...who tried to illegally get one. Near the end of 1971 a Texan woman, Jane Roe, challenged the Texan abortion law saying that it was unconstitutional with it being invasion of privacy that is guaranteed in the Amendments, mainly in the Ninth and Fourteenth. The Ninth Amendment states that we may have rights that aren’t directly stated in the Constitution that exist and although it is not stated it doesn’t mean they can be violated; which could mean that as citizens we have rights that the government can’t deny us even though it may not be said in the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees all citizens their rights on both the federal and state level. The closest case to this case at the time was the 1965 case of Griswold vs. Connecticut that dealt with the issue of use of contraceptives and the right of privacy whether a married couple could use them or not. This case turned from being about abortion to a person’s right to privacy similar to the Griswold case. When the case was first filed it was in the U.S. District Court in Texas where the court ruled in Roe’s favor for her merits because it violated her right to privacy but did not do anything to change the abortion laws. The ruling was based on the Ninth Amendment and the rulings from the Griswold case. Although Roe initially won in the district won, she was not satisfied because the abortion laws were still intact so her attorneys made an appeal to the U.S Supreme Court. The Supreme Court took the case but also...
Words: 535 - Pages: 3
...The Right to Privacy Ramon Rubalcava Redlands University Abstract [The abstract should be one paragraph of between 150 and 250 words. It is not indented. Section titles, such as the word Abstract above, are not considered headings so they don’t use bold heading format. Instead, use the Section Title style. This style automatically starts your section on a new page, so you don’t have to add page breaks. Note that all of the styles for this template are available on the Home tab of the ribbon, in the Styles gallery.] Keywords: [Click here to add keywords.] The Right to Privacy In this new generation the right to privacy is getting lower by the minute due to all of the social media and new electronic devices being invented daily. The right to privacy should not even be a question everyone should have the right to privacy to a certain extent. The right to privacy is a recent creation of little consequence other than cultural custom. The right to privacy is a big part if not the biggest part of everyone’s freedom because if anyone can come into anyone’s house at any given time or listen to all their calls and read all their text people will feel unsafe and without any freedom; It will feel like a prions where everything is being monitor. Everyone likes their privacy even if they do not have anything to hide just knowing that whatever they do or where ever they go will be only known to them and those they chose to share it with making them feel in control of their life...
Words: 1256 - Pages: 6
...In the Supreme Court Case Griswold v. Connecticut, the court ruled in favor of Griswold because the court decided that the Law against contraceptions for pregnancy was unconstitutional as it violated the right of marital privacy. The court essentially stated that no one has the right to tell a married couple that they can or can’t have a baby a certain way because that is the decision for those two people to decide, and no one person or group of people can decide that for them, not even the government. The Supreme Court gave one of it’s reasoning’s to allow Griswold to give pregnancy contraceptions by saying that it went against his first amendment rights to freedom of speech. The Law did this because he wasn’t allowed to voice his opinion about what the couples should do and it restricted his right to teach. It also goes against our freedom of association because the people that were aware and associated with the party got in trouble and likely interrogated for something as simple as just having a meeting with Mr. Griswold and his associate Dr. Buxton....
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...There has been a case in the supreme court called Griswold v. Connecticut that resulted in Connecticut's proposition being refuted, the state wanted to pass a law that prohibited people from using birth control or any form of conception. Connecticut wanted to control people from their right of reproducing or intercourse, however, the U.S. declared it unconstitutional because they were violating people's privacy. The government has given us the freedom to decide how people reproduce and allow women to abort. However, there has been debates on the news recently about making it illegal to abort. Even though it is unmoral to abort, it is nevertheless women's right to do what they want with their babies/fetus. Some fetus that have been aborted...
Words: 586 - Pages: 3
...A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM?: OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Kenji Yoshino The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges1 achieved canonical status even as Justice Kennedy read the result from the bench. A bare majority held that the Fourteenth Amendment required every state to perform and to recognize marriages between individuals of the same sex.2 The majority opinion ended with these ringing words about the plaintiffs: “Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”3 While Obergefell’s most immediate effect was to legalize same-sex marriage across the land, its long-term impact could extend far beyond this context. To see this point, consider how much more narrowly the opinion could have been written. It could have invoked the equal protection and due process guarantees without specifying a formal level of review, and then observed that none of the state justifications survived even a deferential form of scrutiny. The Court had adopted this strategy in prior gay rights cases.4 Instead, the Court issued a sweeping statement that could be compared to Loving v. Virginia,5 the 1967 case that invalidated bans on in––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law. I gratefully acknowledge receiving financial support from...
Words: 15849 - Pages: 64
...seen before. The words “All deliberate speed” proved to haunt Burger along with his vote switching and indecisions, making his tenure of the Supreme Court mediocre at best. His desire to leave a legacy equal to that of the Warren court left him more concerned about perception than with the principles of the law. Burger came to the court replacing the retiring Chief Justice Earl Warren whose court handed down some very important rulings, like Griswald v. Connecticut, giving the right to privacy, and overturning the states contraception law. It also handed down the Miranda ruling, which is still used today to protect people’s rights to an attorney and from self-incrimination. The Warren Court’s most famous and issue ridden ruling was Brown v. Board of Education, which ended segregation in public schools. This ruling was handed down in 1954, and a second Brown, Brown II was heard in 1955, but there was wording in the decision that allowed for loopholes and procrastination. Justice Black was a staunch supporter of the Brown v Wade finding, he felt that the wording in Brown II gave to much lead way to the lower Southern courts, and that it was evident that they were not going to enforce the ruling. Black said “It is almost Ginger Geter beyond belief that the factors mentioned by this court in Brown II, to permit some slight delay in 1954, are precisely the same considerations relied upon in this case to justify yet another delay in 1969.” Justice...
Words: 901 - Pages: 4
...Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions” (Johnson & Martin 1998). This article specifically speaks to answer, whether the Court affects public attitudes when it makes decisions or initial rulings on a salient issue or subsequent decisions on the same issue. Johnson allows us to investigate the effect of the Supreme Court on public opinion, which offers the conditional response hypothesis based on the theory of Supreme Court legitimacy, and a micro-level social-psychological theory of attitude formation through his writing. To test this prediction Johnson analyzes public opinion data before and after the Supreme Court ruled in a highly visible abortion case (Roe v. Wade 1973), along with three key capital punishment rulings. (Furman v. Georgia 1972, Gregg v. Georgia 1976 & McCleskey v. Kemp 1987) When the Supreme Court made decisions, the public simply accepted them as legitimate. The reasoning behind this is simply because the Supreme Court is seen as the ultimate arbiter of the law. The model used by both Johnson and Martin (1998) is based upon two different theories. The first, since the public generally views the Court as a highly credible institution, individuals are more likely to clearly elaborate their attitudes toward an issue after a ruling. When the court makes its first major decision on a particular, the structure of public opinion changes in a manner consistent with the structural response hypothesis. Even if the individuals disagree with...
Words: 3732 - Pages: 15
