Free Essay

Hutu and Tutsi

In:

Submitted By Peter0321
Words 2696
Pages 11
Final Exam Questions

1. Q: Explain the historical relationship between Hutus and Tutsis.

Before 1500s, there were mainly 2 tribes in Rwanda. Hutus and Tutsis.

However, Tutsis had better agricultural and trade and combat skills.

Very slowly over time, Tutsis took over the land ownership of Hutus and Hutus became part of Tutsis society. This was not a violent take over. This happened peacefully. Tutsi created an agreement that allowed Hutus to work on their land in exchange for payment and protection.

As Tutsi became stronger, they saw no need to pay and protect Hutus.

Hutus became Tutsis’ slaves.

After World War II, Rwanda became Belgian colony.

Belgian government tried to establish equal rights between Tutsis and Hutus. UN in 1962 gives independence to Rwanda.

Election system allowed a Hutu to become a president.

Tutsis tried to overthrow the government, but failed and almost all Tutsis fled from the country. Hutus killed almost 12,000 Tutsis in the process. The president signed a cease fire and in 1990, he promised to make many changes to Rwanda to try and allow Hutus and Tutsis to live together in peace. However, Hutu president Juvenal Habyarimana was killed when his airplane was shot down by unknown group. Angry Hutu extremists started to massacre Tutsis in Rwanda. Almost 927,000 Tutsis were killed in 100 days. UN and all other countries in the world did nothing.

2. Q: It is impossible to objectively define nation. Why?

Because in the objective definition of nation, nation is group people who speak the same language, have same religion, share the same history. But what about the countries like Swiss that have multiple language? So it cannot be defined objectively because of this conflict.

3. Q: What is cultural community/nationalism?

Cultural nationalism views nation as a distinctive, unique civilization that shares same history, tradition and values. People use cultural nationalism to gain a clearer sense of their own identity through the heightening of national pride and self-respect.

4. Q: What are the advantages and disadvantages of cultural community/nationalism?

The advantages of nation as cultural community

• Stable

• Cohesive

The disadvantages of nation as cultural community

• Cultural nations are exclusive groups

• Membership is not from political allegiance, but is inherited

• Cultural nations sees each other as same family

• It is impossible to “become” a German, or a Russian simply by adopting their language and belief.

• Insular form of nationalism.

Insular: people who are uninterested in other cultures, and ideas

5. Q: What is political community/nationalism?

• This view of nation says that nation is a group that focuses on loyalty to the country, rather than cultural identity.

• Nation is a group of people with same citizenship, regardless of cultural, ethnic and other loyalties

• So in political view of nation, citizenship is more important than ethnic identity.

• In these political view of nations, they often have multiple number of ethnic groups

6. Q: What are the advantages and disadvantages of political

community/nationalism?

• So all of these countries voluntarily accept a common set of principles or goals and not through existing cultural identity.

• Advantage:

• These political nations tend to be tolerant and democratic.

• These nations are an “inclusive group”, meaning that the membership is not restricted to those who fulfil particular language, religion, or ethnicity.

• Disadvantage:

• Political nations are not as united as those cultural nations because they fail to experience and share historical root.

7. Q: What are 2 ways in which nationalism can be used?

2 Ways of using nationalism

• Can be a tool to liberate and create national unity and independence • Create military policies and war

8. Q: What is liberal nationalism and how is it used?

Liberal Nationalism is based on the fundamental assumption that humankind is naturally divided into a collection of nations, each possessed of a separate identity. Nations are organic communities, not the artificial creation of political leaders or ruling classes.

• The central theme of this form of nationalism is a commitment to the principle of national self-determination.

• Liberal nationalism states believes that each and every nation has a right to freedom and self-determination. All nations are equal

• Liberal Nationalism is a method for securing a peaceful and stable world by promoting political freedom.

• This method can create unity within each nation and brotherhood amongst nations on the basis of mutual respect for national rights and characteristics.

9. Q: What does liberal nationalism believe in?

• 1. For all humans, freedom must always be under the law. Because this is the same for nations, liberals have established a system of international law supervised by international organizations such as United nations and European union.

• 2. Commitment to individualism = Individuals everywhere have the same status and entitlements. Because individual is more important than nation, liberals believe that IF a human liberty is violated in another country, they must go there to help those citizens from their own government.

10. Q: What are the criticisms of liberal nationalism?

• Other people believe that liberal nationalists are not living in the real world. They only see good side of liberalism and believe people will act rationally. They ignore the dark side of nationalism, which is that people distinguish “us” from “them”.

• Liberals have less understanding on the emotional power of nationalism. People, during war, can be persuaded to kill and die for “their” country, regardless of the justice of their nation’s cause.

11. Q: What is conservative nationalism and how is it used?

• conservative nationalism started much later than liberal nationalism because conservatives saw it as a bad thing.

• Conservatives thought that the use of nationalism would lead to revolution.

• However, as centuries have passed, nationalism has become the main tool for conservatives.

• Conservative nationalism cares less about the principle of nationalism of universal self-determination and cares more about the promise of social cohesion and public order of national patriotism.

• Conservatives use nationalism to protect their traditional values and institutions. In this sense, nationalism is also seen as traditionalism.

• Conservative nationalism is used to stop socialism.

• If patriotism is stronger than class division, the working class is effectively integrated into one nation.

• Therefore, conservatives constantly put emphasis on the importance of patriotism.

12. Q: What does conservative nationalism believe in?

• Conservatives believe in 2 things.

• 1. Conservatives see immigration to be a threat because it weakens national culture and ethnic identity and creates conflict.

• 2. Conservatives also don’t want international organizations such as UN and European Union to have power because it weakens distinctive national identity. (Example, EU currency)

13. Q: What are the criticisms of conservative nationalism?

• Conservative nationalism is a tool used by elite class to manipulate the country’s ideology to whatever they wish it to be. • In this view, “nation” is invented and defined by political leaders and ruling elites to create consent from people. • Also, conservative nationalism promotes intolerance and hate. • Conservative nationalism draws a clear line between those who are members of the nation and those who are not. • Conservative nationalism may make immigrants and foreigners as a threat and promote racialism and fear of foreigners.

14. Q: Why did Nazis hate the Jews? And how did Hitler use them for his political power?

Because Jews had grabbed too much economic influence, intrusive in politics or culture even they were biologically and racially distinct from Nazi’s. Jews people were smarter than Nazi’s. Hitler made propaganda to Nazi based on that reasons of Jews. He used his oratory to appeal to the patriotism of the German people by promising to break free of the restrictions and promising to get politic stability and strong government for them. Finally he could become powerful sole leader under the persuasion of Nazi who need to acting against the Jews.

15. Q: What is Pluralist Model?

• Pluralist model thinks media as an ideological marketplace where many political views are debated and discussed. • Pluralist model believes that most forms of media’s impacts are neutral (not taking any sides) and they tend to reflect the balance of forces in the society. This means media is seen as a very positive thing. • Media in this view ensures that the citizens are informed and the quality of democracy is guaranteed. • Example: Watergate scandal

16. Q: What is Market Model?

This model says that regardless of what the owner of the corporation or senior professionals want the news to say, privately owned media is, and always will be, a for-profit business.

Any business (other than non-profit organizations) must maximize profit.

The media (this is a business too) must give people what they want to listen, and watch in order to maximize profit.

They cannot afford to lose customers just because they want the news to say what the owners want to say. Also the “rating” is what matters here.

Some news companies fear that their rating would go down if they show serious political debates (which is very important) and instead focus on “infotainment”.

17. Q: What is dominant ideology model?

This view says that media is a tool for the conservative force used for the interest of economic and social elites.

This tool is used to promote consent and political agreement among the population.

Media is owned by major corporations, the view of the media is also the view of these global corporations.

6 largest global media corporations control almost all of western media.

18. Q: What is elite-values model?

This view is similar to dominant-ideology model. But instead of focusing on corporations controlling the media, this view focuses on the actual people inside the company that makes the decisions.

In a company, there are many editors, journalists, and broadcasters that makes the news.

Even if the owner of the company has his or her ideology, the owner cannot possibly make ALL of the news everyday.

The anti-socialist and politically conservative views of most news is the result of the senior officials in the company making decisions day to day.

These university educated middle class seniors of the company often hold views that are quite different than the view of the population.

19. Q: Make a chart of 4 different types of media and explain each category with proper example

Intentional unintentional

|Content is explicitly political and intends to change political|Content is explicitly political, but with no intent to |
|beliefs or behavior |influence political behavior or beliefs |
|Ex; political ads, documentaries |Ex: news |
|Political content is implied and intent is change political |Whatever political content and consequences that may exist|
|beliefs or behavior |are unintentional |
|Ex: Parody political values in entertaining programming |Ex: vast majority of entertaining programming |

20. Q: What is state-centric political economy? (Defensive mercantilism)

Government is responsible for creating strong economy and market to build up a state’s wealth, power, and reputation by keeping exports high and imports low. Main goal of this political economy is make a country wealthy and strong.

Defensive mercantilism was designed to protect the infant industries and weaker economies from unfair competition stronger economies while aggressive mercantilism aimed to strengthen the national economy in order to provide the basis for expansionism and war. For example japan. During the hard time they sent the workers to another country to learn from foreigner skill and knowledge. After that they come to the country and made the same goods that they learner abroad. At this time in Japan the export was high but they lowered the import.

21. Q: What is classical/neo-classical political economy?

The main point of this type of political economy is the Adam Smith’s invisible hand. They prefer that the government shouldn’t intervene the market, without the government market can regulate itself. Or market can balance the demand and supply by itself. The invisible hand of the market will bring supply demand in line with one another and everyone will be satisfied and happy. This implies a policy in which the state leaves the economy alone and the market is left to manage itself.

22. Q: What is Marxist political economy?

• Karl Marx believed that capitalist society was increasingly divided into ‘two great classes’, the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class, the owners of productive wealth) and the proletariat (non-owners, who subsist through selling their labour power) Capitalism gains profit by making workers work more and pay them less than the value their work makes.

• Because this is essential to capitalism, even if your boss is super nice, under capitalism, he or she does not have any choice but to make you work and pay you less than the money you make. This class conflict makes capitalism ultimately unstable.

23. Q: List the characteristics of enterprise capitalism and list its features, advantages and disadvantages

• 1. US businesses are profit driven and there are minimum regulations

• 2. Unions are weak

• 3. welfare systems are weak

• Advantage: This economic system has made USA to become #1 economic power in the world

• Disadvantage: Material and Social inequalities

24. Q: List the characteristics of social capitalism and list its features, advantages and disadvantages

• 1. Allows market competition with some government interference

• 2. Many social and welfare support from the government

• 3. Unions are strong

• Advantage: Its possible to become a powerful country while improving the quality of citizen’s lives

• Disadvantage: Businesses are slower to react to changing market, high level of social help from government increases tax.

25. Q: List the characteristics of state capitalism and list its features, advantages and disadvantages

Characteristics of State capitalism:

1. State owns major corporations

2. Market is a tool for government to use it for its national interest

Advantage: Governments can use market for its own interest

Disadvantage: No freedom/fairness (use of court/lawyer), lack of transparency. (US vs China/Russia)

26. Q: List 5 reasons why China became very powerful in a short period of time.

• 1. 1.3 Billion population – Chinese citizens used to be rural farmers. When all of these people began to move to cities to work, China became #1 place for cheap and inexhaustible labor.

• 2. China decided to focus on export-led growth strategy. (defensive mercantilism) Many countries around the world will use china for its cheap labor and China used this to their advantage.

• 3. Since China uses export growth strategy, they will have LOTS of capital to use and this allowed their banking system to become very strong. Even if there are global financial crisis, they would be minimally affected.

• 4. China kept its money artificially cheap. Cheap currency makes them strong in export. (If its cheap to export from china, then more companies will come in)

• 5. Chinese government invests heavily in infrastructure. Also, it guarantees their domestic companies of resource prices. Things such as oil, iron ore, copper, aluminum and other materials.

27. Q: What are 4 current problems and solutions to Mongolia?

• 1. Cost estimates are unrealistically low – to get contracts

• 2. significant political favoring to award contracts

• 3. Construction companies cut corners on projects sacrificing quality

• 4. Government need to encourage the growth of construction sector, which is currently lacking skilled engineers and works.

Solution.

• 1. Spending must be focused on UB to get maximum benefit on investment. Just getting 20% of new spending budget to maintenance would greatly improve national road network.

• 2. Need more technically skilled people in government to ensure proper planning and make sure that the project is possible.

• 3. Things need to be transparent. Government needs to give citizens the opportunity to monitor projects and spending. Without this, risk of corruption and waste will continue because rapid growth in spending will encourage and give opportunity for corruption.

• 4. Mongolia needs to consider inviting skilled foreign workers so Mongolian workers can learn the necessary skills for the job.

28. Q: Explain the cause and solution to the 1st depression in detail. (use the following terms: Keynes, unemployment, Keynesianism, supply and demand, inflation)

29. Q: Explain the cause and solution to the 2nd depression in detail. (use the following terms: stagflation, inflation, unemployment, wage-price spiral, oil shock crisis, Friedman, neoliberalism)

30. Q: Explain the cause and solution to the 3rd depression in detail. (use the following terms: financial crisis, mortgages, regulations, neoliberalism, Keynesianism, government, global crisis, pension funds)

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Rwanda Genocide

...or civil conflicts. These conflicts usually break out when one group-ethnic, religious or social feels disadvantaged or exploited by another group in the same state and tries to change that through violence. According to Aldelman (2005), the Rwanda 1994 genocide was the most appalling case of mass murder the world has witnessed since the Second World War. The genocide resulted from the deliberate choice of a modern elite to foster hatred and fear to keep itself in power. According to Shah, (2006), this was a case of the majority Hutu who comprised 85% of the population turning against the Tutsi minority who made up 12% of the population in order to counter a growing political opposition within Rwanda. The killings accounted for the death of an estimated 800 000 people who included a majority of Tutsis and moderate Hutus. The killings fell into three categories. The first category involved combatants killing combatants. The second category involved Hutu citizens...

Words: 2009 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Rwanda

...century in Rwandas history, the Tutsi and Hutu tribes fought over power in a ethnic battle fueled by discrimination and harsh persecution. The Tutsi and Hutu tribes were pushed against eachother by foreign imperialistic powers until finally in 1994 a large scale incedent was finally sparked. The blame of this incedent cannot be put unto anyone without looking into the years of hatred that built up to it. Before the European occupation of Rwanda, The Tutsis and Hutus lived coexistent lifestyles. Tutsis and Hutus were separate ethnic groups that lived peacefully. Some Tutsis and Hutus were local chiefs within Rwanda, and at this time there was no organized discrimination or Clashes between the groups. After World War 1, Belgium overtook Rwanda as a colony and established the Tutsis as the natural born leaders of the Nation. The once peaceful lifestyle that existed in Rwanda was no more, As all Tutsis were given Identity cards to distinguish them from the Hutu Subclass. During this period racial tensions mounted as the Hutus were oppressed. During the 1950s, the Tutsi Elite began to strive towards independence and lash out against the centralized belgian rule in Rwanda. In an attempt to silence this movement, the Belgian Government shifted their support towards the Hutu Majority who lacked experience in domination. Soon after, with the Communist nations in the United Nations supporting Rwandan Independence, Clashes between the weaker Tutsis and the now Dominant Hutus broke...

Words: 788 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Rtlm In Rwanda

...the Tutsi people. First of all, almost every family in Rwanda owned a radio, and RTLM was broadcast on a frequency usually reserved for bureaucratic announcements, daily business and other governmental functions, thus giving it an official and powerful backing. Starting in August 1993, RTLM spread propaganda and contributed directly to the mass killings in every region of Rwanda by Hutu of all different areas, classes, and occupations. To appeal to a wide range of Hutu citizens, RTLM played popular music, and delivered information and hateful propaganda in a...

Words: 779 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hotel Rwanda Sociological Review Essay

...war between the Hutu and the Tutsi. The Hutu rebels went and assassinated the President of Rwanda and started the massacring the Tutsi. Paul Rusesabagina, a Hutu, was against the killing the Tutsi, since his wife and neighbors were Tutsi. Throughout the movie, Paul brought in survivors and attempted to get them into safety and try to escape the attempt of genocide that was happening in Rwanda. One of the biggest social structures that created throughout this movie was the difference between ascribed and achieved status. An ascribed status was status you were born with, and for the most part, it cannot be changed. In the movie, the ascribed status that affect the war was the ascribed status of being a Hutu or a Tutsi. And for the achieved status, it was the political power the Tutsi had in Rwanda. Most of the power in the politics in Rwanda was held by Tutsi, from the president to their congress. Through this, the Hutu was the minority of...

Words: 1765 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Ethnic Groups In Rwanda

...a populous ethnic group called the Hutu slaughtered at least 800,000 people in Rwanda, Africa. Rwanda was split into three ethnic groups: The Twa, the Hutu, and the Tutsi. Majority of the people of Rwanda were Hutu, and the minority were the Tutsi. Although the Tutsi were the minority, the overall rule of the Kingdom of Rwanda were Tutsi. When Belgium received control over Rwanda, they invented an identification system to the people. The people of Rwanda were each required to have an identification card telling whether they were Hutu, Tutsi, or Twa. The Hutu were put in major positions. Elections were held for some positions, and since the Hutu were the majority they were chosen often. Even though the Tutsi were...

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Rwanda

...#10025622 Poli470 Words: 3,451 Introduction: Background of Rwanda Ethnic distinctions and fragmentations, whether actual or perceived have proved to be the causes of several genocides throughout history; in the case of the Rwandan genocide, this was no exception. The Twa, the Hutu and the Tutsi were and continue to be the groups of people constituting Rwanda (Pearn J, 203). Tensions and conflicts with groups in Rwandan society, primarily with the Hutus and the Tutsis eventually led to the immensely destructive 1994 genocide of the Tutsi people as well as Hutu people perceived to be Tutsi sympathizers and supporters. The 1994 Rwandan Genocide, executed mainly by Hutu powers, resulted in approximately 10,000 deaths for 100 days which is the highest rate of killing seen throughout any known act in history (Cohen, J). Within the time period of the communal existence of the Hutus and the Tutsis, political struggle, rivalry, colonization, and civil war were all factors that assisted in leading to the tension that finally erupted into a brutal act of genocidal violence against all Tutsi people. Close examination and analysis of the civil war which occurred during 1990-1993 between the Hutus and the Tutsis, will be elaborated extensively to assist in accounting for the eruption of the genocide. Through a close, detailed analysis of the political, ethnic and socio-economic factors that led to Rwandan Civil war, a close connection between the civil war and the genocide can be established...

Words: 3707 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Rwandan Genocide

...century in Rwandas history, the Tutsi and Hutu tribes fought over power in a ethnic battle fueled by discrimination and harsh persecution. The Tutsi and Hutu tribes were pushed against eachother by foreign imperialistic powers until finally in 1994 a large scale incedent was finally sparked. The blame of this incedent cannot be put unto anyone without looking into the years of hatred that built up to it. Before the European occupation of Rwanda, The Tutsis and Hutus lived coexistent lifestyles. Tutsis and Hutus were separate ethnic groups that lived peacefully. Some Tutsis and Hutus were local chiefs within Rwanda, and at this time there was no organized discrimination or Clashes between the groups. After World War 1, Belgium overtook Rwanda as a colony and established the Tutsis as the natural born leaders of the Nation. The once peaceful lifestyle that existed in Rwanda was no more, As all Tutsis were given Identity cards to distinguish them from the Hutu Subclass. During this period racial tensions mounted as the Hutus were oppressed. During the 1950s, the Tutsi Elite began to strive towards independence and lash out against the centralized belgian rule in Rwanda. In an attempt to silence this movement, the Belgian Government shifted their support towards the Hutu Majority who lacked experience in domination. Soon after, with the Communist nations in the United Nations supporting Rwandan Independence, Clashes between the weaker Tutsis and the now Dominant Hutus broke...

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Rwanada Genocide

...Hutus and the Tutsis broke out after the death of the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu. Of course, the Tutsis were blamed for the assassination and the Hutus seeked for revenge. The question is, who is to be blamed for the start of this genocide in the first place? Although some may argue that the Hutus or the Tutsis were at fault for this genocide, the Belgians are first to blame as to why this genocide broke out between the Hutus and the Tutsis. The Belgians increased racism by continuing with the Hutu and Tutsi differences, they favored the Tutsis over the Hutus, and then gave the Hutus power over the new government. One reason why the Belgians are to be blamed for this genocide is they continued the already existing Hutu and Tutsi differences. They took this traditional Hutu-Tutsi relationship and turned it into their class system making the minority Tutsi with 14% and Hutu 85%. In 1926, the Belgians introduced the system of ethnic identity cards differentiating Hutus and Tutsis. This has caused a lot of tension between the two ethnicities. Another reason why the the Belgians should be blamed is they favored the Tutsis over the Hutus. This made the Hutus really mad because it was minority over majority. This also increased racism because the Belgians favored the Tusis over the Hutus because the Tutsis look more European or whiter than the Hutus. Because the Tutsis looked more European they were given privileges and western-style education. Tutsis were also left...

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Genocide

...Rwanda's Tutsis and Hutu political moderates by the Hutu dominated government under the Hutu Power ideology. Over the course of approximately 100 days, or more, from the assassination of Juvénal Habyarimana on April 6 through mid-July, at least 500,000 people were killed, according to the estimate of Human Rights Watch.[1] Other estimates of the death toll have ranged between 500,000 and 1,000,000,[2] (a commonly quoted figure is 800,000), or as much as 20% of the total population of the country. In 1990 the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a rebel group, composed mostly of Tutsi refugees, invaded northern Rwanda from Uganda. The Rwandan Civil War, fought between the Hutu regime, with support from Francophone nations of Africa and France itself,[3][4] and the RPF, with support from Uganda, vastly increased the ethnic tensions in the country and led to the rise of Hutu Power. As an ideology, Hutu Power asserted that the Tutsi intended to enslave Hutus and thus must be resisted at all costs. Despite continuing ethnic strife, including the displacement of large numbers of Hutu in the north by the rebels and periodic localized extermination of Tutsi to the south, pressure on the government of Juvénal Habyarimana resulted in a cease-fire in 1993 and the preliminary implementation of the Arusha Accords. The assassination of Habyarimana in April 1994 was the proximate cause of the mass killings of Tutsis and pro-peace Hutus. They were carried out primarily by two Hutu militias...

Words: 322 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

War Crimes Executioners and Victims

...the Nuremberg Principles and the Genocide Convention to hold individual responsible for crimes against humanity. Countries have engaged in war crimes for thousands of years in violation of the established laws and customs of war. Torture, rape, massacres, genocide, and atrocities documented over centuries continue today. This paper will discuss some of the heinous crimes committed during War World II Holocaust and the Hutu massacre of the Tutsis. War Crimes the Executioners and the Victims of Genocide Military powers around the world inflict some of the most atrocious crimes against humanity, and in each case, there are executioners and victims of these crimes that never get fair justice. “ The German concentration camps of World War II, the horrors of the Vietnam War, the prolific rape and brutality during the break- up of the former Yugoslavia and the Hutu massacres of the Tutsis in Rwanda,” ("20th Century," n.d., p. 5) are just a few named conflicts that displayed devastating atrocities. The executioners in the World War II Holocaust and the Hutu Massacres in Rwanda caused terrible massacre to the human race more than any other conflict in history. These crimes all have a negative impact on the country and the citizens that live there. Every leader, citizen, and Soldier has a responsibility to report criminal acts committed in war. War crimes and atrocities will leave unshakable scares that will last for generations to come. World War II atrocities in the 20th...

Words: 1667 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Genocide

...million people is divided into three ethnic groups: the Hutu (who made up roughly 85% of the population), the Tutsi (14%) and the Twa (1%). Prior to the colonial era, Tutsis generally occupied the higher strata in the social system and the Hutus the lower. However, social mobility was possible, a Hutu who acquired a large number of cattle or other wealth could be assimilated into the Tutsi group and impoverished Tutsi would be regarded as Hutu. A clan system also functioned, with the Tutsi clan known as the Nyinginya being the most powerful. Throughout the 1800s, the Nyingiya expanded their influence by conquest and by offering protection in return for tribute. Ethnic Conflict Begins The former colonial power, Germany, lost possession of Rwanda during the First World War and the territory was then placed under Belgian administration. In the late 1950’s during the great wave of decolonization, tensions increased in Rwanda. The Hutu political movement, which stood to gain from majority rule, was gaining momentum while segments of the Tutsi establishment resisted democratization and the loss of their acquired privileges. In November 1959, a violent incident sparked a Hutu uprising in which hundreds of Tutsi were killed and thousands displaced and forced to flee to neighboring countries. This marked the start of the so- called ‘Hutu Peasant Revolution’ or ‘social revolution’ lasting from 1959 to 1961, which signified the end of Tutsi domination and the sharpening of ethnic tensions. By...

Words: 2186 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Rwanda Genocide

...On April 1994, Rwanda suffered from genocide and it was lasted for 100 days. It was a conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi ethnic group. It was primarily carried out by “Hutu supremacist militia groups, co-perpetrated by the state government of Rwanda, the Rwandan Army, and Rwandan civilians in compliance with the “Hutu Power” movement” (World without genocide). Which shows that the Hutu ethnic group name Parmehutu led this social revolution or started genocide which overthrew the Tutsi ruling class which was a minority group. This resulted into “20,000 Tutsis and the exile of another 200,000 to neighboring countries” (World without genocide). As a result the population of the Tutsi group got reduced and in 1985 a political group formed by Tutsi...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Jared Diamond's 'Collapse' Chapter- 10

...Jared Diamond, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (2005). CHAPTER 10: Malthus in Africa: Rwanda's Genocide A dilemma ■ Events in Rwanda ■ More than ethnic hatred ■ Buildup in Kanama ■ Explosion in Kanama ■ Why it happened When my twin sons were 10 years old and again when they were 15, my wife and I took them on family vacations to East Africa. Like many other tourists, the four of us were overwhelmed by our firsthand experience of Africa's famous large animals, landscapes, and people. No matter how often we had already seen wildebeest moving across the TV screen of National Geographic specials viewed in the comfort of our living rooms, we were unprepared for the sight, sound, and smell of millions of them on the Serengeti Plains, as we sat in a Land Rover surrounded by a herd stretching from our vehicle to the horizon in all directions. Nor had television prepared us for the immense size of Ngorongoro Crater's flat and treeless floor, and for the steepness and height of its inner walls down which one drives from a tourist hotel perched on the rim to reach that floor. East Africa's people also overwhelmed us, with their friendliness, warmth to our children, colorful clothes -- and their sheer numbers. To read in the abstract about "the population explosion" is one thing; it is quite another thing to encounter, day after day, lines of African children along the roadside, many of them about the same size and age as my sons, calling out to passing...

Words: 7703 - Pages: 31

Free Essay

Gender Stratification and Women in Developing Countries

...Rwanda; also the demographic imbalance in post-genocide Rwanda will be explored. In addition in the following paragraphs the current roles women in Rwanda play in the areas of economics, politics, and social development after genocide will be discussed. In Rwanda in 1994 genocide occurred with mass killings of hundreds of thousands of minority Tutsis and Hutu. The death tolls are believed to be 800,000 or more. The three main ethnic groups in Rwanda have a very long history of social differences. Although they had differences they were able to live in relative peace until German and Belgian colonizers encouraged the barely controlled animosity between the Tutsi, Hutu, and Twa to erupt into violence. Habyalimana was president at this time and his assassination started the Rwanda genocide, which became one of the most massive killings in history. The women and young girls of this country were the victims of rape, mutilations, and death. The Hutu’s targeted and killed Tutsi’s and moderate Hutu men which not only was this genocide but it was also focused on gender. During the genocide there were a large number of Tutsi males murdered throughout Rwanda, and even today the scars from this civil war are still being felt and it is evident in Rwanda’s demographic imbalance. It is believed by sociologists that the demographic imbalance will continue in Rwanda for many years. One effect that this demographic imbalance has brought about is the shift in power for women in every...

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Rwanda Genocide

...Punishment of the Crime of Genocide has stated that acts such as intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group all account for genocidal acts. In 1994 Rwanda witnessed the unleashing of the genocide of the Tutsi by the ruling Hutu led government. It had been stated that Rwanda erupted into one of the most appalling cases of mass murder the world has witnessed since the Second World War. From 1894 until the end of World War 1, Rwanda was part of German East Africa. An estimation of half a million people was killed. The killings in Rwanda fell into three categories; combatants killing combatants, Hutu citizens, parliamentary and military forces killing Hutu citizens because the victims were either moderate or were willing to live and work with Tutsi and the Hutu killing Tutsi because they were Tutsi. The population of Rwanda is made up of three ethnic groups. One percent of the population are Twa (pigmy hunters), fourteen percent are Tutsi (Ethiopian pastoralists) and eighty five percent are Hutu (Bantu farmers). The Belgians and Germans arrived in Rwanda in the 1900’s and wanted to control and rule Rwanda. The Belgian colonisers viewed the Hutu as ignorant, vile, slaves by nature with no ambition. Hutu features were ugly and indicative of the inferior Negro. A 1925 Colonial report described the...

Words: 1462 - Pages: 6