...Have you ever wanted to know what happens when bad people do bad animal testing on your pets and animals. Animal testing was started at ( 384 to 322 BC) and ( 304 to 258 BC). That was really a long time when animal testing first start. But today I am here to tell you why I am against animal testing from happening today in your local city or town. I think animal testing should be illegal because in a video that I saw at http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animal-testing-101/They were hurting the animals and removing the brains of a little mouse that was still alive in the process. Would of you make sure that the mouse did not feel anything happening when it was dead. The first thing why animal testing is bad is because they can make the animal suffer when they get them out of the cage that they are in. I think that they should not making the animals suffer because what happen it was you who was suffering. The second thing is that when they abuse the animal when they get they out of the cage that they live in when they are tested. When the people take they out the animal is scared because the animal does not know where they are at....
Words: 670 - Pages: 3
...Animal Cosmetic Testing I have always been an animal lover and felt it was important for animals to have a voice. As they cannot speak, in my view because people allow the use of animals for cosmetic testing, Using animals to test cosmetic products by injecting large doses into eyes is painful and cause agony, anguish, suffering, and is a practice of animal cruelty(Thiroux&Krasemann,2014 p.352) Animals do have feelings and will cry when they are being hurt. You can see it in the way that they act. They suffer needlessly for vanity reasons and this should not be the case. In my view because people allow the use of animals for cosmetic testing, I believe that it is absolutely immoral that any kind of testing should be done as their must be another way to solve this inhumane treatment...
Words: 505 - Pages: 3
...Reasoning Instructor Galen Johnson June 23, 2014 \ Animals: Deserving of Utilitarianism? 1 Utilitarianism is best defined as given a choice between two acts, the one that creates greater happiness for the greatest number of people should be chosen. This should be applied to non-human beings as well. Animals are essential in our everyday lives. They provide companionship, nourishment for our bodies and can provide amazement to our eyes when seen in their natural habitat. They are important in human life. They deserve respect. We as the superior being should make decisions for non-humans based on the utilitarianism approach creating greater happiness or good for the greater numbers. Our decisions based on this approach when making choices where non-humans are concerned will be a beneficial choice for both humans and animals. So what do humans and animals have in common? René Descartes, for instance, regarded animals as simply “physical bodies that lacked minds or souls; thus, animals were similar to organic machines.” (Mosser, 2013) This type of thought is also coincides with Western and Christian thinking. That is, all is ranked from highest to lowest. God and Angels are the highest with humans, animals and plants to follow in order. Present day this is conflicting...
Words: 1253 - Pages: 6
...Animal Testing in the Medical Field is Wrong In 2015, the approximate total number of animals used in research in the United States was 11 million. However, this number could go as high as 25 million. Each year the number of animals hurt or killed being tested on or experimented on go up. Animals usually suffer in medical labs, whether they experience life-threatening symptom from drugs or their living styling is torture for them. Fortunately, there are laws that protect these animals from being harmed, but not enough to protect all. However, these laws are found only in certain places. Experiments involving animals can range from something little to something huge. For example, a drug injected into a rat. This is a small experiment compared...
Words: 1767 - Pages: 8
...implications of product testing and experimentation on animals have become a very controversial topic in recent years. Some companies choose to test their products on animals before putting them on the market for consumption by the general public. Other companies experiment on animals in hopes of learning new information that could improve the quality or longevity of human lives. Even though some companies have already changed their policies regarding experimentation on animals, there are still many well-known companies that choose to engage in this practise. Some of the most well-known companies that have not changed their policies regarding product testing on animals include Aveeno, Clorox, Head and Shoulders and Tide. These companies...
Words: 1454 - Pages: 6
...Animal Testing Is Wrong A high percent of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats, mice, and cold blooded animals, such as reptiles and most fish. The animals used in these experiments are kept in awful conditions just waiting until it’s their turn to be tested on. They are tortured, abused, and more than often killed in the process. Animal testing is wrong, because animals cannot give consent, they have thoughts and emotions, and there are alternative methods. Animals, unlike humans, cannot give consent to be willing participants in experiments. They do not understand what is happening to them, it just happens and there isn’t anything they can do. Nobody, human or...
Words: 399 - Pages: 2
...its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated,” (qtd. in Mendoza). Today, some of the world’s most advanced countries exploit animals for cosmetic testing. Cosmetic animal testing should be illegal due to it being inhumane, having inaccurate test results, and alternative testing methods are available. First, animal testing is inhumane because it causes animals a lot of pain and permanently damages their bodies. A common way to test chemicals is the Draize test. During this procedure chemicals such as toluene are dropped into rabbits’ eyes and causes severe pain and blindness (Moran and Locke). Testing chemicals on animals’ skin is also common. Exposure to large...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
..."When I look into the eyes of an animal, I do not see an animal. I see a living being. I see a friend. I feel a soul.” This quote was written by Anthony Douglas Williams. Millions of animals are poisoned and killed every year because of experiments they are forced to participate in. Although on the other side of the debate people argue that animal testing is the best option to find cures for diseases. However, it is important for people to know that products should absolutely not be tested on animals because they suffer from the experiments, species of animals are becoming endangered, and there are many alternatives that scientists could use instead. My first reason why it is absolutely critical that products are not tested on animals is because...
Words: 1150 - Pages: 5
...physically and emotionally damaged animals. Animals who will never have the chance to truly live. Life becomes dreadful when one never knows the next time he or she will be injected with peculiar chemicals or concoctions. These foreign substances can cause complications in all organisms. Annually, over 100 billion animals are killed each year from testing in laboratories. This number does not include those who are have developed disabilities....
Words: 743 - Pages: 3
...Research on animals, either dead or alive, is useless. The words “animal” and “research” both revolve around the ‘golden rule’. Respect for each other is key to living. It doesn't matter if you are human, animal, plant, or just an object (Ball, Norris 35-44). Everything on Earth has an effect. Animals are being hurt, neglected, and abused everyday (Singer 17-25). For all these reasons, Animals should not be used for scientific, cosmetic, or commercial testing. First, animals that undergo testing are put through both physical and emotional pain everyday. The emotional pain these animals are put through at a young age is jaw dropping. Millions of animals every year are taken prematurely from their mothers or caregivers (Spun 1). Animals would have grown to help the environment and humans, but instead, being taken away at such an early age, never had the chance to experience what some can (PETA 1). Medical students have learned what they need without the use of animals, which proves more qualified scientists can too (PETA 1). Most animals that are used for testing are rarely exposed to daylight or proper social and mental care because of the tiny enclosures they are kept in (Spun 1). The need for sunlight, especially at an early age,...
Words: 1048 - Pages: 5
...Science defines human life as a characteristic that exhibit a process with organization, growth, adaptation, etc.; however, ancient sages told people human life is extremely valuable and sacred, as a religious doctrine in the Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not kill.” Moreover, when people talk about ethics, they will think about rules to differentiate right and wrong. It might be wise maxims of Confucius or religious beliefs. The most general way to define “ethics” is that “moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior” (American English in Oxford Dictionary). Bioethics is a pretty young interdisciplinary study, which is considered with ethical questions related to the relationships among human beings, animals, and environments in the late twentieth century. Based on this, bioethics derived three main subdisciplines, which are medical ethics, animal ethics, and environmental ethics. Although each sub-discipline has particular study area in bioethics, there still are overlaps of ethical considerations and approaches. This makes it difficult to easily discuss ethics questions such as stem cell research, xenotransplantation, the ethical status of animals and the ethical status of the environment. Further discussion about the vital issue of moral status solutions is necessary at the same time. In the rapid development of the natural sciences and biotechnology has greatly promoted better living conditions and improve the living standards of people around the world...
Words: 2352 - Pages: 10
...Animal Testing: Pros and Cons An Exploratory Research Paper Dallin P. Curtis Arizona State University Main Body "There will come a day when such men as myself will view the slaughter of innocent creatures as horrible a crime as the murder of his fellow man- Our task must be to free ourselves- by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole nature and its beauty." -Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Animal testing is an issue in today's general public that, regardless if anybody understands it, does influence each of us. Is some some testing needed by law? Medical advances, for example, transplants, antibodies, and drugs were all tried on animals before they were utilized on people. However, does government law guarantee that creatures utilized as a part of examination and testing are dealt with compassionately? Today there are a lot of individuals who are against animal testing in lab research. Frequently asking what are other options for utilizing animals as a part of therapeutic studies? Animal testing is expected to advance the wellbeing of people, yet the procedures often include hurting innocent creatures. The individuals who are for animal testing for the most part bolster investigative examination and medical advancement. The two principle ideals with respect to animal testing is that it is heartless and oppressive to creatures, while others feel that there are insufficient willing individuals that organizations need to better help...
Words: 1636 - Pages: 7
...IV 20 April 2015 Animal Abuse Image a puppy with no clue in the world, a nice looking man takes the puppy home. He is nice at first, all trust is for him. Then beats, starves, and drags the puppy when it is grown. The dog is confused he don’t know why he is being treated that way, but yet still trust in his owner. Even when after time and time again he is beating to the point of broken bones. The dog can’t run away or cry for help: he is chained to a tree with about three feet of rope. Animals have been put on earth for joy but owners are abusing them and for that the punishment should equal the abuse. The law has improved from where it was when this problem first came about in the 19 century. It started...
Words: 1028 - Pages: 5
...English 1120 1 October 2015 Should animals be used for scientific research? How many of you look at that pill you’re taking for that migraine or for that nasty sinus infection that has taken you down for the count and know that the animals used in the research are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, withheld food and water, burned and given other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study the effects and treatment? They have even killed by asphyxiation, decapitation, and neck breaking stating they will be able to transfer the good of all of this barbaric treatment to help humans and animals. Animals don’t deserve to be in pain and given diseases with a death sentence to try to prove that a certain medicine or product might work. Animals have feelings just like us humans. I challenge you to tell or even show me that your dog or cat does not have feelings or its own personality. You can’t do it. Why would that cat run or dog go curl up under a table when you yell at them for doing something wrong? Because, they have feelings and know right from wrong. They were taught this from a young age just like we teach our own children to behave. There are alternative testing methods in today’s world that can replace the need for animal use. There are labs that do studying of cell structures in a petri dish. In-Vitro (in glass) testing. This type of testing can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used....
Words: 1385 - Pages: 6
...Humans have used animals for different uses. They have been used for food, clothing farm work and a variety of other uses. So using them to test new medical advances is different. Animal testing for medical purpose help saves lives and future generations. Animal testing should be continued for the use within the medical field. The ancient Greeks believed that animals were created by the gods to be used however people wish. The Bible says God gave man dominions “over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping things that creeps on the earth” (Genesis 9:1-3). The ancient Greeks and Romans influenced the laws of western civilization. The western civilization had no laws saying what you could not do to an animal no matter how cruel or unnecessary the act was (Thorburn). To some people animals have no rights at all while to others animals have rights and should not fell unnecessary pain and suffering. The people who believe animals have no rights; and use them just for their benefits but there is a line that should not be crossed animals do have feelings and some rights. The new movement of animal right groups has some good points like human like primates should not be used in testing like chimpanzees. The first law put in place by western civilizations was in the Massachusetts Bay colony. The law states that it is illegal to exercise any tyranny or cruelty towards any animal which are kept for use by humans...
Words: 1491 - Pages: 6
