Free Essay

George Bush Speech Analysis

In:

Submitted By bestyou
Words 2031
Pages 9
George Bush Speech Analysis
Name:
Institution:

George Bush Speech Analysis
In the evening of September 11 the year 2001, George Bush addressed the United States of America upon the incident of the terrorist attack that had occurred about 12 hours earlier. The attack would define the presidency of Bush that would lead to the changes in the foreign policies of America, the Iraq and Afghanistan interventions as well as years of how to combat terrorism controversies. The president wanted to assure Americans that they still had a functioning government, listing the support from other nations in the terrorism fight and promise and vow to bring those who were involved to justice. That was when men who were 19 in number colluded and worked together to highjack four airplanes that were heading for California. The essay below looks into the various aspects of the speech that the president presented mainly to comfort as well as encourage the Americans despite the attack, in the speech. It looks at the impacts of the address, his resent on the incident, his personality, in addition to his efforts to assure American citizens of the government’s industrious steps to protect them as well as the impacts that the speech had after the proposed counterterrorism measures that involved developing a robust national security as discussed in the paper.
The President of America, George Bush addressed upon the unfortunate events of 9-11 that had unfolded in 2011 the month of September according to the article “George W. Bush - Address to the Nation on 9-11-01. He begins by expressing profound and bitter sentiments upon the deadly terrorist attack that claimed thousands of innocent lives including passengers who had boarded the plane and business people who were in the building. He uses words such as “lives ended suddenly by evil, acts of terror that are despicable. Bush gets into the base of the issue and shares the feeling of pain and loss with the victims of the attack. He paints a mental picture or imagination such as airplanes that fly into buildings; the collapse of massive structures, fires burning, all that has left America with unyielding anger, terrible sadness and disbelief. The tone used suggests a nasty attitude towards the perpetrators of the terrorist acts. That comforts the citizens to know that the President shares their pain and is concern for their well being.
In line with the article, “Bush 911 analysis,” George Bush also seeks to put in place advanced defense mechanisms in United States as well as the collaborating countries. They include plans for emergency projects with teams working in the city of New York as well as Washington D.C. The measures taken encourages the Americans as they feel protected by the government from the terrorists. However, the priority he mentions is to provide aid for the injured individuals who were victims of the attack. The fact that he is willing to offer aid to the victims reveals to the citizens that he is a compassionate leader who is there for them in times like this. He maintains that “there is a search underway for the people behind the evil acts.”That suggests that Bush is ready to fight the terrorists no matter the cost. “The communities of law enforcement will bring them to justice,” he says. Those behind, as well as the people harboring them, will equally be punished. The address on these matters encourages the Americans in regard of their safety in the future. George Bush provides a contrast between the people who offered the initial aid on the victims with the displayed animalism of the terrorists, expressing further resentment. He compares the “best of America” that is the people who provided housing, blood as well as other forms of assistance with the worst “human nature there is” that is the terrorist. He sympathizes with the affected individuals and families and is willing to stand by their side in their time of need. All this was to offer comfort. Additionally, George points out that the federal agencies that were set to evacuate would get re-opened the following day. Also, the institutions of finance would still carry out their duties as normal. Those statements were meant to comfort and assure Americans that the government was doing all it can in the interest of their safety and national security, despite the attack. That was also meant to encourage the fellow Americans. He calls upon other nations that seek global peace and security to come together in a joint war against terror. He was calling for arms for a global war on terror that was soon to be created. “Another nation joining forces and resources in the fight against terrorism”, was a statement that indicates Bush’s readiness to counter the terrorists’ activities and maintain the security of American citizens. That eliminates the element of fear in the nation. Shahidulla (2012) contends that the president aimed at consoling fellow Americans for the tragic events and assuring them that the federal government was having the necessary steps taken to protect America from any further terrorist attacks. His addresses therefore informed the public that the military, as well as other enforcement agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation had been equipped to deal with threats in the future. However, days, hours and weeks had passed with no further terrorist activities following the September 11th incident, citizens of America were still fearful. Therefore, the speech that Bush gave was designed to give assurance to the people of America but did not take effect for quite a while.
The impact of the speech can be assessed by looking at various aspects. As the article on “Milestone Document in American History” reports, evaluating the impact is somewhat complicated. It is attributed to the confusion that people had not to mention the uncertainty as well as fear. The hijackers had not been identified yet and at this time the American citizens were not familiar with the al Qaeda terrorist group. However, the president was showing leadership qualities following his high rate of approvals, and the impacts of his words and actions were considered as favorable as he displayed robust crisis response. The effectiveness of the federal rose following the speech. Peace was maintained for a long time and the safety of the citizens was re-assured. Many people believe that the attacks could have been prevented if the agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation had collaborated earlier. That was because there were many clues of the impending attack before it occurred. This reveals the faith that people had developed on the government after the employment of the security forces.
There was an ultimate restructure of the United States intelligence operations following the various efforts. Additionally, there was the creation of the Department of Homeland Security as well as new counterterrorism center's establishment. The primary impact was initiated by the “Bush Doctrine” that stated that the United States taking military action was justified against any country that harbored or supported terrorist organizations. The doctrine was referred by Bush in 2003 when he started a war in Iraq that overthrew the Saddam Hussein regime on the premise that he was a dictator who sponsored threats of terrorism to other countries. He mentioned that Iran, North Korea, and Iraq were sponsors and supporters of terrorism calling them the “axis of evil.” American citizens could now freely walk in their streets as the government was on a war against terrorism. Reduction of terrorist attacks provided a healthy environment for living in the United States and peace was restored. The administration of George Bush could be entrusted with their lives as the fear of an imminent attack was eliminated hence the impacts of the speech proved to be encouraging for the Americans.
The call made by the president on the joining of arms by different countries to fight terror was rather successful. His goal was to create an international coalition to fighting terrorism, and many countries agreed to the deal. Many countries provided military forces, intelligence resources, diplomatic and economic support for counter-terrorism. Moreover, the hunt for terrorists continued. Global peace was realized and most countries in the world benefitted from the collaboration. The comfort and faith further encouraged the citizens and they could carry out their daily activities without any worry concerning their safety. The United States, together with other foreign agencies, co-operated continuously pre-empting terrorist acts as well as hunting down terrorists. Those were some of the effects that George Bush gave following the 9-11 speech.
However, as much as the speech had strong impacts on the American national security, there have been failures as well. Garson (2008) recognizes that there have been various incidences of the speech failures. That is attributed to the bombing of the Madrid train in Spain. The notion of nations coming together to stand against terrorism in the speech was compromised. Also, there was a London train bombing in 2005 July. These failures go against the long term intentions of collaborating nations to provide global security as indicated in the speech. Nevertheless, the positive effects that the speech has had overweighed the failures, as there has been a notably significant absence of terrorist attacks since 9-11 on the United States soil through the end of the year 2007. America is now a country at peace that receives millions of visitors and immigrants every year as it remains to be a peaceful country.
In the speech, Bush depicted his character as interested, caring and compassionate. He was willing to get to the bottom of the tragedy his good will is observed throughout his speech. That showed the people that Gorge relates to the problems they face every day and he addresses them as his equals. Also, he comes off as an emotional person. He says that the country offers condolences to the affected citizens bringing out the sympathy and pity emotion. Additionally, Bush provides a logical reasoning and content through the words he expressed. He provides the intended plans of uniting nations and improving the structure of the federal government on the war on terrorism. As a leader with plan, Bush gives the people a reason for people to trust and believe in him. All his allegations that were aimed at restoring peace encouraged and conforted the citizens of America.
In closing, the attack that occurred in 2001 September 11th came as a terrible shock to the nation of United States. The security of the country was compromised, and it was prudent for the president intervening as soon as possible. He first expresses his negative sentiments on the act that had occurred saying that it was a despicable act. Also, he provides his plans to enhance the national security of America by improving on the agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency. The essay above offers rhetoric of the speech presented by the former President George Bush pointing out his sentiments towards the terrible event, his consolation and assurance of security to the citizens as well as the steps that were soon to be taken to wage war against terror including collaboration with other nations. Also, the impact of the speech’s effectiveness has been taken to account as well as a few of its failures. Moreover, the President’s character is elaborated in the literature above. All this was wired to the comfort and encouragement of the citizens through the restoration of peace.

Reference
Bibliography. (January 01, 2008). 420-463.
Bush 911 analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2015, from http://www2.bakersfieldcollege.edu/jgiertz/Speech 5/Rhetoric/Bush 911 analysis.htm
Garson, G. D. (January 01, 2008). Bush Administration Information Policy and Democratic Values.
George W. Bush - Address to the Nation on 9-11-01 - The Rhetoric of 9/11. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2015, from http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/gwbush911addresstothenation.htm
Milestone Document in American History. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2015, from http://salempress.com/store/pdfs/address_to_the_nation.pdf
Shahidullah, S. M., & Hossain, M. M. (January 01, 2012). U.S. Federal Data Mining Programs in the Context of the War on Terror.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Of George Bush 9/11 Speech

...Rhetorical Analysis of President George W. Bush’s “9/11 Address to the Nation” On September 11, 2001 the United States was tragically struck by a series of terrorist attacks that left many people dead and many fearful of the future. The President of the United States at the time, George W. Bush, addressed the nation shortly after the attacks in his “9/11 Address to the Nation,” which was aired across the country to ease any fears amongst citizens and to assure that he was qualified to handle such a dire situation. In his speech, Bush uses organization, tone, and diction to achieve his purpose of connecting to his audience on a more personal level. In his Address, Bush discusses the events of 9/11 in a chronological and orderly fashion, helping...

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Of George Bush Speech 9/11

...George Bush delivered a speech following the horrific acts taken place on September 11, 2001. Bush speaks to the whole American public so he could use our vulnerability in order to persuade us to feel and think a certain way. That evening when Bush delivered his speech to Americans from all over, for or against him, waited in suspense for their leader to inform them of what actually took place earlier that day. During the speech Bush adds specific details so he could achieve certain reactions from the American people. The tone of this piece often evoked emotions such as empathy, anger, vengeance, security, nationalism, and unity. Americans were so easily influenced and affected by Bush’s speech because nothing of this caliber has ever threatened the citizens of America....

Words: 787 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

George W Bush 9/11 Speech Analysis

...ears were drawn to none other than the nation’s leader himself, George W. Bush. What was delivered was a carefully worded, strong, relatable reply to the country. Bush was troubled and in shock when he gave this address because the events that happened were so catastrophic. Out of concern for his country Bush was willing to do everything in his power to make sure America remained on its feet and stood firm, maintaining its status as a world power. Bush...

Words: 1727 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

9/11 Rhetorical Analysis

...9/11 Speech Rhetorical Analysis Essay The setting of this speech was September 11, 2001 and our former president during the time, George Bush, was addressing the nation about an infamous terrorist attack on the twin towers in lower Manhattan, New York, The Pentagon in Washington D.C, and flight 93 that landed in a field in Pennsylvania. The towers took up over 16 acres of land and both stood at 1,362 feet with 104 floors. The terrorist attack on the twin towers had the most fatalities with 2,606 that perished. Flight 93 obtained 44 fatalities including the 4 hijackers. The pentagon was attacked on the west side of the building, which was thankfully under construction that day which led to no casualties besides the terrorists. The president had to address the nation about what was happening and help people understand the importance of keeping our nation safe. The president got the attention of the nation with his opening sentence. Bush said, “Today our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and...

Words: 695 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

George Tenet and the Last Great Days of the Cia

...George Tenet and the Last Great Days of the CIA George Tenet was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 1997-2004. He was good at what he did; he was so good that he was asked to stay on as the Director of the CIA when President Bush won the Presidency. The one thing Tenet experienced with the Bush administration that he did not experience with the Clinton Administration is he became part of the President’s inner circle. Once George Tenet experienced the inner circle, he no longer was able to focus on rebuilding the agency (Stillman 2000). In George Tenet and the Last Great Days of the CIA, Richard White, Jr. gives us the rise and fall of the CIA under CIA Director George Tenet. With any profession ethics always plays an important role. We run across many ethical situations and it always come down to what should you do? In George Tenet’s case it was no different. During his political career Tenet had faced many ethical dilemmas, some of those ethical dilemmas include him serving as a go-between person making his job politically complicated, not being able to openly disagree and communicate with the members of President Bush administration, even when he knew the President was wrong he still backed him, and being in a cross road for performing the duties of his job and being loyal to the president. Tenet had always seen the role of CIA as an “honest broker that avoided direct involvement in foreign policy making” (Stillman...

Words: 1551 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Import

...January 24, 2013 Inaugural Address Analysis On January 21, 2013, President Obama gave his inaugural speech. By giving an inaugural speech, this means that the president will bear witness to the enduring strength of the constitution and affirm the promise of the democracy. In the beginning of his speech, he stated the vows he has agreed to make as a country together. He says, “Together, we discover that a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play. Together, we resolve that a great nation must care for the vulnerable and protect its people from life’s worst hazards and misfortunes.” As the speech goes on, he explains that when times change we, the people, must do the same. We must come together as one nation and one people. He talks about the middle class- how America’s “prosperity” must rest upon their broad shoulders. He believes that every citizen deserves the same amount of security and dignity; therefore, he decided to reduce the cost of health care. He will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure by not allowing other nations have the technology that will power new jobs and industries, but by claiming its promise. He wants to defend our people through strength of arms and rule of law; resolve issues with other nations peacefully. He ends his speech by saying that by being a citizen we, the people, have to set the course; by votes we cast and voices we lift. The last line of his speech is very powerful and states, “Thank...

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

War on Terrorism - Ethics Project

...War on Terrorism Case Study Analysis GM530 Managerial Decision Making Week6 Assignment Keller Graduate School of Management Ravi Murugan February 14 2011 Prof. Marc Friedman Discuss the different decision personalities/styles advising Bush. Bush’s war cabinet consisted of a select group of senior administration officials. They were George Bush, Richard Cheney, Andrew Card, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, George Tenet, Robert Mueller, Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, Henry Shelton, Paul O’Neill, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Armitage who held secret meetings for weeks and had experience in foreign affairs. Five of these people planned and executed the Persian Gulf War with bush’s father and so had his trust (Cheney, Rice, Powell, Wolfowitz and Armitage). For our personalities discussion I am selecting just the key persons who were advising or feeding input on different matters. i) George W. Bush: He prefers to lead by setting a broad direction and delegating responsibilities to trusted subordinates and leans heavily on his advisors. He is careful in his selection and chooses loyal people who are given goals and left to work on it. His lack of foreign policy experience contributed to his heavy reliance on his counsel and advisors. He knew how to delegate authority and hold people accountable for their responsibilities and authority. He listened more and then made a decision, which he stands firm to. He is more of not the details oriented person but draw a clear outline...

Words: 1145 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Bushs Speaks

...Rhetorical analysis - Bush’s speech. On a cloudless fall day in September 2001, 19 terrorist attacked USA and made it into front pages of every newspaper in the entire world. The whole world’s population were shocked, and never before have people conjectured that the terrorists would attack the United States of America. Same evening, at the time president, George W. Bush held a speech, whose intention was to calm the U.S. population and to warn the terrorist and the rest of the world about an eventually war. Bush’s intentions with the speech is to calm the country, and be their president. Since Bush is the president, he already has a big ethos. However, he also points out in the speech, to underscores his ethos even more, that he has control over the situation, and that America does not need to be worry about theirs safety even though what just happened a few hours ago. He says:” Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government's emergency response plans. Our military is powerful, and it is prepared.” He underscores that America is strong and powerful and that they are not afraid of the future because they can and will handle it. In addition, he also warns the terrorist about an eventually war with the same quote. The US is ready for war in any minutes, and they want to fight for peace and security and win the war against terrorism. The speech bears the mark of pathos in particular. In the first part of the speech, Bush keeps mention the victims and theirs...

Words: 874 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Georgr Tanet and the Cia

...Introduction George tenet and the last great days of the CIA cases focus on ethics and public administration ,it is important to those who are studying in public administration because this case illustrate when the executive in public sectors confront with ethical dilemma which is the problem that usually face when working in public services because public sector are not private sectors which have the efficiency goal and make profits ,but those who work in public sectors are confront with the choice among efficiency equity moral and duty. The Facts and Chronology George Tenet was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 1997 to 2004. Tenet graduated from the Georgetown University in 1976 with bachelor’s degree in foreign affairs, and received a master’s degree from Columbia in 1978. George Tenet is a product of Washington, during his career at Washington he was named to be workaholic straightforward and loyalty. After he had spent four years as a lobbyist, he stared his career in Capitol Hill as a legislative assistant for Senator John Heinz. In 1985 he began working for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) which he had a reputation as an “effective and efficient staffer who served his boss well” Because of his loyalty, impressed by Oklahoma senator David Boren, he was appointed to be the director of the SSCI, one of the most prestigious positions on the Hill. Later, Tenet joined President Bill Clinton's national security transition team in...

Words: 913 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Arnold

...Arnold Schwarzenegger’s speech to the Republican convention Arnold Schwarzenegger's speech given at the Republican national convention in 2004 is clearly of persuasive intent supporting the current President, George W. Bush and the Republican Party. The speech is given just before the presidential election in 2004, and Schwarzenegger is recommending sending George Bush to the white house for four more years. He praises the president of that time: “We are one America, and President Bush is defending it with all his heart and soul. That’s what I admire most about the president. He’s a man of perseverance.” (l. 41, p. 3) As the speech is given on the Republican convention, the audience is probably all Republicans, and throughout the speech, it is clear that it is given to an audience that has already been convinced. Especially in the introduction to his speech, we see that Schwarzenegger speaks to his sympathizers: “My fellow immigrants, my fellow Americans, how do you know if you are a Republican? Well, I tell you how. If you believe that government should be accountable to the people, not the people to the government, then you are a republican. If you believe that a person should be treated as an individual, not as a member of an interest group, then you are a Republican. If you believe your family knows how to spend your money better than the government does, then you are a Republican.” We see here that he focuses his speech on an audience which he addresses as "my fellow Americans"...

Words: 1556 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

From the Truman Doctrine to the Bush Doctrine

...the Truman Doctrine to the Bush Doctrine | Contemporary History | | An overview and comparative analysis of two decisive American foreign policy doctrines breed from fear that impacted the world. | Fear and the reaction to it has been a driving force throughout human evolution, it has helped shape both our physical and social development. Fear and the reaction to it in politics, has helped create and shape everything from our borders and languages, to our technology and religion. At its very best it serves as a common uniting factor that all people share. At its worst it has lead to some of our greatest wars. The Truman and Bush Doctrines are two such policy sets rooted in fears that helped shape the world we know today. On the 12th of March 1947, then President Harry S. Truman addressed a joint session of Congress requesting $400 million in military funding and other foreign aid to support the struggling nations of Turkey and Greece. Truman implored Congress to act quickly to provide aid and support to both nations. Truman described the current state of affairs in Greece as an environment of “political chaos” and that its internal security and very survival were threatened by “terrorist activities of several thousand armed men, led by Communists…” (Truman, 1947) In this speech lay the foundation for the resulting Cold War, and idea that the spread of Communism should be halted and contained. With further analysis of this same speech one can also locate early indication...

Words: 1077 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Paper

...and action. The act of obeying orders from the big power leads to survival, and the rebellion for freedom leads to the most devastating punishment. Would you give in to the big power or would you fight? The novel Nineteen-Eighty Four written by George Orwell portraying through the view of the protagonist, Winston Smith, describing a nation called Oceania being under the ruling of the antagonist, a totalitarian Party or the Big Brother. In addition, it presented various methods such as constant surveillance, unending propaganda, distortion of language, historical revisionism, fear, torture, perpetual war, and lack of habeas corpus to characterize an oppressive and authoritarian government. The Party utilizes these methods to keep its citizens living in a state of fear, making them developing a feeling of dependency of the party. The novel Nineteen-Eighty Four has its significance today because all of the methods that characterize a totalitarian government are still presence, especially being currently utilized by the government of the United States. Once upon a time, the U.S used to be a land of unparalleled freedom. However, ever since the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, the U.S government, primarily under the management of the bush administration, has been taking numerous steps of becoming to a totalitarian state. Constant Surveillance: Under the reason of security, government proposed the method of surveillance to provide protection to its citizens. But, it could be...

Words: 3137 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Just Water Under the Bush

...Just Water Under The Bush? By: Janice Foster There is a term that old folks often say to refer to something that has taken place in the past that cannot be changed and therefore you just get over it. This is easier said than done especially if you are the living reminder of what cannot be changed. All of us have been affected by George w. Bush and his administration whether it is good or bad, directly or indirectly. There are some of us who have been affected in ways that you can only imagine. Sometimes even though something has taken place in the past it can have an important bearing on how you prepare for your future. For Katrina and 911 victims, the term may not be so easy to apply in their lives. The presidency of George W. Bush began on January 20, 2001, when he was inaugurated as the 43rd President of the United States of America. George W. Bush is the oldest son of former president George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush was elected president in the 2000 general election, and became the second US president whose father had held the same office. Bush did not get into office without some scandal and controversy because On December 8, 2000, the Supreme Court of Florida ordered that the Circuit Court of Leon County tabulate by hand 9,000 ballots in Miami-Dade County. It also ordered the inclusion in the certified vote totals of 215 votes identified in Palm Beach County and 168 votes identified in Miami-Dade County for Vice President Albert Gore, Jr., and Senator Joseph Lieberman...

Words: 3024 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Fahrenheit 9/11 Analysis

...Fahrenheit 9/11, Moore presents a biased recount of the Iraq war. Analysis of Fahrenheit 9/11, in particular chapter eight, demonstrates the subjective nature of the documentary genre. Moore exploits a toolkit of persuasive techniques to position viewers to accept his own values and beliefs regarding the war. Moore creates three distinct, biased representations in the chapter; he represents George Bush and his administration as deceitful warmongers, Iraq as a sovereign nation suffering at the hands of US oppression and American soldiers as both unsympathetic idiots and as mere pawns that are experiencing the horror of war. Together, these representations uphold Moore's political agenda of the time; to discredit Bush and his administration, to depict the US decision to invade Iraq as a foreign policy abomination, all with the ultimate goal to sway the public from re-electing Bush in 2004. Chapter eight opens with a shot of bombs being readied for deployment, immediately followed by Bush receiving attention to his hair. The alternation between wartime preparations and the cheeky smile of the president continues until Bush addresses his nation. By juxtaposing the serious subject-matter of war with a president who is apparently more concerned with appearances, Moore represents Bush as being superficial and underhanded. It can be seen that Moore wastes no time in this chapter and immediately sets out to discredit Bush. The Bush administration is directly discredited later in the chapter...

Words: 1416 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethics and Obligation

...| Concept of Ethics & Obligations | George Tenet: Ethical Dilemmas | | Vivian L Burke | | February 5, 2012 In his essay Public Administration and Ethics: A Prologue to a Preface, Dwight Waldo identifies and differentiates between private and public morality and notes that the two can often be at odds with each other. In Waldo’s opinion, the fundamental premise of public morality is that the actions and behavior of those in office or tasked with the representation of the public, should be done for the good of all. Hence it is about more than simply being honest, trustworthy and law abiding. Often personal, professional, legal and organizational goals are in conflict. The competent public administrator is one who in spite outside pressures, is able to juggle and overcome these conflicting ethical codes (White 2008). George Tenet was well liked, direct and loyal. Though he was not an experienced politician and lacking any experience in foreign policy and lacked military background, he was chosen to become the Director of Central Intelligence at the CIA. He inherited a CIA at a point of dismal morale. The agency suffered due to years of inconsistent leadership and direction. Tenet’s priorities were rebuilding the CIA, improving morale, advancing technological capabilities to acquire intelligence and to clarify and enforce the mission of the agency. The CIA continued to suffer intelligence blunders that were the basis of misinformation or lack of knowledge about...

Words: 1344 - Pages: 6