining it over the long term. High Performance: As Unique as a Company Itself One of the most striking characteristics of highperformance organizations is the level of harmony between business strategy and organization culture that they manage to achieve and sustain over time. A manufacturer competing chiefly on cost and efficiency, for instance, requires a culture very different from that of a luxury goods retailer for which personalized customer attention is the ultimate differentiator. “High performance” means different things in companies competing on different strategic priorities across industry sectors. In short, the right high-performance environment is one that helps a company achieve a specific set of business requirements. In a high-performance organization, workplace practices must actively influence the employee behaviors needed to execute its strategy and reinforce its market focus. behaviors of leaders are critical in establishing a culture that aligns with the business strategy. But, certainly, this is easier said than done. In fact, many companies’ cultures are not aligned with their business objectives, because their leaders, who by and large focus on the financial and operational aspects of the business...

Words: 2606 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Servant Leadership vs. Traditional Leadership

...been created throughout the years. One modern style of leadership is servant leadership. This may actually sound like an oxymoron because how can you be a servant and leader at the same time. However, this leadership has been found to very effective in some settings. There has been a rise in new forms of leadership style due to people feeling that the traditional style of leadership just doesn’t work anymore. Traditional leadership has evolved to so many different forms of leadership one that will be discussed specifically is servant leadership. First, I will compare the basis of each type of leadership. I will then compare how both styles of leaders interact to their team and how their team respects them. Lastly, I will also explore the pros can cons of each leadership style. Leadership has evolved throughout the years and it is important to recognize the effectiveness of new forms of leadership. This paper will compare and contrast the values, attributes, interaction and team moral of traditional and servant style leaders. It will also highlight the similarities and differences of each leadership style. Reading this paper a person will learn that both styles have a similar foundation but somewhat different styles. It is important to understand that it is as a leader you can choose what style of leader you would like to be or if would like to even combine leadership styles so you can be a...

Words: 2690 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Health Campaign Ii

...Public Health Campaign II Nicole Jones HCS 535 Concepts of Population Health Becky Brown July 15, 2012 Running Head: Public Health Campaign II Healthy People 2010 are a science based 10 year national objective for improving the health of Americans. Healthy People 2010 have developed benchmarks that encourage collaboration across communities, empowered individuals toward making informed decisions and the measurement of the impact of prevention activities. Healthy People 2010 focus on various illnesses such as: obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The goal of Healthy People 2010 is to increase the quality of life, the years of a healthy life, and to eliminate health disparities amongst different groups in the population. Diabetes is a specific issue that is affecting 23.6 million children and adults or 7.8% of the population. Description of the target population Diabetes is a disorder where a person’s body cannot produce or respond to insulin. Insulin is a hormone that the body uses to absorb and use glucose as fuel for the cells in the body. Diabetes Mellitus is the 7th leading cause of death in the United States. Diabetes Mellitus can lower the life expectancy by up to 15 years and is the leading cause of kidney failure, lower limb amputations and adult onset blindness. In 2007 Diabetes Mellitus cost the citizens of the United States $174 billion dollars including the cost of treatments, disability, and premature death. ...

Words: 1902 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Followership Module Analysis

...Followership module was being a Team Leader. This is the type of leader I strive to be, especially as I work towards becoming a First Sergeant. Effective First Sergeants must complete all tasks while also having a relationship with their Airmen. This is necessary because the First Sergeant must have the faith, trust, and loyalty of those under them to foster a team environment. A team environment encourages members to work their hardest and reach their highest potential. Team Leaders are necessary for every unit’s effectiveness; without them, the unit’s work ethic, morale, and goal will deteriorate. The negative implications of not having a Team Leader include deteriorated work ethic, morale, and goals. If I do not become an effective Team Leader, my team members will lose motivation and become unproductive. An unsuccessful Team leader won’t be able to get members to focus on the task at hand, nor have a good working relationship with their peers or subordinates. A poor Team Leader may not take into consideration the personal needs of their Team Members which may cause them to become unfocused if they are...

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Instructional Leader

...important and effective elements in the leadership role include the following: Prioritization: Instructional Leaders make adult learning a priority and set high expectations for performance (NAESP, 2001). While leaders cannot neglect other duties, teaching and learning is where the majority of a leader’s scheduled time needs to be allocated. Visible Presence: Placing the focus on learning objectives, modeling behaviors of learning, and designing programs and activities on instruction are essential for instructional leadership (Whitaker, 1997). Having leaders as teachers of instruction serves as a model for many teachers who may struggle with certain concepts and can help build trust and relationships. Curriculum: Principals need to know about the changing concepts of curriculum (Approaches to Leadership). The goal of any leader should be to increase student achievement; therefore, the curriculum, instruction, and assessments must all be aligned with the standards. Leaders need to be knowledgeable with curriculum and state standards and provide professional development and continuous learning for adults. Data: In their focus on improving achievement, effective leaders use multiple sources of information to assess performance (NAESP, 2001). Many leaders use data to help guide the instructional focus and professional development for teachers. Effective leaders skillfully gather information that determines how well a school organization is meeting goals and use that...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Wgu Leadership Task 1

...they are a highly engaged team. The most senior staff member has thirty-nine years of clinical experience with twenty years as the department supervisor. The most junior staff member has ten months of clinical experience and a strong focus on research. Majority of the staff have over fifteen years of clinical experience and mentor the less experienced staff members. Therefore, I must identify the priorities of the department and the larger organization, the technical and clinical skills of the staff, the engagement of the staff, and adjust my leadership from directing, coaching, supporting, and delegating depending on my staff’s needs and the situation. This style allows me to be flexible in my approach depended on the tasks and actions that I am requesting from them. This style also allows me to support my staff in their professional and technical development. This style resulted in the development of a clinical education program, preschool-aged therapy group, teaching opportunities both in the community and overseas, and home-based therapy program. I am sure my leadership style will continue to adapt as my professional career evolves. A1a. Strengths: Two strengths of a situational leadership style include the flexibility of the leader to adapt his or her approach to the situation and the empowerment of his or her staff to develop competence and engage in problem solving (Dubrin, 2010). The rapidly changing healthcare...

Words: 1887 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Individual Leadership Analytical Paper

...Individual Leadership Analytical Paper November 25, 2014 Abstract In order for a leader to be effective they must balance their approach to leadership. A leader cannot focus solely on the development of subordinates at the expense of the organization’s goals, and they cannot focus solely upon the organization while neglecting the people within it. In this paper I examine the leadership of one of my previous superiors to attempt to determine if his approach was effective, and why or why not. Introduction Leadership within the United States army is primarily focused upon accomplishment of the organization’s mission. That mission is to fight and win the nation’s wars (U.S. Army). There are many other areas of focus which support the primary mission. Leaders must ensure their subordinate’s well-being, as a sick soldier cannot fight. Leaders must develop their subordinates, as the United States army has been around since the founding of the country and will still be there when the leader is gone. The next generation of leaders must be prepared to take over and continue the army’s mission. Leaders must instill confidence in their subordinates. One area of focus which can sometimes be forgotten at lower levels is the appearance of soldiers. When soldiers look professional, fit, well-equipped, and prepared they inspire confidence in the civilian population. Americans, and others, view professional appearing soldiers as more competent and thus respect them more. ...

Words: 2228 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Leadership

...Daniel Goleman. He is a co director of the Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations at Rutgers University, also is the author of Focus, the Hidden Driver of Excellence. Title of this article is “The Focused Leader”. This is mainly focused on ‘How effective executives direct their own and their organization’s attention. This is reviewed in December 2013, Harvard business review volume no. 91. Article theme: This article is written about the leadership. In this article the author focus that a good leader must be “self aware” and “self directed”. He argues that in a good leader Emotional intelligence begins with self-awareness. Leaders who heed their inner voices can draw on more resources to do so; leaders must learn to focus their own attention. A look at how people focus inward can make this abstract concept more concrete. Hearing your inner voice is a matter of paying careful attention to internal physiological signals. How well people can sense their heartbeats has, in fact, become a standard way to measure their self-awareness. A good leader has fully command and control on his emotions. He has ability to judge situation promptly. Leaders are self controlled especially in the anxiety and crises situations. They have ability to hide their emotions, in nutshell they are good actor. A good leader always keeps an eye on future. He is social person and very focused in his strategies. In organization leadership is all about the management staff that typically...

Words: 1035 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Leadership Strategies

...them and follows those. The employees are free to do what they like in hoping that letting them act freely will bring in better results. They are letting the employees think for themselves and do what they feel will bring in the best results. Achievement culture is a type of culture that sets a clear vision and goals. Leaders also focus on specific targets and goals of the company. This culture is all about results making sure everything is very transparent so everyone knows where they stand and what they need to do to reach weekly, monthly, and yearly goals. In this culture the top management gives anything and everything employees need to motivate them to work hard enough to make sure they get to results they need. The next one is clan culture which is a culture that looks for the internal focus on the participation and contribution of the employees to meet the changing outlooks from the external focus. These companies are more like a family and have a very friendly environment. The philosophy for companies like this are more focused on making sure the employees are happy and can bring in the results. The last one is bureaucratic culture which has an internal focus for a stable culture. Everything is very orderly and efficient in that there is a certain time for breaks, and a dress code everyone must follow. This is more of a strict business professional environment, a place where you wouldn’t get away with much. Following the rules is very important! My company follows the clan...

Words: 600 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Leaders and Followers

...Leaders and Followers Leadership has been defined as the process of influencing others in a manner that enhances their contribution to the realization of group goals (Haslam, 2004). Studies conducted on leadership styles and theories led to an abundance of information. The study of leadership has identified different styles exhibited by leaders. Leaders predominantly use a single style or may demonstrate the use of different styles depending on the situation. Scholars today have discussed the nature of leadership in terms of interaction among the people involved. The leader is not the work of a single person; but rather a "collaborative endeavor" among group members (Rost, 2008). With such a wide definition it can be assumed that effective leadership may depend on the combination of the leader, the follower, the situation, or any mixture of these aspects. This paper will discuss contingency, transformational, and transactional theories and the relationship between leaders and followers. The implications that these theoretical perspectives have on organizations as well as the organizational psychology development (OPD) professional concern with developing and implementing a talent management and development strategy through an organization's leaders. How these theories play out in my organization will also be discussed. Contingency, Transformational, and Transactional Theories During the 1960's and 1970's leadership theories were developed under the 'contingency' perspective...

Words: 2033 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Management & Leadership

...influential managers or leaders. One may think of people like George Washington, Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln, Mother Theresa, and Robert E. Lee or maybe the names of superiors, family members, ministers, or teachers come to mind. Usually, when people think of managers or leaders, they tend to think of today’s current heroes and past historical figures who demonstrated excellence, and we do not include ourselves. Leaders may not control large armies or nations, but they do lead organizations, projects, and crews. The real question is how can one differentiate between management and leadership? What can help both managers and leaders to maintain a healthy organizational culture? Managers are faced with many tasks each day, one of which is leading people. The terms manager and leader are often used in the same context, but they are not synonymous. Understanding the difference between the two terms is important. The goal of a successful manager is to achieve the maximum output of the organization by way of administrative implementation. Management is the creative and systematic pursuit of practical results, (including the results of more knowledge), by identifying and using available human and knowledge resources in a concerted and reinforcing way. Successful leaders rarely focus on failure; they always keep their sights on making the vision a success. This often makes them seem distant and perhaps not a team player. For this reason, it is important for leaders to maintain a fine...

Words: 1736 - Pages: 7