...and injure animals in the process of testing products? There tends to be three sides taken amongst this argument. Side one involves people that believe that an animal life does not compare to that of a human life and therefore it causes no problem to test any product we may have on animals if it benefits the consumer, side two which consists of the opposing argument to this, consists of the people who are against animal testing and believe that it is cruel and unjust and no matter the situation cannot be justified. Finally the third argument is the middle ground which embodies both points from the for and against argument of animal testing, they say that animal testing is cruel however sometimes it can be justified if the pros out way the cons such as in medical product development. Animal testing has and will always be a hotly debated topic one reason for this is because of the money it brings to the economy. “Animal research is a multibillion-dollar industry. Much money can be made by researchers and their institutions, those that supply animals and equipment for experiments, and companies that sell products tested on animals.”( Yarri, Donna, 2005) It is unlikely that the people involved in animal testing are going to want to use more costly methods of experimentation because of the “rights” of animals and therefore will argue the point that animal research is justified. Another point that may be argued by them is that if they have to find new means of testing this may reduce...
Words: 637 - Pages: 3
...[Professor Name] [Course Number] [Date] Scientists say animal testing is unethical and should be prohibited A good or sound argument makes a claim and offers reasons and evidence in support of that claim. It also anticipates opposing viewpoints and acknowledges, accommodates, and/or refutes them. Think about your audience and what you feel they need to hear, the subject you feel is of greatest concern to your audience, and discover what most affects your audience. You will begin this assignment by thinking of three topics. I and your classmates will help you choose the strongest of those. You will need to consider the assignment, but you will also need to recognize this is not an “issue” paper. You will need to consult the Taboo List. From the point of topic selection, you research will begin. I will be giving you some sp We will be covering the many components of argument in upcoming meetings. Argument is a big subject, and we will be taking our time covering elements of proof, logic, fallacies, and counter argument. Document Type: Argumentative essay Style: MLA Actual Order Pages: 3 References: 6 Academic Level: Masters Subject Type: English Language: US English Line Spacing: Double (Standard) Font Face: Times New Roman Word Count: 825 Sources / References: 1- Two books- Salem Press, EBSCOhost eBooks or Google Books, etc. 2- Two online sources- Google Scholar, JSTOR, EBSCOhost or government sources (Census Bureau, Centers for Disease Control...
Words: 1358 - Pages: 6
...Is testing drugs on animals wrong? The ethical issue of animal testing is an area that has very divided opinions on whether is right or not. However some people are not sure about the issue and may agree with it in some circumstances, but not in other ones. Support for animal testing: The major and general argument for testing on animals is hat as humans we are more important/ superior in turn making are action ok. As long as the testing will lead to an advancement which may save lives the suffering of the animals is completely justified. Many people are completely against the idea of cosmetics being tested on animals however support the testing of medicine on animals. Another reason why people support animal testing is that it helps prevent...
Words: 602 - Pages: 3
...Animal testing, an imperative and common procedure that has raised controversy regarding humanistic values, has been a long-lasting debated question in the scientific community. In the pursuit of scientific knowledge, animal testing has been undoubtedly essential: It has allowed for the development of new treatments and vaccines, and a better understanding of the human body. Without the sacrifices made in animal experimentation, medical, educational and commercial advancements could not be possible. For these reasons, it is evident that animals are a scientific necessity to the well-being of humanity, and should be used for experimentation. Animal testing refers to experimentation carried out on living animals for the purpose of research in basic...
Words: 754 - Pages: 4
...certain types of testing; especially on animals. Scientists have been conducting experiments on animals for centuries, which has resulted in many medical advances that would have otherwise taken much longer to realize. Consequently though, a great multitude of people has begun to advocate for animal rights in this area. They believe that certain restrictions should be set in place to limit the amount of suffering animals go through or to do away with testing on them all together. Several of these advocates claim that...
Words: 777 - Pages: 4
...instinct. It can be common to go along with what is unethical due to feelings of fear from the consequences that may arise. This can happen anywhere and at anytime. Ethical dilemmas are constantly arising especially with animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is a very popular and widely used method to develop new medicines and to test the safety of products. These experiments are conducted whether they cause pain to the animal or not. In addition to causing the animal pain, these experiments can greatly diminish their quality of life. Animal experimenters are to be made aware of this ethical problem, and are instructed to make the process as humane as possible. There are two opposing sides to this ethical dilemma. The first side would be that conducting these experiments can benefit human life. The second side argues that it causes suffering to animals, the benefits to human beings are not proven, and alternative testing could always be provided. Animal rights extremists believe that those that experiment on animals have zero moral standing. However, the argument is whether conducting these experiments is morally right or wrong. The BBC (2014) states, “The lack of ethical self-examination is common and generally involves the denial or avoidance of animal suffering, resulting in the dehumanization of researchers and the ethical degradation of their research subjects” (BBC, 2014). Ruggiero (2011) states that according to Kant, the basis of moral action is duty. People's...
Words: 735 - Pages: 3
...All animals truly deserve to lead joyful and healthy lives, yet over 100 million creatures are subjected to harsh animal testing experiments each year alone. New evidence has proved that animal tests are completely unregulated and no longer provide accurate results. Animal experimentation needs to be illegal in the United States because it is truly inhumane and completely unnecessary. Experiments using animals has been used for many centuries now. In fact, testing of animals can be traced all the way back to the early Greeks. For a time, animal experimentation was a groundbreaking tool into understanding complex diseases and how to combat said diseases. Testing animals back then was still incredibly vile, but it was at least justified...
Words: 1011 - Pages: 5
...Benefits from the Unethical Animal testing has been going on for far too long. Whether it is to test a new cosmetic or develop another medication, scientists have used animals as a way of testing out new drugs and products before they are used on humans. Each year animals are blinded, force-fed, genetically altered, injured and more. They are kept in tiny, uncomfortable cages just to test something new. These innocent animals are hurt for science and the results might not even hold true for humans. While some may think that animals are not as developed as humans and use that argument to justify these experiments; Jeremy Bentham, a British philosopher, once said, “The question is not, ‘Can they reason?’ nor, ‘Can they talk?’ but rather, ‘can they suffer?’” Animals have been through too much suffering to sometimes benefit the lives of humans. Their deaths should not be considered acceptable simply because an occasional experiments has led to medical advancements. There are other options that we need to investigate. Testing on animals is unethical and should not be practiced under any circumstances. Some argue that animal testing has produced some benefits in the medical field. There have been numerous drugs proven though animal testing that have improved the lives of humans all over the world. From treatments for cancer to antibiotics for infection, without animal research, many of the medicines we use today would not exist. During animals testing, scientists are given a living...
Words: 1176 - Pages: 5
...Humans have a history of experimenting on animals, most often in the areas of medical and cosmetics. Humanity would not exist as it is today if animal experimentation was eliminated. The argument animal testing is useful cannot surpass its’ cruelty. With advancements in science and medical technology, animal testing no longer stands as a morally justifiable option. Animal testing lacks proof of necessity because it inhumanely abuses animals, carries inaccuracy, and is outdated. Animal experimentation is an abusive method of testing. Very minimal regulation in procedures can be done to animals during experimentation. Abuse defined as a verb, means to treat (a person or an animal) with violent cruelty, especially regularly or repeatedly. For research, animal abuse remains allowed legal: “the only U.S. law that governs the use of animals in laboratories, the Animal Welfare Act, allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and braindamaged” (“Animal Testing is”). These methods are unbelievably cruel and abusive, as this suffering of the animals is intentional. Famous British philosopher Jeremy Bentham, famously proposed that “the question is not, can they reason? nor can they talk? but can they suffer?” The question asked, states that defenders of animal experimentation do not deny that animals suffer. Peter Singer, author of Animal Liberation , explains that scientists cannot deny animal abuse, while the book stresses the ...
Words: 1088 - Pages: 5
...contemporaries disagreed with this ethical standpoint on how to treat animals. John Locke, an English physician, philosopher, and contemporary, openly disagreed and stated that humans should not conduct these painful biomedical experiments on animals, and that animals contain some human-like characteristics and are capable of feeling pain. Locke believed that conducting these harmful experiments and mistreating animals could potentially lead to a path of also harming humans. Immanuel Kant, another important contemporary, also expressed his views against pointless harmful experiments against animals. He stated that animals were indeed conscious beings which could feel pain and it would be unethical and...
Words: 1818 - Pages: 8
...Animal Testing Introduction The application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to Pharmaceutical products has been considered to be a normal strategy for many years. Laboratory animals are generally used in three primary fields: biomedical research, product security evaluation and education. (Animal Experiments) It has been estimated that approximately, 20 million animals are being used for testing and are killed annually; about 15 million of them are used to test for medication and five million for other products. Reports have been generated to indicate that about 10 percent of these animals are not being administered with painkillers. The supporters of animal rights are pressurizing government agencies to inflict severe regulations on animal research. However, such emerging criticisms of painful experimentation on animals are coupled with an increasing concern over the cost it would have on the limitation of scientific progress. (Of Cures and Creatures Great and Small) Around the world, animals are utilized to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. Each and every medication used by humans is first tested on the animals. Animals were also applied to develop anesthetics to ease human ailments and suffering during surgery. (Animal Experiments) Currently, questions have been raised about the ethics surround animal testing. As a result several regulations have been put in place to evaluate and control the...
Words: 3584 - Pages: 15
...Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs” (“Animal Testing”). Unfortunately, some cosmetic companies treat animals unethically during testing; this brings into question whether or not the practice of animal testing can be considered ethical, or even necessary, in regards to cosmetic purposes. Those with pro-animal testing views may argue that the practice of testing cosmetics on animals is necessary for human safety, however, with modern advances in technology, there are now more options for alternatives than ever before. With support from major companies and governments, alternatives to animal testing could potentially become the standard in the near future. Those who support animal testing argue that animal testing in cosmetics is necessary to ensure that the product is safe for human use. They argue that “there is no adequate alternative to testing on a living whole-body system” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”), and this is why “animals are appropriate research subjects because . . . animals and humans are so biologically similar” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”). Humans are biologically similar to animals in...
Words: 1363 - Pages: 6
...Animal testing has been recognized as one of the most controversial bioethical issues within the 20th to 21st century. Bioethics can first be defined as the study of the ethical and moral implications of medical research and practice. The major issue that has risen over the last century is whether or not animals should be tested in scientific or commercial purposes. Is it ethical to perform specific experimentations on various animals, if that animal is faced with life and death situations? Some individuals in our society say yes while others say no. Animal testing has remained to be a global issue for a very long time now and people wonder if this issue will ever come to an end. Animal testing has been researched and experimented with more...
Words: 1217 - Pages: 5
...As soon as the words “animal testing” spirals out in a conversation, the atmosphere immediately becomes uncomfortable, but people never realize why. This is probably because when people think of animal testing, they think of cages, injections of poisonous liquids, and other cruel treatments for the selfish benefits of the human race. Many people look upon animals as companions while others view them as a way of advancing experimental research. Animals are meant to be respected and admired, but the truth is that many people either are not aware or don’t acknowledge that animals are essential to human existence and have been playing a vital role in improving the quality of our lives. Their role in finding cures for diseases, treatments for illness,...
Words: 1677 - Pages: 7
...Animal testing has been a hot topic of debate for centuries, dating experimentation all the way back to ancient Greece with Aristotle. Two polar opposite sides clash on the daily; those who want animal testing banned, and those who want it regularly applied. While researching on the internet, the first impression you receive is from animal rights organizations loudly protesting the laboratory critters--vocalizing opinions about how “animal testing should be banned from laboratories”; but is what they say the full story? Animal testing has been the source of countless human achievements including a better understanding of life and valuable cures for diseases, and several laws demand the use of animal testing before human trials. Animal experimentation...
Words: 1577 - Pages: 7
