...With the upcoming election, are you scared of one of the candidates becoming a tyrant? No need to worry because the Constitution guards against tyranny. The US Constitution is a body of laws which our country is governed, and it was created in May of 1787. The men who wrote our constitution wanted it to guard against tyranny, absolute power in the hands of an individual, because just four years earlier the states ended the revolutionary war to get rid of the king of England, who they considered a tyrant. The US Constitution guards against tyranny because it has a separation of powers, uses checks and balances, and it uses the division of power between central and state governments known as Federalism. One way the constitution guards against tyranny is by having a separation of powers. James Madison once said, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny…(L)iberty...
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
...Does the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? What is life without the Constitution? The Constitution was written in Philadelphia the year of 1787. A Constitution tells how the government is going to act. Without out a constitution we would have a tyranny. What is tyranny? Tyranny is a cruel and oppressive government or rule. Meaning that one person or group of people have a lot of power in their hands.What in a constitution helps guard against tyranny? The constitution guards against tyranny by using Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. One way how the constitution guards against tyranny is with separation of powers which means that the government is divided into three branches and each branch has its own power. The Legislative Branch...
Words: 369 - Pages: 2
...Itatyana Newson Mr.Alvarado 09/6/2016 The united states constitution guards against tyranny by supporting the ideas of federalism . Federalism a system of government in which power is divided . james madison , federalist paper #st , 1788 “ how does this compound government provide “ “double security “ to the people “ the central and state government will check each other's power . this shows how important federalism is and how it is used . “how does federalism guard against tyranny ? “ by distributing certain powers between central and states government neither could gain absolute power over the nation or nations people . The united states constitution guards against tyranny supporting checks and balance . checks and balance a system that allows each branch of government to amend or veto acts of another branch so as to prevent anyone branch from exerting too much power . It was important to keep control of the three branches to make it far for one or another .[ james madison , federalist paper #st , 1788] “each branch should have some check on the powers of the others” . this helped them keep track over each other . “ according to this document , how did the farmers of the constitution guard against tyranny ?” to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other ....
Words: 538 - Pages: 3
...How Does the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? We fought the American Revolution to get rid of tyranny of being under a king. After the Revolution, we created a new system of government outlined in our Constitution. Fifty five delegates representing twelve different states got together in Philadelphia,1781 to fix our government. How does the constitution guard against tyranny, and what is tyranny? Tyranny is when a person or group of people have too much power. The constitution guarded against tyranny by establishing a new government that included the principle of Checks and Balances. One of the principles that guards against tyranny is Checks and Balances. This means there are certain ways that branches of the government can check on...
Words: 373 - Pages: 2
...How does the constitution guard against tyranny? Why would Peter Kropotkin think that “America is just the country that how all the written guarantees in the world for freedom are no protection against tyranny and oppression of the worst kind. There the politician has come to be looked upon as the very scum of society”. Tyranny is a cruel and oppressive government ruled by one person. The Constitution was written in September of 1787 in Philadelphia. There have been many tyrants in history such as Gelon, Hiero I, Dionysius. The United States Constitution has ways to guard against tyranny such as Checks and Balances and Small and Large state. The Constitution guards against tyranny by using Checks and Balances. Some of the ways the United...
Words: 453 - Pages: 2
...answer is no if we were we would have tyranny and that's what the founding fathers sought to prevent. In 1775 we won the war against Britain, the founding father looked for a better future that didn’t have tyranny so in 1787 they had a Constitution convention and in the end, they had made a constitution which hopefully would prevent tyranny. Now what is Tyranny? Tyranny is when one person rules over everyone, like home. The Constitution guards us against by Big states and small states the same say in Senate, separation of power, Federalism and checks and Balances. Giving equality to the big states and small states helps prevents tyranny. I infer this from Article 1, section 2, House of representatives...
Words: 444 - Pages: 2
...How The Constitution Prevents Tyranny “Don’t interfere with anything in the constitution. That must be maintained for it is our only safeguard to our liberties.” -Abraham Lincoln. The document talks about the constitution and how James Madison framed it to prevent tyranny and to escape the settlers tyrannic lives in England. How does the constitution prevent against tyranny? The constitution guards against tyranny by using four steps such as Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state-large state plan. The Constitution guards against tyranny by using Federalism. In Madison’s quote, he talks about a “Double Security” between powers in the central government and state powers. “Hence a double security arises to the...
Words: 548 - Pages: 3
...How does The U.S. Constitution guard against tyranny? Every American knows that the Constitution established America’s natural government and fundamental laws, but there is also more to the Constitution that many people don’t know. The Constitution guarantees certain basic rights for its citizens, and was signed on September 17th, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention. Most importantly, the Constitution protects the United States against tyranny; which is the accumulation of all powers in the same hands. The Constitution protects against tyranny by separation of powers, checks and balances, and equal representation between states. The Constitution protects against tyranny by separation of powers between each branch of government, which prevents branches from becoming tyrants. “The different government will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Doc A) This sentence means that state and national government will limit each other. This was done by delegated powers which were given to the central government, and by reserved powers which were given to the states. These powers were only for those types of governments and prevented one government from having...
Words: 754 - Pages: 4
...serve the new nation, but not create any form of tyranny? The first constitution, The Articles of Confederation, was an agreement among all thirteen states that was drafted on July 12, 1776 and completed its formal ratification in March of 1781. It allowed thirteen states to set up central organizations to oversee the domestic and foreign affairs, but many believed it was not working and needed to be changed. In the summer of 1787, the group of men, including James Madison, gathered at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia because they were concerned about the future of the nation. The Articles of Confederation was intended to discourage oppression, but failed to accomplish this because it lacked a chief executive, a court system, and the central government could not force a state pay taxes. James Madison was primarily concerned with how they framed the document to assure that tyranny did not have a chance to resurface. They drafted the new constitution in hopes that it would keep the country from falling apart. James Madison and his fellow delegates framed the constitution to protect the country from tyranny by any one individual, group of individuals, branch, or level of government from gaining too much power by including the areas of Federalism, separation of powers, a system of checks and balances, and big states versus small states. Federalism was a major component in guarding against tyranny in the Constitution. James Madison described it as a “compound republic...
Words: 1286 - Pages: 6
...POS-301: Principles and Articles of the United States Constitution Worksheet Part I: Principles of the Constitution The constitution consists of some primary principles. Briefly explain the following principles and their significance in shaping American government. * Self-Government: Is the most important principle in the Constitution of the United States and refers to the need to have a system which would make sure that everyone has a voice in the local, state and national governments.(www.4uth.gov.ua) Separation of Powers: Each branch is responsible for their job. Separation of power establishes that one person or group of people could not control the government alone. The Constitution states the power of each branch and their functions are completely separate. No one gets too much power help things run smoothly.(www.nationalparalegal.edu) * Checks and Balances: Ensure that no people can control the government alone. Because each branch has separate power, they can check and balance each other to make sure that the best interests of all people are served, rather than only the interest of a small group. Check and balances specifically assigns power to the states, but only what has not been delegated to the federal government (PATimes, 2014). This intergovernmental relationship was created to ensure that the people’s voices would be heard through their elected representatives. Part II: Balance of...
Words: 1707 - Pages: 7
...in which left thirty-three persons including the gunman died, many persons were of the opinion that such an incident could have been avoided through effective gun control measures. However, the issue of gun control is a very sensitive topic in the American society. Many Americans view control gun legislation and policies as an attempt to refute and violate a constitutionally enshrined liberty, which guarantees them a right to own a gun. This liberty to own and possess firearms stems from the Second Amendment which many believe affords the ordinary citizen the right to be armed. On the contrary, there is the other sector of American society who argues that the Second Amendment does not afford or protect and such a right. Moreover, members of this group also argue that if the Constitution does in fact afford such a right it needs to be revisited or repealed since it is not applicable to the present American society. Both sides of the spectrum are heavily represented by influential lobby organization and political action committees which challenge, or support the implementation of new gun legislations or the revising of existing ones. For instance, Handgun Control Inc. also known as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence is one of the largest gun control lobbying organizations in the U.S. This organization and its influential PAC, seek stricter gun...
Words: 4741 - Pages: 19
...On July 20, 2102, in Aurora, Colorado, at the premiere of “The Dark Knight Rises,” James Holmes shot and killed twelve people, while seventy more were injured. Unfortunately, none of the individuals in the theater that day were armed (“U.S Mass Shootings”). In Newtown, Connecticut, at Sandy Hook Elementary School, Adam Lanza, a twenty-year old, opened fire and killed twenty-six people, including twenty children. He had previously shot his mother at their home and afterwards, he then shot himself at the crime scene. Once again, no one was armed inside the school. Just imagine how many lives could have possibly been saved if just one person would have had a gun for self defense in either of these places. Since Holmes bought his weapons legally, some say that if the guns were more difficult to acquire, incidents like this could be prevented. On the other hand, if any individual would have been allowed a gun, the outcome could have been completely different as well. Also, since both of these shootings occurred at two locations where guns were prohibited, one can evidently tell that laws and policies cannot prevent a criminal from an act of violence. A report written in 2012 cites an approximate 5,000 news reports from October 2003 to November 2011 involving gun usage for defense and protective purposes. Of the 5,000 incidents...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
...Senior Research Project: Is the right to bear arms ethical? Lucas Van Duyn Senior Seminar: Business Ethics Dr. Jewe July 31, 2012 Introduction to the Project: In the United States, research into firearms and violent crime is fraught with difficulties, associated with limited data on gun ownership and use, firearms markets, and aggregation of crime data. Research studies into gun violence have primarily taken one of two approaches: case-control studies and social ecology. Gun ownership is usually determined through surveys, proxy variables, and sometimes with production and import figures. In statistical analysis of homicides and other types of crime, which are rare events, these data tend to have poison distributions, which also presents methodological challenges to researchers. (Just Facts, 2010) Americans own an estimated 270 million firearms, approximately 90 guns for every 100 people. In 2009, guns took the lives of 31,347 Americans in homicides, suicides and unintentional shootings. This is the equivalent of more than 85 deaths each day and more than three deaths each hour. 66,769 Americans were treated in hospital emergency departments for non-fatal gunshot wounds in 2009. Firearms were the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide in 2009, following poisoning and motor vehicle accidents. Between 1955 and 1975, the Vietnam War killed over 58,000 American soldiers – less than the number of civilians killed with guns in the U.S. in an average...
Words: 10549 - Pages: 43
...The Controversy of the Second Amendment of the Constitution 997 words (2.8 double-spaced pages) Red (FREE) I. INTRODUCTION: The Second Amendment to the Constitution(Second Amendment) of the United States of America(USA) is one of the most controversial. The Second Amendment specifically grants that, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" The way that an individual interprets the wording of the Second Amendment influences their point of view on who has the right to "keep and bear arms" (Amendment 2). The controversy brought on by the Second Amendment is because the Second Amendment does not clearly define whom "the people" are. This ambiguity has left room for action by legislative bodies and the courts to pass laws and make interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." (Amendment 2). A central argument put forth by gun-control advocates is that since there is no longer a "militia", that individuals should lose their rights to own a gun. They often assert that the term "militia" should now be defined as each state's National Guard or Reserves. On the other hand, anti gun control advocates argue that the Second Amendment clearly states that the people have the right to own and bear arms even if they are not part of an organized...
Words: 1005 - Pages: 5
...protect their families, and to hunt for food. The challenging issue of gun control takes a harmonizing act of extreme measures. Weighing the rights and liberties for each individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a risky balancing act. In the United States, gun control is an issue that has both sides firmly imbedded in their beliefs. The parties in favor of gun ownership and the right to keep and bear arms rely on the fact that provisions for such rights is protected by the constitution. In this time of turmoil and growing violence, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. The issue of gun control continues to remain a controversy. A large number of citizens believe that if gun acts are strictly enforced, that violence and the threat of crime will reduce everywhere. On the other hand, a large amount of society feels that they deserve the right to bear arms and will stop at nothing to protect their second amendment. Society benefits from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. Attempts to keep firearms away from these citizens do more harm than good. Americans want to know, how far is too far when it comes to passing laws restricting the second amendment? After all isn’t this “The Land of the Free”? The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America is one of the most controversial Amendments. The Second Amendment specifically grants that, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not...
Words: 1654 - Pages: 7
