Free Essay

Hands on Management

In:

Submitted By iq2013
Words 5929
Pages 24
Concentrated Knowledge™ for the Busy Executive

Vol. 24, No. 11 (3 parts) Part 1, November 2002 • Order # 24-26

FILE: HANDS-ON MANAGEMENT

®

Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations

THE HEART OF CHANGE
THE SUMMARY IN BRIEF
By John Kotter and Dan Cohen

CONTENTS
The Heart of Change
Page 2

Increase Urgency
Pages 2, 3

If you’ve ever tried to change anything, you know how hard it is. How do you go about getting your message across to truly change people’s behavior? While most companies believe change happens by making people think differently, that isn’t the case. Instead, according to John Kotter and Dan Cohen, change happens when you make people feel differently. You have to appeal more to the heart than the mind. In this summary, you will learn about a new dynamic — the “see-feelchange” dynamic that fuels action by showing people potent reasons for change that spark their emotions. Built around the eight steps of change first introduced in Kotter’s bestseller, Leading Change, The Heart of Change gives straight advice on successful change — and true stories of companies making change happen.

Build the Guiding Team
Pages 3, 4

Get the Vision Right
Pages 4, 5

What You’ll Learn In This Summary
In the following pages, you will learn about: ✓ The Heart of Change: Why people succeed and why they fail at large scale-change and how you can use an eight-step path to success. ✓ The Need for Urgency: You will see why you must raise feelings of urgency so that people start telling each other “we must do something.” ✓ Building the Guiding Team That Gets the Vision Right: You need the right group of people with the right vision to start the change process. ✓ Communicating for Buy-in: You will send clear messages about change and remove barriers to those changes. ✓ Creating Early Wins and Not Letting Up: You will see why creating an early win is important and why you have to keep momentum up. ✓ Making Change Stick: You will learn how to change your organization’s culture so that change will stick.
Published by Soundview Executive Book Summaries, P.O. Box 1053, Concordville, Pennsylvania 19331 USA
©2002 Soundview Executive Book Summaries • All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or part is prohibited.

Communicate For Buy-In
Page 5

Empower Action
Pages 6, 7

Create Short Term Wins
Pages 7, 8

Don’t Let Up
Page 8

Make Change Stick
Page 8

THE HEART OF CHANGE by John Kotter and Dan Cohen

— THE COMPLETE SUMMARY

The Heart of Change
People change what they do because they are shown a truth that influences their feelings. This is especially so in large-scale organizational change, where you are dealing with new technologies, cultural transformation, globalization and e-business. In an age of turbulence, when you handle this reality well, you win. To understand why some organizations are leaping into the future more successfully than others, you need first to see the flow of effective large-scale change efforts. Change is an eight step process that few handle well. These steps are: 1. Create a sense of urgency so that people start telling each other “Let’s go, we need to change things!” 2. Pull together a guiding team powerful enough to guide a big change. 3. Create clear, simple, uplifting visions and sets of strategies. 4. Communicate the vision through simple, heartfelt messages sent through multiple channels so that people begin to buy into the change. 5. Empower people by removing obstacles to the vision.

6. Create short-term wins that provide momentum. 7. Maintain momentum so that wave after wave of change is possible. 8. Make change stick by nurturing a new culture. ■

Increase Urgency
In successful change efforts, the first step is making sure sufficient people act with sufficient urgency — with on-your-toes behavior that looks for opportunities and problems and energizes colleagues, that beams a sense of “let’s go.” Without urgency, large-scale change won’t happen. Four sets of behaviors often stop change. The first is complacency, driven by false pride or arrogance. The second is immobilization and self-protection, driven by fear or panic. The next is “you-can’t-make-me-move” deviance, driven by anger. And the last is a pessimistic attitude, leading to constant hesitation. These behaviors prevent people from taking action. Instead, they hold back or complain as others initiate new action. The result is that a needed change effort is derailed. The first step is not to create a vision. This is especially true if your organization is in crisis, if alligators are nipping at your feet. If they stand on a burning platform, they have no choice but to take immediate action, to jump away from their comfortable positions. Assembling a team to discuss the organization’s new vision won’t be very successful, because team members will be worried more about self-preservation than the new vision.
(continued on page 3)

See, Feel, Change
Changing one person is hard enough, but changing 100 or 1000 is an almost Herculean task. Yet organizations are doing just that. Most that do so successfully focus on showing what needs to be changed. Once people respond emotionally to the lesson, their emotional reactions propel them into action. They see, then feel, then change. To help them make the leap, you must: ✓ Help people see the need for change with compelling, eye-catching dramatic situations to visualize problems and solutions. ✓ Let people feel as they are hit with the reality of their situation and feel the need to act. ✓ Let people take their emotionally charged ideas into action.

The author: John P. Kotter is a world-renowned expert on leadership at the Harvard Business School and the author of many books, including Leading Change. Dan S. Cohen is a Principal with Deloitte Consulting LLC. Copyright© 2002 by John P. Kotter and Deloitte Consulting LLC. Summarized by permission of the publisher, Harvard Business School Press, 60 Harvard Way, Boston, MA 02163. 190 pages. $20.00. 1-57851-254-9.

Published by Soundview Executive Book Summaries (ISSN 0747-2196), P.O. Box 1053, Concordville, PA 19331 USA, a division of Concentrated Knowledge Corporation. Publisher, George Y. Clement. V. P. Publications, Maureen L. Solon. Editor-in-Chief, Christopher G. Murray. Published monthly. Subscriptions: $195 per year in U.S., Canada & Mexico, and $275 to all other countries. Periodicals postage paid at Concordville, PA and additional offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to Soundview, P.O. Box 1053, Concordville, PA 19331. Copyright © 2002 by Soundview Executive Book Summaries. Available formats: Summaries are available in print, audio and electronic formats. To subscribe, call us at 1-800-521-1227 (1-610-558-9495 outside U.S. & Canada) Multiple-subscription discounts and Corporate Site Licenses are also available. .

2

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

The Heart of Change — SUMMARY

Angry Customer Videotape Spurs Action
How do you change years of ingrained habits and attitudes? You can try facts and figures, but nothing works better than a shock. That’s how one company managed to inspire change in a group of craftsmen who had refused to listen to a key customer’s needs and continued to do things their way. The customer had ordered custom-designed equipment, but found he still had to make significant alterations to the equipment. He told management that he had talked to the craftsmen designing the equipment many times, but that they didn’t seem to listen. Sure, they would nod their heads, he explained, but they wouldn’t take action. The manager asked permission to videotape the customer’s complaints. He then showed the craftsmen the tape. Many were genuinely surprised to see the angry customer complain they hadn’t listened. Some thought they were right and the customer wrong. But the overwhelming reaction was that something had to be done. The videotape created a sense of urgency that propelled the craftsmen into action.

Build the Guiding Team
The team you put together to guide change needs a sense of urgency. When there is urgency, more people want to lead, even if there is personal risk and few short-term rewards. But urgency isn’t enough. Largescale change does not happen without a powerful guiding force. A fragmented management team cannot do the job, and a hero CEO doesn’t work either. There aren’t enough hours in the day for even the strongest executive to accomplish change single-handedly. Your challenge is to put together an effective guiding team. A powerful guiding group has two characteristics. It is made up of the right people, and it demonstrates teamwork. The “right people” are those individuals with appropriate skills, leadership capacity, organizational credibility, and the connections to handle organizational change. The “right people” aren’t necessarily part of the existing senior management. How do you build a team of the right people? A single individual who feels great urgency usually pulls in the first people. The people selected create a team with: ● Relevant knowledge about what’s happening outside the enterprise (essential for creating vision). ● Credibility, connections and stature within the organization (essential for communicating vision). ● Valid information about the internal workings of the enterprise (essential for removing barriers that disempower people from acting on the vision). ● Formal authority and the managerial skills associated with planning, organizing and control (needed to cre(continued on page 4)

Increase Urgency
(continued from page 2)

One company brought the need for change to executive attention with a compelling demonstration. The company bought and ordered gloves for its factories through a decentralized process. As a result, the company bought 424 different types of gloves. To make matters worse, each factory negotiated its own glove purchases. Some factories paid $5 per pair while another paid $17 per pair for exactly the same glove! To spur action, a manager collected one pair of all 424 types of gloves, attached the price, and placed them on the board room conference table. The vice-presidents were shocked by what they saw and immediately took action to change the company’s procurement practices. Here’s what works to motivate action: ● Show others the need to change with a compelling object that they can actually see, touch and feel. ● Show people valid and dramatic evidence from outside the organization that demonstrates that change is required. ● Look for cheap and easy ways to reduce complacency and don’t underestimate complacency, fear and anger. ■

The New and More Diverse Team
What happens when an organization moves from acquisition mode to one focused on organic growth? Here’s how one company created a new and more diverse team to make the transition. The company had just ended an acquisition phase and found there were no remaining competitors small enough to buy. The deal-maker team had been small and like-minded. It was dominated by people with years of combined banking experience, but few of the skills needed to manage organic growth. The team the CEO put together was incredibly diverse. It consisted of representatives from every major function: finance, human resources, corporate affairs, IT, regional leaders, and asset managers. Together, the team members represented the entire company. As a result, all viewpoints were represented, and decisions about the path to growth were balanced.
3

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

The Heart of Change — SUMMARY
Build the Guiding Team
(continued from page 3)

The Body in the Living Room
The change process needs to move forward quickly or it won’t go anywhere at all. If you use a strategy of slow change, chances are organizational inertia will take over, no matter what your original vision. Consider the advice a real estate agent gave a young professional who had stretched his resources to buy a sixty-five year old house that could best be classified as a “real fixer-upper.” She told the buyer that he should immediately make a list of the things he wanted fixed, and get it done in the first six months of ownership. If he didn’t, she predicted, it would never get done. He told her he would take five years of slow improvements and get everything he wanted done, done. She said, ‘No you won’t, because after six months you get used to it. It seems to fit. You get used to stepping over the dead body in the living room.” Five years later, he had to admit she had been right. What hadn’t been fixed in the first six months never was. It’s the same with “slow and steady” organizational change. What isn’t done when the momentum is rising won’t get done later. ferent yet tightly interrelated, and each requires a different development process. The budget is the financial piece of the plan, and is a math exercise in numbers crunching. The plan specifies step by step how to implement a strategy and is a logical, linear process. The strategy shows how to achieve the vision, and requires accurate and up to date information about customers and competitors. And the vision shows an end state where all the plans and strategies will take you. Visioning requires the creativity to see possible futures. Your vision can fit on a page, while your strategy might take up ten pages. Your plans should fit in a notebook, while your budgets probably will require a large notebook and many meetings.

ate short-term wins). ● The leadership skills associated with vision, community, and motivation (required for nearly every aspect of the change process). As change progresses throughout the entire organization, additional groups are formed at lower levels. These teams help drive action within their units. Together, these groups form a kind of guiding coalition.

Making Meetings Work
Even something as mechanical as how a meeting is run is important when creating a team. How often should you meet and for how long? What will be on the typical agenda? Who will run the sessions? Are nonmembers welcome? Get the format wrong, and frustration grows. Get it right, and the group pulls together into a powerful force. Poor meeting structure hurts particularly when a group is new. For example, a meeting at which important issues are discussed over and over with no resolution will drive the team crazy. Bad meetings undermine trust, especially with a new group. How do you avoid this? Stick to one topic per meeting. Put someone credible in charge. The person in charge of the unit or department to be changed has to be a central force in the guiding team. For the sake of the credibility of the effort and to avoid the constant threat of the boss pulling the plug on change, this is essential. ■

Get the Vision Right
In successful large-scale change, a well-functioning guiding team answers the questions required to produce a clear sense of direction. What change is necessary? What is our vision for the new organization? What should not be altered? What is the best way to make the vision a reality? What change strategies are unacceptably dangerous? Good answers to these questions position an organization to leap into a better future. Unfortunately, guiding teams often have neither clear direction nor are they encouraged to embrace sensible missions. One reason that smart people create no or poor direction for change is that they have been taught that “charting the future” means planning and budgeting. Truth is, when pursuing large-scale change, the best planning exercise is never sufficient. Something very different is essential. In those organizations that have successfully implemented large-scale change, four things have helped direct action in the right direction. These are budgets, plans, strategies and visions. All four are dif4

Bold Strategies for Bold Visions
Today’s change visions are becoming bolder by necessity. More and more executives believe that their visions must include being an industry leader, being the firm that’s first into new markets, or being the low-cost competitor. Bold visions require bold strategies, and that’s where many change initiatives fall apart. People without experience developing bold strategies can’t figure out what to do next because it’s so different from what they’ve done before. They sometimes back away from the obvious because it’s threatening. Or they convince themselves that small modifications in their current ways of
(continued on page 5)

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

The Heart of Change — SUMMARY
Get the Vision Right
(continued from page 4)

Nuking the Executive Floor
When one company started talking seriously about its vision of becoming the low-cost producer in its industry, many employees thought the idea was outrageous. After all, the company’s executive offices were very grand. The executive offices had huge rooms, and the joke was that you could play a half-court basketball game in the chairman’s office. Almost every executive office had an adjoining conference room and private bath. There was enough polished wood around to build a ship and expensive art on the walls, as well as a private elevator. But discussions got nowhere since redoing the space would cost more than leaving it alone. When a new CEO took office, he nuked the entire floor. It was gutted, and the expansive offices were replaced by smaller, more contemporary spaces. He sold the art and opened up the elevator. The effect was powerful. The club atmosphere was gone, and the changes would pay for themselves in about two years. To be effective, the change messages communicated to employees must be simple and heartfelt, not complex and technocratic. Then fear, anger, distrust and pessimism shrink. Feelings of relief and optimism grow. Employees begin to buy into the changes. They waste less time being angry or anxious. They start to take steps to make change happen.

operating will achieve the vision — eventually. They may even come to believe that the vision is useless because they can’t come up with a strategic plan. The key is to focus on speed. Talking yourself into a very slow change schedule can be disastrous. Nothing may get done! Remember that this is the twenty-first century world. The pace of external change is only going to increase. That means that internal change has to accelerate also. How do you get the vision part right? Here’s what works and what doesn’t: ● Articulate a vision that is so clear that it fits on one page and takes less than a minute to share. ● Articulate a vision that’s moving — such as a commitment to serve people. ● Create a bold strategy and move ahead quickly. ● Don’t assume that logical plans and budgets are enough. ● Don’t rely on overly analytical, financially based vision exercises. ● Don’t rely on visions that just slash costs. These produce anxiety and depression, but rarely change. ■

Communicate for Buy-In
In successful change efforts, the visions and change strategies can’t stay locked in a room with your team. They must be communicated with as many people as possible, who in turn must buy in. The goal: to get as many people as possible acting to make the vision a reality. When we communicate about a large-scale change, common responses are: “I don’t see why we need to change that much,” “We’ll never be able to pull this off,” and “Are you guys serious or is this a joke?” In successful change efforts, the guiding team doesn’t argue with this reality. Instead, they find ways to deal with it. They address anxieties, accept anger, and evoke faith in the vision. Communicating the need for change through a Question-and-Answer session can be effective if done properly. Make sure employees are given a well-prepared presentation about the change effort underway and are encouraged to ask any questions. During the Q&A session, each presenter responds quickly and clearly, with conviction, and without becoming defensive. This demonstrates to everyone that the ideas aren’t muddled, that the presenters have faith in the vision, and that those answering the questions think the changes are good.

Matching Words and Deeds
People in change-successful enterprises do a much better job than most in eliminating the destructive gap between words and deeds. Deeds speak volumes. When you say one thing and then do another, cynical feelings grow. When you speak of a vision of innovation and then reward people who come up with good ideas or when you talk globalization and then immediately appoint two foreigners to senior management, employees begin to take the message of change seriously. Matching words and deeds is usually tough, even for a dedicated guiding team. Team members have to help one another. At the end of meetings, for example, they should ask, “Have our actions in the past week been consistent with our change vision?” When the answer is “no,” they should ask, “ What do we do now and how can we avoid the same mistake in the future?” With a sense of urgency, an emotional commitment to others on the team, and a deep belief in the vision, change leaders will make the personal sacrifices needed to make the message consistent with action. ■

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

5

The Heart of Change — SUMMARY

Empower Action
When people begin to understand and act on a change vision, you need to remove barriers in their paths. One example: Take away a pessimistic skipper and give the crew an optimistic boss. Often the biggest obstacle to change efforts is a boss — an immediate manager or someone higher in the hierarchy. Subordinates see the vision and want to help, but are effectively shut down. The supervisor’s words, actions, or even subtle vibrations say, “This change is stupid.” The subordinate, not being a fool, either gives up or spends an inordinate amount of time trying to maneuver around the barrier. How can you overcome a reluctant boss who has become a barrier to needed change? Try easing the reluctant boss’ attitude through creative approaches. Remember, change can be difficult, especially for someone who has invested psychologically in the status quo. For a fragile and insecure person, change can cause fear, which in turn can lead to the person becoming immobilized. When change does come, the experience can be life changing as the person moves from being stuck in the past to leaping into the future. When seemingly immovable middle-managers feel sufficient urgency, develop sufficient faith in the people leading the change, and see the change vision clearly, they, too, will embrace it.

Manufacturing Movies
At one company, senior managers for years came to the factory floor to “inspect things.” The plant manager only received instructions about what needed to be fixed. The visits were never positive until one day a division executive announced that there would be no more plant inspections. Instead, he insisted, the company had to empower the work force. At first, the workers agreed they needed to hold meeting to discuss improvements. These quickly deteriorated into “bitching” sessions. They finally decided meetings did no good, and decided to try something entirely different. Two workers volunteered to be filmed going about their jobs. They started out following how one product was manufactured, capturing on film everything from getting the raw material to taking it off the production line and preparing to ship it. As people watched the tape, they could see some of the problems. Workers literally walked miles around the plant to finish one piece of equipment. Workers wasted time getting tools out of cabinets one at a time when they could keep them close at hand. The tape let ideas flow freely as the teams rethought options that would make their jobs easier and safer. The film became a very important tool for the work force. It helped spawn good ideas. are at odds with the direction of needed change. “We want you to boldly leap into the future,” is the communication, yet the system says, “Boldly leap into the future and you will receive ten cents if you succeed and a hammer on the head if you fail.” Conversely, evaluation and rewards can empower people by identifying and compensating behavior that is required by the vision. When we think of evaluation and rewards, most of us think of money. Few people believe they have all the money they need, and many struggle, even on two incomes. Thus, when there are no economic rewards for transformation, you have a barrier that is very powerful. But the addition of bonuses and raises does not necessarily motivate a change in behavior, nor does it necessarily convince people that if change efforts fail, they won’t be punished. Other rewards that strike a cord can include contests and competitions, so long as they aren’t cheap manipulations designed to avoid paying for performance. They must be worthwhile.

Removing the “System” Barrier
A second common source of disempowerment is the formal arrangements we often call the system. A decade or two ago, this would mostly have been overwhelming bureaucracy — but today the performance evaluation and rewards part of the system is often the stickiest problem. Evaluations and rewards can disempower when they

Three Don’ts for the Boss Barrier
When confronted with the “Boss Barrier” to change, most companies take one of three approaches. They either: ✓ Ignore the barrier. ✓ Send the “obstacle” to a short training course. ✓ Fire, demote or transfer him or her. None of these approaches work. Ignoring the problem won’t make it go away. A short training course is equally unlikely to work, since the barrier probably will cynically view it as just another part of the misguided change effort underway. And firing, transferring or demoting the culprit is likely to spread fear to others — hardly the atmosphere you are trying to create.
6

Removing Other Barriers
After years of stability, incremental change, or failed attempts at change, people can internalize a deep belief that they are not capable of achieving a leap. They may not shout, “I can’t do it!” but at some level, they feel it even
(continued on page 7)

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

The Heart of Change — SUMMARY
Empower Action
(continued from page 6)

when it isn’t true. We’ve all seen this. “No,” thinks the 60year old. “I’ll never be able to learn to use the computer.” But it’s all in his or her head — an irrational and psychological block. Never underestimate the power of the mind to disempower, but don’t underestimate the power of clever people to help others see the possibilities either. Another important barrier to remove is the information barrier. Information is a source of power, and lack of information can disempower. One of the most powerful forms of information is feedback on our own actions. We are often remarkably unaware of how we spend our time, how we interact with others, and how we physically move about. When we do get feedback, it comes from another person, often sounding and feeling subjective, biased, or like a precursor to sanctions. So we end up with information that seems suspect. It need not be that way. ■

The Senator Owned A Trucking Company
Here’s what happened when a state transportation department implemented a change plan. The agency knew one of the state’s senators also ran a trucking company. They approached him to see what the department could do to help companies such as his operate better, thus making the agency’s vision of better service to those the agency regulated become a reality. The senator’s immediate response was that he was angry the agency made him fill out 15 forms every year, many asking for the same information. When the change team heard about the problem, they were reluctant to find a solution right away. They had other, bigger plans in mind for transforming the agency, and changing the way trucking companies provide information didn’t seem to be urgent. They needed to battle entrenched interests, and redesigning forms didn’t seem to be important except that the senator could be in a position to help them later if he saw they were serious about changing. Making truck licensing more efficient could be the early and momentum-building win they were looking for. A month later, the process had been streamlined from 15 forms into one. The senator was impressed, and the team was enthusiastic about the prospects for real change. A short-term result got the change process in high gear. are likely to get results. Not all wins are equal. In general, the more visible the victories, the more they help the change process. If you have been a part of enough successful change efforts, you will understand the power of visible, meaningful and unambiguous wins. If you have not, you can miss the mark. Too often we create wins that we can see, but which others do not, at least not to the same degree. The order of projects can also make an important difference in large-scale change efforts. You can choose to first target a problem based on a logic that seems rational but does not supply enough wins fast enough to build momentum. For example, suppose the vision is globalization. One choice that seems rational is to work on the manufacturing piece before the marketing. Make it before you sell it. But building the Frankfurt factory can easily take two years, cost a hundred million dollars, and then another year to assess whether the company can handle its first German manufacturing facility. During this time, wins are hard to find. A less obvious but better choice is to sell a product,
(continued on page 8)

Create Short-Term Wins
In successful change efforts, empowered people create short-term wins — victories that nourish faith in the change effort, emotionally reward the hard workers, keep the critics at bay, and build momentum. Without early wins that are visible, timely, unambiguous and meaningful, change efforts invariably run into serious problems. In successful change efforts, an empowered group of people are very selective in how they spend their time. They focus first on tasks where they can quickly achieve results. These wins: ● provide feedback to change leaders about the validity of their visions and strategies; ● give those working hard to achieve a vision a pat on the back, an emotional lift; ● build faith in the effort, attracting those who are not yet actively helping; and ● take power away from the cynics. Without these achievements, large-scale change rarely happens, and no matter how brilliant the vision and how needed the changes, they never take place.

Focus is Essential
In large organizations, a change effort may require hundreds of projects. When people feel urgency and are empowered to act, they can easily charge ahead on all fronts. With scattered attention, you might find the first win in two years — two years too late! Don’t focus on 150 projects (as if you could!) Instead, pick four that

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

7

The Heart of Change — SUMMARY
Create Short-Term Wins
(continued from page 7)

then build it. Put together a marketing plan for Germany. Implement a plan at minimum cost with a product from Chicago. Achieve a clear success in less than a year. Choose your first success carefully. It must satisfy the basic criteria: visibility, meaningfulness, unambiguity and speed. ■

the future. The answer is really very simple: When you have too much work, jettison some. Just how do you do that? Start by looking at day-today activities, and deciding if a particular task adds value and absolutely needs to be done. Identify and agree on what people can stop doing, and you won’t feel so overwhelmed. This needs to be done as early in the change process as possible. Purge your calendar of everything that has no current pressing relevance. Stop the unnecessary Tuesday morning meeting that’s been a fixture for five decades. Eliminate the six reports that you don’t need. Teleconference instead of hitting the road. Delegate up, down and sideways. ■

Don’t Let Up
After the first set of short-term wins, a change effort will have direction and momentum. In successful situations, people build on this momentum to make a vision a reality by keeping urgency up and a feeling of false pride down; by eliminating unnecessary, exhausting and demoralizing work; and by not declaring victory prematurely. The most common problem at this stage in change efforts is sagging urgency. Success becomes an albatross. “We’ve won,” people say, and you have problems reminiscent of those in step 1. It’s easy for those driving change to allow organizational urgency to drop, especially when short-term performance rises. Don’t become frustrated, and resist the temptation to “beat up” on your people. Early in a change effort, you generally take on some of the easier problems in order to establish a few wins and create momentum. Picking up every piece of furniture in a house at once and moving it across the street isn’t necessary or feasible. There aren’t enough movers. In a successful move, the lighter pieces — pictures and side tables — go first. But sooner or later, you are faced with the credenza. For a move to be successful, you can’t stop half-way through. You have to persevere. It’s the same with a major organizational change effort. Simple courage and perseverance help. Better still, structure situations so that people can take risks to deal with difficult bureaucratic and political situations without having to put their lives on the line. Structure situations so that people can gain the power to take on the most intractable problem. Power here means more than authority — it means time, resources and access to get the job done.

Make Change Stick
Tradition is a powerful force. Leaps into the future can slide back into the past. Change sticks only if you create a new, supportive and strong organizational culture. A supportive culture provides roots for new ways of working. Making it stick is difficult. If this challenge isn’t met at the end of the change process, enormous effort can be wasted. Change is often held in place solely by a guiding team, a central player in such a team, a compensation system, an organizational structure, initial enthusiasm over the changes created by the changes, or even less. It may not seem that way. You may think you have built a sturdy house, yet not notice that the walls are being held in place by the construction crew. Eventually, the crew leaves, and gravity takes over. The culture isn’t there to support the building. Culture means the behavioral norms and shared values in a group of people. It’s a set of common feelings about what is of value and how we should act. In largescale change efforts, we use the power of culture to help make a transformation stick. It’s hard, because creating a new norm means you need to change deeply embedded norms. Make sure that the cultural changes you have worked so hard to create are passed on to new employees. Be sure new employees are introduced to the culture early on. Create compelling visions that help new employees become part of the company fast. And don’t forget the new culture when you hand out promotions. The right promotions make those that truly reflect the new norms more influential, thus strengthening those norms. By putting into power those people who have absorbed the new culture, you create an increasingly stable and solid foundation. ■

Not Killing Ourselves
Deep into a transformation, even if urgency remains high, even if people want to take on the big problems, and even if they succeed in generating waves of change, they can still fail because of exhaustion. After all, key people not only have to do the old work to keep things going, but have to handle the additional work to create
8

Soundview Executive Book Summaries ®

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Radical Managment

...What Challenges Might a Radically Hands-Off Leader Face? by Chirantan Basu, Demand Media Leadership styles range from the radically hands-off, which means delegating just about everything to subordinates, to the completely hands-on, which means micromanaging even the smallest operational detail. Although a hands-off management style can empower employees to adapt quickly to changing business conditions, small and large businesses under such management can also veer off course and run into trouble. Ads by Google Brain Training Games Improve memory and attention with scientific brain games. Free Trial www.lumosity.com Organizational Drift Radically hands-off leadership can lead to organizational drift as departments and divisions lose focus without clear guidance from senior management. Businesses need strong leaders who communicate their priorities clearly and consistently. This is especially true for small businesses, which need a steady hand and strong focus over the first few years of operation. As these small businesses grow, the owners can start delegating some of the operational responsibilities and focus on the big picture. Fuzzy Accountability Accountability may become fuzzy under radically hands-off leadership because there can be confusion as to who is in charge. Serious problems may remain unresolved because nobody wants to take ownership of them. Senior executives, especially in large businesses, may not even know about potentially damaging problems until...

Words: 1474 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Assignment and Essay.... Others)Information Technology (Programming/ Languages (Java, C++, Vb,.Net, & Etc)/Database Design/ Computer Networking/ System Analysis/ Project Management/Project Development/ It & Society/ and.

...Computer Networking/ System Analysis/ Project Management/Project Development/ IT & Society/ and. - NET programmers continue to struggle with the complexities of a hybrid managed/unmanaged environment. ..... Sorry, I had to laugh at that paper! ... Java on the other hand is cross-platform, and also traditionally runs as an ... - NET programmers continue to struggle with the complexities of a hybrid managed/unmanaged environment. ..... Sorry, I had to laugh at that paper! ... Java on the other hand is cross-platform, and also traditionally runsASSIGNMENT and ESSAY. ... others)Information Technology (Programming/ Languages (Java, C++, VB, .NET, & etc)/Database Design/ Computer Networking/ System Analysis/ Project Management/Project Development/ IT & Society/ and. - NET programmers continue to struggle with the complexiASSIGNMENT and ESSAY. ... others)Information Technology (Programming/ Languages (Java, C++, VB, .NET, & etc)/Database Design/ Computer Networking/ System Analysis/ Project Management/Project Development/ IT & Society/ and. - NET programmers continue to struggle with the complexities of a hybrid managed/unmanaged environment. ..... Sorry, I had to laugh at that paper! ... Java on the other hand is cross-platform, and also traditionally runs as an ... - NET programmers continue to struggle with the complexities of a hybrid managed/unmanaged environment. ..... Sorry, I had to laugh at that paper! ... Java on the other hand is cross-platform, and also traditionally runs...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Aviation

...similar approaches due to their divergent points of view. People find it hard on the other hand to find their counterparts accountable since of difficulties in interpersonal communication. Another danger gets into the picture as people try hard avoiding situations where they blame other people and as a solution to this they tend to avoid communicating with the affected people. (Garrett, 1967).Problem causes should be pointed out therefore, without any adore and their root causes found out. This though will take time as serious conversations will need to be held in order to make them completely aware of their accountability roles and obligations. When accountability seeks to determine the objective of a given problem, blames ignores and do not undertake to find out the root cause of some problems. Accountability will therefore, undertake to align organizational objectives with some actions such as wanting some people out of the organization due to non accountability issues. Accountability will seek avoid countermeasure decisions that blames will encourage. (Garrett, 1967). Accountability will seek to find out the actual facts through understanding of the problem at hand. It also tends to disregard the reported or second hand information and data that blame situations would advocate this point accountability will seek to trace the history of the problem at hand to get first hand information and facts that blame cannot reach. Accountability will also seek to fit the...

Words: 1451 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Management

...Case Study The 2008 Chinese Milk Scandal Contents * Introduction * The Hand of Management * The Hand of Government * Employees * Customers * International * Conclusion * The Hand of Management According to our group study and discussion, we think that this company is extremely unethical, for they think only profits and ignore social responsibility. For this case, we refer to all the levels of managers, for example, the top manager, the middle manager, and the first line manager of the company. They joint hands together, and make the decision about how to generate income with less time consuming. The theory of iron law of responsibility stated that “In the long run, those who do not use power in a manner that society considers responsible will tend to lose it” And they lose it! Since they are just pursuing economic goals, without considering the society. This is clearly reflected that the hand of management of this company is very low. They definitely do not have organizational social responsibility such as: economic, ethical, legal, and discretionary responsibility. Moreover, they are too greed to be rich as they knew that there is no shortcut to succeed. It is basically mean they need to think in long-term benefits especially for the society. According to the hand of management viewed that “Corporations and their managers must act to protect and improve society’s welfare whereas advancing corporate economic interest. We can say the development...

Words: 262 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Management

...EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT NAME: OBADIAH KIPRONO ROTICH REG NO. MBA/GC/690/13/14 COURSE CODE: 510 COURSE NAME:MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURER :SR LUCY DATE:3/6/2014 Management is the organization and coordination of the activities of a business in order to achieve defined objectives. Management is often included as a factor of production along with‚ machines, materials, and money. According to the management guru Peter Drucker (1909-2005), the basic task of management includes both marketing and innovation. Practice of modern management originates from the 16th century study of low-efficiency and failures of certain enterprises, conducted by the English statesman Sir Thomas More (1478-1535). Management consists of the interlocking functions of creating corporate policy and organizing, planning, controlling, and directing an organization's resources in order to achieve the objectives of that policy.The directors and managers who have the power and responsibility to make decisions and oversee an enterprise. The size of management can range from one person in a small organization to hundreds or thousands of managers in multinational companies. In large organizations, the board of directors defines the policy which is then carried out by the chief executive officer, or CEO. Some people agree that in order to evaluate a company's current and future worth, the most important factors are the quality and experience of the managers. The main objectives of management are:Getting...

Words: 866 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Unit 2 Btec L3 Science

... The current lab contains lots of previous testing results and other data, stored in several large filing cabinets. The management team want to improve the provision for data storage and have fewer filing cabinets in the new build. As a member of the leadership team, put a proposal together for updating the old data storage system with the new storage procedures that should be put in place in the laboratories of the new build. You need to justify why the funds from the budget should be given to implement the new data storage system. Grading Criteria * P4:Describe the procedure for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system * M4:Explain the processes involved in storing information in a scientific workplace * D3: Discuss the advantages gained by keeping data and records on a laboratory management information system * Grading Criteria * P4:Describe the procedure for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system * M4:Explain the processes involved in storing information in a scientific workplace * D3: Discuss the advantages gained by keeping data and records on a laboratory management information system * How Do I Do It? 1. For P4, learners must describe the procedures for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system (LIMS). A prepared list of scientific data is provided below. Learners must decide which sets of information could...

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Storing Information

... The current lab contains lots of previous testing results and other data, stored in several large filing cabinets. The management team want to improve the provision for data storage and have fewer filing cabinets in the new build. As a member of the leadership team, put a proposal together for updating the old data storage system with the new storage procedures that should be put in place in the laboratories of the new build. You need to justify why the funds from the budget should be given to implement the new data storage system. Grading Criteria * P4:Describe the procedure for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system * M4:Explain the processes involved in storing information in a scientific workplace * D3: Discuss the advantages gained by keeping data and records on a laboratory management information system * Grading Criteria * P4:Describe the procedure for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system * M4:Explain the processes involved in storing information in a scientific workplace * D3: Discuss the advantages gained by keeping data and records on a laboratory management information system * How Do I Do It? 1. For P4, learners must describe the procedures for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system (LIMS). A prepared list of scientific data is provided below. Learners must decide which sets of information could...

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Help with Task 3

... The current lab contains lots of previous testing results and other data, stored in several large filing cabinets. The management team want to improve the provision for data storage and have fewer filing cabinets in the new build. As a member of the leadership team, put a proposal together for updating the old data storage system with the new storage procedures that should be put in place in the laboratories of the new build. You need to justify why the funds from the budget should be given to implement the new data storage system. Grading Criteria * P4:Describe the procedure for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system * M4:Explain the processes involved in storing information in a scientific workplace * D3: Discuss the advantages gained by keeping data and records on a laboratory management information system * Grading Criteria * P4:Describe the procedure for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system * M4:Explain the processes involved in storing information in a scientific workplace * D3: Discuss the advantages gained by keeping data and records on a laboratory management information system * How Do I Do It? 1. For P4, learners must describe the procedures for storing scientific information in a laboratory information management system (LIMS). A prepared list of scientific data is provided below. Learners must decide which sets of information could...

Words: 1217 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Immunocompromised Patients

...Evidence Based Practices for Infection Control in Immunocompromised Patients Diane Scott My rationale for choosing this subject is since many people in the hospital have a compromised immune system and they need to be protected from opportunistic infections. As a nursing student, I am responsible for making sure that I do not cause cross contamination. My question is “What are evidence based methods to prevent opportunistic infections in patients with a compromised immune system?” Since one of my sources addresses neutropenia, it is necessary to explain the disorder and how it relates to my question. Information about neutropenia was obtained from an article named Neutropenia: A Diagnostic Approach from the Western Journal of Medicine. The two authors are doctors and this article is based on evidence-based case review. Neutropenia is a somewhat common condition in which the level of neutrophils in the blood is abnormally low (Montgomery and Munshi, 2000, para. 1). An immune system becomes compromised when it does not have an adequate number of neutrophils and my question concerns patients who have a compromised immune system. Some causes of neutropenia include chemotherapy, viral or bacterial infections, adverse drug reactions and autoimmune disorders, such as AIDS (Montgomery and Munshi, 2000). Another source is a peer reviewed article named Neutropenia: State of the Knowledge Part II. The main author of this article is Nirenberg, but she had input...

Words: 1186 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Employee Productivity

...have contributed to the organisation first. Most of the employees who complain are habitual poor performers who complain all the time in order to hide their poor performance record. This is made worse by an incompetent management team that has no clue on how to lead people. The majority of managers have appalling people management skills that affect the morale of staff. They are where they are not because they know better than those they lead but because of their connections. Improper promotion systems have lead to the elevation of incompetent managers to positions of authority. The majority of these managers think like “employees”. They are in the workers committees by proxy. They direct workers committee proceedings through their people in these associations. It has been an interesting observation that the internet contains very little information on how employees can individually improve their work performance but contains thousands of articles on how MANAGEMENT can enhance employee productivity, how managers can motivate employees, how management can improve the workplace to enhance productivity, job design methods etcetera. Most information is targeted at management. What does this say about employee productivity? Are we saying the onus is on management to improve productivity? Are we saying the employee has to be pushed and cajoled into...

Words: 505 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business Administration

...engaging productive ones, and which regard people as whole human beings, seeing life and work as interrelated in a mutual commitment. His presentations are provocative, insightful and based on personal experiences as a CEO. His leadership example is a powerful catalyst for other leaders to explore fresh alternatives and to find creative solutions to modern management problems. Only drawback that people must not take management as granted by absence of sticks and be demotivated in absence of carrots :))) What challenges might a radically hand-off leader face? Answer: Leadership styles range from the radically hands-off, which means delegating just about everything to subordinates, to the completely hands-on, which means micromanaging even the smallest operational detail. Although a hands-off management style can empower employees to adapt quickly to changing business conditions, small and large businesses under such management can also veer off course and run into trouble. Radically hands-off leadership can lead to organizational drift as departments and divisions lose focus without clear guidance from senior management. Businesses need strong leaders who communicate their priorities clearly and consistently. This is especially true...

Words: 321 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Qwerty.Doc

...bargaining or in terms of “might makes right.”Someone whose conflict management style is Controlling pursues personal concerns at another’s expense. If you conflict with someone of who uses the Controlling conflict management style, you may need to stand up for your rights, defend a position which you believe is correct, or simply try to win. The Controlling style of conflict management works well when you need to act quickly or when you believe you are correct. On the other hand, the Controlling style of conflict management intimidates people, and they may be afraid either to admit to problems or to give you important information. Collaborating When you use the Collaborating style, you manage conflict by negotiating and may believe that two heads are better than one. When Collaborating you work with others to explore their disagreement, generate alternatives, and find a mutually satisfying solution. The Collaborating style of conflict management allows you to learn from another’s perspective. It can be helpful when you need a decision that addresses both parties’ concerns. On the other hand, the Collaborating style of conflict management may be unsuitable either for minor decisions or when time is limited. Compromising When you use the Compromising style, you manage conflict by splitting the difference so that the solution partially satisfies both parties. The Compromising style of conflict management is useful when other styles fail, for fast decision-making on minor...

Words: 446 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Why Mgrs Need an Evolutionary Theory

...School of Management, USA Russell M. Genet Orion Institute, USA Introduction Most observers have agreed that the theory of human behavior derived from the assumption of selfish rationality is inadequate to describe human behavior and human organizations (Rousseau et al., 1998). The issue is what other approach to theory building will provide an adequate theoretical toolkit for human behavior. We argue in this essay that evolutionary theory is the proper foundation for the human sciences, particularly a theory that includes an account of cultural evolution. This theory shows how the limited but real altruistic tendencies of humans arose by tribal-scale group selection on cultural norms followed by coevolutionary responses on the part of our genes. Our tribal social instincts in turn act as a moral hidden hand that makes human organizations possible. We introduce this theory and describe some implications of it for strategy and organization. In effect, managers want to control the cultural evolution of organizations so as to make them perform better. Understanding the tribal roots of our social instincts and the dynamic properties of cultural evolution should lead to a better understanding of the potentials of humans to create functional organizations and to a better understanding of how organizations can become dysfunctional and fail. We hope to strike up a dialog with SO!’s readers about the applications of cultural evolutionary theory. A challenge to management and management...

Words: 5043 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Radical Leadership

...Introduction Radical Managementsm is a way of managing organizations that generates at the same time high productivity, continuous innovation, deep job satisfaction and customer delight. Radical Managementsm is fundamentally different from the traditional management prevalent in large organizations today.  In Radical Leadership, participants discover a whole new sense of personal power and freedom. One can obtain personal mastery by choosing to hold a clear focus and cultivate more of what they want. Radical Leadership has transformed company cultures from “head’s down, hating to go to work” to fully engaged, alive, responsible individuals dedicated to outrageous and sustainable results! Conclusion Ricardo Semler, CEO of Semco group of Sao Paulo, Brazil, considered by many as radical. He breaks all the traditional rules of Leading and managing. He follows a very simple philosophy: Treat people like adults and they’ll respond like adults. Semler gave a management approach “Organizations succeed by allowing employees to apply their creativity and ingenuity in service of whole enterprise, and to make important decisions close to the flow of work. According to his leadership/management approach there are no organization charts, no long term plans, no corporate values, no written rules or policy manuals. Employees themselves decided their work hours, pay levels. At one of the company’s plants as the workers know the organizations objective and they were using common sense to...

Words: 678 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Guest Model

...that the human resource management is in its own world in terms of people management. David guest developed four aspects of human resource management which are strategic integration, flexibility, high commitment and quality. This model is a fusion of aspects that resemble both a hard and a soft approach of HRM. The purpose of this model was to try and distinguish human resource management from personnel management. In his quest to distinguish the 2, Guest suggested that human resource management is unitaristic, individualistic and mutual while personnel management is advisory, compliance oriented, pluralist and collective. Tempting as it may be, human resource seems to promise unrealistic goals. Firstly, Armstrong defines human resources as strategic, intergrated and coherent approach to the management of the organisations most valued asset working there (2009). Rama Rao (2010) defines personnel management as a set of programs functions and activities designed to maximize both personal and competent people. According to Bratton et al 2007 personnel management only focuses on cost minimisation rather than quality of workforce. On the other hand human resource management is manipulative. Wilmo (1993) quoted in Armstrong (2005) that human resources management operates as a form of insidious control. It preaches mutuality but the reality is that it exploits workers whereas human resources in this case is seen as manipulative. More so, human resource management is in the world of its...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4