...How would you feel if you were locked in a cage, with people coming and going, experimenting on you? Would you feel good? This is what actually happens to animals. I believe that animal testing is horrible and should not be continued. Why this is important is because of my reasons, that are: first it is expensive; second that it is inaccurate; and my third and most important reason is because animal testing abuses an animal rights. My first reason why I think animal testing is bad is because it is really expensive. According to Vittana “... the total cost of caring for a dog could be over $9000 per year.”. That is only a possibility, and only that, but the cost could still be well over $500, which is the least amount required, and even though...
Words: 1388 - Pages: 6
...different from a human being to a wild animal. We think, we feel, and we see, we all have a life. An animal poked, prodded, and abused is no different from a person being mishandled. Happiness and sadness are two major emotions both animal and human both experience, weather we were born in a jungle or a hospital. The Department of Agriculture has approved the importation of 37 marmosets for experiments in laboratories. We don't know precisely what's in store for these creatures but you can be sure it's likely to be something that turns your stomach. Sydney University in recent years used marmosets in experiments in which their eyes were removed for testing and the animals were put down. About 92% of experimental...
Words: 1599 - Pages: 7
...Animal Testing Many the big issues, for many years, has been about animal testing. The argument of is animal testing good or bad has been a bother for numerous amounts of people. Many people believe that animal testing is terrible because sometimes it causes animals to suffer and even die. Most scientist say animal testing is used to help the nation. They test different products to see if it's safe for humans to use. Many forget the benefits from animal testing and how much good it has done to humankind. A few ways animal testing has benefited mankind is by testing medications, substances that may affect people, and other product such as beauty products. Scientist have been able to Discover many cures for diseases because of animal testing. Because of, millions of people have been able to live a long life. Scientists also test medications on animals to see if there are safe for humans to use. Animals have saved millions because of their uses for medical and scientific research. Each time a person takes a medication or is given anything for medical usage, animals have contributed to that. Dangerous chemicals testing has also helped mankind. The purpose of animal testing is to see if any chemicals or substances are a danger to the people. Scientists have learned so much about what helps humans and what harms them. We are still, to this day, discovering what is safe for the people in the world. Animals get to be a part of helping humanity grow. Everyone wants to look...
Words: 524 - Pages: 3
...Testing Hurts What would you do if you heard that people’s dog’s have been taken from them for testing purposes.What type of testing do they do on them? They test medical products and drugs.The issue is people are using many animals for testing.My opinion is that animals are to be loved not tested on and why make animals suffer.Animals are living things and your just taking there life from them. How many animals do you think die a year?Each year more than 100 million animals die from testing on them.Don’t those number scare you what if they go extinct I mean like there are already hunter killing animals making them extinct why make it worse.What also harms animals is the things what humans are doing.Pollution causing climate change and humans cutting trees down.Everything we do harms the animals or have an...
Words: 550 - Pages: 3
...Scientists putting animals through suffrage through medical research, but in any case, it is not contested, but on a scale it often is. There is an up and downstream of whether animal experimentation is a part of good science and also result in medical breakthroughs for humans. Depending on whether the progress may have achieved by any means. Millions of animals each year in the United States are experimented on for testing to help find cures and medicine for sick people/patients. Toxicity of medicine is put into animals and take the risk of whether or not are tests are successful or not so we can research further more. Research is led into saving lives, but what about the ones that are tested for hours on end and spend days in cages without...
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
...Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle compassion to embrace all living things creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. (Albert Einstein) Animal testing is a complicated process which has many benefits and downfalls. What is animal testing? Animal testing is the use of non-human animal in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study which also forces animals to inhale toxic gases which exposes animals to rashes and radiations. People shouldn't be texting animals because it's bad, animal should have a right to live their life. Next, this paragraph will state some facts about animal testing. Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled,...
Words: 342 - Pages: 2
...Testing Products on Animals Today there are many ways to test products and find cures for diseases. Doctors can take tissue samples from people and grow them in test tubes to evaluate the specimen. They can also use computer modeling techniques to study diseases and products. With so many ways to test products and find cures, doctors do not need to rely on animals. Doctors should not use animals for testing because it is cruel and unreliable. Doctors should not use animals in experiments because it is unreliable. Animals are very different than humans, so what worked on an animal might not work on a person. 95% of drugs that worked in animal tests failed on humans. A recent study showed that only 19% of 93 dangerous drug side effects could have been predicted by animals. “Using mice and rats to test the safety of drugs is only accurate 43% of the time” (Dr. Nick Palmer Unreliable animal testing).That shows that using rodents to test products isn’t the best thing for doctors to rely on. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine concluded that there was no current need for chimpanzees in biomedical research. Chimpanzees share up to 98% of their genes with...
Words: 718 - Pages: 3
...Humans have used animals for different uses. They have been used for food, clothing farm work and a variety of other uses. So using them to test new medical advances is different. Animal testing for medical purpose help saves lives and future generations. Animal testing should be continued for the use within the medical field. The ancient Greeks believed that animals were created by the gods to be used however people wish. The Bible says God gave man dominions “over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping things that creeps on the earth” (Genesis 9:1-3). The ancient Greeks and Romans influenced the laws of western civilization. The western civilization had no laws saying what you could not do to an animal no matter how cruel or unnecessary the act was (Thorburn). To some people animals have no rights at all while to others animals have rights and should not fell unnecessary pain and suffering. The people who believe animals have no rights; and use them just for their benefits but there is a line that should not be crossed animals do have feelings and some rights. The new movement of animal right groups has some good points like human like primates should not be used in testing like chimpanzees. The first law put in place by western civilizations was in the Massachusetts Bay colony. The law states that it is illegal to exercise any tyranny or cruelty towards any animal which are kept for use by humans...
Words: 1491 - Pages: 6
...Animals have been tortured and traumatized, but for what? Soap? Some people think it’s okay for animals to die for our benefit, but its really not. Animals deserve rights and should not be taken advantage of. They don’t deserve what the scientists do to them. Not all experiments actually help everyone. Many experiments effect animals very differently than they effect humans, good or bad. In a Nature Reviews Drug Discovery article, it explains how the top leukemia drug, Gleevec, was almost thrown away because it caused severe liver toxivity in dogs. Misleading animal experiments may cause us to throw away possible cures in humans. Vice versa, Vioxx, was shown to protect the hearts of mice, monkeys, dogs, and other lab animals. Though, it was linked to heart attacks and strokes in over 400,000 humans. Therefore, experiments on animals can actually harm humans too....
Words: 477 - Pages: 2
...Business Coursework Corporate Social Responsibility: With reference to your own research, do you think that the ability of a business to act successfully in a socially responsible manner is mainly determined by the products it produces? 1963 Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as that of the local community and society at large. This simply means that a company gives back that which it has taken from the environment, workforce and society. There are many ways by which a company can behave in a socially responsible way, for example: using recycled products, making sure their products are fair trade (fair trade is paying workers with a wage enough for them to have a comfortable life so that they can survive, customers usually do not mind paying extra for these products) or giving donations to charities etc. “Companies with a defined corporate commitment to ethical principles do better financially than companies that don’t” – DePaul University 1997 A company behaving socially responsible is a relatively new phenomenon, in the past many companies did not care about their staff, economy and environment as long as the business was making profit and expanding, which is still the main objective for many companies today, but through a socially responsible way. The main objective for most companies...
Words: 2441 - Pages: 10
...[Professor Name] [Course Number] [Date] Scientists say animal testing is unethical and should be prohibited A good or sound argument makes a claim and offers reasons and evidence in support of that claim. It also anticipates opposing viewpoints and acknowledges, accommodates, and/or refutes them. Think about your audience and what you feel they need to hear, the subject you feel is of greatest concern to your audience, and discover what most affects your audience. You will begin this assignment by thinking of three topics. I and your classmates will help you choose the strongest of those. You will need to consider the assignment, but you will also need to recognize this is not an “issue” paper. You will need to consult the Taboo List. From the point of topic selection, you research will begin. I will be giving you some sp We will be covering the many components of argument in upcoming meetings. Argument is a big subject, and we will be taking our time covering elements of proof, logic, fallacies, and counter argument. Document Type: Argumentative essay Style: MLA Actual Order Pages: 3 References: 6 Academic Level: Masters Subject Type: English Language: US English Line Spacing: Double (Standard) Font Face: Times New Roman Word Count: 825 Sources / References: 1- Two books- Salem Press, EBSCOhost eBooks or Google Books, etc. 2- Two online sources- Google Scholar, JSTOR, EBSCOhost or government sources (Census Bureau, Centers for Disease Control...
Words: 1358 - Pages: 6
...you ever wondered the benefits of animal tests? Well, there aren’t many. they delay the releases of cures for many diseases, they yield defective results, and they kill/injure 1,000s of humans and animals each year. This is why I argue that they should be banned from the world. I see how an innocent bystander like yourselves would be fooled by the shroud of lies surrounding animal tests and I hope this can make you see the truth. My first reason is that these tests actually delay cures from being released, not hurry them up like they're supposed to. For instance, blood transfusions were delayed a whole 200 years by animal studies! In addition, The polio vaccine was delayed by another 40 years because of … ( big surprise) monkey tests! My last piece of evidence is...
Words: 569 - Pages: 3
...There are a million ways to argue if animal testing is good or bad. There are the “protect the animals” side and the “better than human beings” side going on everywhere. There are no right or wrong side, just look at the pros and the cons. “Animal Testing ProCon.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that presents research, studies, and pro and con statements on whether or not animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing” (ProCon.org). There is definitely many more pros than just five, however, these are the five most discussed. It is very wrong to do this to animals. There is no reason to do this when there are other ways. Animals have feelings as well as humans do. With everything used in these tests and the required amount...
Words: 881 - Pages: 4
...Animal Testing More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. every year in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as in medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities (Testing 101). Many people may ask what exactly is animal testing? Animal testing refers to any procedure performed on living animals for purposes of research, yet there are alternative ways to do that research. Why aren’t we using those? Why do people continue to use animal testing? Some of the most beneficial things that have come from medical testing on animals are Penicillin, various asthma treatments, and insulin (Wpadmin). The majority of the animals used in these types of tests are mammals with a DNA structure...
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...Procter & Gamble First of all, an animal is not a human being, so they will respond differently than us humans. Even if there were bad reactions from a drug taken by the animals, that doesn’t mean it is safe for humans to consume. You can look up many examples of drugs that have been recalled because of the dangerous effects it had on humans, even after animal testing. These experiment and testing situations can make animals suffer severely every year. There are many strict guidelines and standards set by PETA that are supposed to make sure that animals are treated well and to reduce the suffering, but still there are many companies that are violating these rules and still abusing animals. What it all comes down to is ethics and your own ethical behavior. To me, I personally believe that animal testing is unethical behavior and is just plain cruel. Also PETA’s members and supporters are increasing significantly every year. More people are standing up and voicing their opinion against animal testing. With more people acting against animal testing, this is raising the ethical intensity to a new level. Mope people can lead to larger negative consequences, with a clear agreement that the decision to keep animal testing will lead to larger negative consequences and a high ethical intensity. Also you must look at what is socially responsible and who you are to be socially responsible to. Many economists and financial analysts still argue that organizations are only to be...
Words: 489 - Pages: 2
